EPTOn February 24 2012 21:42 SedativeDev wrote:
Dude.. Be pissed at venue. It's NOT Bnet. So dumb.
Dude.. Be pissed at venue. It's NOT Bnet. So dumb.
Local Area Network is a technology that works independently of an Internet connectino.
[Asus ROG] Day 1 Group Stage - Page 49
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Gigaudas
Sweden1213 Posts
Local Area Network is a technology that works independently of an Internet connectino. | ||
|
beamingrobot
United States685 Posts
On February 24 2012 21:43 bluQ wrote: Tho Stephano could have just busted Happies natural after he morphed some banes in his mane to kill off marine drops. The Tanks on the lowground can only siege your gas. I don't think he had a bane nest by then. Or did I miss something? | ||
|
Sea_Food
Finland1612 Posts
On February 24 2012 21:43 shizna wrote: Blizzard promise to support esports.... soooooo presumably they're going to spend billions of $$$ on upgrading the internet worldwide to make sure their battlenet doesn't come crashing down? How can you think blizzard has any intention of supporting esports? You know that they are taxing even this tourmanet huge money for playing sc2. | ||
|
Mosquitow
England510 Posts
| ||
|
HQuality
2682 Posts
| ||
|
iamPrower
United Kingdom21 Posts
| ||
|
qbs
Poland771 Posts
| ||
|
Tanukki
Finland579 Posts
| ||
|
Warpish
834 Posts
| ||
|
elKaDor
Sweden376 Posts
| ||
|
Champloo
Germany1850 Posts
On February 24 2012 21:42 SedativeDev wrote: Dude.. Be pissed at venue. It's NOT Bnet. So dumb. With LAN mode the game could've just played on, even if the venue's internet went down. | ||
|
Ko1tz
France493 Posts
Anyway, hopefully they fix whatever the problem was soon, the game was looked like if it was going to be quite nice. | ||
|
Fleener
United States25 Posts
On February 24 2012 21:45 Devolved wrote: They want control over who can run tourneys. Basically, they don't want KeSPA (or someone like them) to profit off of their IP without paying royalties. I bet Blizzard is really hurting for money too...... | ||
|
Zowon
Norway237 Posts
On February 24 2012 21:45 iamPrower wrote: Umm, stephano v mana? So they're telling us stephano won outright? No? Happy has already played vs mana. | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38257 Posts
On February 24 2012 21:46 elKaDor wrote: ehm, why does it say stephano vs mana? should be regame ye? They probably just queued up the next overlay briefly by mistake ^^ | ||
|
shizna
United Kingdom803 Posts
On February 24 2012 21:45 Devolved wrote: They want control over who can run tourneys. Basically, they don't want KeSPA (or someone like them) to profit off of their IP without paying royalties. why can't the game pause forever - until internet is back online? battlenet goes "lolz internet down, NP ill just close everything down for you!! thank me later" | ||
|
DerKiLLa
Germany47 Posts
;D | ||
Shellshock
United States97276 Posts
On February 24 2012 21:45 Mosquitow wrote: fnatic mana? surprise? | ||
|
iamPrower
United Kingdom21 Posts
I meant the fact that it was the 2nd game, so if it was stephano was v mana, it would mean a 2-0 result. | ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38257 Posts
oh, apparently Kas tied it up 1-1 now. | ||
| ||
