|
On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100
Not 50, but it does 2x damage to biological
|
On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100
and 22range.
|
I'm not sure what the controversy about the ability to be incognito in the ladder is all about. If people want others to have no idea who they are, that's fine.
|
Tear! He's friggin sick!!!
|
United States97277 Posts
On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range.
with splash
|
On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range.
now we're getting somewhere
|
Tear was a fucking beast in WoL, yet had no remaining tournaments after a certain point, so he obviously started playing HOTS. He's got this.
|
On February 24 2013 15:17 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range. with splash
Forgot the additional damage to massive.
EDIT: BLs are toast.
|
On February 24 2013 15:17 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range. with splash
But only against mutas.
|
On February 24 2013 15:17 AgentW wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:17 Shellshock1122 wrote:On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range. with splash Forgot the additional damage to massive.
don't forget the stun.
|
Yay more ZvP (lol can't believe I'm saying this)
Hope Violet uses swarmhosts. I feel like those have great potential
|
United States97277 Posts
On February 24 2013 15:18 Nerevar wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:17 AgentW wrote:On February 24 2013 15:17 Shellshock1122 wrote:On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range. with splash Forgot the additional damage to massive. don't forget the stun.
and the moving shot + .1 sec burrow
|
BTW is it tear like crying or tear like ripping something apart? sounds like he intended it to be the second meaning, but as far as i know everyone pronounces it the first way...
|
On February 24 2013 15:18 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:18 Nerevar wrote:On February 24 2013 15:17 AgentW wrote:On February 24 2013 15:17 Shellshock1122 wrote:On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range. with splash Forgot the additional damage to massive. don't forget the stun. and the moving shot + .1 sec burrow
projectile spawns a pair of scourge on hit.
|
On February 24 2013 15:18 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:18 Nerevar wrote:On February 24 2013 15:17 AgentW wrote:On February 24 2013 15:17 Shellshock1122 wrote:On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range. with splash Forgot the additional damage to massive. don't forget the stun. and the moving shot + .1 sec burrow
screw that, they can shoot while unburrowed
and have 5 movement speed
|
On February 24 2013 15:18 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:18 Nerevar wrote:On February 24 2013 15:17 AgentW wrote:On February 24 2013 15:17 Shellshock1122 wrote:On February 24 2013 15:16 Assirra wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:15 Acer.Scarlett` wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 Dodgin wrote:On February 24 2013 15:14 FrostedMiniWheats wrote:
I really hope muta vs muta doesn't end up the dominant composition for the next few months. It's fun at first but quickly gets old. It's even more volatile and the matches are much quicker. At least with roach/infestor the games could be very back and forth and sometimes if the player is good you could see come backs. If you get behind on the mutas you're pretty much fucked :/ Just make spore crawlers do 50 damage per shot to mutas only, boom. Blizzard already did that O_O Is it actually 50? ...make it 100 and 22range. with splash Forgot the additional damage to massive. don't forget the stun. and the moving shot + .1 sec burrow
but ZvZ would be imbalanced then...
|
On February 24 2013 15:18 Confuse wrote:
BTW is it tear like crying or tear like ripping something apart? sounds like he intended it to be the second meaning, but as far as i know everyone pronounces it the first way...
Tear like out of an eye I believe. It sounds better that way
|
United States97277 Posts
On February 24 2013 15:18 Confuse wrote:
BTW is it tear like crying or tear like ripping something apart? sounds like he intended it to be the second meaning, but as far as i know everyone pronounces it the first way...
They pronounce FXOTear like you would a tear from the eye.
FXOTear says there is no meaning to his name, neither "tear as in to rip" nor the "tear from the eye". That answer didn't satisfy, so I quizzed, "if you had to pick a meaning, which one would you go for?". He gesticulated to rip (probably his enemies).
From Grubby
source: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=391510
|
On February 24 2013 15:18 Confuse wrote:
BTW is it tear like crying or tear like ripping something apart? sounds like he intended it to be the second meaning, but as far as i know everyone pronounces it the first way...
Well, Ken said tear as in crying so I figure it's that. xD
|
On February 24 2013 15:19 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On February 24 2013 15:18 Confuse wrote:
BTW is it tear like crying or tear like ripping something apart? sounds like he intended it to be the second meaning, but as far as i know everyone pronounces it the first way... Show nested quote +They pronounce FXOTear like you would a tear from the eye.
FXOTear says there is no meaning to his name, neither "tear as in to rip" nor the "tear from the eye". That answer didn't satisfy, so I quizzed, "if you had to pick a meaning, which one would you go for?". He gesticulated to rip (probably his enemies). From Grubby source: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=391510
wow nice, okay! i didnt realize this was a debated topic before i asked, lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
