| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Canucklehead
Canada5074 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:00 SafeAsCheese wrote: MMA couldn't qualify for Code A either, that's an incredibly stupid argument Huh MMA has qualified for code a multiple times. He beat ret in code A way back when. | ||
|
AlternativeEgo
Sweden17309 Posts
On November 26 2011 22:54 Automata wrote: Next game is in three hours? Last game between Naama and Nightend is starting now and the next two quarterfinal games are scheduled to start..now. A small wait but no "three hours".  | ||
|
ilbh
Brazil1606 Posts
On November 26 2011 22:55 mordk wrote: Failing to qualify for Code A multiple times denies that statement. I know he's not in KR anymore, but playing decently in foreign tournaments doesn't cut it for "Top 5 terran". Maybe Top 10. Maybe. maybe?? he just beat DRG who has one of the best ZvT in the world. there even aren't more than 5 good terrans in Korea LOL | ||
|
skrotcyk
Sweden432 Posts
On November 26 2011 22:59 andaylin wrote: skill isn't based on the amount of tournaments one has won, sorry. pumas wins are in international tourneys too, while he can't qualify for Code A u realize he hasn't been trying to qualify for every code A? | ||
|
Badfatpanda
United States9719 Posts
On November 26 2011 22:59 Radook wrote: PumA is my favorite player but his TvT isn't top notch so kind a few other that is better them him. Who would you say is better? MVP MKP MMA PuMa/Taeja Polt/Bomber maybe 4 and 5 switched | ||
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
Ganzi won Code A and both played Code S this season, which is much harder than anything Puma ever did. Not to mention that Taeja does extremely well in the Taeja weeklies | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
SafeAsCheese
United States4924 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:01 andaylin wrote: so is your statement of skill equating to number of international tournament wins. Yet people are calling Naniwa a top 5 protoss. Why can we ignore puma achievements yet praise Naniwa? | ||
|
Kommander
Philippines4950 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:00 SafeAsCheese wrote: MMA couldn't qualify for Code A either, that's an incredibly stupid argument MMA is a GSL champion, your argument is invalid.  | ||
|
VoirDire
Sweden1923 Posts
Wth are you talking about? Ganzi has won code S and taeja has won 4 korean weekly tournaments? | ||
|
Hubris
United States113 Posts
What's QQ about this? People aren't allowed to dislike tuning into a serious competition to have it ruined by shit they can see on ladder all day? Surprise! People like interesting games! | ||
|
MaleficOR
United States315 Posts
On November 26 2011 22:57 MandoRelease wrote: Proxy rax into some helion & cloak banshee off 1 base. It's a "rush", not an "all-in". Its a SC2 LR thread, everything is cheese, everything is an all-in, there is always a reason why someone lost jetlag,sick,depressed,on death bed Ect. Ect. | ||
|
InDaHouse
Sweden956 Posts
| ||
|
FeyFey
Germany10114 Posts
On November 26 2011 22:54 Alpina wrote: so sad drg got cheesed  not really as he wouldn't have won by scouting the proxy rax, (also he scouted the the missing racks in time knew whats coming but didn't build a spine for safety, so greedy while it could have been everything, probably felt save because of the early gas and thought proxy hellions) Then attacking the bunker without spine support. because he thought puma would focus the queen and he would get the marines with his lings. Cheese is a 50/50 win chance if unscouted, being an instant loss when scouted. The exception of this is if the opponent cutting things in favor of eco, changing the 50/50 chance of winning in your favor. Proxy racks in sc2 aren't really cheese anymore, since you have to build that depot and thanks to buildings flying super fast, you might only lose 1-2 marines if you have to fly home. I would say it goes under taking a risk to get an advantage. the term got formed in bw, so we should keep the description or use another term. Or should we call moving the 6 starting workers to the mineral line now Maynert slide ? | ||
|
Fyzar
Netherlands8010 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:02 SafeAsCheese wrote: Yet people are calling Naniwa a top 5 protoss. Why can we ignore puma achievements yet praise Naniwa? The way I see it, is that Nani plays impressive games while he wins, while whenever I see PuMa win, it's with some kind of 1base cheesy allin. I must say I'm a bit biased against PuMa, but that's how I see it . | ||
|
Ysellian
Netherlands9029 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:00 SafeAsCheese wrote: MMA couldn't qualify for Code A either, that's an incredibly stupid argument Uhm yes he could -_- It was Code S what MMA was struggling with | ||
|
akalarry
United States1978 Posts
| ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:01 skrotcyk wrote: u realize he hasn't been trying to qualify for every code A? http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/2011_Global_StarCraft_II_League_November/Preliminaries lost in the first round. | ||
|
Mycl
Australia1370 Posts
On November 26 2011 23:01 andaylin wrote: so is your statement of skill equating to number of international tournament wins. Or better yet why don't we just use the measurement of there play instead? Picking a top 5 for a race is completely up to a persons perspective. If some people want to use a place in the gsl as the measuring stick more power to them and vice versa if people look at tournament performances as a whole | ||
|
Logros
Netherlands9913 Posts
. | ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Other Games |
|
Afreeca Starleague
Snow vs Shinee
Shine vs EffOrt
GSL
PiGosaur Cup
The PondCast
Kung Fu Cup
Replay Cast
KCM Race Survival
IntoTheTV X SOOP
Replay Cast
IntoTheTV X SOOP
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
