EPT[WCS EU] Premier Division Qualifiers - Page 163
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
| ||
|
s3rp
Germany3192 Posts
On April 16 2013 07:59 BronzeKnee wrote: Well, there are a lot more Koreans playing in America... and better ones at that... And they have alot less lag to US . Not to mention the fact the NA scene in general is a bit weaker in comparison. | ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:00 Kasaraki wrote: It's hilarious to me how happy people are with a person beating 1 Korean with terrible ping. Slim pickings?  ya, since there are only 4 of them in the tournament, slim indeed. | ||
|
bluQ
Germany1724 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:00 Kasaraki wrote: It's hilarious to me how happy people are with a person beating 1 Korean with terrible ping. Slim pickings? He tried two times. Finale that is. And Tails didn't make it too. But yea lets blame the ping D: | ||
|
Iodem
United States1173 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:00 HotGlueGun wrote: Europeans holding strong. Hopefully the American's can defend against the onslaught of koreans too! Between the EU scene being better than the NA scene and the EU scene having far fewer high-caliber Koreans competing than NA, things don't bode well for us. | ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:00 Kasaraki wrote: It's hilarious to me how happy people are with a person beating 1 Korean with terrible ping. Slim pickings? It's all about context  | ||
|
Aeroplaneoverthesea
United Kingdom1977 Posts
There has to be a better and fairer method than this. I'd actually prefer pure invites so long as they used a logical method for choosing invites (unlike what MLG did). On April 16 2013 07:57 TheDougler wrote: And? He went from total unknown (3rd in WCS Denmark, yay) to taking down MVPFinale. I call that a cinderella story. With a huge latency advantage. It's always been the case that random players can win or do well in online tournaments in Sc2. This is the latest in an endless line of bizzare and unexpected players winning qualifiers across all scenes. | ||
|
Benjamin99
4176 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:00 Kasaraki wrote: It's hilarious to me how happy people are with a person beating 1 Korean with terrible ping. Slim pickings? Maybe because we want the EU money to be spend on promoting and supporting new EU amateur players like Bunny instead of greedy B-professional players from Korea. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:02 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: I really dislike the way ESL and MLG are doing these qualifiers. It's just so arbitrary to me that you get into something as massive as being a Code S player in your region on the back of playing well in one random online qualifier, where as if you get bad bracket luck a few times you don't get in. There has to be a better and fairer method than this. I'd actually prefer pure invites so long as they used a logical method for choosing invites (unlike what MLG did). With a huge latency advantage. It's always been the case that random players can win or do well in online tournaments in Sc2. This is the latest in an endless line of bizzare and unexpected players winning qualifiers across all scenes. It'll just have to be like the GSL. It'll work itself out eventually, unfortunately it'll just take some time for the weaker players to get filtered out. At least it's not the original GSL format that made Ensnare immortal | ||
|
AIKfans87
Sweden170 Posts
On April 16 2013 07:58 SpikeStarcraft wrote: bunny has quite an impressive run today with wins against minraser, whitera, firecake (who beat morrow, fraer and forsen), welmu and mvp finale. gratz! bunny really deserves it! Ye saw that too pretty sic run. I think he had HoBBiT also in round of 256, he only met one unknow player(and firecake who beat MorroW)! Love these tourneys where new players comes from nowhere. | ||
|
m0ck
4194 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:01 StarVe wrote: Bunny, preaching the way of the hellbat wherever he can. They do still look kinda broken. | ||
|
SpikeStarcraft
Germany2095 Posts
On April 16 2013 07:58 Bowzar wrote: Sure but its still a qualifier and giving unknowns a chance is pretty much the point of open brackets. its not just a usual qualifier. Thats the easiest way to go straight into the first EU Code S. Thats huge! | ||
|
Bowzar
Sweden741 Posts
On April 16 2013 07:57 TheDougler wrote: And? He went from total unknown (3rd in WCS Denmark, yay) to taking down MVPFinale. I call that a cinderella story. So a cinderella story happens every single Code A qualifier? | ||
|
anessie
180 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:00 bluQ wrote: It is over. No finlamatch cause it is not Go4SC2 Seems they indeed didn't bother with a bo5 final cheesefest again since players only wanted to get qualified, it's not on any channel atm. | ||
|
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:03 Bowzar wrote: So a cinderella story happens every single Code A qualifier? LabyRinth! | ||
|
govie
9334 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:00 Bagi wrote: Are there actually any potential players besides Demu + Koreans in the NA qualifier? Maybe Kane could make it? There are enough possibilities. Dont forget a bo1 is dangerous (allins). | ||
|
Bagi
Germany6799 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:00 Kasaraki wrote: It's hilarious to me how happy people are with a person beating 1 Korean with terrible ping. Slim pickings? 4 Koreans, and the guys who beat them are up-and-coming players too. I don't think anyone would care much if it was Stephano or Naniwa beating Finale with terrible ping. | ||
|
Awesomeness
Germany1361 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:02 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: There has to be a better and fairer method than this. I'd actually prefer pure invites so long as they used a logical method for choosing invites (unlike what MLG did). yeah fuck all the new players who want to make a name for themselves...The system isn't bad just because a player you like didn't qualify. 24 out of 32 players being invites is a lot anyway. | ||
|
LighT.
Canada4501 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:02 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: I really dislike the way ESL and MLG are doing these qualifiers. It's just so arbitrary to me that you get into something as massive as being a Code S player in your region on the back of playing well in one random online qualifier, where as if you get bad bracket luck a few times you don't get in. There has to be a better and fairer method than this. I'd actually prefer pure invites so long as they used a logical method for choosing invites (unlike what MLG did). With a huge latency advantage. It's always been the case that random players can win or do well in online tournaments in Sc2. This is the latest in an endless line of bizzare and unexpected players winning qualifiers across all scenes. You guys have to look at it from a neutral point of view. First off... MVPFinale is a solid player but not a great player. He has little credentials and basically the 3rd or 4th toss on his team. Secondly, latency issues EU vs Kor. It's worse than it is for Kor/Na Thirdly, Finale and MVP are playing in Korea, the tournament was like 11-6pm EST which is basically 1am to 8am..so they're not in the best of environments having to not sleep at all to play in the qualifiers. | ||
|
Finrod1
Germany3997 Posts
On April 16 2013 08:02 Aeroplaneoverthesea wrote: I really dislike the way ESL and MLG are doing these qualifiers. It's just so arbitrary to me that you get into something as massive as being a Code S player in your region on the back of playing well in one random online qualifier, where as if you get bad bracket luck a few times you don't get in. There has to be a better and fairer method than this. I'd actually prefer pure invites so long as they used a logical method for choosing invites (unlike what MLG did). With a huge latency advantage. It's always been the case that random players can win or do well in online tournaments in Sc2. This is the latest in an endless line of bizzare and unexpected players winning qualifiers across all scenes. the best and most fair way would be a tsl point system. anyhow in a few seasons code s and a will have sorted themselves out, hopefully. | ||
| ||
