EPT[Up/Down] Group D WCS KR 2013 Season 2 - Page 36
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Greenei
Germany1754 Posts
| ||
|
energized
Croatia117 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:24 Gorribal wrote: Wtf? WHy didn't they play tiebreakers? Maybe if you look at the group results the answer will come to you. Just give it some time  | ||
|
Gorribal
Canada186 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:25 energized wrote: Maybe if you look at the group results the answer will come to you. Just give it some time Go be a condescending jerk somewhere else. That's so stupid, so EffOrt has the same score but because he got lucky he advances. You caould make the arguement Paralyze and Super shoudl advance because they beatr players EffOrt didn't. Obviously whoever made this head to head rule has never heard of rock paper scissorts or luck or making small mistakes. | ||
|
Daswollvieh
5553 Posts
| ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:30 Gorribal wrote: Go be a condescending jerk somewhere else. That's so stupid, so EffOrt has the same score but because he got lucky he advances. You caould make the arguement Paralyze and Super shoudl advance because they beatr players EffOrt didn't. Obviously whoever made this head to head rule has never heard of rock paper scissorts or luck or making small mistakes. head to head is a very common and fair tiebreaker method, the only time there are complaints are when the fan favourite or something doesn't advance lol | ||
|
teddyoojo
Germany22369 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:30 Gorribal wrote: Go be a condescending jerk somewhere else. That's so stupid, so EffOrt has the same score but because he got lucky he advances. You caould make the arguement Paralyze and Super shoudl advance because they beatr players EffOrt didn't. Obviously whoever made this head to head rule has never heard of rock paper scissorts or luck or making small mistakes. u stupid? User was warned for this post | ||
|
illidanx
United States973 Posts
| ||
|
Gorribal
Canada186 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:34 opterown wrote: head to head is a very common and fair tiebreaker method, the only time there are complaints are when the fan favourite or something doesn't advance lol Explain how it's fair. | ||
|
Gorribal
Canada186 Posts
fuck you User was warned for this post | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:34 opterown wrote: head to head is a very common and fair tiebreaker method, the only time there are complaints are when the fan favourite or something doesn't advance lol It's not really fair, just saves time. Three people got the same number of wins and only one advances despite losing to people the others beat. The only fair method for a three way tie is playing more games. | ||
|
p14c
Vatican City State431 Posts
| ||
|
Schelim
Austria11528 Posts
this is gonna end well | ||
|
scr
Hungary1025 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:38 illidanx wrote: so how many kespa and how many esf in code S? hey you shouldnt count it. THEY are owning! | ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12387 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:40 p14c wrote: Terrans get fewer and fewer with each GSL as expected after all the whining. Protoss and Zergs are almost equal in numbers. And David Kim still wants to buff Protoss...Except Innovation and Flash all the other Terrans are mediocre with no chance whatsoever to win a GSL. Protoss players will eliminate Terrans then they will lose to Zergs. There is a very big probability that the next GSL champion will be a Zerg again. Litteraly a month ago, terran couldn't lose to protoss and protoss couldn't lose to zerg. The game changes. Don't be a prophet for no reason. | ||
|
CruelZeratul
Germany4588 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:43 Nebuchad wrote: Litteraly a month ago, terran couldn't lose to protoss and protoss couldn't lose to zerg. The game changes. Don't be a prophet for no reason. There was no time Protoss couldn't lose to Zerg. | ||
|
Nebuchad
Switzerland12387 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:45 CruelZeratul wrote: There was no time Protoss couldn't lose to Zerg. You're confusing reality and this forum's opinion... | ||
|
shockaslim
United States1105 Posts
How is it NOT fair. Say me and you are both 2-2 and I already beat you. Why should I have to beat you AGAIN to move on? Especially in this case, where effort already beat those two. | ||
|
Scarecrow
Korea (South)9172 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:51 shockaslim wrote: How is it NOT fair. Say me and you are both 2-2 and I already beat you. Why should I have to beat you AGAIN to move on? Especially in this case, where effort already beat those two. Paralyze beat the best player in the group whereas Effort didn't. They have the same W:L ratio. That's why it's not particularly fair. | ||
|
p14c
Vatican City State431 Posts
On June 06 2013 21:43 Nebuchad wrote: Litteraly a month ago, terran couldn't lose to protoss and protoss couldn't lose to zerg. The game changes. Don't be a prophet for no reason. I've been a prophet since Hots beta. I understood then that the new Terran units are gimmicky and they will get figured out soon. Already Zerg and Protoss players know how to properly defend drops. | ||
|
Kasaraki
Denmark7115 Posts
| ||
| ||
