|
On January 22 2014 18:14 Mozdk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 18:11 Pandemona wrote: So......lets see if Zest can win in a straight up game now. ? Is this not a straight up game? What exactly is wrong with winning when someone does something that is too greedy? If starcraft was 15 min no attack Zerg would win every single game.
Too greedy? Ah you never know what you're going to read in those LR threads...
|
On January 22 2014 18:15 Heartland wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 18:14 Tchado wrote: innovation gonna get all-ined and cheesed hard today , it makes sense , if i was P in that group , I would focus on my pvp and my pvt all-ins and cheese , innovation should've expected this shit.
then again I'm a noob so I have no opinion. Yeah, that wasn't cheese.
I know , I'm just expecting that in later games.
|
On January 22 2014 18:14 NovaMB wrote:Poll: Recommend Innovation vs. Zest Game 1?Bad Game (21) 68% Good Game (6) 19% Excellent Game (2) 6% Meh Game (2) 6% 31 total votes Your vote: Recommend Innovation vs. Zest Game 1? (Vote): Excellent Game (Vote): Good Game (Vote): Meh Game (Vote): Bad Game
Even as a BW Protoss fan, I think blink aggression is disgusting!
|
That map seems ridiculous for TvP (I haven't been watching GSL recently.)
Not complaining as a Zest/KT fan though 0
|
On January 22 2014 18:15 ETisME wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 18:14 Mozdk wrote:On January 22 2014 18:11 Pandemona wrote: So......lets see if Zest can win in a straight up game now. ? Is this not a straight up game? What exactly is wrong with winning when someone does something that is too greedy? If starcraft was 15 min no attack Zerg would win every single game. this is where you are wrong data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt=""
Ok they wouldn't win a PvT...
|
4713 Posts
Not at all surprised by that result, though I've got to give props to Zest for blinking like a god in some of those engagements.
|
On January 22 2014 18:13 Bagi wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 18:11 Dark.Carnival wrote: surprised innovation went for the double reaper/fast +1. i'd just blindly assume all the protoss are just going to blink all-in and hope to blind counter it Yeah terran players, just blind counter it ffs... better than doing a build that basically straight up dies to blink all-ins :3
although that game he may have been okay if he saw the twilight asap, but even then he had already made the ebay and his 2nd rax was late so i'm not sure he had much of a chance holding it.
|
Inno messed up, he should've had 5 bunkers.
|
is there any other streams going on ? twitch is lagging hard for me
|
Canada16217 Posts
On January 22 2014 18:17 Tchado wrote:is there any other streams going on ? twitch is lagging hard for me data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/77e98/77e98be67f263e78995d632fb850d627ce97d99f" alt="" no sorry
|
|
On January 22 2014 18:16 Mozdk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 18:15 ETisME wrote:On January 22 2014 18:14 Mozdk wrote:On January 22 2014 18:11 Pandemona wrote: So......lets see if Zest can win in a straight up game now. ? Is this not a straight up game? What exactly is wrong with winning when someone does something that is too greedy? If starcraft was 15 min no attack Zerg would win every single game. this is where you are wrong data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Ok they wouldn't win a PvT...
What hinders you from taking expansions as fast as Zerg if Zerg must not attack them... I mean, 14Nexus, 15Nexus, 16Nexus... You'll be maxed with whatever you want/need at 15mins.
|
Pandemona
Charlie Sheens House51449 Posts
|
If I said what every non protoss is thinking, I am sure I would get a warning. So I will refrain.
|
|
On January 22 2014 18:19 Big J wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 18:16 Mozdk wrote:On January 22 2014 18:15 ETisME wrote:On January 22 2014 18:14 Mozdk wrote:On January 22 2014 18:11 Pandemona wrote: So......lets see if Zest can win in a straight up game now. ? Is this not a straight up game? What exactly is wrong with winning when someone does something that is too greedy? If starcraft was 15 min no attack Zerg would win every single game. this is where you are wrong data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Ok they wouldn't win a PvT... What hinders you from taking expansions as fast as Zerg if Zerg must not attack them... I mean, 14Nexus, 15Nexus, 16Nexus... You'll be maxed with whatever you want/need at 15mins.
Not about maxing fastest. It's about zerg hitting 80 drones way before. Meaning more money, meaning better army, remax and so on.
|
Proxy Thor him Inno. please
|
United Kingdom31935 Posts
|
On January 22 2014 18:21 GumBa wrote: ... Looks like +2 Chargelot Storm timing
|
On January 22 2014 18:20 Mozdk wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2014 18:19 Big J wrote:On January 22 2014 18:16 Mozdk wrote:On January 22 2014 18:15 ETisME wrote:On January 22 2014 18:14 Mozdk wrote:On January 22 2014 18:11 Pandemona wrote: So......lets see if Zest can win in a straight up game now. ? Is this not a straight up game? What exactly is wrong with winning when someone does something that is too greedy? If starcraft was 15 min no attack Zerg would win every single game. this is where you are wrong data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" Ok they wouldn't win a PvT... What hinders you from taking expansions as fast as Zerg if Zerg must not attack them... I mean, 14Nexus, 15Nexus, 16Nexus... You'll be maxed with whatever you want/need at 15mins. Not about maxing fastest. It's about zerg hitting 80 drones way before. Meaning more money, meaning better army, remax and so on.
which isn't true. You can do the math. Hell, with the existence of mules (and my extreme experiements with 4-5CC builds in WoL) it's rather so that Zerg is economically behind Terran in such a scenario.
|
|
|
|