EPTOF
THE
CENTURY
[DreamHack] Winter Day 2 - Page 72
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
NMHU.
Canada110 Posts
OF THE CENTURY | ||
|
Cheerio
Ukraine3178 Posts
| ||
|
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
Surely Naniwa beats ForGG and Nightend on internal mapscore? | ||
|
Jockmcplop
United Kingdom9847 Posts
| ||
|
Zwerver
Netherlands104 Posts
| ||
|
ACrow
Germany6583 Posts
 Sad, just sad. | ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
...which would be totally nonsensical and retarded | ||
|
Gladiator6
Sweden7024 Posts
| ||
|
darish
United States77 Posts
| ||
|
era909
Sweden139 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:15 Eee wrote: Head to head means Naniwa vs NightEnd results which favours NightEnd, not Naniwa. But there is a three way tie with forgg, which means internal mapscore should decide and then nani goes through. | ||
|
XiGua
Sweden3085 Posts
| ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
| ||
|
UnKooL
Korea (South)1667 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:15 HandleTaken wrote: i love you Ret but first the bm pause and now this. i realize the tournament format and Dreamhack gets part of the blame but you're not a class act anymore Ret. He bm paused? Really? I understand him prolonging the game, but bm pausing is absolutely pushing it. | ||
|
Prugelhugel
Austria637 Posts
| ||
|
Pin
United States55 Posts
| ||
|
narkissos
198 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:14 Undead1993 wrote: this is such an unacceptable behavior i dont get it. just not him anymore just go away ret this is bm and just all in all bad Still think the game is pointless and Ret knows it. Internal mapscore between forrgg, Nightend and Naniwa means naniwa wins because of 2-0 over forgg the other matches all 2-1 | ||
|
shabby
Norway6402 Posts
| ||
|
Zeon0
Austria2995 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:14 Undead1993 wrote: this is such an unacceptable behavior i dont get it. just not him anymore just go away ret this is bm and just all in all bad he is right though. if you dont care about the fans and you win nothing, why dont retire? | ||
|
StreaK
Canada580 Posts
| ||
|
Sonic Death Monkey
Sweden991 Posts
On November 24 2012 02:15 -_- wrote: EXPLAIN THE RULING!! This so much. WTF? | ||
| ||
