SHOUTcraft Invitational 4 - "Colin Smith" - Page 97
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Results can be found at http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/The_SHOUTcraft_Invitational/4 | ||
poorcloud
Singapore2748 Posts
| ||
Neverplay
Austria532 Posts
| ||
cyclone25
Romania3344 Posts
On January 16 2012 00:40 KalWarkov wrote: balance ftw. You said you quit watching the match after game 2, why still here? ![]() | ||
haffy
United Kingdom430 Posts
On January 16 2012 00:39 NrGmonk wrote: Voidrays are much much worse versus infestors. But much worse against corruptors, which are easier to remax on, don't relay on energy and more mobile. Also voidrays do extra damage to corruptors and broodlord. | ||
Manimal_pro
Romania991 Posts
| ||
WiljushkA
Serbia1416 Posts
On January 16 2012 00:40 KalWarkov wrote: balance ftw. dont make balance excuses for grubby being the worse player. if you ever watched stephano playing against top korean protosses with this playstyle you'd see that they dont have any trouble dealing with it. its just that grubby's lategame management/harass/army micro is not that good. | ||
Carnagath
230 Posts
| ||
hzflank
United Kingdom2991 Posts
On January 16 2012 00:39 Seraphone wrote: Sigh Grubby. If only he just went and won the game 20 minutes ago. He couldn't. He didnt have the bank/production to suicide into spincrawlers and infestors. | ||
ZenithM
France15952 Posts
Carriers are also less susceptible to fungal growth. They clump up less easily. Grubby should have continued to sacrifice little pieces of his stalker force and cheese out a critical amount of carriers, while praying that Stephano doesn't notice. | ||
VENDIZ
1575 Posts
| ||
Noocta
France12578 Posts
Thorzain.. meh i don't know.. Thorzain admit himself he's not as good as Stephano. | ||
JohnMatrix
France1357 Posts
| ||
YipCraft
United States216 Posts
| ||
Cereb
Denmark3388 Posts
![]() I would have fallen to surprise carriers, absolutely ! :p | ||
KalWarkov
Germany4126 Posts
On January 16 2012 00:41 TheDwf wrote: Infestors can deal with Voidrays (range 6), but not so much with Carriers (range 8, more hit points). You need Templar support, though, and for some reason Grubby had not this in last fights. air upgrades and carriers cost 0 gas. how stupid is that that protoss needs 2 more bases now to even fight lategame Zerg, when Zerg is the race that can expand all over the map the easiest? | ||
TheDwf
France19747 Posts
On January 16 2012 00:41 HaXXspetten wrote: ...hopefully all those actually said Carriers were good against this will shut up now... It's because you're supposed to have Templar support with them. And not throw away your Mothership against nothing but Infested Terrans... | ||
spacer
Netherlands2786 Posts
| ||
Olinimm
1471 Posts
On January 16 2012 00:41 JohnMatrix wrote: mass infestors + spines + afraid to make a mistake and lose Dude, he had a 70 supply lead with blink and colossi. :/ There was no way he would've lost if he attacked the third. | ||
phyren
United States1067 Posts
| ||
Mouzone
3937 Posts
| ||
| ||