|
On December 15 2011 19:45 jojo311 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 19:43 CrappyHippo wrote: I believe the reason MC used carriers in game 4 was show to everybody that CARRIERS ARE USELESS. agreed. I see why carriers are to be removed in HOTS. they just suck.
Or you could just fix stuff that is broken... like, not making 1 enemy unit counter your entire air force and best anti ground unit would be a good start...
|
Seeker
Where dat snitch at?37071 Posts
On December 15 2011 19:46 jojo311 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 19:45 TooN wrote:On December 15 2011 19:44 KiNGxXx wrote:MVP: "Oh, that's the guy who will finished 2nd?" ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/MKeB3.jpg) so awesome !! haha lol MVP " ok, a zerg. ezpz to me "
That is..... IF MVP can beat MMA that is
|
On December 15 2011 19:46 Shellshock1122 wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 19:46 Clefairy wrote:On December 15 2011 19:44 sickra wrote: MC didn't take game 4 srsly. Carriers? Really? It worked for Genius! and Alicia
and HongUn!
|
On December 15 2011 19:40 Maitolasi wrote: I think the stargate definitely lost MC the game. He couldn't do any damage with it and couldn't even try to take a 3rd or do a strong timing push because of all those wasted resources on the phoenix. To re-iterate what I said earlier, MC should go for Archons and Storm instead of Stargate tech. When he's behind with that composition he is always able to trade so cost efficiently. Imagine if he had that composition and wasn't behind.
|
On December 15 2011 19:47 Seeker wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 19:46 jojo311 wrote:On December 15 2011 19:45 TooN wrote:On December 15 2011 19:44 KiNGxXx wrote:MVP: "Oh, that's the guy who will finished 2nd?" ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/MKeB3.jpg) so awesome !! haha lol MVP " ok, a zerg. ezpz to me " That is..... IF MVP can beat MMA that is 
Depends how much his wrists are hurting
|
the fck was MC doing?!? :-/ was he just showing off or did he really think that would work?
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On December 15 2011 19:46 Engore wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 19:46 Shellshock1122 wrote:On December 15 2011 19:46 Clefairy wrote:On December 15 2011 19:44 sickra wrote: MC didn't take game 4 srsly. Carriers? Really? It worked for Genius! and Alicia and HongUn
And Brown, even though the carriers never made it to the fight...bah to gg timings
|
Let's go over the maps: Calm Before the Storm ZvP: 3-7(30%) Crossfire SE 1.1 ZvP: 5-4 (55.6%) Dual Sight 1.1 ZvP: 6-9 (40%) Shakuras Plateau 2.0 ZvP: 6-11 (35.3%) Antiga Shipyard 1.2 ZvP: 13-10 (56.5%)
3 Maps favoured protoss, 2 favoured zerg. Arguably you can say that dual sight is a bad map for ZvP because you can't get a fast third. That leaves 2 maps HEAVILY favoured for protoss and 2 Slightly favoured for zerg. So yeah, stop QQing.
|
|
|
DRG will probably produce a more entertaining finals anyway. ZvT is just an exciting match up and DRG actually has a winning record against both the Terrans while MC has a relatively steep losing record against both.
|
On December 15 2011 19:46 Squide wrote: MC proved in set 5 you can't play standard vs zerg or you just get overwhelmed by zerg's macro.. but zergs QQ everytime they get harassed early game and complain it's a cheese lol
He can play standard.He bungled in defending that attack where he lost all his sentries but one.Without enough sentries,it was basically GG at that time.
|
On December 15 2011 19:46 Fionn wrote: I prefer DRG in the final. He'll produce better games. MVP has shown time and time again he'll crush MC. MMA has pretty terrible TvP, so it would be close, but probably produce a lot of cheesy games. MC always cheeses on Bel'shir against Terran for example.
Do you even know what you're talking about? MVP and MC have barely played against each other and every time they did it was close.
|
United States97276 Posts
On December 15 2011 19:47 Ysellian wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 19:47 Seeker wrote:On December 15 2011 19:46 jojo311 wrote:On December 15 2011 19:45 TooN wrote:On December 15 2011 19:44 KiNGxXx wrote:MVP: "Oh, that's the guy who will finished 2nd?" ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/MKeB3.jpg) so awesome !! haha lol MVP " ok, a zerg. ezpz to me " That is..... IF MVP can beat MMA that is  Depends how much his wrists are hurting and if he decides to make a sensor tower and some turrets in his main. those finals games were just... wtf.... a raven would be good too
|
On December 15 2011 19:46 Logros wrote: MC used to beat zergs, but then he took an arrow to the knee.
He needs to become the archer next year and return the favor.
|
MVP vs MMA is about, suddenly the sky turns obsidian black, all noises stop, no more wind, all living things stop breathing. The end is near, the clash of gods. HYPE HYPE HYPE !!!!
|
On December 15 2011 19:40 Xkalibert wrote: Mc always forget to expand more after getting first expand.
Hilarious and accurate description!
On a more serious note: Am I the only one who feel MC plays the same style like he did when he won his second GSL? A lot of 2 base timing pushes with stalkers as his main go-to unit. His early game is almost always centred around air openings as well. I haven't seen an immortal or zealot charge from MC in some time now :/
|
|
|
United Kingdom10823 Posts
On December 15 2011 19:47 dmnum wrote:
Let's go over the maps: Calm Before the Storm ZvP: 3-7(30%) Crossfire SE 1.1 ZvP: 5-4 (55.6%) Dual Sight 1.1 ZvP: 6-9 (40%) Shakuras Plateau 2.0 ZvP: 6-11 (35.3%) ZvP: 13-10 (56.5%)
3 Maps favoured protoss, 2 favoured zerg. Arguably you can say that dual sight is a bad map for ZvP because you can't get a fast third. That leaves 2 maps HEAVILY favoured for protoss and 2 Slightly favoured for zerg. So yeah, stop QQing.
Way to look at the absolute latest version of the map, thus limiting your sample size. Add all versions together then state your claim
|
On December 15 2011 19:44 sickra wrote: MC didn't take game 4 srsly. Carriers? Really? Maybe he went Carriers because it's a valid strategy on this map? (He lost mainly because he went Templar tech too late, not because of Carriers themselves.) Why on earth wouldn't he play serious the very game which could qualify him? You should really think before writing such nonsense.
|
On December 15 2011 19:45 Nate.F wrote:Show nested quote +On December 15 2011 19:45 NGrNecris wrote:On December 15 2011 19:43 CrappyHippo wrote: I believe the reason MC used carriers in game 4 was show to everybody that CARRIERS ARE USELESS. Yeah lets show everyone how useless a unit is by doing it in an important televised match with money on the line nah he was up one game. it was to throw off his opponent and defeat(probably) him in style. Or he could just play standard macro and win instead of attempting to throw drg off with a scoutable gimmicky build
|
|
|
|
|
|