EPTthe entire concept didnt convince me so im not watching but the only fun part doesnt even take place. With that price pool you could have created something really awesome but this doesnt really work apparently
[ESGN] Fight Night - Page 10
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
SpikeStarcraft
Germany2095 Posts
the entire concept didnt convince me so im not watching but the only fun part doesnt even take place. With that price pool you could have created something really awesome but this doesnt really work apparently | ||
|
CutTheEnemy
Canada373 Posts
| ||
|
dizzy101
Netherlands2066 Posts
| ||
|
Holdenintherye
Canada1441 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:52 dizzy101 wrote: This ESGN venture is interesting. I agree the 90's gameshow feeling + the scantily clad chicks are a bit much. But if they tone that down a bit, it's promising. I hope they'll get the viewers they deserve. Yeah I like the players and casters but the card girls are a bit cringeworthy imo | ||
|
barny94
France39 Posts
2/ Replays hurts the HYPE. One month old Replays destroys the Hype with a big hammer ! 3/ Plz improve, i love your (Hearthstone) show ! | ||
|
dizzy101
Netherlands2066 Posts
On January 25 2014 08:08 Holdenintherye wrote: Yeah I like the players and casters but the card girls are a bit cringeworthy imo They also have to think about what type of broadcast they want to be. Is it a weekly show? Or a small tournament? One game/different games? Which viewers do they want to attract? So far, it seems it's not quite clear what the unifying idea behind ESGN is. I mean, they want to tap into the huge viewerbase for gaming that currently exists. But how are they differentiated from what's already available out there? | ||
|
Zorkmid
4410 Posts
On January 25 2014 07:52 dizzy101 wrote: This ESGN venture is interesting. I agree the 90's gameshow feeling + the scantily clad chicks are a bit much. But if they tone that down a bit, it's promising. I hope they'll get the viewers they deserve. I feel like with all the money they're sinking into production and stuff, that they probably need more than a peak of 5k viewers. I'd love to read the business case for this project. | ||
|
grs
Germany2339 Posts
On January 29 2014 05:24 Zorkmid wrote: I feel like with all the money they're sinking into production and stuff, that they probably need more than a peak of 5k viewers. I'd love to read the business case for this project. Unless there is some serious sponsoring we can't see (and what good does a sponsoring you can't see?) I fear their reports don't look promising. I hope for them to have some funds to keep trying and improving. | ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
On January 29 2014 05:50 grs wrote: Unless there is some serious sponsoring we can't see (and what good does a sponsoring you can't see?) I fear their reports don't look promising. I hope for them to have some funds to keep trying and improving. For all we know its Clauf (aka Azubu) who is funding this, and I guess we know where Azubu money came from. On a related note, what ever happened to that big LYGF sponsor announcement? | ||
|
Niko_Thien
Germany2671 Posts
On January 29 2014 06:14 NovaMB wrote: For all we know its Clauf (aka Azubu) who is funding this, and I guess we know where Azubu money came from. On a related note, what ever happened to that big LYGF sponsor announcement? LYGF have a private sponsor, they didnt say much more. I guess that is what you are talking about? | ||
|
NovaMB
Germany9534 Posts
On January 29 2014 07:09 Niko_Thien wrote: LYGF have a private sponsor, they didnt say much more. I guess that is what you are talking about? Yeah, they said they'd announce the sponsor "soon". Guess soon is still an undefined term in esports | ||
|
Aeromi
France14463 Posts
On January 29 2014 06:14 NovaMB wrote: For all we know its Clauf (aka Azubu) who is funding this, and I guess we know where Azubu money came from. On a related note, what ever happened to that big LYGF sponsor announcement? We are still waiting, they said they would announce it like 15 days ago... | ||
|
Enstein
Russian Federation134 Posts
| ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
On March 09 2014 18:51 Enstein wrote: The format definitely needs to be improved: the player that declines to go on and decides to take the money looses the right to play again and should not be re-invited again. The prizepool also needs to go increasing (for example 100 - 250 - 550 - 1200 - 2500 - 5500 - 12000). Why would you punish the player if he chooses one of two legitimate options? Makes no sense at all , lol. | ||
|
SantosPhillipCarlo
United States351 Posts
On March 09 2014 20:40 NarutO wrote: Why would you punish the player if he chooses one of two legitimate options? Makes no sense at all , lol. Actually, it sort of does, NarutO. Last week, on the Street Fighter edition, we along with Tasteless and Frodan watched Alioune play Xian with $10,000 up for grabs and it was perhaps the sickest moment in any Fight Night season in any game. I'm with you in that a player should never be forced to keep fighting or press his luck - that'd be just wrong - but the hype reaches crazy levels when someone goes for the big bucks, so there should be a way to reward taking risks. | ||
| ||
