|
On July 12 2013 00:08 SChlafmann wrote: Whatever mistakes Bly made, this should NOT be possible to come back from such a position. Terran is so imba is this very kind of scenario.
Zerg can remake 15 workers at a time, Protoss can chrono their workers. If you remove mules you gotta remove chrono / change larva management. I'm fine with that
|
On July 12 2013 00:08 SChlafmann wrote: Whatever mistakes Bly made, this should NOT be possible to come back from such a position. Terran is so imba is this very kind of scenario. Yeah yeah, terran can mule, zerg can make 20 drones at a time. Races are different from each other.
|
On July 12 2013 00:08 SChlafmann wrote: Whatever mistakes Bly made, this should NOT be possible to come back from such a position. Terran is so imba is this very kind of scenario. It shouldn't be possible that inferior Zergs regularly manage to put superior Terrans in such a position.
|
On July 12 2013 00:08 SChlafmann wrote: Whatever mistakes Bly made, this should NOT be possible to come back from such a position. Terran is so imba is this very kind of scenario.
Well 3mules is equal to 18 workers and 3cc
Nothing strange about it
|
On July 12 2013 00:10 TheDwf wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2013 00:08 SChlafmann wrote: Whatever mistakes Bly made, this should NOT be possible to come back from such a position. Terran is so imba is this very kind of scenario. It shouldn't be possible that inferior Zergs regularly manage to put superior Terrans in such a position.
lol
|
When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible.
|
On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. now, if he pulled all drones with that attack, he would have won. how does that feel?
|
On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now?
|
On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible.
So you want a game with a low skill ceiling where inferior players have plenty of opportunity to defeat far superior ones?
Again, I question your understanding of game balance and game design...
It would be nice if you stopped embarrassing yourself like this.
|
On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now?
Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD
Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be
|
On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. I think you're confused.
|
TL+ Idea. Ignore poster feature.
|
Meanwhile, Nathanias is crushing HyuN while casting in ATC!
|
On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote:On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
Then thank god the game is not anywhere near how you want it to be, because then it would be terrible
|
On July 12 2013 00:14 Wintex wrote: TL+ Idea. Ignore poster feature. Ewww, I love reading horrible balance suggestions!
|
Lorning
Belgica34432 Posts
On July 12 2013 00:14 Wintex wrote: TL+ Idea. Ignore poster feature.
Yes please
|
On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote:On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt=""
If you're looking for a game where advantages will always snowball into a win regardless of who the better player is, might I recommend Call of Duty or perhaps League of Legends?
|
2 base ultra into 2 base broodlord, bly learned from uzer it seems
|
On July 12 2013 00:16 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote:On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote:On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" If you're looking for a game where advantages will always snowball into a win regardless of who the better player is, might I recommend Call of Duty or perhaps League of Legends? Good thing you didn't recommend DoTA.. i just watched Na'Vi come back vs VP so hard it was sad. VP forfeited after that loss.
|
On July 12 2013 00:16 MasterOfPuppets wrote:Show nested quote +On July 12 2013 00:13 SChlafmann wrote:On July 12 2013 00:12 AgentW wrote:On July 12 2013 00:11 SChlafmann wrote: When you are down 3 peon to 30, you should lose to a peon attack, even if GM vs bronze. I don't like the fact that this is possible. So we're playing WC3 now? Yep, I know I have some issue with game disign xD Edit : this is not about understanding, but about what I would like it to be data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/41f32/41f32ccbf9c308e87a90fa896d4fd874e9b79ee6" alt="" If you're looking for a game where advantages will always snowball into a win regardless of who the better player is, might I recommend Call of Duty or perhaps League of Legends? I don't know. I watched LoL once and they just turtled for 70 min and did one teamfight. Totally different Edit: yeah Wintex, that game was pretty sad for VP
|
|
|
|