|
On November 24 2012 01:56 Finrod1 wrote: just do a coinflip between the 6 players in the group. thats sound fair. NO! They should fight eachother in a deathmatch! That way there is no question who goes on!
|
|
|
dont do it ret! dooooont....
|
On November 24 2012 01:56 Ventris wrote: Making rules so complicated not even the admins get them :D
Rules are simple, but hard to implement real-time by human brain. Liquipedia should have simple script written in JavaScript for this, everything would be crystal clear real-time. Casters having no idea what is going on is another story. They should at least grasp possibilities correctly.
|
On November 24 2012 01:56 Azzur wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 01:55 hashaki wrote:No, according to rulebook: Score -> map difference +/-, head-to-head. There is nothing in there about maps won whatsoever. The groups are decided in the following order: points, maps +/-, internal match. In case of a three-way-tie of the previous criteria internal maps +/- will decide. I don't understand your statement - maps +/- and internal maps +/- are regarding maps...
I don't get how you can misread what I said when I said what the rulebook said, just stupider. Maybe brush up on your reading skills?
|
On November 24 2012 01:57 Dexington wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 01:56 Azzur wrote:On November 24 2012 01:55 hashaki wrote:No, according to rulebook: Score -> map difference +/-, head-to-head. There is nothing in there about maps won whatsoever. The groups are decided in the following order: points, maps +/-, internal match. In case of a three-way-tie of the previous criteria internal maps +/- will decide. I don't understand your statement - maps +/- and internal maps +/- are regarding maps... 5-7 == 6-8 is what he's saying, because both are -2. Then it goes to head to head. Oh yep, i understand
|
Haha Ret got called by Nazgul to troll Incontrol back.
|
Holy shit this is fun ^.^
|
According to liquipedia nani is through, not sure if they know something we dont
|
Shitstorm ensues if he gets told no and throws it.
|
|
|
On November 24 2012 01:56 ceaRshaf wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2012 01:55 Jockmcplop wrote: yay we get to watch Naniwa bitch and whine like little baby again next time he plays awfully. Well, he did play really bad, not like himself. The bitching is a bonus.
I was out, what did he say this time ?
|
On November 24 2012 01:57 soon.Cloak wrote: I'm not trying to be a hater, but does any else think the overall quality of play in this tournament is...somewhat sub-par?
I think the actual bracket play will be a lot better. Some big names are clearly not playing at their peak in this group play, unfortunately.
|
So now they tell ret he can't win and he will lose intentionally, what a misadventure.
|
gotta say this is actually fun
|
What were they talking about with the +/- maps
|
Naniwa owes nightend a beer to say the least.
|
On November 24 2012 01:57 DwD wrote: Kinda bad when the admins have to gather to discuss what the actual rules means.... Yeah. Cmon sort this shit. Afaik Ret is through if he wins 2-1 and Nani is through if Nightend wins. Fuck Im so confused lol.
Not true, Ret is out for loosing a map, most likely. It was last DH the case in similar situation. First difference in maps then head-to-head.
|
It was expected of them to pick the most convenient rule for Naniwa after all.
|
Ret is ridiculous, just play your games?!
|
|
|
|
|
|