EPT[Code A] RO48 Day 1 2012 GSL Season 4 - Page 29
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
ElephantBaby
United States1365 Posts
| ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:45 CTRLTiLT wrote: Splitting roaches, microing BOTH sides WELL, cost efficiently engaging armies, slipping past Aces defense, burrowing roaches at mineral line constantly as harassment, taking a fourth and massing spines, teching up to Hive and infestors with upgrades all at the same time. but I guess all that shit is easy as fuck Yah he did all that at once. Somehow I saw that over a 5minute+ time period on my stream. You must be having lag issues. | ||
|
FireSA
Australia555 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:45 CTRLTiLT wrote: Splitting roaches, microing BOTH sides WELL, cost efficiently engaging armies, slipping past Aces defense, burrowing roaches at mineral line constantly as harassment, taking a fourth and massing spines, teching up to Hive and infestors with upgrades all at the same time. but I guess all that shit is easy as fuck Nobody is disputing that RorO did well. But he didn't do anything that we would praise if anybody else was doing it. So please, calm down. | ||
|
SnipedSoul
Canada2158 Posts
| ||
|
vthree
Hong Kong8039 Posts
| ||
|
Parcelleus
Australia1662 Posts
Watching this RTS player evolve in SC2 is a sight to see. | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:46 ElephantBaby wrote: Those who says the series is terrible, obviously don't understand every detail and thoughts zerg players put into the game. They can only saw the obvious. Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series. | ||
|
ElephantBaby
United States1365 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:45 DJHelium wrote: I feel that going stargate after defending a roach bust is so much better, keeps you kind of safe vs more all ins, safe vs mutas and gives you the scouting needed. If opponent is greedy, you can punish it with 4-6 gates. He doesn't even have a core, when his 1st phoneix or voidray is out, 10 mutas will already be out. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
| ||
|
CTRLTiLT
69 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:46 FireSA wrote: Nobody is disputing that RorO did well. But he didn't do anything that we would praise if anybody else was doing it. So please, calm down. Just because his play wasn't non-standard, doesn't mean its not praise worthy | ||
|
Marth
Germany146 Posts
| ||
|
Solarist
291 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:47 mrtomjones wrote: Uhh.. it was fairly bad... Ace looked his usual PvZ self and the games were very one sided.... just because one person executes a plan the way they want it does not automatically make it a good series. Look at his name. Why do you think he think it was a great series, considering what organization the winner was from? | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38255 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:48 Fragile51 wrote: Man we're gonna have a clash of the former teammates between ryung and roro. Now that should prove to be interesting. Haven't had a chance to see too much of Roro's ZvT either so that should be great =) | ||
|
FairForever
Canada2392 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:43 X3GoldDot wrote: lol ace placed like 2 too manycannons Actually Roro played that pretty terribly at the start, that should have been an auto win right there. If you can't win against a protoss player who doesn't even scout and doesn't start putting up a second cannon till the roaches are at the front door, that's pretty bad. Ace threw that game away not because of the mass cannons but because of the inexplicable decision to all-in afterwards. Roro was on two-base, Ace could've played a lot more patiently there. Roro definitely played game 1 really well though, but game 2 initial all-in control wasn't very strong. | ||
|
bgx
Poland6595 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:49 Asha` wrote: Haven't had a chance to see too much of Roro's ZvT either so that should be great =) He looked very impressive vs Hack. | ||
|
mrtomjones
Canada4020 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:48 CTRLTiLT wrote: Just because his play wasn't non-standard, doesn't mean its not praise worthy Just because he crushed someone who sucks at PvZ does not mean it is more praise worthy than any other Zerg who could do the same to him. Roro looked good but do not take much from that series other than he is better than someone who isnt Code A anymore and wont likely be next season. | ||
|
Crisco
1170 Posts
| ||
|
Dosey
United States4505 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:48 CTRLTiLT wrote: Just because his play wasn't non-standard, doesn't mean its not praise worthy Except for the fact that if he wasn't an "elephant", we wouldn't even be having this pointless discussion because everyone would just be saying "meh, standard good vs standard bad. better player won, next game please!" | ||
|
Yello
Germany7411 Posts
On September 18 2012 18:45 CTRLTiLT wrote: Splitting roaches, microing BOTH sides WELL, cost efficiently engaging armies, slipping past Aces defense, burrowing roaches at mineral line constantly as harassment, taking a fourth and massing spines, teching up to Hive and infestors with upgrades all at the same time. but I guess all that shit is easy as fuck He didn't do all of that at the same time. He did play well but you are overstating. We saw a lot of this and better stuff before so this is actually nothing special. And Roro mostly looked so good because Ace didn't put up much of a fight. Ace didn't split his army well, didn't use force fields well, had units doing nothing during the fight. Ace playing bad made Roro looking good here because he could just crush in with his Roach force. | ||
| ||
