Poll: Recommend Bomber vs Bly Game 2?
Yes (6)
100%
No (0)
0%
If you have time (0)
0%
6 total votes
No (0)
If you have time (0)
6 total votes
Your vote: Recommend Bomber vs Bly Game 2?
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
Poll: Recommend Bomber vs Bly Game 2? Yes (6) No (0) If you have time (0) 6 total votes Your vote: Recommend Bomber vs Bly Game 2? | ||
|
KristofferAG
Norway25712 Posts
| ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On July 12 2013 00:27 Wintex wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2013 00:26 Lorning wrote: On July 12 2013 00:25 Wintex wrote: this is beautiful terran play. Huh, what? ?? read again. I almost thought you were cheering for Bomber | ||
|
Wintex
Norway16848 Posts
On July 12 2013 00:27 KristofferAG wrote: Yussss, Bomber<3 dat's no keen. you would love that more | ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
| ||
|
YoungTyTy
United States801 Posts
| ||
|
Lukeeze[zR]
Switzerland6838 Posts
| ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
| ||
|
mechengineer123
Ukraine711 Posts
On July 12 2013 00:16 MasterOfPuppets wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote: On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote: On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be ![]() If you're looking for a game where advantages will always snowball into a win regardless of who the better player is, might I recommend Call of Duty or perhaps League of Legends? Both very bad examples :p | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On July 12 2013 00:43 mechengineer123 wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2013 00:16 MasterOfPuppets wrote: On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote: On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote: On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be ![]() If you're looking for a game where advantages will always snowball into a win regardless of who the better player is, might I recommend Call of Duty or perhaps League of Legends? Both very bad examples :p How are killstreaks "very bad examples" in a shooter where the weapons are extremely easy to use and have little depth to begin with? Start chaining a few kills and getting more becomes easier and easier... ~_~ As for LoL, I think other posters have already made a case. | ||
|
YoungTyTy
United States801 Posts
On July 12 2013 00:46 MasterOfPuppets wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2013 00:43 mechengineer123 wrote: On July 12 2013 00:16 MasterOfPuppets wrote: On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote: On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote: On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be ![]() If you're looking for a game where advantages will always snowball into a win regardless of who the better player is, might I recommend Call of Duty or perhaps League of Legends? Both very bad examples :p How are killstreaks "very bad examples" in a shooter where the weapons are extremely easy to use and have little depth to begin with? Start chaining a few kills and getting more becomes easier and easier... ~_~ As for LoL, I think other posters have already made a case. Actually I said quite the opposite. From what I watched, if a team starts losing they can turtle forever and win with one fight. No I don't think that's good, but you're arguing for the opposite in snowballing. Which side are you even on | ||
|
MasterOfPuppets
Romania6942 Posts
On July 12 2013 00:49 YoungTyTy wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2013 00:46 MasterOfPuppets wrote: On July 12 2013 00:43 mechengineer123 wrote: On July 12 2013 00:16 MasterOfPuppets wrote: On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote: On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote: On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be ![]() If you're looking for a game where advantages will always snowball into a win regardless of who the better player is, might I recommend Call of Duty or perhaps League of Legends? Both very bad examples :p How are killstreaks "very bad examples" in a shooter where the weapons are extremely easy to use and have little depth to begin with? Start chaining a few kills and getting more becomes easier and easier... ~_~ As for LoL, I think other posters have already made a case. Actually I said quite the opposite. From what I watched, if a team starts losing they can turtle forever and win with one fight. And you think that's good game design? (plus I've read tons comments that say the exact opposite to what you're saying, and what I've seen indicated that as well, but hey anecdotal evidence and all that) | ||
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
| ||
|
YoungTyTy
United States801 Posts
On July 12 2013 00:50 MasterOfPuppets wrote: Show nested quote + On July 12 2013 00:49 YoungTyTy wrote: On July 12 2013 00:46 MasterOfPuppets wrote: On July 12 2013 00:43 mechengineer123 wrote: On July 12 2013 00:16 MasterOfPuppets wrote: On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote: On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote: On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be ![]() If you're looking for a game where advantages will always snowball into a win regardless of who the better player is, might I recommend Call of Duty or perhaps League of Legends? Both very bad examples :p How are killstreaks "very bad examples" in a shooter where the weapons are extremely easy to use and have little depth to begin with? Start chaining a few kills and getting more becomes easier and easier... ~_~ As for LoL, I think other posters have already made a case. Actually I said quite the opposite. From what I watched, if a team starts losing they can turtle forever and win with one fight. And you think that's good game design? (plus I've read tons comments that say the exact opposite to what you're saying, and what I've seen indicated that as well, but hey anecdotal evidence and all that) Comebacks are fine to me. But only if the leading person or team does something stupid or if the one behind plays well with multitasking or getting a better comp. Sitting in your base for an hour until you have enough resources that you only need one even fight to win is pretty stupid, but I know that happens in many RTS games, this one included. My only point is that I can't be bothered to watch that shit. | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
| ||
|
Sent.
Poland9316 Posts
| ||
|
-Celestial-
United Kingdom3867 Posts
I never thought a person timing out could be so entertaining with commentary. | ||
|
YoungTyTy
United States801 Posts
| ||
|
DJHelium
Sweden13480 Posts
| ||
|
Yhamm
France7248 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Counter-Strike Heroes of the Storm Other Games Organizations Dota 2 StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 Other Games |
|
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
Bombastic Starleague
The PondCast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
Replay Cast
HomeStory Cup
OSC
[ Show More ] Sparkling Tuna Cup
WardiTV Weekly
The PondCast
|
|
|