EPT[TSL4] Ro32 Day 3 - Page 14
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Gescom
Canada3483 Posts
| ||
|
nojok
France15845 Posts
| ||
|
marttorn
Norway5211 Posts
On August 05 2012 05:59 Xxavi wrote: I don't know how he won DreamHack, and how good that tournament was, but it has been very one-sided so far. It's ugly from Mana. If you're not informed on the players' results and how he got them then speaking out on their skill level as a whole is not a good idea. To each their own. | ||
|
Grumbels
Netherlands7031 Posts
| ||
|
scsnow
Slovenia515 Posts
 | ||
|
AgentChaos
United Kingdom4569 Posts
| ||
|
iAmJeffReY
United States4262 Posts
Anyone that knows the game knows mana was dead. I'm positive he does too. | ||
|
Noocta
France12578 Posts
I hope he tries it. | ||
|
Gosi
Sweden9072 Posts
![[image loading]](http://0.media.dorkly.cvcdn.com/9/f/e39e7b59c5d84b3d4b6c25ff2240dc04.jpg) Make it happen Hack. | ||
|
Fungal Growth
United States434 Posts
| ||
|
Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo
Germany2959 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:00 marttorn wrote: If you're not informed on the players' results and how he got them then speaking out on their skill level as a whole is not a good idea. To each their own. Yeah I hate this attitude so much. "Hey look at THIS ONE series, this player must be bad!" | ||
|
Swiv
Germany3674 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:01 AgentChaos wrote: and day9 talking bs again, step up your game man he is really good in getting you in the game as a beginner, but then.. urgh | ||
|
Sapphire.lux
Romania2620 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:00 MCDayC wrote: The only way I can forgive Hack is if he plays mech. That will do, that will do! | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:02 Noocta wrote: Only time I've seen Hack do the Mech style, it was either daybreak or Ohana. I hope he tries it. Both, beat lure with it on ohana, lost to creator on daybreak. | ||
|
Xxavi
United States1248 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:00 marttorn wrote: If you're not informed on the players' results and how he got them then speaking out on their skill level as a whole is not a good idea. To each their own. I am just posting a comment about the current games. What's wrong with that? Mana looks like a terrible player. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:01 iAmJeffReY wrote: Any of you think maybe he's hyping the losing player to not make it look like a landslide? Maybe trying to make it interesting for people watching? Anyone that knows the game knows mana was dead. I'm positive he does too. There is a pretty big line between hyping the losing player and blatantly miscalling the game. Questioning if mana still has a shot of holding a push that is literally destroying everything before our very eyes definitely fits in the latter category. I'm used to better from day9. | ||
|
Utukka
26 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:01 iAmJeffReY wrote: Any of you think maybe he's hyping the losing player to not make it look like a landslide? Maybe trying to make it interesting for people watching? Anyone that knows the game knows mana was dead. I'm positive he does too. This | ||
|
Fusilero
United Kingdom50293 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:02 Na_Dann_Ma_GoGo wrote: Yeah I hate this attitude so much. "Hey look at THIS ONE series, this player must be bad!" I said in another thread that a player is only as good as the last match he played, sucks how much in the SC2 community that is actually followed. | ||
|
Fragile51
Netherlands15767 Posts
On August 05 2012 06:03 Xxavi wrote: I am just posting a comment about the current games. What's wrong with that? Mana looks like a terrible player. Everything. It makes you look ignorant. | ||
|
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
hack didnt feel dead defending manas push, he felt he was miles ahead and wanted to avoid a stupid loss, he knows he can sell the bunkers after so doesnt mind over commiting to a defence. during the mid game, hack was actually ahead in tech, had stim/+1/medivacs on the way and mana had a robo he didnt have the money to use, considering hack was still up in supply while investing in more tech should be a huge clue he has a large advantage. then the final push showed just how far ahead he was, mana was making 'bad' plays, taking thirds etc, because he knew he was behind and they didnt pay off, no biggy, but to imply that hack is working hard to win the final battle is misleading. mana put his eggs in teching up because it was the only choice, when hack just attacked it was a steam roll. on the subject of manas micro. it wasnt top tier but it wasnt bad either, i think people are being overly critical on that point, he went nexus first and it got caught, he was probably flustered and just wanted to end the game fast, win or lose, i think he lacked a bit of patience with his stalker control, attacking back in the marines all the time rather than taking the free pot shot then regenerating shields, but i put it down to feeling behind. my 1 critisism of manas play on that map was scouting with the stalker and sitting in base with the zealot. holding a nexus first is possible with good stalker control, with the stalker at home (knowing theres a chance he wouldnt see a push because of back passage) he could pick off 1/2 marines on the low ground get out 2 sentries and probably hold. he also misplayed the chrono usage and ffs a bit right at the start. i think if mana just watches the replay for 2 moments between the games he would still be comfortable nexus first, we will see | ||
| ||
