|
On March 19 2012 03:02 teddyoojo wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2012 03:01 Type|NarutO wrote: 30 3-3 Ghost would have won that fight without much of a problem. Too bad Terrans don't like Ghosts :/. *cant afford
You can and he certainly could. He was banking money while still playing a lot of marauders, he also had the gas. The only thing that hurts you if you have so many ghosts is if you slip in viking production or miss them hiding colossi. If they hit you with 6-9 colossi and you didn't build up vikings you die.
But yeah, a mass ghost style would never lose to a army composition that is zealot archon and a few templars.
|
On March 19 2012 02:56 Meovin- wrote: How is it possible for a protoss to lose a fight where you hit storms like that :S Sometimes I don't understand why the terrans dislike tvp late game
You were saying?
|
On March 19 2012 03:03 Dfgj wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2012 03:01 Fyzar wrote: This is what I never understand about terrans playing lategame, versus Zerg they sacrifice their SCV's, but why not versus Protoss?
Isn't that supposed to be their thang, having a way bigger army supply due to MULEs? I agree tbh, I find it far more annoying to play vs Ts that chill on 50~ scvs and match my 70 probes with mules to have more army supply. Amusingly, Demuslim's drops let Bling's bad macro create an even bigger army and win. Exactly, DeMu was down 20 army supply, had like 2 drops which is 20 more supply flying around the map, ofcourse he is going to lose the head-on fights, but he shouldn't if he doesn't have 75 scv's.
Dunno, just seems weird to me.
|
Both of them seem quite nervous but glad that Bling won that in the end. TrampolineToss fighting!
|
On March 19 2012 03:03 Sea_aeS wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2012 03:01 Type|NarutO wrote: 30 3-3 Ghost would have won that fight without much of a problem. Too bad Terrans don't like Ghosts :/. Too bad ppl troll 
Did I?-_-
|
On March 19 2012 03:02 Fyzar wrote: Reposting this, cause it died in all the protoss hate comments ;p.
This is what I never understand about terrans playing lategame, versus Zerg they sacrifice their SCV's, but why not versus Protoss?
Isn't that supposed to be their thang, having a way bigger army supply due to MULEs?
Hmmm...vs Zerg you can make the transition to mass OC because your army is cost-effective enough to survive the transition period (which is very expensive). Vs Protoss, I'm not sure how you can do the mass mule without getting walked over.
|
On March 19 2012 03:03 iAmiAnC wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2012 03:02 samw wrote: yes his tvp is sick recently 2-0 against polt Have u watched those games? It was 3 Gate expand vs 2 Rax 8 minute games Actually it was 1 gate expand and when he managed to defend the 2 rax he added gates and attacked.
|
On March 19 2012 03:02 Fyzar wrote: Reposting this, cause it died in all the protoss hate comments ;p.
This is what I never understand about terrans playing lategame, versus Zerg they sacrifice their SCV's, but why not versus Protoss?
Isn't that supposed to be their thang, having a way bigger army supply due to MULEs?
Korean Terrans are beginning to do this but afaik there haven't been many foreigner T's to sac their SCVs in this matchup, GanZi and MMA do it quite often in late-late game scenarios, but DeMu did actually lose scvs, he just remade them the entire time >.>
|
On March 19 2012 03:01 Type|NarutO wrote: 30 3-3 Ghost would have won that fight without much of a problem. Too bad Terrans don't like Ghosts :/.
Rofl. You have no idea. Good luck affording 30 3-3 Ghost AND retaining all of them throughout the game buddy, that's way too unrealistic. Retaining your extremely expensive Ghost during trades/engagements is near impossible, they may be sturdy, but for their cost, not so much.
It's highly impractical/impossible to go pure mass ghost vs Protoss because of cost, supply, and the fact that they have to have support.
Go find me a game were a terran went 30+ Ghost vs Terran and wins. Thanks.
|
On March 19 2012 03:01 Type|NarutO wrote: 30 3-3 Ghost would have won that fight without much of a problem. Too bad Terrans don't like Ghosts :/. That and you really have to kill the observers which is over your army most of the game. I really dont see why he allowed bling to keep his obs hanging over such exposed spots so long
|
I wouldve like Demuslim do multipronged drops while lightly chipping away at the Protoss army to keep it small :\
|
On March 19 2012 02:50 Flanq wrote: Does anyone else think it's really nice to see inc doing better? Sure he does cannon rush into 2 base timings, but 3 or 4 months ago he'd probably already have lost. For all the shit he gets the practise does slowly seem to be paying dividends for him.
It's pretty dissapointing that he lost to a completely no name player tbh, granted that Heavens has been playing pretty great. I expected him to win this one. That would have made it a positive showing. Now it's kind of meh..
|
United States15275 Posts
On March 19 2012 03:05 Lillpapps wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2012 03:03 iAmiAnC wrote:On March 19 2012 03:02 samw wrote: yes his tvp is sick recently 2-0 against polt Have u watched those games? It was 3 Gate expand vs 2 Rax 8 minute games Actually it was 1 gate expand and when he managed to defend the 2 rax he added gates and attacked.
Nope both games were 2 rax.
|
|
On March 19 2012 03:02 Fyzar wrote: Reposting this, cause it died in all the protoss hate comments ;p.
This is what I never understand about terrans playing lategame, versus Zerg they sacrifice their SCV's, but why not versus Protoss?
Isn't that supposed to be their thang, having a way bigger army supply due to MULEs?
Bio is really mineral heavy.
In order to ditch scv's, you need to throw down 3-4 CC's and turn them in to orbitals.
Demuslim was never floating minerals through that game... he was constantly using all his resources to rebuild his army.
|
This game wasn't close. If Bling produced while the fight was going on the game would have ended a lot faster and more decisive. We now have the illusion that Demuslim deserved to win just because Bling made one mistake. Lets be real, Demu couldn't get anywhere not even after he managed to stay alive after two big fights. This means he was far far behind.
|
Demuslim is doing his standard 2 rax scv all in that he does a lot of ladder o: it looks like a 1 rax FE
|
On March 19 2012 03:05 d00p wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2012 02:50 Flanq wrote: Does anyone else think it's really nice to see inc doing better? Sure he does cannon rush into 2 base timings, but 3 or 4 months ago he'd probably already have lost. For all the shit he gets the practise does slowly seem to be paying dividends for him. It's pretty dissapointing that he lost to a completely no name player tbh, granted that Heavens has been playing pretty great. I expected him to win this one. That would have made it a positive showing. Now it's kind of meh.. With the exception of the VERY beginning of SC2 incontrol has never been a good player (as far as progamers go).
No one should be surprised at him losing.
|
On March 19 2012 03:06 ceaRshaf wrote: This game wasn't close. If Bling produced while the fight was going on the game would have ended a lot faster and more decisive. We now have the illusion that Demuslim deserved to win just because Bling made one mistake. Lets be real, Demu couldn't get anywhere not even after he managed to stay alive after two big fights. This means he was far far behind. Also a good point, if Bling had had sufficient gates up before he lost his army, he'd have rolled over Demuslim completely.
|
Stop saying that it was a good game by both players? Nothing could be farther from the truth. Also, rotterdam, why do you keep defending that Demuslims loss is justified.
|
|
|
|