|
Not a surprise. Revival made Stephano look easy many times in the past.
|
On January 03 2013 11:59 NoGasfOu wrote:
Not a surprise. Revival made Stephano look easy many times in the past.
^they've faced each other twice... and its a 2-3 map record with 1-1 in series.
|
On January 03 2013 11:59 NoGasfOu wrote:
Not a surprise. Revival made Stephano look easy many times in the past.
Wrong again...
|
On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock.
Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to.
|
On January 03 2013 12:09 blade55555 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock. Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to.
Right...
Muta ling bane or ultras never win games.
You do it because it's easy.
User was warned for this post
|
On January 03 2013 11:04 Noocta wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 11:01 Dodgin wrote:It seems like Revival was a good investment for EG, instead of losing to Choya he beats Tear and Leenock. On January 03 2013 11:01 Noocta wrote:On January 03 2013 11:00 Walnuts wrote:
uhhhh kibbels...
"best zerg in the world"... is life.
and he played well, not good. It's hard to tell really between those two :p I get my Gumiho Revival match atleast. I hope Gumiho win. It's not hard to tell, one of them is a two time GSL champion ( and very recent wins ) and the other is not. I mean this is assuming that GSL > all other tournaments which I think most people would agree with, although IPL5 does mean a lot considering how stacked it was. Leenock won 2 MLG this year too. And let's be honest, Leenock is basicly a GSL champion, everyone has forgot Jjakji beside me and the other terrans fans in this thread
Jjakji may have been a one hit wonder, but he still has more GSL titles than Leenock :p
And there is no almost when it comes to GSL titles, you either become a champion or you fall short. That being said, Leenock is certainly a very impressive GSL finalist :p
Well played EG
|
On January 03 2013 12:10 decado90 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:09 blade55555 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock. Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to. Right... Muta ling bane or ultras never win games. You do it because it's easy.
Still nothing wrong with that...an easier strategy has a greater chance to win, and therefore is the better one for a pro to choose.
|
On January 03 2013 12:21 slowbacontron wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:10 decado90 wrote:On January 03 2013 12:09 blade55555 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock. Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to. Right... Muta ling bane or ultras never win games. You do it because it's easy. Still nothing wrong with that...an easier strategy has a greater chance to win, and therefore is the better one for a pro to choose.
true, and i think no one blames revival or any other zerg for choosing it. but at the same time, you cant blame me as a fan for being sick of it.
|
|
|
On January 03 2013 12:23 Black Gun wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:21 slowbacontron wrote:On January 03 2013 12:10 decado90 wrote:On January 03 2013 12:09 blade55555 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock. Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to. Right... Muta ling bane or ultras never win games. You do it because it's easy. Still nothing wrong with that...an easier strategy has a greater chance to win, and therefore is the better one for a pro to choose. true, and i think no one blames revival or any other zerg for choosing it. but at the same time, you cant blame me as a fan for being sick of it.
I won't disagree there. 2013's another year, though. Let's see what it brings us!
|
On January 03 2013 12:23 Black Gun wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:21 slowbacontron wrote:On January 03 2013 12:10 decado90 wrote:On January 03 2013 12:09 blade55555 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock. Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to. Right... Muta ling bane or ultras never win games. You do it because it's easy. Still nothing wrong with that...an easier strategy has a greater chance to win, and therefore is the better one for a pro to choose. true, and i think no one blames revival or any other zerg for choosing it. but at the same time, you cant blame me as a fan for being sick of it.
I think everyone is sick of it honestly. I am sick of all deathball syndroms. I was sick of the toss deathball before and now I am terribly sick with the zerg one. I more or less stopped playing because as a zerg its incredibly boring to feel the need to either go all in or turtle into this silly comp.. since I have no hope in ever being a top player winning isnt worth it when the comp you play is boring as fuck. This is balance aside, even if it was balanced vs the other races, its still boring as fuck to play aslong as its by far the best lategame comp we have.
And again, playing a toss deathball is just as boring, it just isnt as strong anymore but no way is it harder to control or more fun.
|
On January 03 2013 12:24 Emzeeshady wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:10 decado90 wrote:On January 03 2013 12:09 blade55555 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock. Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to. Right... Muta ling bane or ultras never win games. You do it because it's easy. Not if the Terran is just as good as you
And terrans can't beat zergs with BL/infestor as long as the zerg is as good as them. Don't you see a problem with that?
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me when the big tournaments switch over to HOTS? Do I have to wait until release? I've been playing HOTS like mad and regular SC2 kinda bores me now.
|
On January 03 2013 14:02 thepuppyassassin wrote:
Can anyone tell me when the big tournaments switch over to HOTS? Do I have to wait until release? I've been playing HOTS like mad and regular SC2 kinda bores me now.
I don't think any major tournaments will switch til HOTS is out.
|
On January 03 2013 14:06 Laryleprakon wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 14:02 thepuppyassassin wrote:
Can anyone tell me when the big tournaments switch over to HOTS? Do I have to wait until release? I've been playing HOTS like mad and regular SC2 kinda bores me now. I don't think any major tournaments will switch til HOTS is out.
huge bummer.
|
On January 03 2013 12:51 vthree wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:24 Emzeeshady wrote:On January 03 2013 12:10 decado90 wrote:On January 03 2013 12:09 blade55555 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock. Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to. Right... Muta ling bane or ultras never win games. You do it because it's easy. Not if the Terran is just as good as you And terrans can't beat zergs with BL/infestor as long as the zerg is as good as them. Don't you see a problem with that?
thus, blatantly nerfing infestors and broods without a buff to other units will basically bring us back to early 2011 where T >>>>Z, except this time P will > Z as well
|
On January 03 2013 12:10 decado90 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 03 2013 12:09 blade55555 wrote:On January 03 2013 11:48 Black Gun wrote:On January 03 2013 11:27 keeperton wrote:On January 03 2013 11:24 Black Gun wrote:
bl infestor into gg.... meh. gratz to revival and eg i guess.... The way he got there was pretty interesting, I thought. true, but im still so fed up of seeing this "i win"-composition. there should absolutely be no composition in the game that is as close to unbeatable while at the same so "easily" accessible as bl/infestor. (something like 15 bcs + 15 vikings + 15 ravens or a max out on carriers is probably equally strong, but less accessible by several magnitudes..) im just so sick of seeing terrans play a really good game, being in the lead and then losing without having any actual fighting chance nonetheless, simply because they couldnt prevent the zerg from reaching his money composition. revivals performance today was great anyway, beating gumiho is still no easy feat as is beating tear and leenock. Believe it or not most zergs don't like doing it either. But if we want to win games we have to. Right... Muta ling bane or ultras never win games. You do it because it's easy.
Muta/Ling/Bane and Ultras would never work if Terran weren't expecting fast BL/Infestors. They're metagaming builds.
|
Oh SNAP. Revival just tearin' it up, good job man 
|
Oh wow Revival three in a row!
I guess he was a good pickup for EG after all 
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
