EPT[WCS KR] WR3 - Page 12
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
| ||
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On August 20 2012 18:34 NguN wrote: How about not having 40 supply of your army when you're engaging the other army? That wasn't a balance note, it's a thing that I hate I see that often in ZvZ where one zerg heavily over estimates his defenders advantage, trades like 15 roaches for a hatchery and a bunch of drones then just dies to a counter attack. Like that match polt heavily over committed to trying to deal damage doing nothing about an army and army > no army. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On August 20 2012 18:36 massivez wrote: Well, Seed didn't split exactly 1-Aing his army to drop defence. Pretty sure that was a conscious decision. Seed has split his army perfectly in other games before, he believed that he couldn't hold on to his third and defend the drop at the same time. I'd tend to agree with him, and that decision basically made him fall slightly behind instead of just die outright. | ||
|
SnipedSoul
Canada2158 Posts
On August 20 2012 18:37 Wildmoon wrote: lol@ all people downplaying seed win. He just played patiently and win with muh better decision making. Polt did cool thing but his multitasking was not used at the right time. What decision making? Deciding to attack after polt threw away 40 supply in drops and 3/3 is finishing? | ||
|
klops
United States674 Posts
On August 20 2012 18:37 Fragile51 wrote: Didn't overcommit on anything, focussed on upgrades instead of unit count, defended both quad drops pretty much perfectly and recognised polt's moment of weakness after the second quad drop did absolutely jackshit and just went and killed him. so played a standard ladder PvT. who DOESN'T double forge and dump chronos to 2-2 in PvT? | ||
|
kckkryptonite
1126 Posts
| ||
|
BlindKill
Australia1508 Posts
| ||
|
zhurai
United States5660 Posts
| ||
|
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
| ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
| ||
opterown
Australia54784 Posts
| ||
|
NarutO
Germany18839 Posts
| ||
|
sitromit
7051 Posts
On August 20 2012 18:37 Fragile51 wrote: Didn't overcommit on anything, focussed on upgrades instead of unit count, defended both quad drops pretty much perfectly and recognised polt's moment of weakness after the second quad drop did absolutely jackshit and just went and killed him. So turtling is called not overcommitting now? Don't all Protoss focus on upgrades, since they can get them faster and be ahead? Is that really a decision? How hard is it to defend drops if you're just turtling in your base? | ||
|
Wildmoon
Thailand4189 Posts
On August 20 2012 18:38 SnipedSoul wrote: What decision making? Deciding to attack after polt threw away 40 supply in drops and 3/3 is finishing? Decided to punish Polt's failure is enough for me to call that better decision than Polt's. | ||
|
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
| ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38257 Posts
| ||
|
Sethronu
United Kingdom450 Posts
| ||
|
Caesarion
Australia8332 Posts
| ||
|
Looms
United States4624 Posts
| ||
|
kckkryptonite
1126 Posts
| ||
| ||
