There will be two Spring Arenas in New York City, April 20-22 and May 18-20. Full information regarding packaging and pricing will be announced very soon.
MLG Spring Arena Dates Announced
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
![]()
MLGAnnouncements
United States95 Posts
There will be two Spring Arenas in New York City, April 20-22 and May 18-20. Full information regarding packaging and pricing will be announced very soon. | ||
myRZeth
Germany1047 Posts
| ||
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
With that said, best of luck. ![]() | ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
| ||
VirgilSC2
United States6151 Posts
Will it be solely based on MLG Columbus results? | ||
Rabbet
Canada404 Posts
User was banned for this post. | ||
sYz-Adrenaline
United States1850 Posts
| ||
supsun
United Kingdom343 Posts
| ||
Fubi
2228 Posts
| ||
Belha
Italy2850 Posts
On March 03 2012 02:49 WigglingSquid wrote: I am dubious about the frequency. One per month seems a bit excessive to me, both for viewers and players; it also kind of loses the whole "special event" feeling. With that said, best of luck. ![]() Agree. But looks like the numbers went well ^^ | ||
Xarles
459 Posts
On March 03 2012 03:28 Fubi wrote: Don't know about you guys, but as much as I want to support e-sport, I personally can't shell out 20 bucks per month just for MLG (considering GSL and stuff too) =( Same. At least IPL is free SD & 5$ HD the ENTIRE MONTH. | ||
Spaceneil8
United States317 Posts
On March 03 2012 03:33 Xarles wrote: Same. At least IPL is free SD & 5$ HD the ENTIRE MONTH. The difference is that IPL isn't going to have live events every month. IPL4 is in April and IPL5 is in August. Their online content is sick, but you are basically only paying for that. I'm hoping these arenas aren't $20 though. I was okay with MLG starting at $20, but it's better for everyone if it's 10 or free for gold members. | ||
MrMotionPicture
United States4327 Posts
Can't wait to look at the brackets on liquipediea though! ;D | ||
amiGo_O
Czech Republic959 Posts
On March 03 2012 03:28 Fubi wrote: Don't know about you guys, but as much as I want to support e-sport, I personally can't shell out 20 bucks per month just for MLG (considering GSL and stuff too) =( I probably missed something, where did you read every Arena will cost 20 bucks? | ||
Tanatos
United States381 Posts
Of course it doesn't mean I am willing pay $20 for each arena ![]() | ||
JustJonny
Canada294 Posts
![]() | ||
TheEvo
United States23 Posts
| ||
Bumblebee
3237 Posts
| ||
Xarles
459 Posts
On March 03 2012 03:37 Spaceneil8 wrote: The difference is that IPL isn't going to have live events every month. IPL4 is in April and IPL5 is in August. Their online content is sick, but you are basically only paying for that. I'm hoping these arenas aren't $20 though. I was okay with MLG starting at $20, but it's better for everyone if it's 10 or free for gold members. True, but getting to watch the entire event for free is still pretty sweet. Aside from the internet issue I actually thought IPL3 had better production value than every MLG to date, but that's just me. It does indeed depend on pricing. 20$ was an interesting way to test the waters to say the least, but I just don't think that e-sports have developed to this level where one can just shell out 20$ each month, nor the viewership for that matter. Is MLG really going to have an Arena each month? or is it a combo of Arenas and regular MLG events like Columbus? | ||
Tommylew
Wales2717 Posts
| ||
Tommylew
Wales2717 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. yeh thats quite a few top europeans missing.... good old MLG!!! | ||
Utinni
Canada1196 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:28 Tommylew wrote: haha didnt pay for the past one, deffiantly wont be paying for these two... not unless they really reduce the price..... anyway they do know about abusing? just because the first was a success you would of throught they would of spread them out a bit better..... Seems quite greedy.,.. You do realize these are extra events right? The Arenas are different from the regular season. Who cares, if you don't like it don't pay for it, if you want extra content pay the 13 bucks or whatever they are charging for the next arena. | ||
Mohdoo
United States15466 Posts
| ||
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. How could MLG do this again? First with assembly and now this? It's in their own damn studio for christ sakes. It's not like they have to deal with convention booking time. It's inexcusable for them to do this for a 2nd time in a row. | ||
Kazeyonoma
United States2912 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:36 Mohdoo wrote: Why are MLG events always the same day as other big events? T_T I doubt they are doing this on purpose, there's probably some level of cooperation between events, and holidays, and there are only 4 weekends per month. | ||
![]()
Antoine
United States7481 Posts
| ||
Apom
France655 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:36 Mohdoo wrote: Why are MLG events always the same day as other big events? T_T MLG Adam went on SotG to talk about how they consulted every other event organizer in the world to avoid scheduling conflicts, but unfortunately there was one mistake, and they missed Assembly in the list of notable tournaments. But they did ask IPL, NASL, Dreamhack, everyone else. So, to answer your question, the scheduling conflict with Dreamhack must be intended. | ||
ShuttingFromTheSky
Japan199 Posts
1. There'll be free alternatives for sure 2. they scheduled it on the same weekend as Dreamhack 3. arenas tend to be too frequent | ||
![]()
MLG_Adam
United States994 Posts
| ||
BlackDove
Sweden11 Posts
I'm expecting it to go down by at least half by the next tournament, which will show just how much of a success this first outing was. All the best with the PPV model though. | ||
busbarn
Sweden984 Posts
| ||
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:41 Antoine wrote: have to say i think running ppv-only events on the same weekend as free events (assembly last one, dreamhack stockholm this first one) is a big mistake. maybe i'll check out the 2nd one though. I think the issue is only the conflicts for players as they can't play in both. I don't think there's an issue with viewers because of the time zone differences, viewers can watch both as the tournaments would only overlap slightly for the most part. I know for assembly, I could barely watch it because it started b/w 12am-2am PST, so could only catch the matches when I woke up and those barely conflicted with MLG matches. | ||
LittleAtari
Jordan1090 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:44 MLG_Adam wrote: Just finding out about this DH situation. Is this a live event of considerable scope? YES! It's like the MLG of Europe. They probably already have Day9 booked for it. He always does DreamHack and they give him his own tent when he's there. | ||
![]()
MLG_Adam
United States994 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:47 busbarn wrote: DH and MLG announcing same dates at the same day T_T why no communication Was this event announced today? | ||
CuteZergling
641 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. Groan. Again this happens. Thankully Dreamhack is a smaller player pool. | ||
![]()
MLG_Adam
United States994 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:48 LittleAtari wrote: YES! It's like the MLG of Europe. They probably already have Day9 booked for it. He always does DreamHack and they give him his own tent when he's there. I know what DH is, they are a great event. I'm talking about this open qualifier. | ||
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:44 MLG_Adam wrote: Just finding out about this DH situation. Is this a live event of considerable scope? This is what happens when event organizers treat tourney dates and venues like they're some sort of state secret. Forget being sick about announcement of announcements, I'm sick of tourneys keeping their dates so secretive. I have no idea who that benefits. Fans, players and other tourneys benefit when dates are known cause people can plan around the event and you can avoid conflicts like this. | ||
CuteZergling
641 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:48 MLG_Adam wrote: I know what DH is, they are a great event. I'm talking about this open qualifier. http://www.dreamhack.se/dhs12/2012/03/02/dreamhack-announce-2012-dates-hello-stockholm-valencia-bucharest/ Unknown if this is open or invitational. Either way, these smaller stops last year were of modest attendance and featured a smaller player pool. | ||
busbarn
Sweden984 Posts
yes, | ||
Apom
France655 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:48 MLG_Adam wrote: I know what DH is, they are a great event. I'm talking about this open qualifier. Nothing a Liquipedia search couldn't have found out, but here's a link : last year's roster. | ||
LittleAtari
Jordan1090 Posts
edit: just saw people's links. I thought it was the main dreamhack event. | ||
CuteZergling
641 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:51 LittleAtari wrote: The DH website says that their event is June 16-19. Is Bumblebee talking about a smaller event that hasnt been announced yet? Yes, April 21-22 DreamHack Open: Stockholm | ||
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:52 CuteZergling wrote: Yes, April 21-22 DreamHack Open: Stockholm Wait is this one of their smaller events like valencia where there's only 8 players competing? If so, then I don't see this as a huge conflict now. | ||
![]()
MLG_Adam
United States994 Posts
| ||
EffeCt
United States77 Posts
| ||
LittleAtari
Jordan1090 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:53 Canucklehead wrote: Wait is this one of their smaller events like valencia where there's only 8 players competing? If so, then I don't see this as a huge conflict now. Um, yea, i almost never watch the open qualifiers. | ||
CuteZergling
641 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:53 MLG_Adam wrote: These dates were announced today. We definitely did now about them when we announced. We were aware of THE Dreamhack in June. Is this a typo and you meant did not know about them? | ||
![]()
MLG_Adam
United States994 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:56 CuteZergling wrote: Is this a typo and you meant did not know about them? Yup typo, thank you. | ||
justdweezil
United States186 Posts
On March 03 2012 02:49 WigglingSquid wrote: I am dubious about the frequency. One per month seems a bit excessive to me, both for viewers and players; it also kind of loses the whole "special event" feeling. With that said, best of luck. ![]() Totally agree with this sentiment: having them too frequently robs the specialness, and can be draining. I am wiling to pay more per event for less frequent, more awesome events. Good luck. | ||
Diab
Denmark320 Posts
| ||
Condor Hero
United States2931 Posts
On March 03 2012 02:49 WigglingSquid wrote: I am dubious about the frequency. One per month seems a bit excessive to me, both for viewers and players; it also kind of loses the whole "special event" feeling. With that said, best of luck. ![]() I can totally see the Arenas gradually being more prevalent and important than the actual Pro Circuit. Especially since Pro Circuit is free. I don't mind this since these events are 100% Starcraft. Been a fan of Professional SC since 2007 and I don't care much about the other games at regular MLGs. | ||
![]()
MLG_Adam
United States994 Posts
Wait for more information (shooting for next week) on how these events all tie together, how they're different, and of course pricing/packaging. I think you'll be very happy. We heard everyone's feedback, we're usually pretty good about instituting community changes. | ||
CuteZergling
641 Posts
Since the Europe times probably won't overlap with the NA times, the only possible issue is player pool. Time will tell. | ||
krisss
Luxembourg305 Posts
Without at least some of the following improvements i wont pay for sure for the next arenas: - get audience. - get motivated commentators. They get more bored everytime i see them. - and most importantly: GET SOME GOOD INTERVIEWER! Have u seen 2GD at Assembly? Thats what im talking about! Hes fun, hes real, hes honest. He doesnt always ask the boring 2 same questions. He has personality. And let JP do some other stuff. He really is the worst and most boring interviewer ever. At least get slasher.. Those interviews at the last arena, was more boring than the waiting screen. no joke. | ||
Domus
510 Posts
You do know it is optional right? You can decide for yourself if you want to pay and look. I like this approach, because when there are more events, I can start picking the ones I am most interested in ![]() | ||
NuclearJudas
6546 Posts
Also, please announce a considerable time beforehand what the pricing will be, and not like 10 days before the event, like last time. Also, good luck, MLG. | ||
Diab
Denmark320 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:01 CuteZergling wrote: Dreamhack didn't make these dates public until today. MLG didn't know they were going to overlap. It could be DH's fault for not communicating these dates, MLG's fault for not inquiring deeply, or both parties for not communicating properly. Since the Europe times probably won't overlap with the NA times, the only possible issue is player pool. Time will tell. I agree completely.. It's the job of both of the tournaments to communicate about the dates, not just MLG.. And if it's like Assembly, it won't overlap anyway.. But sucks for the player pools.. | ||
TigerKarl
1757 Posts
Please tournament organizers, make less tournaments, make them therefore better and bigger. This will increase hype, increase practice time and game quality and decrease travelling issues like the costs to fly people all over the world all the time. Please remember TSL3 and why that has been the best tournament in Starcraft so far. | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
![]() | ||
Noocta
France12578 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. lol, they did that again ? | ||
Hrrrrm
United States2081 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:01 MLG_Adam wrote: Hey guys. Wait for more information (shooting for next week) on how these events all tie together, how they're different, and of course pricing/packaging. I think you'll be very happy. We heard everyone's feedback, we're usually pretty good about instituting community changes. Except for that whole Extended Series thing... | ||
GoSuChicken
Germany1726 Posts
gogo gonna be sick :D | ||
SMD
Canada627 Posts
wasn't compeltely MLG's fault this time. Dreamhack announced these dates today, as did MLG. So don't just blame MLG dreamhack has a part in it too. | ||
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:06 TigerKarl wrote: Please remember TSL3 and why that has been the best tournament in Starcraft so far. Huh, no it hasn't because no online tournament can be considered the best. Live events is where it's at. At the time of TSL 3 it was rare to see koreans vs foreigners even if it was online. It's such a common occurrence these days especially with online tourneys like IPL, Iron Squid, etc that it doesn't look as special today and doesn't stand the test of time to be considered the best tournament in sc so far. | ||
jogamijo
United States28 Posts
| ||
Bagration
United States18282 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. First Assembly and now this? There needs to be more coordination between tournaments | ||
TheBamf
Denmark366 Posts
| ||
ragnorr
Denmark6097 Posts
Well DH annouced theirs today(So i presume tournements dont really talk to each other that much). Tho assembly was set for a long time | ||
mitthrawn
Germany443 Posts
| ||
HappyChris
1534 Posts
You talk so much about saving esport and make it financial viable but what about the players shoulnt it be financial viable for them also? Not everyone can get top 3 or top 8. Im very sceptics atm it seems you guys pulling in huge sums of money but the players that basically make all this happend are barely payed a minimum vage. I would love to see that all players get payed some and the top 8 should be really good! So MLG Adam time to show some love towards the players? | ||
Attunga
Australia41 Posts
On March 03 2012 02:45 MLGAnnouncements wrote: The Winter Arena was a success. Thanks to everyone who tuned in; we hope you enjoyed it. As a viewer, it was a not a success for me - it was a disaster. The vods were horrible 10 hours after the first day, although a couple of matches worked, many were not there and many others were choppy or unwatchable. And the atmosphere was just not there ... As a gold member who supposedly signed up for a year of content - I won't bother paying for this again. | ||
xShoeicide
New Zealand41 Posts
On March 03 2012 02:49 WigglingSquid wrote: I am dubious about the frequency. One per month seems a bit excessive to me, both for viewers and players; it also kind of loses the whole "special event" feeling. With that said, best of luck. ![]() I 100% agree with this. i happily paid for the winter arena cos it was a one off epic best of the best tournament. i hope they dont trash it. thinking about it MLGs brand is actually the massive build up and excitement leading up to events, thats why i always watch | ||
TheDougler
Canada8302 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. ..You're shitting me... WTF MLG!? Sorry Sundance, gotta opt for Dreamhack on this one. | ||
JKM
Denmark419 Posts
And dont misunderstand me, I love watching high level tournaments, but part of that is the hype of individual players and the tournament itself, a hype I feel is lost when these players are dispayed so often and these tournaments held so often. For that reason I will probably not watch it (also because I am from Europe and obviously dont want to pay for something thats going to fuck my sleep schedule up ;-)). | ||
cmcaneff5502
United States116 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:37 TheDougler wrote: ..You're shitting me... WTF MLG!? Sorry Sundance, gotta opt for Dreamhack on this one. Come on now read the whole thread before posting, DH and MLG announced the tournament dates on the same day. No one did it first, no one did it purposely. MLG directly responded if you would read a few pages in | ||
Femari
United States2900 Posts
| ||
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:27 HappyChris wrote: Well since its such a huge success I really hope you up the price winnings. Its so small and im not just talking about top or I mean top 8 etc. You talk so much about saving esport and make it financial viable but what about the players shoulnt it be financial viable for them also? Not everyone can get top 3 or top 8. Im very sceptics atm it seems you guys pulling in huge sums of money but the players that basically make all this happend are barely payed a minimum vage. I would love to see that all players get payed some and the top 8 should be really good! So MLG Adam time to show some love towards the players? You realize all of the players had EVERYTHING paid for for the arenas? Travel/Hotel/3 Meals per day... AND they got money for top finishes? What more do you want? Give each player $5,000.00 for just coming? | ||
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:41 cmcaneff5502 wrote: Come on now read the whole thread before posting, DH and MLG announced the tournament dates on the same day. No one did it first, no one did it purposely. MLG directly responded if you would read a few pages in That's not much of an excuse. It's quite baffling how two of the biggest sc2 organizers can't coordinate their schedules. It's seems like they (both of them) just threw a dart at the schedule and crossed their fingers. Sometimes it may be unavoidable, so be it, but at least put in a bit of an effort. | ||
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:46 nam nam wrote: That's not much of an excuse. It's quite baffling how two of the biggest sc2 organizers can't coordinate their schedules. It's seems like they (both of them) just threw a dart at the schedule and crossed their fingers. Sometimes it may be unavoidable, so be it, but at least put in a bit of an effort. I agree with you, but why does everyone IMMEDIATELY blame MLG? DH announced the dates today as well, yet all we see is "WTF MLG?!" | ||
yawnoC
United States3704 Posts
![]() What a horrible decision I will have to make ... Also, I was expecting these to maybe be every 2 months but if they are every month (i doubt they are) it will be a bit excessive imo | ||
hacky
United States63 Posts
| ||
GumThief
Canada284 Posts
| ||
phanto
Sweden708 Posts
| ||
zul
Germany5427 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. yeah "unfortunate" indeed. Didn`t MLG say the arena would be something special and extra. But who needs an extra event when there is already one very good on the exact same weekend. With free HD Streams. With a big enthusiastic crowd. And this is already the 2nd time MLG puts the arena on the same weekend with another top tier LAN tournament. How do they plan on delivering the best tournament possible, when a considerable amount of proplayers attend DREAMHACK. they just can`t. | ||
JustJonny
Canada294 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:56 zul wrote: yeah "unfortunate" indeed. Didn`t MLG say the arena would be something special and extra. But who needs an extra event when there is already one very good on the exact same weekend. With free HD Streams. With a big enthusiastic crowd. And this is already the 2nd time MLG puts the arena on the same weekend with another top tier LAN tournament. How do they plan on delivering the best tournament possible, when a considerable amount of proplayers attend DREAMHACK. they just can`t. Read the thread please. | ||
GwSC
United States1997 Posts
Nevermind, just saw it was today. I like how people keep blaming MLG. | ||
TumNarDok
Germany854 Posts
There is like 200+ players out there we love to see play, more than enough to hold 3 tournament on the same days. | ||
m0ck
4194 Posts
| ||
Michaels
419 Posts
| ||
Jeremy Reimer
Canada968 Posts
I don't mind the idea of PPV, but the point of PPV was that we were supposed to get a superior viewing experience. Instead, it was an inferior one. If the next Arena gets a proper audience, I'll pay for it. | ||
zul
Germany5427 Posts
ok both got announced on short notices, thats bad luck for everyone. What`s going to happen now? DH and MLG calling the biggest stars asap to get them onboard. It`s fine for most of the Fans if the biggest stars go to DREAMHACK, because everybody can watch, if some big names will attend MLG, most of the fans won`t be able to watch, again. Maybe it`s because I strongly believe PPV is extremely unconductive for the eSports industry, but I just don`t like it. | ||
JustJonny
Canada294 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:12 zul wrote: ok both got announced on short notices, thats bad luck for everyone. What`s going to happen now? DH and MLG calling the biggest stars asap to get them onboard. It`s fine for most of the Fans if the biggest stars go to DREAMHACK, because everybody can watch, if some big names will attend MLG, most of the fans won`t be able to watch, again. Maybe it`s because I strongly believe PPV is extremely unconductive for the eSports industry, but I just don`t like it. i just wanted you to read the thread as your question had been asked and answered many times. i guess my advice to you is 'watch dreamhack' if that's what you want to do. | ||
beefhamburger
United States3962 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:12 zul wrote: ok both got announced on short notices, thats bad luck for everyone. What`s going to happen now? DH and MLG calling the biggest stars asap to get them onboard. It`s fine for most of the Fans if the biggest stars go to DREAMHACK, because everybody can watch, if some big names will attend MLG, most of the fans won`t be able to watch, again. Maybe it`s because I strongly believe PPV is extremely unconductive for the eSports industry, but I just don`t like it. What. Read the thread again please. | ||
nachtkap
Germany195 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:53 MLG_Adam wrote: These dates were announced today. We definitely did not know about them when we announced. We were aware of THE Dreamhack in June. MLG_Adam on stog: we checked with alle the major tounament oranizers. dreamhack, IPL GSL, but assembly slipped through our fingers. as far as I am concered thats the last bit of belivabilty out the window. at this point I will just choose not to trust you on that. I just cant get myself to pay for mlg when there is such a disconnect between the content of interviews and that of posts. | ||
TheDougler
Canada8302 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:41 cmcaneff5502 wrote: Come on now read the whole thread before posting, DH and MLG announced the tournament dates on the same day. No one did it first, no one did it purposely. MLG directly responded if you would read a few pages in Fair enough, I was frustrated | ||
![]()
MLG_Adam
United States994 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:18 nachtkap wrote: as far as I am concered thats the last bit of belivabilty out the window. at this point I will just choose not to trust you on that. I just cant get myself to pay for mlg when there is such a disconnect between the content of interviews and that of posts. We looked on every public listing for events. Aside from NASL, no other organizer shares their dates. We found out about this event TODAY after we announced. | ||
beefhamburger
United States3962 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:18 nachtkap wrote: as far as I am concered thats the last bit of belivabilty out the window. at this point I will just choose not to trust you on that. I just cant get myself to pay for mlg when there is such a disconnect between the content of interviews and that of posts. You pretty much just said that it was Dreamhack's fault for not telling MLG about a 'secret' even they were planning on holding. | ||
adiga
495 Posts
| ||
Batch
Sweden692 Posts
![]() | ||
Bumblebee
3237 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:21 MLG_Adam wrote: We looked on every public listing for events. Aside from NASL, no other organizer shares their dates. We found out about this event TODAY after we announced. No harm done in sending an e-mail to the other tournament organisers, right? | ||
fenrysk
United States364 Posts
i'm not as concerned with the scheduling issue because of the European time and US Eastern time zone difference. I got a chance to view MLG winter arena via Barcraft, and i was very pleased with what did get to see (mostly championship sunday games, but the friday/saturday brackets looked hella exciting)--- for those of you worried about costs, have you guys considered pooling resources with some friends? if my other SC2 buddy wasn't already going to buy a full ticket anyways i'd have split the cost with him. i think Slasher would be better for interviews though, after seeing some of the interviews he did at the Winter Arena for gamespot i was pretty impressed. as an additional thought, i think the MLG Arenas is probably the closest any other event will get to HSC, atmosphere-wise, since it's only the players in the studio (the analogy isn't perfect, but i think it's closer than anything else has been able to do), and maybe that's something MLG might want to consider doing more of in maybe having some of players sit at the commentary desk or table for some of the matches (i didn't watch the entirety of Winter Arena so if it happened, i think more would be awesome) | ||
beefhamburger
United States3962 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:23 adiga wrote: I really don't buy that Winter Arena was a success sorry. Then why hold another one? | ||
SnoLys
149 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:18 nachtkap wrote: as far as I am concered thats the last bit of belivabilty out the window. at this point I will just choose not to trust you on that. I just cant get myself to pay for mlg when there is such a disconnect between the content of interviews and that of posts. To be fair MLG could have just asked if they had something for the dates of the 1st Arena, if this was the case DH would have said no since they had no events during that time. | ||
Spaceneil8
United States317 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:26 Bumblebee wrote: No harm done in sending an e-mail to the other tournament organisers, right? Adam just said "Aside from NASL, no other organizer shares their dates." NASL dates aren't announced yet so I assumed they tried to contact other tournament organizers and only NASL shared. | ||
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:26 Bumblebee wrote: No harm done in sending an e-mail to the other tournament organisers, right? Why can't Dreamhack send emails to other tourneys as well though? It's a 2 way street. Tourney date secrecy is killing e-sports. | ||
Xcobidoo
Sweden1871 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. You know some of these smaller events like ASUS, Dreamhack, IPL and NASL just slip under the radar, it happens. You can't keep track of every tournament out there, especially not those that are 2(plural!) times a year. | ||
emc
United States3088 Posts
| ||
Tpox
22 Posts
Of course it's a totally different thing if it would have been DH summer or some tournament of that size. | ||
emc
United States3088 Posts
ROG's broadcast ended like 2 hours before MLG started theirs. MLG will be in NYC again and Dreamhack will still be in Europe. If they ever do cross time slots it will only be an hour or 2 hours tops. I watched ROG and watched MLG, it was quite a lot of SC2 but the time zone differences didn't interfere at all. | ||
m0ck
4194 Posts
| ||
Chenz
Sweden1197 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:32 emc wrote: is it always going to be in NYC? I suppose that makes sense since MLG is stationed in NYC, but if there could be someway to get it more centralized, might make it easier on the koreans jet lag. I'm all for foreigners doing better but not at the cost of a korean being jet lagged. Since top 8 from the Winter Arena was koreans, I'd say jet lag wasn't much of an issue. Edit: Nvm, Violet lives in the US. Still, 7 out of the top 8. | ||
vitruvia
Canada235 Posts
| ||
adiga
495 Posts
I guess making just another one is better than: OK guys you were right all along! It was a big failure! Sorry! we get it! | ||
archonOOid
1983 Posts
| ||
Smackzilla
United States539 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:49 hacky wrote: ...I don't understand why people want FEWER events. There's nothing rational about it. Some people just want to bitch. | ||
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:40 adiga wrote: I guess making just another one is better than: OK guys you were right all along! It was a big failure! Sorry! we get it! Eh no that would be stupid. At the minimum the winter arena showed promise (financially). MLG wouldn't just throw money away just so they don't have to admit it didn't work out... | ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
| ||
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:44 Smackzilla wrote: There's nothing rational about it. Some people just want to bitch. If fewer means higher quality it makes perfect sense. You could argue this issue. | ||
THELEHGOTERRAN
United States1837 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:40 adiga wrote: I guess making just another one is better than: OK guys you were right all along! It was a big failure! Sorry! we get it! They are not just adding one but two more. | ||
nam nam
Sweden4672 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:38 Chenz wrote: Since top 8 from the Winter Arena was koreans, I'd say jet lag wasn't much of an issue. Edit: Nvm, Violet lives in the US. Still, 7 out of the top 8. And why can't the foreigners have jet lag? | ||
dnld12
United States324 Posts
| ||
Nazeron
Canada1046 Posts
| ||
RaiD.RaynoR
United States294 Posts
| ||
Isaac
United States810 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:44 Smackzilla wrote: There's nothing rational about it. Some people just want to bitch. Its sort of like having Christmas every month. Suddenly the quality and the, for lack of a better word, epicness goes down. edit: personally, i dont mind having mlgs every month. but having it every week could bring that feeling down for me. | ||
Smackzilla
United States539 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:46 nam nam wrote: If fewer means higher quality it makes perfect sense. You could argue this issue. That's a fair point, although I'd wager most people were simply still bitter at MLG for trying PPV. I'd wager 2 arenas simply means more players. 2 arenas means that if there's a scheduling conflict with one, then there's a chance at making the other. There are plenty of top quality players that didn't make winter arena that I'd love to see in an arena and then seeded in the championships, so I'm not too worried about the quality of players being diluted. I'd also say that 2 arenas will increase the number of top players we see in the MLG championships. | ||
schimmetje
Netherlands1104 Posts
| ||
Smackzilla
United States539 Posts
On March 03 2012 07:01 Isaac wrote: Its sort of like having Christmas every month. Suddenly the quality and the, for lack of a better word, epicness goes down. edit: personally, i dont mind having mlgs every month. but having it every week could bring that feeling down for me. Sure, at some point it breaks down. However, I don't think going from 1 arena and 1 championship to 2 arenas and 1 championship pushes us over that edge. | ||
Full.tilt
United Kingdom1709 Posts
| ||
GreyKnight
United States4720 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:31 Xcobidoo wrote: You know some of these smaller events like ASUS, Dreamhack, IPL and NASL just slip under the radar, it happens. You can't keep track of every tournament out there, especially not those that are 2(plural!) times a year. dreamhack isnt a small tournament | ||
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
He was being sarcastic :| | ||
ReturnStroke
United States801 Posts
| ||
HappyChris
1534 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:46 LovE- wrote: You realize all of the players had EVERYTHING paid for for the arenas? Travel/Hotel/3 Meals per day... AND they got money for top finishes? What more do you want? Give each player $5,000.00 for just coming? No I dont. But I want players to be payed for there work time. Who cares if they get a free trip to NY. They are still working and spending time in NY without getting payed. Atleast at mcdonalds you get minimum vage ![]() So you think its ok that players only get a free trip to New York and work there ass off while MLG makes $$$ of the players? | ||
vijeze
Netherlands719 Posts
On March 03 2012 07:43 HappyChris wrote: No I dont. But I want players to be payed for there work time. Who cares if they get a free trip to NY. They are still working and spending time in NY without getting payed. Atleast at mcdonalds you get minimum vage ![]() So you think its ok that players only get a free trip to New York and work there ass off while MLG makes $$$ of the players? In the end, the players CHOOSE to go. | ||
kiy0
Portugal593 Posts
They didn't announce the overall attendance via stream, going with an extremely vague and meaningless "this was a success". I guess this pretty much says that PPV didn't work as well as they thought it would. Hopefully they will reevaluate the situation. Overall, the tournament was amazing and you can't really ask for a more stacked tournament than this one. | ||
Smackzilla
United States539 Posts
On March 03 2012 07:43 HappyChris wrote: No I dont. But I want players to be payed for there work time. Who cares if they get a free trip to NY. They are still working and spending time in NY without getting payed. Atleast at mcdonalds you get minimum vage ![]() So you think its ok that players only get a free trip to New York and work there ass off while MLG makes $$$ of the players? Everyone can't be a winner. Upping the prize pool is nice, but a real salary is better. Earning a decent living is the responsibility of teams and their sponsors. MLG has payed the expense of players going to the tournament. Teams and their sponsors reaped the benefit of having their brand represented at MLG basically for free. If players need more money, the teams can pass that savings onto their players in the form of a salary and/or raise, pay for team houses, support them in their training or send them to other tournaments they can make money at, etc. Course, I'm sure its all much more complicated than that. I just think it's crap to say that MLG is not helping players out with free travel, room, and board. | ||
Hrrrrm
United States2081 Posts
On March 03 2012 07:50 kiy0 wrote: Gotta love the part where he goes "first of all.. this was a success [fake reading the cards]" They didn't announce the overall attendance via stream, going with an extremely vague and meaningless "this was a success". I guess this pretty much says that PPV didn't work as well as they thought it would. Hopefully they will reevaluate the situation. Overall, the tournament was amazing and you can't really ask for a more stacked tournament than this one. Even if the first one was a great success or a mild failure they need more data points to truly know where this whole PPV stands. So unless they only got 100 or so people buying the PPV there were going to be more PPV events regardless. Anyone who thought otherwise is delusional. The more PPV events there are the less "new" they are and more people hesitant to purchase. Especially if other events will have the same exact players just a week later for free and without Extended Series so you actually get to see straight up Bo5's and Bo7's between the best players. MLG needs a monopoly or this will either fizzle out or just become a one or two time a year event. They've already attempted to buy loyalty from teams/personalities through their referral system. I wouldn't be surprised if they start paying for appearance fees to certain players so they don't go to another conflicting tournament that will have more viewers for the teams sponsors. Which at the end of the day pays the teams bills. The writing is on the wall. | ||
Lennient
497 Posts
On March 03 2012 07:50 kiy0 wrote: Gotta love the part where he goes "first of all.. this was a success [fake reading the cards]" They didn't announce the overall attendance via stream, going with an extremely vague and meaningless "this was a success". I guess this pretty much says that PPV didn't work as well as they thought it would. Hopefully they will reevaluate the situation. Overall, the tournament was amazing and you can't really ask for a more stacked tournament than this one. Why would they continue to do so if they failed ? For the passion of Esports ? Also, they can just make up a number. If they announced a number that exceeds the expectation of everyone ,other organizations would follow. | ||
TheSir
1830 Posts
On March 03 2012 07:43 HappyChris wrote: No I dont. But I want players to be payed for there work time. Who cares if they get a free trip to NY. They are still working and spending time in NY without getting payed. Atleast at mcdonalds you get minimum vage ![]() So you think its ok that players only get a free trip to New York and work there ass off while MLG makes $$$ of the players? They get paid for their time when they are winning, that's what sports is. I can imagine though they probably get a small entering fee and dont forget that players had the option to use the referral system to get a percentage (i guess) of the tickets. Thats not bad when they cover you on everything else and you even can take someone with you if you really want. And only a free trip? When for example a EU player need to cover something like that on his own money it will cost him probably around $1,5/$2k total (2 tickets, hotel, food etc), not to mention he has to enrage it all, now MLG did it all for the players. | ||
Nonvidius
United States34 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:27 HappyChris wrote: No I dont. But I want players to be payed for there work time. Who cares if they get a free trip to NY. They are still working and spending time in NY without getting payed. Atleast at mcdonalds you get minimum vage ![]() So you think its ok that players only get a free trip to New York and work there ass off while MLG makes $$$ of the players? I hope you realize that MLG is far from making any money, probably very far. If you want players to make more there needs to be incentives for companies to pay them more, hopefully this PPV model works out for MLG and they are at least covering their transport + room and board unlike every other tourney. Don't know why MLG keeps getting flak for this stuff . . . I guess people are really that selfish and bitter about losing their free content. | ||
krisss
Luxembourg305 Posts
On March 03 2012 08:14 TheSir wrote: They get paid for their time when they are winning, that's what sports is. I can imagine though they probably get a small entering fee and dont forget that players had the option to use the referral system to get a percentage (i guess) of the tickets. Thats not bad when they cover you on everything else and you even can take someone with you if you really want. And only a free trip? When for example a EU player need to cover something like that on his own money it will cost him probably around $1,5/$2k total (2 tickets, hotel, food etc), not to mention he has to enrage it all, now MLG did it all for the players. You dont get it. You cant buy ur children food, when all you get is paid trips. And the players are not fukkin salesman. If they wanted to make money by selling stuff, they could definately find a better job than gettin those few bucks from selling tickets?! And yes, they get paid for winning,t hats professional sports. But the relation between what we clients pay, and what the actual stars get is pathetic. We pay 20 dollars each, how much of this money is gone to the main characters? 1 dollar of each pass? sorry, thats just a rip-off. This system would not survive in a "real" economic system. It only works because progamers a kind of "idealistic". 99% of them do it because they love it. If they find out how much money MLG makes by selling those passes for 20 dollars each.. i hope they demand more prize money.. | ||
Madder
Australia427 Posts
| ||
HappyChris
1534 Posts
On March 03 2012 08:56 Nonvidius wrote: I hope you realize that MLG is far from making any money, probably very far. If you want players to make more there needs to be incentives for companies to pay them more, hopefully this PPV model works out for MLG and they are at least covering their transport + room and board unlike every other tourney. Don't know why MLG keeps getting flak for this stuff . . . I guess people are really that selfish and bitter about losing their free content. What the feck are you talking about they sayd it was succesfull so they are making money. This got nothing todo with PPV the fact is if the scene and esport got a future the players needs a living. And yea while a free trip to NY might sounds good for some people im sure alot of players would like to get payed for there work. MLG told us support them to save esport ok I did and I payed 20 dollars and ill do it again next event. But things got to be fair the players needs a slice of the money cake and this pathetic little price pool where 90% of the players dont even get payed isnt good enough.. Tell me why a company should make so much more money over players that do all the entertainment that we love to see?? | ||
SerafeimSC
98 Posts
While i don't agree with what MLG is doing i also don't agree with you, but eveyone has their own opinions and that is what makes this intersting. I also agree with the one person who was talkinga bout the DH and MLG thing. Really? Its not hard for the event organizer to email/call the other event organizers. Yes there will be competition, but we can deal with that once esports gets bigger because eventually this will happen... But right now with such a small player pool scheduling conflicts can hurt. | ||
adiga
495 Posts
On March 03 2012 06:46 THELEHGOTERRAN wrote: They are not just adding one but two more. So? It even supports more my point, I really think this arena was bad for them and no wonder why, with the all the drama 1 week before the kickoff. I do believe most the people didn't bought the pass. But until the 2nd Arena gets by all the heat will get lower and people will be easier to buy by just lowering the price for the pass by 5$, and if that won't work they can change it to 10$ for the 3rd arena. The "it was a success". statement is so vague, and it was the first thing they all said(just like: I get it, we fucked up, we are sorry). | ||
Champloo
Germany1850 Posts
On March 03 2012 05:01 MLG_Adam wrote: we're usually pretty good about instituting community changes. You are... what!? gj on scheduling btw, again not the best euro players at your event. | ||
Deadlift
United States358 Posts
| ||
Spaceneil8
United States317 Posts
On March 03 2012 09:09 HappyChris wrote: What the feck are you talking about they sayd it was succesfull so they are making money. This got nothing todo with PPV the fact is if the scene and esport got a future the players needs a living. And yea while a free trip to NY might sounds good for some people im sure alot of players would like to get payed for there work. MLG told us support them to save esport ok I did and I payed 20 dollars and ill do it again next event. But things got to be fair the players needs a slice of the money cake and this pathetic little price pool where 90% of the players dont even get payed isnt good enough.. Tell me why a company should make so much more money over players that do all the entertainment that we love to see?? Player's main income is their team's salary. The less the team has to spend on travel, the more they can spend on other stuff like salary. It's better for the teams this way. Plus paying out top 8 is still pretty good. 1/4 of players get paid. Also, top 16 get into pool play at columbus and top 16 get payed out there. | ||
jake1138
United States82 Posts
| ||
darmousseh
United States3437 Posts
Congrats mlg on a successful event and I look forward to future events! | ||
TheSir
1830 Posts
On March 03 2012 08:59 krisss wrote: You dont get it. You cant buy ur children food, when all you get is paid trips. And the players are not fukkin salesman. If they wanted to make money by selling stuff, they could definately find a better job than gettin those few bucks from selling tickets?! And yes, they get paid for winning,t hats professional sports. But the relation between what we clients pay, and what the actual stars get is pathetic. We pay 20 dollars each, how much of this money is gone to the main characters? 1 dollar of each pass? sorry, thats just a rip-off. This system would not survive in a "real" economic system. It only works because progamers a kind of "idealistic". 99% of them do it because they love it. If they find out how much money MLG makes by selling those passes for 20 dollars each.. i hope they demand more prize money.. First, all you get is paid trips? You get a free chance to win 10k in 3 days and everything is enraged for you, thats a freaking good deal. But i get it, no you cant buy stuff when your get your trips paid but you have to make serious cash if you want to cover those kinds of trips on your own. What if you loose your first 2 matches? You think you can make a profit then as a player or team? Players would be even worse off when for example MLG would give them for example $2k for showing up instead of covering the expenses, cause then players would need to pay taxes over that. So no bad idea and it wont help them. Or do expect that MLG covers the expenses and give the players a nice entry fee? Your talking about a economic system... what has a economic system to do with this? Absolutely nothing but ok, if the tournament wasn't profitable for the players they wont come. For example Grubby already said that he probably wouldn't come if MLG didn't cover the expenses. In sports in general athlete's dont get their expenses paid, that on it's own is freaking luxury that 90% of the athlete's and teams in any sport would kill for. BTW how do you know how big the percentage is that players received from the referral system? Even if it is 1 dollar thats not bad, thats 5% guaranteed without playing. And do you know how big the profit was in total? I bet you the profit wasn't even that big. On what source do you even build your opinion on that players should demand more prize money? | ||
Dodgin
Canada39254 Posts
| ||
js_the_greatest
Canada7 Posts
| ||
Lysanias
Netherlands8351 Posts
And i supose it shows that even for 20 dollars people are willing to put in money in E-sports and making it grow. Best of luck with the other PPV tournaments. | ||
Seraphone
United Kingdom1219 Posts
On March 03 2012 09:09 HappyChris wrote: What the feck are you talking about they sayd it was succesfull so they are making money. This got nothing todo with PPV the fact is if the scene and esport got a future the players needs a living. And yea while a free trip to NY might sounds good for some people im sure alot of players would like to get payed for there work. MLG told us support them to save esport ok I did and I payed 20 dollars and ill do it again next event. But things got to be fair the players needs a slice of the money cake and this pathetic little price pool where 90% of the players dont even get payed isnt good enough.. Tell me why a company should make so much more money over players that do all the entertainment that we love to see?? Basically every player asked about this said they much, much preferred the format of paying all expenses with a smaller prize pool. The players themselves completely disagree with you. | ||
Seraphone
United Kingdom1219 Posts
On March 03 2012 10:06 Champloo wrote: You are... what!? gj on scheduling btw, again not the best euro players at your event. It was actually Dreamhack's fault, not MLG's. | ||
krisss
Luxembourg305 Posts
On March 03 2012 11:27 TheSir wrote: First, all you get is paid trips? You get a free chance to win 10k in 3 days and everything is enraged for you, thats a freaking good deal. But i get it, no you cant buy stuff when your get your trips paid but you have to make serious cash if you want to cover those kinds of trips on your own. What if you loose your first 2 matches? You think you can make a profit then as a player or team? Players would be even worse off when for example MLG would give them for example $2k for showing up instead of covering the expenses, cause then players would need to pay taxes over that. So no bad idea and it wont help them. Or do expect that MLG covers the expenses and give the players a nice entry fee? Your talking about a economic system... what has a economic system to do with this? Absolutely nothing but ok, if the tournament wasn't profitable for the players they wont come. For example Grubby already said that he probably wouldn't come if MLG didn't cover the expenses. In sports in general athlete's dont get their expenses paid, that on it's own is freaking luxury that 90% of the athlete's and teams in any sport would kill for. BTW how do you know how big the percentage is that players received from the referral system? Even if it is 1 dollar thats not bad, thats 5% guaranteed without playing. And do you know how big the profit was in total? I bet you the profit wasn't even that big. On what source do you even build your opinion on that players should demand more prize money? You forget that those "big events" are rare. They players dont have a "chance" to win 10k everyday. If you look at the calendar and watch for the events with a prizepool of 10k for the winner, you wont find much. And if you theoretically spread the money of the prizepool to all the participating players to all the players that participated: that 26k for 32 players. Thats not even 1k average for each player. If you think that most of those players dont have the chance of winning such an event every week, they would earn probably more by just asking McDonalds for a job. Yes, they knew it before they became progamers, but when now things change, and that much money is put into the system by the consumers, i want the players to get their fair share of the money. Because its only for them i pay. Sry im not native english speaker, maybe its better to compare this system to an organizational system, where the players are the most important people in the firm. When your one of those VIPs, and you see how suddenly so much more money is put into the organisation (you know its because of you), you have a right the demand a share of that money. And please stop witht hat referral system. Still, the players are not salesmen! They get paid for giving good games, not selling stuff! | ||
Archvil3
Denmark989 Posts
Lack of communication and late/bad planning is an industrywide problem, not an MLG problem. | ||
Vul
United States685 Posts
I pay for the GSL so I would definitely pay for solid content at the right price, here's hoping they're reducing that $20 price by at least 50%. $10 is probably the most I'd pay to watch just one tournament which takes place over the course of one weekend. If not, best of luck all the same. | ||
RyF
Austria508 Posts
2 arenas per year would be more than enough. if evry single tournament would only do it for PPV, esports would be dead within a year. i don't like... | ||
KAmaKAsa
Finland210 Posts
| ||
KAmaKAsa
Finland210 Posts
| ||
aebriol
Norway2066 Posts
On March 03 2012 09:09 HappyChris wrote: What the feck are you talking about they sayd it was succesfull so they are making money. "Success" is such an undefined term. They call it a success because they are not idiots. If they made a lot of money, or lost money, doesn't matter - they would still call it a success, because they are the only ones that knows the facts, and they aren't morons. It would be moronic to call it a failure, and then try to arrange another one. I have no idea whether or not they made money off it, but them calling it a success, doesn't matter at all as 'proof' for this either way. | ||
TheSilverfox
Sweden1928 Posts
On March 03 2012 16:25 Seraphone wrote: It was actually Dreamhack's fault, not MLG's. Both of them launched their dates on the same day, and both MLG & DH have publically said that they didn't know the other ones dates. So before people say stuff like "It's MLG's fault" or "Dude, DreamHack is wrong here" you have to remember - both have responsibility because they did not communicate with each other. Edit: And no, looking at an event calender or assuming stuff is not communicating with each other in my world. | ||
Frankon
3054 Posts
- If this event will be PPV also (since first one according to Sundance was a success) - Will the price be the same? - Will they fix Twitch in time? Those are rather important question when you take into account ROI of team sponsors. I know that the MLG pays player costs for the arena and thats lowers the costs for the teams. But PPV also lowers the viewer ship for the team sponsors - so they can decide to cut some contracts when it will come to renegotiation of them. | ||
ale_jrb
United Kingdom72 Posts
On March 03 2012 19:49 aebriol wrote: "Success" is such an undefined term. They call it a success because they are not idiots. If they made a lot of money, or lost money, doesn't matter - they would still call it a success, because they are the only ones that knows the facts, and they aren't morons. It would be moronic to call it a failure, and then try to arrange another one. I have no idea whether or not they made money off it, but them calling it a success, doesn't matter at all as 'proof' for this either way. But running two more suggests that they made something. If they'd lost loads of money, they just wouldn't - they'd have quietly never announced another one. | ||
amiGo_O
Czech Republic959 Posts
On March 03 2012 10:06 Champloo wrote: You are... what!? gj on scheduling btw, again not the best euro players at your event. i agree that scheduling is really terrible(?) for DH and MLG, but both events will suffer ... and I dont really get what do you mean by "again", the best players were at MLG, players who didnt manage to qualify and who wanted to avoid best Koreans played at Assembly | ||
TheSir
1830 Posts
On March 03 2012 17:09 krisss wrote: Yes, they knew it before they became progamers, but when now things change, and that much money is put into the system by the consumers, i want the players to get their fair share of the money. Because its only for them i pay. Dont get me wrong i agree players should get a fair share but no one here knows how big the profit for MLG was and no one knows what they are going to do with it so unless you have data on that your argument is pretty weak. On March 03 2012 17:09 krisss wrote: And please stop witht hat referral system. Still, the players are not salesmen! They get paid for giving good games, not selling stuff! In matter of facts, athlete's are some sort of salesmen, they are selling themselves. Look between the difference how Grubby sells himself against other players (just look at the difference in interviews), look how much he makes with his stream (11k followers, 3/4k viewers when he streams). Oh and good luck getting 600 dollars in a month by donations (which he pulls of) when working in McDonalds, so yes they are salesmen, like it or not. | ||
archonOOid
1983 Posts
![]() | ||
Hall0wed
United States8486 Posts
Will be great regardless but I really want to see this place they have planned. | ||
Synche
United States1345 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. For most of us it's great. Something else to watch instead of F5ing or lie cheat steal. | ||
Champloo
Germany1850 Posts
On March 03 2012 21:28 amiGo_O wrote: i agree that scheduling is really terrible(?) for DH and MLG, but both events will suffer ... and I dont really get what do you mean by "again", the best players were at MLG, players who didnt manage to qualify and who wanted to avoid best Koreans played at Assembly Look how many top european players didn't even try to qualify for MLG and went to Assembly instead. The same will happen this time again. | ||
felisconcolori
United States6168 Posts
Maybe having more PPVs also gives MLG more opportunities to find out what sucks, and fix it? (Starting with the price point.) And then find out if what they did fixed what sucked, or if it added some new suck to the product. What I saw of the Arena looked like it had some good things, and some bad things - but the production value was up a notch from the usual streaming camera of the show floor at a live MLG event. (And the live event isn't bad, if you're there - but that's because of the Dr. Pepper girls.) Speaking of price point, I did like someone else's suggestion that a yearly "ticket" might be workable if they decide to go more heavily towards the GSL-style events. Especially if it might let them finish a studio in a reasonable location (sorry, NYC is hideously expensive and I'm shocked your offices are even in that city) and maybe add a live crowd. | ||
Perseverance
Japan2800 Posts
| ||
magnaflow
Canada1521 Posts
On March 03 2012 03:28 Fubi wrote: Don't know about you guys, but as much as I want to support e-sport, I personally can't shell out 20 bucks per month just for MLG (considering GSL and stuff too) =( I'm sure the cost for these events will be lower as they are going to be held more frequently. $12.99 would seem like a great price to me. (I did pay for the first event and IMO it was worth the money) | ||
aebriol
Norway2066 Posts
For me at least, when I am primarily concerned with watching good players. By all means, if MLG is worth it, pay up. It helps MLG, and will evolve their product. I am not interested enough in an MLG weekend to pay that much for what I consider an inferior product, but over time - maybe it won't be, maybe it'll get better. Up to MLG to do whatever they need to get the best product out there. If PPV monthly tournaments is it, then by all means, go for it. But for me - it's not worth it. Up to everyone to make up their own mind about that. | ||
HappyChris
1534 Posts
On March 03 2012 22:24 TheSir wrote: Dont get me wrong i agree players should get a fair share but no one here knows how big the profit for MLG was and no one knows what they are going to do with it so unless you have data on that your argument is pretty weak. In matter of facts, athlete's are some sort of salesmen, they are selling themselves. Look between the difference how Grubby sells himself against other players (just look at the difference in interviews), look how much he makes with his stream (11k followers, 3/4k viewers when he streams). Oh and good luck getting 600 dollars in a month by donations (which he pulls of) when working in McDonalds, so yes they are salesmen, like it or not. It doesnt matter how big the profit is for MLG. The fact of the matter is MLG is doing 3 more and sayd the last one was succesfull and at the same time 99% of the players that attended MLG winter arena didnt make 1 cent.. How is that even fair?? Work without getting payed and at the same time there employees are making money? This sound allmost like slavery or something we did to our workers in the 1920 where we didnt had unions. I really hope MLG will be succesfull how cool woulnt it to have an PPV event every month aslong the players get payed or maybe do like boxing a % of the PPV sales? Atm it simply not fair that 99% of the players made nothing | ||
HeeroFX
United States2704 Posts
| ||
zhenherald
Canada37 Posts
| ||
crms
United States11933 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:24 Bumblebee wrote: Unfortunate that DreamHack and the first Spring Arena will be on the same dates. i some how doubt it's an 'unfortunate coincidence' anymore. | ||
Deshkar
Singapore1244 Posts
The GSL is by far more worth spending money on, almost daily content and high level content at that. Didn't pay the first Winter Arena, wouldn't do for the others. | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
| ||
Dranak
United States464 Posts
On March 04 2012 00:32 HappyChris wrote: It doesnt matter how big the profit is for MLG. The fact of the matter is MLG is doing 3 more and sayd the last one was succesfull and at the same time 99% of the players that attended MLG winter arena didnt make 1 cent.. How is that even fair?? Work without getting payed and at the same time there employees are making money? This sound allmost like slavery or something we did to our workers in the 1920 where we didnt had unions. I really hope MLG will be succesfull how cool woulnt it to have an PPV event every month aslong the players get payed or maybe do like boxing a % of the PPV sales? Atm it simply not fair that 99% of the players made nothing Might want to actually look at what happened. 25% of the players from the Winter Arena made at least $900. 16 (50%) of them get free travel/seeding to the Winter Championship where simply making it to the group stage will no doubt give them a nearly guaranteed chance of winning at least $1000. As for the rest, I believe MLG reported that they operated at a net loss last year. As in they lost money and the profit you rage about them having doesn't exist. | ||
Smackzilla
United States539 Posts
On March 04 2012 00:32 HappyChris wrote: It doesnt matter how big the profit is for MLG. The fact of the matter is MLG is doing 3 more and sayd the last one was succesfull and at the same time 99% of the players that attended MLG winter arena didnt make 1 cent.. How is that even fair?? Work without getting payed and at the same time there employees are making money? This sound allmost like slavery or something we did to our workers in the 1920 where we didnt had unions. I really hope MLG will be succesfull how cool woulnt it to have an PPV event every month aslong the players get payed or maybe do like boxing a % of the PPV sales? Atm it simply not fair that 99% of the players made nothing So what other SC2 tournaments are profit sharing with players? None that I know of. Sure, there's a precedence in other sports for profit sharing, but there's also sports where stable consistent financial support comes from the teams and their sponsors. In SC2, the financial support (if much of any) comes from the teams. The bottom line is that no other SC2 tournament is helping out teams financially like MLG is doing right now. And that's good for the players too, and not just the players who place, but ALL the players on the teams that attended. Money is tight in SC2, but MLG is bring money into the sport and passing some of that onto the teams. That all said, I think it would be great if there was PPV percentages and bonuses for players like they have in UFC. Maybe it will happen some day. However, this is the first time SC2 ever did this. The winter arena was arena #1. UFC just had #144! Rome wasn't built in a day. At least MLG has the balls to try to create something financially sustainable for SC2. | ||
HappyChris
1534 Posts
On March 04 2012 01:31 Dranak wrote: Might want to actually look at what happened. 25% of the players from the Winter Arena made at least $900. 16 (50%) of them get free travel/seeding to the Winter Championship where simply making it to the group stage will no doubt give them a nearly guaranteed chance of winning at least $1000. As for the rest, I believe MLG reported that they operated at a net loss last year. As in they lost money and the profit you rage about them having doesn't exist. Im not talking about MLG and there hole operation im talking about the first ever PPV event called winter Arena. I payed 20 dollars to support that and ill happy do it again and it would be great if it would happend every month becuase then we got a league where players can be supported.. The thing is they need to be supported. Payed for there work. free travel/seeding ? Its a PR stunt to look good come on. The players cant pay the rent for that can they? still as you say 25% made something but what about the rest? Becuase of PPV we now got something unique that can support the scene in itself without sponsors so the quistion are. Do we want all the money to goto MLG only and there top exec ? Or do we want all players to make something? I would love to see the players at the winter arena to respond especially those who didnt make anything. But I do understand if they cant but maybe a player like Cloud could give us his input | ||
HappyChris
1534 Posts
On March 04 2012 01:42 Smackzilla wrote: So what other SC2 tournaments are profit sharing with players? None that I know of. Sure, there's a precedence in other sports for profit sharing, but there's also sports where stable consistent financial support comes from the teams and their sponsors. In SC2, the financial support (if much of any) comes from the teams. The bottom line is that no other SC2 tournament is helping out teams financially like MLG is doing right now. And that's good for the players too, and not just the players who place, but ALL the players on the teams that attended. Money is tight in SC2, but MLG is bring money into the sport and passing some of that onto the teams. That all said, I think it would be great if there was PPV percentages and bonuses for players like they have in UFC. Maybe it will happen some day. However, this is the first time SC2 ever did this. The winter arena was arena #1. UFC just had #144! Rome wasn't built in a day. At least MLG has the balls to try to create something financially sustainable for SC2. UFC 1 still payed all there fighters tbh | ||
turdburgler
England6749 Posts
On March 03 2012 21:16 ale_jrb wrote: But running two more suggests that they made something. If they'd lost loads of money, they just wouldn't - they'd have quietly never announced another one. they ran the pro circuit for 10 years without making a profit and told us sc2 numbers were a huge success ;p then 3 months later it turns out we have to pay from now on. you cant take anything mlg say as fact, just react to what they do instead of their words. | ||
Dranak
United States464 Posts
On March 04 2012 01:56 HappyChris wrote: Im not talking about MLG and there hole operation im talking about the first ever PPV event called winter Arena. I payed 20 dollars to support that and ill happy do it again and it would be great if it would happend every month becuase then we got a league where players can be supported.. The thing is they need to be supported. Payed for there work. free travel/seeding ? Its a PR stunt to look good come on. The players cant pay the rent for that can they? still as you say 25% made something but what about the rest? Becuase of PPV we now got something unique that can support the scene in itself without sponsors so the quistion are. Do we want all the money to goto MLG only and there top exec ? Or do we want all players to make something? I would love to see the players at the winter arena to respond especially those who didnt make anything. But I do understand if they cant but maybe a player like Cloud could give us his input Paying for the travel wasn't a PR stunt, it was a move designed to remove a barrier to entry for players, thereby allowing them to bring in more of the best players in the world. (Which yes, in turn would bring in more PPV subscriptions). It also works out for the players by giving them better access to another event where they can get paid. There's also been references in this very thread (I don't have original sources) claiming that players preferred less prize money and paid travel to slightly larger prizes and no paid travel, which suggests players are okay with that aspect of the current system. Again, MLG calling the event a "success" still doesn't prove whether or not they turned a profit on it. There's no proof yet that it was a profitable event and that PPV is capable of being truly self-supporting. All we know for certain is that whatever result it did have was encouraging enough to MLG that they're adding an additional event in spring, which does suggest they expect PPV to be profitable (or at least sustainable). When MLG starts turning large profits, I'll worry about if a large enough portion is going to the players. | ||
Spooony
United Kingdom108 Posts
| ||
Madder
Australia427 Posts
On March 04 2012 01:56 HappyChris wrote: Im not talking about MLG and there hole operation im talking about the first ever PPV event called winter Arena. I payed 20 dollars to support that and ill happy do it again and it would be great if it would happend every month becuase then we got a league where players can be supported.. The thing is they need to be supported. Payed for there work. free travel/seeding ? Its a PR stunt to look good come on. The players cant pay the rent for that can they? still as you say 25% made something but what about the rest? Becuase of PPV we now got something unique that can support the scene in itself without sponsors so the quistion are. Do we want all the money to goto MLG only and there top exec ? Or do we want all players to make something? I would love to see the players at the winter arena to respond especially those who didnt make anything. But I do understand if they cant but maybe a player like Cloud could give us his input You're so ignorant and unappreciative, it's ridiculous. You really need to read what these guys in this thread are saying to you, read it, understand it, shut up. | ||
Madder
Australia427 Posts
On March 04 2012 02:02 turdburgler wrote: they ran the pro circuit for 10 years without making a profit and told us sc2 numbers were a huge success ;p then 3 months later it turns out we have to pay from now on. you cant take anything mlg say as fact, just react to what they do instead of their words. You're retarded. MLG still plans to do the regular free events for you freeloaders. Just because MLG needs to make a profit and to try break even by supporting the players that play doesn't mean that they're lying. | ||
GT500
United States5 Posts
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
| ||
eloz
1 Post
User was temp banned for this post. | ||
Darksteel
Finland319 Posts
On March 04 2012 19:54 JustPassingBy wrote: I hope they will offer discounted passes for only the final day, because - assuming the schedule is similar to the Winter Arena - living in europe makes it very difficult to watch the first two days (they started around 1am where I live). Yea this is important for me too. I don't want to pay for a competition that happens from 23:00 to 05:00 or so. The final day in Winter Arena was nice because it ended at around 02:00, making it possible to view the finals and still get some sleep before work. I feel starting the competitions a bit earlier every day, like 9 AM local, would gather a lot more European audience. Its not like anyones play should suffer if they have to play at 9 AM. On top of that it would be theoretically better time to play for players coming from Korea too in regard of jet lag | ||
Bastosai
France23 Posts
But is everybody blind in this topic? MLG running its classic Championship, free viewer with HD pass, on separate dates vs others big tournaments. Then propose a PPV exclusive tournament exactly on same WE as Major European championship? Seems to me like a gentle move to kill softly competition by taking away some big names away from DH/Assembly. I hope to be wrong, but third date of arena should prove or not my point. My two cents. | ||
Nyarly
France1030 Posts
However, i'm giving a lot of money to every tournament that makes free streams. How ? By watching their ads and keeping the stream opened during the full time of the event. I don't see why i should pay in cash and then pay again by watching ads. And I couldn't care less if players make 150k$ per tournament. I don't want pro players to be superstars winning a lot of money, but i want them to be able to earn enough money for a good life. 3k is two times the avarage salary in france. So instead of upping the pool prizes everywhere and making us pay for that, i would rather see a 3k prized pool tournament founded by ads, sponsors and/or donations where the benefits is shared for every participant (including staff). Meaning that you don't need to win atleast one tournament in the month to pay your rent but participating in few of them would be enough and winning one would be a real bonus. My 2cents. | ||
iSunrise
3302 Posts
On March 03 2012 04:44 MLG_Adam wrote: Just finding out about this DH situation. Is this a live event of considerable scope? Everything DH is worth considering, don´t you think? It´s the biggest LAN of the world. | ||
JustPassingBy
10776 Posts
On March 04 2012 20:43 Bastosai wrote: Oddly enough, people did found out that Spring Arena was on the same day as DH, just announced at the same time. But is everybody blind in this topic? MLG running its classic Championship, free viewer with HD pass, on separate dates vs others big tournaments. Then propose a PPV exclusive tournament exactly on same WE as Major European championship? Seems to me like a gentle move to kill softly competition by taking away some big names away from DH/Assembly. I hope to be wrong, but third date of arena should prove or not my point. My two cents. Well, as for assembly, you were very able to watch both events, as they did not overlap time-wise (only date-wise). | ||
Seraphone
United Kingdom1219 Posts
On March 04 2012 20:57 iSunrise wrote: Everything DH is worth considering, don´t you think? It´s the biggest LAN of the world. Kind of irrelevant. It's the third biggest Starcraft 2 tournament after GSL (1st) and MLG (2nd) and this year maybe IPL will surpass Dreamhack anyway. The fact that there's a 'LAN' (which is basically a bunch of kids on the same connection) in Sweden has very little to do with a Starcraft 2 tournament in New York. Especially when it's not actually a Dreamhack LAN, it's a smaller ESports invitational and frankly MLG has proven with IEM and Assembly that when the best players have a choice MLG and anything else not called GSL they will pick MLG. As for viewers well the biggest draw is Idra, Huk, Koreans in that order and they will all favour playing MLG especially as MLG is paying for free flights, food and accommodation. The losers here are the players and Dreamhack, not MLG. | ||
nufcrulz
Singapore934 Posts
On March 04 2012 02:02 turdburgler wrote: they ran the pro circuit for 10 years without making a profit and told us sc2 numbers were a huge success ;p then 3 months later it turns out we have to pay from now on. you cant take anything mlg say as fact, just react to what they do instead of their words. Well I don't think they've been making money. Really how can they? All they were getting the past year was sponsorship money + spectator and player passes which i doubt covered their expenses alone. Although I think they are better in terms of financial stability compared to IPL (i think someone mentioned they lost over a million dollars last year?), I think they're trying to do things too big, too fast. It wouldn't surprise me at all if I found out they've eaten through most of their start-up capital without having made a profit in any financial year. But I'm just speculating of course, since they're the only ones who know the exact numbers, but I wouldn't be surprised... So now that they realized the other business model wasn't sustainable, they're trying to add PPV. In my opinion I don't feel this community needs PPV. I'd rather have smaller events, with a smaller budget, and making it free to us consumers. I for one am not paying. If I have to pay for SC2, I'd rather use the money to pay for my NBA league pass, something which I've been deferring from coughing up the money for some time already. | ||
Titorelli
2492 Posts
| ||
iSunrise
3302 Posts
On March 04 2012 21:14 Seraphone wrote: Kind of irrelevant. It's the third biggest Starcraft 2 tournament after GSL (1st) and MLG (2nd) and this year maybe IPL will surpass Dreamhack anyway. The fact that there's a 'LAN' (which is basically a bunch of kids on the same connection) in Sweden has very little to do with a Starcraft 2 tournament in New York. Especially when it's not actually a Dreamhack LAN, it's a smaller ESports invitational and frankly MLG has proven with IEM and Assembly that when the best players have a choice MLG and anything else not called GSL they will pick MLG. As for viewers well the biggest draw is Idra, Huk, Koreans in that order and they will all favour playing MLG especially as MLG is paying for free flights, food and accommodation. The losers here are the players and Dreamhack, not MLG. After reading your post serveral times I have come to the impression that you don´t like (especially) Dreamhack very much. Therefore I have written my sentences a bit more differently than I would have without knowing that. Otherwise we probably would have ran into each other, because you make it sound that people who enjoy LANs are a bunch of kids, which you should have left out of your arguments, which I understand pretty well, without that flame of yours. Solely from a viewer´s perspective, Dreamhack´s past events were pretty fucking great. Past invitationals or qualifiers for DH, with 2GD and TLO casting were also great fun. I also enjoyed this Assembly far more than the MLG winter arena and also IEM was very good. Both of these were free and both treat their players with respect. Assembly also had >20.000 viewers. Some people also have a life apart from this and the late hours (even on weekends) for the MLG events and also their length make it difficult to watch everything. It is far more relaxing if you have an event like Assembly or Dreamhack within the day to follow. There definately is a market for people who constantly shell out money for their passion, which is Starcraft 2 and that is OK for me. It just isn´t for me at that price point. And I really enjoy their big events like Columbus, which I am looking forward to. I always try to make my time schedule work with these, because they are great. A lower price would probably make me tune in again, but I won´t pay another 20$ for an Arena event. | ||
BanditX
United States78 Posts
On March 03 2012 03:18 Rabbet wrote: Will you be offering a free high quality stream like the first Winter Arena? User was banned for this post. Lol so true. I disagree with the frequency with this is occuring. And of course they are going to PPV. We've failed as a community. This is why no one should have bought the first winter arena. If you give a Corporation like MLG money, they will take it every opportunity they get, then NASL and IPL and Every other --L will catch on and sc2 will be dead. Good job guys. EDIT- Its also a bit dubious that they are trying to schedule it on the same day as dreamhack. Sounds like a powerplay by MLGsundance to get viewership. They can't possible be broke if they can buy players from other events. I don't like this at all. And its obviously intentional. The first one on the same day as ASUS Rog was aslo intentional. These business tactics by MLG are not good for the growth of Esports. Just lining MLG pockets. God I hate MLG more and more everyday. EDIT2 - Its also terrible for the players to be flying around the world every month. The games evolves when pros can sit and focus on creating new strategies. Not when MLG is begging them to fly around the world twice a month so MLG can make a quick buck. Because they obviously made profit off of Winter Arena, if they can do it again, every month. Fuck MLG. Go back to shit games like Halo, we don't need you. User was warned for this post | ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
| ||
Corrosive
Canada3741 Posts
On March 05 2012 05:57 BanditX wrote: Lol so true. I disagree with the frequency with this is occuring. And of course they are going to PPV. We've failed as a community. This is why no one should have bought the first winter arena. If you give a Corporation like MLG money, they will take it every opportunity they get, then NASL and IPL and Every other --L will catch on and sc2 will be dead. Good job guys. EDIT- Its also a bit dubious that they are trying to schedule it on the same day as dreamhack. Sounds like a powerplay by MLGsundance to get viewership. They can't possible be broke if they can buy players from other events. I don't like this at all. And its obviously intentional. The first one on the same day as ASUS Rog was aslo intentional. These business tactics by MLG are not good for the growth of Esports. Just lining MLG pockets. God I hate MLG more and more everyday. EDIT2 - Its also terrible for the players to be flying around the world every month. The games evolves when pros can sit and focus on creating new strategies. Not when MLG is begging them to fly around the world twice a month so MLG can make a quick buck. Because they obviously made profit off of Winter Arena, if they can do it again, every month. Fuck MLG. Go back to shit games like Halo, we don't need you. Seems like you just hate MLG for no real reason. MLG is helping SC2 grow, and you hate that they want money? You realize if none of these organizations had a way to make money sc2 (as a esport) would ACTUALLY be dead right? | ||
![]()
Adebisi
Canada1637 Posts
On March 05 2012 05:57 BanditX wrote: Lol so true. I disagree with the frequency with this is occuring. And of course they are going to PPV. We've failed as a community. This is why no one should have bought the first winter arena. If you give a Corporation like MLG money, they will take it every opportunity they get, then NASL and IPL and Every other --L will catch on and sc2 will be dead. Good job guys. EDIT- Its also a bit dubious that they are trying to schedule it on the same day as dreamhack. Sounds like a powerplay by MLGsundance to get viewership. They can't possible be broke if they can buy players from other events. I don't like this at all. And its obviously intentional. The first one on the same day as ASUS Rog was aslo intentional. These business tactics by MLG are not good for the growth of Esports. Just lining MLG pockets. God I hate MLG more and more everyday. EDIT2 - Its also terrible for the players to be flying around the world every month. The games evolves when pros can sit and focus on creating new strategies. Not when MLG is begging them to fly around the world twice a month so MLG can make a quick buck. Because they obviously made profit off of Winter Arena, if they can do it again, every month. Fuck MLG. Go back to shit games like Halo, we don't need you. Take off the tin foil hat man. | ||
BanditX
United States78 Posts
On March 05 2012 06:28 jmbthirteen wrote: Damn dude, did Sundance bang your mom or something? So much hate against an organization going all in with sc2. On March 05 2012 06:32 Corrosive wrote: Seems like you just hate MLG for no real reason. MLG is helping SC2 grow, and you hate that they want money? You realize if none of these organizations had a way to make money sc2 (as a esport) would ACTUALLY be dead right? Its that MLG is trying to throw their weight and money at the SC2 audience under the guise of growing esports. MLG's goals have nothing to do with esports. Thats like saying WalMart gives money to stop child labor in foreign textile factories. They say it, but it just isnt true. MLG trying to take over and dominant the SC2 scene is unhealthy for the viewership, the players, and other events. In 2011 MLG's circuit event was exciting. In 2012 they are just trying to cash in. In poor taste at that. Look at it this way, the most successful, and proven sustainable model to esports has been GomTVs. (Even in broodwar.) Almost like a television series in their approach. It builds drama, its reliable, its frequent enough at a good price. Hell, IPL's current model is better. 5$ HD streams and a ticket to a final live event. MLGSundance is taking a UFC PPV approach, where you pay 30$USD to watch 2 days worth of content. Which is a ripoff quite honestly. MLG's dealings lately have seemed underhanded. Annouce Winter Arena 2 months in advance, then announce its 20$ fee 10 days before the event, then fuck over all your subscribers (gold members). Its all a giant power play buy MLG. If you don't see it as well, then you're ignorant about how business works. MLG has the money to draw the star players to their events and weaken other events. HSC3 was exciting because HuK, MC, Ret, Naniwa, everyone went there. Also, its bad for the development of the game and extremely taxing on players to be traveling to MLG events all the time. But why turn it down if they can pay the players $$$$$$ to show up? What happens when MLG schedules X Arena on the same day as HSC4? or even the week after? Think people. | ||
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
On March 05 2012 06:43 BanditX wrote: Its that MLG is trying to throw their weight and money at the SC2 audience under the guise of growing esports. MLG's goals have nothing to do with esports. Thats like saying WalMart gives money to stop child labor in foreign textile factories. They say it, but it just isnt true. MLG trying to take over and dominant the SC2 scene is unhealthy for the viewership, the players, and other events. In 2011 MLG's circuit event was exciting. In 2012 they are just trying to cash in. In poor taste at that. Look at it this way, the most successful, and proven sustainable model to esports has been GomTVs. (Even in broodwar.) Almost like a television series in their approach. It builds drama, its reliable, its frequent enough at a good price. Hell, IPL's current model is better. 5$ HD streams and a ticket to a final live event. MLGSundance is taking a UFC PPV approach, where you pay 30$USD to watch 2 days worth of content. Which is a ripoff quite honestly. MLG's dealings lately have seemed underhanded. Annouce Winter Arena 2 months in advance, then announce its 20$ fee 10 days before the event, then fuck over all your subscribers (gold members). Its all a giant power play buy MLG. If you don't see it as well, then you're ignorant about how business works. MLG has the money to draw the star players to their events and weaken other events. HSC3 was exciting because HuK, MC, Ret, Naniwa, everyone went there. Also, its bad for the development of the game and extremely taxing on players to be traveling to MLG events all the time. But why turn it down if they can pay the players $$$$$$ to show up? What happens when MLG schedules X Arena on the same day as HSC4? or even the week after? Think people. There are so many things wrong with your post its not even funny. Yes, MLG 2011 was very exciting. Yet MLG was still in the red, like every other tournament. And guess what, we still get those huge events in 2012! For free! The Arenas are additional tournaments. MLG wants to run more than the 4 big circuit events a year. So in come the Arenas. But in order to run the Arenas they needed to be PPV to actually pull them off. Its not trying to cash in, its trying to create a sustainable business. The most successful and proven sustainable model you talk about, it isn't that successful or sustainable. Gom is probably the only tournament that breaks even and thats because they can get away with having a studio where the best players in the world go to on their own because they live in Korea. No other organization can get away with that. Gom saves so much money by not having to rent out places to hold events. Not sure why you bring up broodwar, which runs on TV stations in Korea. It has nothing to do with the free stream + pay for HD stream. Not to mention, the only way we get to watch BW is through restreams of it. The PPV for the arena was $20 for 3 days of content. And to many people, it was more than worth it. Worth is a personal opinion. And the price probably isn't staying at $20. How is this MLG's fault with the event date? Why didn't DH contact MLG? The DH Open is a brand new event that no one outside of DH knew about. There is blame on both sides. Taxing on the players? MLG will be holding 11 events this year (7 arenas, 2 per season after winter, 4 championship events). 11 events over months is taxing? Are you really complaining about MLG holding more events, 7 which they pay the way for the players, where they are giving away about half a million dollars and provide a huge ROI for teams? Just be honest, you hate MLG for no good reason. | ||
GhostBusters
United States198 Posts
| ||
![]()
Akio00
United States98 Posts
1. So the date overlaps with Dreamhack. It's not the main DH event. Also, MLG announced their date first. Why is nobody upset with DH for not checking with MLG? Also, as many others have stated, they are in different time zones with little to no overlap. 2. MLG charges for this content. GSL does the same. Yes it is more expensive, but nobody is forcing you to buy it. It's like real sports. The Clipper's were the most overpriced ticket in sports for years, yet nobody complained about a horrible product. It's simple, if you don't want to spend for it, then don't. 3. No free stream. Why should they? It is their choice as an organization. They know other tournaments provide free streams, but they CHOOSE to not. Let them choose. Let your voice be heard with your wallet. 4. MLG has sold out and is hurting esports? This is retarded. MLG IS esports in the USA. IPL is growing, but it isn't on MLG's level yet. Get over yourselves. If you don't like it, don't participate. Sitting here anonymously bashing a company on the internet does not make you a better person. | ||
firemansam
Australia29 Posts
| ||
midftw
Canada170 Posts
| ||
LeLfe
France3160 Posts
| ||
Metak
296 Posts
Being mad at MLG for trying to create a profitable business model is naïve if you actually want e-sports to grow. You can be mad at the idea that the world can be considered a slave to capitalist economy, but that is an entirely different discussion. | ||
aebriol
Norway2066 Posts
On March 05 2012 20:39 Metak wrote: Being mad at MLG for trying to create a profitable business model is naïve if you actually want e-sports to grow. You can be mad at the idea that the world can be considered a slave to capitalist economy, but that is an entirely different discussion. I think it's fine to be annoyed at MLG for promoting their business model with the catch phrase 'support e-Sports' by giving them money. Plenty of ways of doing it without giving them money, and plenty of other companies that take our money without trying to make it about 'supporting e-Sports'. I think that, as a marketing ploy, it's about converting people to 'their cause' instead of giving value for money and promoting it as 'worth it'. I dislike that. Don't mean I dislike capitalism, or other companies that get paid (like GOMTV, NASL, IPL, whatever). | ||
nutzizme
United States130 Posts
and as far as the whole "supporting esports" shit goes.....me giving my money to mlg doesnt help the "esport" at all. what has mlg done for the esport with my 20 bucks? they decide they want another 20, and then another and then another. its not like mlg is bringing in big sponsors to the sc2 community or anything, all theyre doing is convincing people that their product is superior to others, and worth 20$ for a weekend. unfortunately in my eyes, it is not. /jumps off the mlg train. ps. im not a cheap fuck, ive paid for many GSL's, season 1 of nasl, and that horrorshow of a mlg in dallas. | ||
Benjamin80
581 Posts
On March 06 2012 00:08 nutzizme wrote: this is why i was skeptical about purchasing the winter arena, because now were gonna see mlg transition over to the pay only product. unfortunately for them, their product isn't enough to make me keep dishing out 20s per weekend. the production value isn't any more than i can view for less from tournaments such as dreamhack. and as far as the whole "supporting esports" shit goes.....me giving my money to mlg doesnt help the "esport" at all. what has mlg done for the esport with my 20 bucks? they decide they want another 20, and then another and then another. its not like mlg is bringing in big sponsors to the sc2 community or anything, all theyre doing is convincing people that their product is superior to others, and worth 20$ for a weekend. unfortunately in my eyes, it is not. /jumps off the mlg train. ps. im not a cheap fuck, ive paid for many GSL's, season 1 of nasl, and that horrorshow of a mlg in dallas. I dont mind the PPV I think its a fun idea and it needed to be tryed. However when that is sayd im against the so called referral program. MLG did the same thing to the halo scene and it completly destroyed the scene. Its a really good business model but a really bad growth model. The problem are if MLG gets so much power of the referral program that they can influence players and teams to participate in other tournaments. It seems MLG is playing hardball and it will only hurt the growth of the scene. | ||
Xalorian
Canada433 Posts
Whatever I guess... MLG is losing more and more of my respect each time they announce something. Soon enough, casters and players will realise how hurting their business way is for the growth of SC2. | ||
ceaRshaf
Romania4926 Posts
| ||
My.Row
Germany24 Posts
MLG Spring Arena Dates Ann… ...a Prosser! 1st thing that came to my mind. Other than that: Looking 4ward 2 it! | ||
GohgamX
Canada1096 Posts
![]() | ||
BanditX
United States78 Posts
On March 06 2012 00:19 Benjamin80 wrote: I dont mind the PPV I think its a fun idea and it needed to be tryed. However when that is sayd im against the so called referral program. MLG did the same thing to the halo scene and it completly destroyed the scene. Its a really good business model but a really bad growth model. The problem are if MLG gets so much power of the referral program that they can influence players and teams to participate in other tournaments. It seems MLG is playing hardball and it will only hurt the growth of the scene. At least 2 people are getting at what I was trying to say. but bit less aggressively than I was. Thanks guys ![]() | ||
ODKStevez
Ireland1225 Posts
| ||
Kernen
United States84 Posts
| ||
Perseverance
Japan2800 Posts
On March 06 2012 06:54 Kernen wrote: I don't mind the frequency if the quality is as good as the first winter arena. I feel like 10 dollars is the perfect amount to charge for this, as well as a free low quality stream. I don't like the idea of a free low quality stream, it's better for people to just pay the $10-$15 for the premium content and leave the free LQ stream for the live events they do around the US. | ||
pezit
Sweden302 Posts
| ||
whereismymind
United Kingdom717 Posts
![]() | ||
Deathtrooper
Canada38 Posts
| ||
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
On March 13 2012 03:05 Deathtrooper wrote: Where specifically in New York? I live in Toronto Canada, and am curious about making a cross-border trip to see my first live MLG! The arenas do not have a live audience, unless they announced that these will have a very very limited number of tickets? | ||
Pudge_172
United States1378 Posts
I'm have a Gold Membership and no I won't pay $15 with the discount. I can't sit and watch enough of the event to justify spending more than $4.99. I think MLG might have overshot the momentum they had and taking away the free LQ stream will prove to be a mistake. IEM/DH/IPL all have a free stream and there are enough good players to go around. My eyeballs will be on a free stream most of the time, but I will watch what I've already paid for with my Gold Membership and most likely will let it renew itself later this year. | ||
darkscream
Canada2310 Posts
On March 03 2012 02:49 WigglingSquid wrote: I am dubious about the frequency. One per month seems a bit excessive to me, both for viewers and players; it also kind of loses the whole "special event" feeling. With that said, best of luck. ![]() Wasn't the point of splitting apart the main events, the fact that it was too crazy to run so many tournaments in a year? the solution to that.. is running more tournaments in the year? sounds like everything we heard was bullshit, and the reason they spaced the main circuit events was so that they could compartmentalize and sell more shit to us. | ||
mki
Poland882 Posts
| ||
seiferoth10
3362 Posts
On March 13 2012 03:49 mki wrote: MLG CONSISTENTLY plans their events at the same time of other events. Just throwing this out there - interpret it how you like... Sigh, you're making Europe look bad. I don't think they appreciate it. | ||
LovE-
United States1963 Posts
On March 13 2012 03:49 mki wrote: MLG CONSISTENTLY plans their events at the same time of other events. Just throwing this out there - interpret it how you like... Sigh... MLG and DH announced the events ON THE SAME DAY. | ||
![]()
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On March 13 2012 03:49 mki wrote: MLG CONSISTENTLY plans their events at the same time of other events. Just throwing this out there - interpret it how you like... If you're talking about Dreamhack or whatever I believe it was said earlier in the thread that the dates for both tournaments were announced on the same day so there's no way mlg could have known. They aren't trying to steal views from other tournaments. It seems everyone has similar ideas for what weekends are good Edit nvm you changed ur post | ||
mki
Poland882 Posts
On March 13 2012 04:04 Shellshock1122 wrote: If you're talking about Dreamhack or whatever I believe it was said earlier in the thread that the dates for both tournaments were announced on the same day so there's no way mlg could have known. They aren't trying to steal views from other tournaments. It seems everyone has similar ideas for what weekends are good Edit nvm you changed ur post I didn't change anything, I meant what I wrote. DH now, Assembly recently and there was another event before I'm not going to search about. They could change it by communicating with event organizers. Others somehow don't run into the same issues (and if they do nowhere near as often). Besides I added - interpret it as you like... don't blame me on my opinion, I'm just putting something out there for people to consider. On a side note: are there qualifiers for the spring arena? | ||
StarVe
Germany13591 Posts
| ||
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
I would not watch MLG anyway due to the hefty price, so I wont be missing out on anything. | ||
Parcelleus
Australia1662 Posts
| ||
schaf
Germany1326 Posts
On March 06 2012 00:19 Benjamin80 wrote: I dont mind the PPV I think its a fun idea and it needed to be tryed. However when that is sayd im against the so called referral program. MLG did the same thing to the halo scene and it completly destroyed the scene. Its a really good business model but a really bad growth model. The problem are if MLG gets so much power of the referral program that they can influence players and teams to participate in other tournaments. It seems MLG is playing hardball and it will only hurt the growth of the scene. so what happened to Halo? care to elaborate? | ||
Xeris
Iran17695 Posts
| ||
| ||