EPT[GSL] Blizzard Cup Group B - Page 133
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Can't go to lunch without coming back to 20+ reports. This makes me upset. Stop the bullshit or get ready to hammered. Thanks --Pholon | ||
|
HTE
16 Posts
| ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
Leenock is 5-1 on this map in the GSL, while Nestea is 1-2 A ZvZ with Nestea…oh God…However, they're playing on Leenock's best map. It took a player like MVP to stop his 12-win killstreak, and his ZvZ on this map is unbeaten still (2-0 with kills over DRG and Banjo). Problem is, Nestea is also unbeaten on Antiga vZ, with a 4-0 record (Vibe, Idra, Kyrix and Sniper). On top of this, Nestea has a 2-0 lead in the head-to-head. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:18 Qikz wrote: He was trading really really efficiently. It slowed down the push so much yet Naniwa didn't have enough units back at home. Throwing the zealots away cost him I think. That wasn't efficient, he got like 2 marines for 3 stalkers, also he cut like 20 probes total during that attack. If he just fell back and chronod probes and then warped like 3-4 full rounds while having like 4 immortals he'd have won easily | ||
|
ChaosTerran
Austria844 Posts
| ||
|
WigglingSquid
5194 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:21 GhostKorean wrote: I have no idea whats going on in the big battles on the low quality stream  I couldn't see the autoturrets in Polt vs Naniwa, the burrowed banelings in MMA vs Leenock, or how MMA won his battles in MMA vs NesteaI can't afford to buy season tickets and I can't really complain but they should really at least make the quality a little bit better... Use the TwitchTV free stream that is linked in the OP, its quality is almost as good as the premium one. | ||
|
synkronized
United States125 Posts
| ||
|
CrappyHippo
Canada275 Posts
| ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
10 pool vs 12 pool  | ||
|
humbre
353 Posts
there were no banshees he didnt even take all his scvs, he just got 1 based similar to toss wins with 4wg rush or other proxy faggotry which they often do | ||
|
Sneakyz
Sweden2361 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:20 Itsmedudeman wrote: He lost like 4 stalkers when he retreated. There's a reason why naniwa's army was puny even though he had so much time for his expansion to kick in. He had 6 zealots in his mineral line not participating. | ||
|
Miraju
Germany235 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:20 MaestrO_ wrote: Proceed with the terran balance whine theres no need to whine about balance. everyone just saw that this is fucking broken lol. User was temp banned for this post. | ||
|
tomatriedes
New Zealand5356 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:18 SuperFanBoy wrote: Don''t worry the replicator will fix the issue next expansion, siege tank vs siege tank is gonna be good, PvT is going to be kinda like TvT atm but it will be phoenix tank vs viking tank. Yeah it will be like TvT except protoss replicated siege tanks will cost more. | ||
|
Orome
Switzerland11984 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:19 SafeAsCheese wrote: He was picking off units the entire game without losing stalkers, just zealots. I guarantee that his money lost was lower than polts before polt pushed. It was good for a while (first 2 attack waves probably), but he was starting to be less cost-effective and because he was warping in constant units, his robo was really late. Imagine that fight in the end, but with 3 immortals out for Naniwa. | ||
|
Silentness
United States2821 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:17 mrtomjones wrote: uhh what? He basically made no use of "1-1-1" other than the medivacs for healing. Raven did very little. Naniwa was pretty damn greedy there. Could have had half the probes and a much bigger army. I'm a toss btw. Naniwa lost because of himself. Not due to imbalance. You're wasting your time responding to the 1-1-1 replies. I swear some of the whining posters are below below gold league or something whining with the random 1-1-1 troll posts when they don't even clearly know what a 1-1-1 is. | ||
|
Spiner
United States360 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:17 Maesy wrote: ROFL TERRAN. Pressure Terran to death when he doesn't even get SHELLS and his 1 base timing still beats your 2 base zzzzzzzzzzzzzz. Woooow. He got combat shield instead of shells, which is pretty good. Naniwa traded inefficiently and loss too many stalkers when he should have just turtled after defending against the two rax. He attacked someone on one base who was oversaturated with scvs anyway so losing a few to those small attacks by naniwa when he was doing an all in anyway wasn't a big deal. | ||
|
Bergys
Sweden337 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:18 doko100 wrote: oh god, when you are on 2 base vs. 1 base and constantly attack and throw away units its no wonder you are going to lose, wtf is wrong with people. If you replace throwing away units with trading cost-efficiently, people begin to wonder why he lost. Naniwa traded super efficiently in the 2-rax push since polt forgot conc shells, and when he put on pressure he also traded very well. The 1-1-1 is just a super strong build which gets insanely cost-efficient if he gets set up. | ||
|
thoradycus
Malaysia3262 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:19 Alexj wrote: Who says terrans need to expand? why should polt expand versus a toss who has 2base for quite a long time.. | ||
|
NExt
Australia1651 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:21 JohnMatrix wrote: less probes = robo + gates more early = better defense smart... lets not make probes to make production buildings that we can't support. | ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
Pipeline
Sweden1673 Posts
On December 13 2011 20:21 GhostKorean wrote: I have no idea whats going on in the big battles on the low quality stream I couldn't see the autoturrets in Polt vs Naniwa, the burrowed banelings in MMA vs Leenock, or how MMA won his battles in MMA vs NesteaI can't afford to buy season tickets and I can't really complain but they should really at least make the quality a little bit better... Sigh, use the twitch.tv stream then??? | ||
| ||
