|
Stop whining. This lr is terrible. |
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On February 27 2014 11:36 felisconcolori wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:35 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:32 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:31 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:29 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:27 Caladan wrote: [quote]
Yeah, that's not the Starcraft anymore we all loved. Where is micro, where is macro? Everything is about holding the next all-in. No more open games. I'm really fed up with this game in its current state. Feels dead. rewatch IEM if you are able to cop with good P matchs. that was sick. P must mean Polt right data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" you need to be 2 for good games data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Polt X Polt. One True Matchup. nah. The Only True One was Polt vs MMA. <3 Polt X Ryung, never forget. speaking about godlike TvT and old vods, against who Keen played an aggressive mech on entombed valley (and barely lost in one of the best mech games ever in sc2) My first instinct is either Keen vs Nada, Keen vs Gumiho or Keen vs Mvp? Surprised no one is talking about the absolute best TvP ever played - Mvp vs Squirtle on Metropolis.
When for one instant, Mvp convinced us Mech was playable against Protoss.
|
On February 27 2014 11:30 Scarecrow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:28 Waise wrote:On February 27 2014 11:26 Scarecrow wrote:On February 27 2014 11:25 Darkhorse wrote:On February 27 2014 11:23 scott31337 wrote: A creative planned out build and you whine about balance? That was awesome... I'm no balance whiner in this particular instance, but that is creative? He looked at that and thought, "I wonder how many pylons it would take to go across that choke" It's not exactly a remarkable innovation. How many other protosses have thought that and made it work vs a top zerg? It's pretty creative imo, assuming he came up with it. spending more money to build more pylons isn't an innovation. it's the same build You're still looking at a seriously wide choke and thinking about 5 pylons before cannon as a possibility. It's innovative compared to most play we see. Regardless of how much you hate that play. has nothing to do with my opinion of the play. you're using "innovative" to mean "courageous" and they're just not the same thing. if you 2rax a zerg in their main, it's not "innovative" just because you did it in a riskier way with bigger reward. it's just ballsy.
|
On February 27 2014 11:33 werynais wrote: Whats even more annoying than balance whine? The pathetic guys who brag about reporting balance whiners. Just report and shut up, it's not really that interesting. I personally stopped giving a shit about teachers pets when I was 10
|
I gotta stop rooting for players. They always seem to lose.
|
On February 27 2014 11:35 vthree wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:30 Scarecrow wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 Waise wrote:On February 27 2014 11:26 Scarecrow wrote:On February 27 2014 11:25 Darkhorse wrote:On February 27 2014 11:23 scott31337 wrote: A creative planned out build and you whine about balance? That was awesome... I'm no balance whiner in this particular instance, but that is creative? He looked at that and thought, "I wonder how many pylons it would take to go across that choke" It's not exactly a remarkable innovation. How many other protosses have thought that and made it work vs a top zerg? It's pretty creative imo, assuming he came up with it. spending more money to build more pylons isn't an innovation. it's the same build You're still looking at a seriously wide choke and thinking about 5 pylons before cannon as a possibility. It's innovative compared to most play we see. Regardless of how much you hate that play. However, I think the frustration is that T and Z don't really have this type of play due to MsC. You're blaming the MsC for 5 pylon cannon rushes?
|
Okay bomber you KNOW he's gonna cheese you just be ready man please!!!
|
On February 27 2014 11:35 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:35 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:33 Xinzoe wrote:On February 27 2014 11:32 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:31 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:29 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 sAsImre wrote: [quote]
rewatch IEM if you are able to cop with good P matchs. that was sick. P must mean Polt right data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" you need to be 2 for good games data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Polt X Polt. One True Matchup. nah. The Only True One was Polt vs MMA. <3 Polt X Ryung, never forget. speaking about godlike TvT and old vods, against who Keen played an aggressive mech on entombed valley (and barely lost in one of the best mech games ever in sc2) Taeja (bio) vs Innovation (mech) was the best 50 min TvT it was hots TvT and there is a huge blunder by inno sadly in the midst of an almost perfect game (when he lost 10+ tanks in the middle of the map at a moment he was way ahead) I do not remember that happening at any point.
he was pushing towards the middle and left tanks without hellbat/viking support at a moment he had a critical mass that was going to be a pain to deal with. Taeja was transitionning into sky T at this moment but took the opportunity and continue to play bio. Then Inno hellbats happened for the rest of the game but he slowly ran out of steam.
|
On February 27 2014 11:36 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:36 felisconcolori wrote:On February 27 2014 11:35 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:32 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:31 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:29 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 sAsImre wrote: [quote]
rewatch IEM if you are able to cop with good P matchs. that was sick. P must mean Polt right data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" you need to be 2 for good games data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Polt X Polt. One True Matchup. nah. The Only True One was Polt vs MMA. <3 Polt X Ryung, never forget. speaking about godlike TvT and old vods, against who Keen played an aggressive mech on entombed valley (and barely lost in one of the best mech games ever in sc2) My first instinct is either Keen vs Nada, Keen vs Gumiho or Keen vs Mvp? Surprised no one is talking about the absolute best TvP ever played - Mvp vs Squirtle on Metropolis. When for one instant, Mvp convinced us Mech was playable against Protoss. If I had a dollar for every mass BC+Ghost army I've seen against Protoss, I'd have $1.
|
proxy tempest please. please.
|
Why doesn't Terran do this with 3 bunkers btw?
|
|
Bisutopia19152 Posts
After reading the mod note I'd hate to ask, but Bomber and Jaedong really lost a set?
|
On February 27 2014 11:36 stuchiu wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:36 felisconcolori wrote:On February 27 2014 11:35 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:32 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:31 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:29 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 sAsImre wrote: [quote]
rewatch IEM if you are able to cop with good P matchs. that was sick. P must mean Polt right data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" you need to be 2 for good games data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Polt X Polt. One True Matchup. nah. The Only True One was Polt vs MMA. <3 Polt X Ryung, never forget. speaking about godlike TvT and old vods, against who Keen played an aggressive mech on entombed valley (and barely lost in one of the best mech games ever in sc2) My first instinct is either Keen vs Nada, Keen vs Gumiho or Keen vs Mvp? Surprised no one is talking about the absolute best TvP ever played - Mvp vs Squirtle on Metropolis. When for one instant, Mvp convinced us Mech was playable against Protoss.
Well, to be fair, for a brief time in HotS Beta... it really was. It was just... too playable.
|
|
On February 27 2014 11:34 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:32 Greendotz wrote:On February 27 2014 11:31 braller wrote: Not pleased with the mod notification on top... I know balance whining is annoying, but whenever I see something like that it's very obvious that a top player lost to less regarded Protoss. Seriously, this has actually been rather tame compared to when JD usually gets knocked out. HerO was actually getting death threats when he beat JD in Cologne. i wish i'd died
you're alive?
|
A cheese! I am so surprised.
|
On February 27 2014 11:36 felisconcolori wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:35 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:32 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:31 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:29 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:27 Caladan wrote: [quote]
Yeah, that's not the Starcraft anymore we all loved. Where is micro, where is macro? Everything is about holding the next all-in. No more open games. I'm really fed up with this game in its current state. Feels dead. rewatch IEM if you are able to cop with good P matchs. that was sick. P must mean Polt right data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" you need to be 2 for good games data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Polt X Polt. One True Matchup. nah. The Only True One was Polt vs MMA. <3 Polt X Ryung, never forget. speaking about godlike TvT and old vods, against who Keen played an aggressive mech on entombed valley (and barely lost in one of the best mech games ever in sc2) My first instinct is either Keen vs Nada, Keen vs Gumiho or Keen vs Mvp? Surprised no one is talking about the absolute best TvP ever played - Mvp vs Squirtle on Metropolis. That was boring tbh, nr30 into massive micro mistake + archon toilet
|
On February 27 2014 11:37 Scarecrow wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:35 vthree wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 Scarecrow wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 Waise wrote:On February 27 2014 11:26 Scarecrow wrote:On February 27 2014 11:25 Darkhorse wrote:On February 27 2014 11:23 scott31337 wrote: A creative planned out build and you whine about balance? That was awesome... I'm no balance whiner in this particular instance, but that is creative? He looked at that and thought, "I wonder how many pylons it would take to go across that choke" It's not exactly a remarkable innovation. How many other protosses have thought that and made it work vs a top zerg? It's pretty creative imo, assuming he came up with it. spending more money to build more pylons isn't an innovation. it's the same build You're still looking at a seriously wide choke and thinking about 5 pylons before cannon as a possibility. It's innovative compared to most play we see. Regardless of how much you hate that play. However, I think the frustration is that T and Z don't really have this type of play due to MsC. You're blaming the MsC for 5 pylon cannon rushes? How did you even read that, terran and zerg can't early game rush a protoss with any build because of MsC.
|
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
On February 27 2014 11:36 sAsImre wrote:Show nested quote +On February 27 2014 11:35 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:32 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:31 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:30 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:29 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 stuchiu wrote:On February 27 2014 11:28 sAsImre wrote:On February 27 2014 11:27 Caladan wrote: [quote]
Yeah, that's not the Starcraft anymore we all loved. Where is micro, where is macro? Everything is about holding the next all-in. No more open games. I'm really fed up with this game in its current state. Feels dead. rewatch IEM if you are able to cop with good P matchs. that was sick. P must mean Polt right data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" you need to be 2 for good games data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Polt X Polt. One True Matchup. nah. The Only True One was Polt vs MMA. <3 Polt X Ryung, never forget. speaking about godlike TvT and old vods, against who Keen played an aggressive mech on entombed valley (and barely lost in one of the best mech games ever in sc2) My first instinct is either Keen vs Nada, Keen vs Gumiho or Keen vs Mvp? too recent for NaDa, definitely not against Mvp (who was 100% meching on entombed valley so i'll check for Gumi :p)
Either that or him vs Innovation or Keen vs Byun. Maybe Keen vs Heart.
|
On February 27 2014 11:38 BisuDagger wrote: After reading the mod note I'd hate to ask, but Bomber and Jaedong really lost a set? Bomber lost to Arthur and Jaedong to both Bomber and Has.
|
|
|
|