On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious.
Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series.
Look at his name. Why do you think he think it was a great series, considering what organization the winner was from?
Greedy protoss playing blindly and getting punished, sounds about right. Never liked Ace and his cheesy/abusive style. He should have known that zergs don't like the map and played more carefully.
On September 18 2012 18:48 Fragile51 wrote: Man we're gonna have a clash of the former teammates between ryung and roro. Now that should prove to be interesting.
Haven't had a chance to see too much of Roro's ZvT either so that should be great =)
He looked very impressive vs Hack.
He did!
I don't think Ryung will fall apart like Hack did though so it should be a good battle presuming Roro has improved in the match up since then a bit too =)
On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious.
Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series.
Not many GSL zergs have those multi prong attack skills.
On September 18 2012 18:30 KiNGxXx wrote: RorO didn't even play very good. But Ace....
...what? Roro outplayed him the whole game..
If one player is playing bad you only need mediocre play to outclass him.
what did Roro do that was "medicore"?
Nothing special obviously.
lol what do you even define as "special" ? Roro had ridiculous multitasking and executed a multi prong harass with perfection. Scouted the twilight council and spotted the high stalker count which led him to go mass roach.
Some unnecessary hating going on here..
"Ridiculous multitasking"? He can build roaches and split them in two groups. OMG only Elephants can do this!
Yes, he played way better than Ace. But it wasn't impressive. I'm not saying he can't play impressive but he couldn't show it in this game.
Splitting roaches, microing BOTH sides WELL, cost efficiently engaging armies, slipping past Aces defense, burrowing roaches at mineral line constantly as harassment, taking a fourth and massing spines, teching up to Hive and infestors with upgrades all at the same time. but I guess all that shit is easy as fuck
He didn't do all of that at the same time. He did play well but you are overstating. We saw a lot of this and better stuff before so this is actually nothing special.
And Roro mostly looked so good because Ace didn't put up much of a fight. Ace didn't split his army well, didn't use force fields well, had units doing nothing during the fight. Ace playing bad made Roro looking good here because he could just crush in with his Roach force.
no i refuse to listen to you say anything bad about Roro. kespa players #1
On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious.
Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series.
Not many GSL zergs have those multi prong attack skills.
Really? Are you really going there?
I thought BW fans were going to be more mature. I already miss balance whiners, at least they were amusing, this is just irritating.
On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious.
Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series.
Not many GSL zergs have those multi prong attack skills.
On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious.
Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series.
Not many GSL zergs have those multi prong attack skills.
Which is probably the reason why we haven't seen any korean zergs making the finals as of late.
On September 18 2012 18:48 Fragile51 wrote: Man we're gonna have a clash of the former teammates between ryung and roro. Now that should prove to be interesting.
Haven't had a chance to see too much of Roro's ZvT either so that should be great =)
He looked very impressive vs Hack.
He did!
I don't think Ryung will fall apart like Hack did though so it should be a good battle presuming Roro has improved in the match up since then a bit too =)
Certainly it will be interesting, Ryung is much better player, but what i meant impressive was not really the result of the match but rather how intelligent and exploitive Roro was vs Hack. Pulling fast muta antics, rarely seen nowadays, alas.
On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious.
Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series.
Look at his name. Why do you think he think it was a great series, considering what organization the winner was from?
My ID has nothing to do with the elephant article. It is the crying elephant baby appearing whenever teamliquid crashes.
On September 18 2012 18:30 KiNGxXx wrote: RorO didn't even play very good. But Ace....
...what? Roro outplayed him the whole game..
If one player is playing bad you only need mediocre play to outclass him.
what did Roro do that was "medicore"?
Nothing special obviously.
lol what do you even define as "special" ? Roro had ridiculous multitasking and executed a multi prong harass with perfection. Scouted the twilight council and spotted the high stalker count which led him to go mass roach.
Some unnecessary hating going on here..
"Ridiculous multitasking"? He can build roaches and split them in two groups. OMG only Elephants can do this!
Yes, he played way better than Ace. But it wasn't impressive. I'm not saying he can't play impressive but he couldn't show it in this game.
Splitting roaches, microing BOTH sides WELL, cost efficiently engaging armies, slipping past Aces defense, burrowing roaches at mineral line constantly as harassment, taking a fourth and massing spines, teching up to Hive and infestors with upgrades all at the same time. but I guess all that shit is easy as fuck
He didn't do all of that at the same time. He did play well but you are overstating. We saw a lot of this and better stuff before so this is actually nothing special.
And Roro mostly looked so good because Ace didn't put up much of a fight. Ace didn't split his army well, didn't use force fields well, had units doing nothing during the fight. Ace playing bad made Roro looking good here because he could just crush in with his Roach force.
ace looked bad because roro played well
roro proved in wcs that he's already extremely good at zvp
On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious.
Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series.
Not many GSL zergs have those multi prong attack skills.
Are you truly this blind to what you want to see or do you enjoy troll baiting? Judging a match when the opponents are not closely matched is pretty silly. A masters player would look pretty darn good when crushing a plat or diamond player in 10 minutes too.
On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious.
Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series.
Look at his name. Why do you think he think it was a great series, considering what organization the winner was from?
RorO is his dad? How cute D:
You idiot.
Again, my ID has nothing to do with the elephant article. It is the crying elephant baby appearing whenever teamliquid crashes.