| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Ammanas
Slovakia2166 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:40 thirtyapm wrote: actually as dumb was that was, tvp is still more watchable than pvp and pvz yeah that's where the state of the game is at lol wut? What's wrong about PvP? And PvZ is awesome, when played by Koreans (not the turtle style from EU ladder, but that can be broken easily by Korean protosses). | ||
|
SC2Toastie
Netherlands5725 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:41 samurai80 wrote: 3 bunkers with no marauder, if not intensively repaired there is no way it can hold. I counted 12-15 ish marines and 3 marauders, 4 bunkers and 6 prepulled SCVs when the first fighting happened. | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:41 Zygno wrote: He had 4 bunkers if i recall correctly. And the ones where parting attacked had units in it. Bunker at bottom had one unit in. But the moma core and 4th repears were deciding i think. | ||
|
sharkie
Austria18713 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:41 DaRKMaTT3r wrote: On reactor first opening building 2 reapers is pretty much standard, so are you trying to say if he had 2 extra marines instead of the 2 extra reapers he would have held that all in? because it wont delay the extra barracks, because mineral wise marines and reapers cost the same and the extra gas doesnt delay the tech unless you are opening 1/1/1. but reapers take longer to build | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16849 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:41 ujonecro wrote: Parting lost probes and stalkers. Thats optimal??????????? Or i forgot protos doesnt have to play optimal. They have DK. The first units made are very crucial, and when you go reapers and lose them THAT's non-optimal. Come on. Zealously, you know what to do. | ||
|
Qwerty85
Croatia5536 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:40 Wintex wrote: Bunker placement was less than optimal, he had no units because his transition took too long and a MSC killed 5 units or so.. Come on. Yeah bunker should have been 5 pixels to the right. Then he would hold :D | ||
|
75
Germany4057 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:41 ujonecro wrote: Parting lost probes and stalkers. Thats optimal??????????? Or i forgot protos doesnt have to play optimal. They have DK. calm down :D | ||
|
SSVnormandy
France392 Posts
| ||
|
Ufnal
Poland1435 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:42 SC2Toastie wrote: I counted 12-15 ish marines and 3 marauders, 4 bunkers and 6 prepulled SCVs when the first fighting happened. I feel you counted wrong with marines and prepulled SCVs, but I am not 100% sure. | ||
|
Probemicro
3708 Posts
| ||
|
DamnCats
United States1472 Posts
With great reason, I might add. | ||
|
FFW_Rude
France10201 Posts
Yeah that also. It prevented him to have enough units too. Reactor + 4 reaper. It's quite a long building time. | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16849 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:43 Qwerty85 wrote: Yeah bunker should have been 5 pixels to the right. Then he would hold :D Placement of production and bunkers is actually quite important to holding. | ||
|
bertu
Brazil871 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:41 DaRKMaTT3r wrote: On reactor first opening building 2 reapers is pretty much standard, so are you trying to say if he had 2 extra marines instead of the 2 extra reapers he would have held that all in? because it wont delay the extra barracks, because mineral wise marines and reapers cost the same and the extra gas doesnt delay the tech unless you are opening 1/1/1. Extra marines would have helped against losing 7 units to MSC, yes. | ||
|
TheBloodyDwarf
Finland7524 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:39 ujonecro wrote: Wasnt prepared? 3 bunker? Its fucking disgusting if you cant stop a scouted all in with 3 bunkers while its not even an all in at all for protos. Bunkers dont shoot. You need units inside. | ||
|
ujonecro
United Kingdom846 Posts
On February 09 2014 20:42 Wintex wrote: The first units made are very crucial, and when you go reapers and lose them THAT's non-optimal. Come on. Zealously, you know what to do. Wow you are pretty pathetic. Running out of arguments so you call your circlejerk friends for ban. Parting lost probes and stalkers - his FIRST units (optimal?). I dont think so. But it doesnt matter since protos doesnt have to play optimal. | ||
|
RookUK
United Kingdom283 Posts
| ||
|
Mozdk
Denmark6989 Posts
| ||
Destructicon
4713 Posts
Anyway congrats to SKT1, now time to see how they match up against Samsung. | ||
|
SSVnormandy
France392 Posts
-reduce by half his DPS : this unit shouldnt do any dmg really. This would allow some kind of aggression from terran - reduce the vision range - reduce the cast range to PO at 2 this would probably help to fix the damn unit. User was warned for this post | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Horang2 Dota 2 1012EffOrt  887firebathero  443ggaemo 295actioN 261hero 235Snow 226Sharp 105Free 75JYJ 70[ Show more ] Counter-Strike Other Games singsing2034 hiko1027 B2W.Neo907 Mlord440 crisheroes330 Hui .216 Liquid`VortiX186 ToD181 TKL  146XaKoH  106C9.Mang0102 CosmosSc2  73QueenE69 KnowMe49 Rex48 Trikslyr37 |
|
Big Brain Bouts
Soulspirit vs goblin
TriGGeR vs Bunny
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
RSL Revival
Serral vs SHIN
herO vs Solar
Online Event
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Clem vs ByuN
Rogue vs Lambo
OSC
WardiTV Weekly
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
