EPT[IPL] Day 3 Live Report Thread - Page 334
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Standard LR thread rules apply. No caster bashing, no insulting the interviewers, no player bashing, no balance whining. Bans will be doled out to violators so don't shit up this thread with immature garbage. | ||
nooboon
2602 Posts
| ||
|
Amornthep
Singapore2605 Posts
| ||
|
daSilvaz
809 Posts
On October 09 2011 05:21 ZAiNs wrote: It didn't make that much of a difference, by the time the second Immortal was out MC had already lost. The 1st immortal killed like 4 or 5 stalkers, that is a pretty big deal in that case i think | ||
|
Hierarch
United States2197 Posts
On October 09 2011 05:21 Gevna wrote: 1.4 has nothing to do here, MC played a delayed 4 gates and miscontroled it. Immortal range doesn't really matter against a 4g. The vision up ramps mattered the most, MC had to walk up the ramp to have his stalkers do anything, thus making force fields actually useful. | ||
|
clusen
Germany8702 Posts
And smartphones! | ||
|
ZAiNs
United Kingdom6525 Posts
On October 09 2011 05:21 Noktix wrote: Immortal range is huge against 4 gate. Stop spouting incorrect info pls In this game it wasn't. | ||
|
sixfour
England11061 Posts
| ||
|
Silidons
United States2813 Posts
| ||
|
Elasticity
3420 Posts
![[image loading]](http://x44.xanga.com/9d5f174526730228732319/w180127105.jpg) | ||
|
iLikeRain
Denmark504 Posts
I see what you did there :p | ||
|
dangerjoe
Denmark1866 Posts
LOL :D | ||
|
Dumboprime
985 Posts
| ||
|
PSIKevin
United States114 Posts
| ||
|
Mike15xp
United States595 Posts
On October 09 2011 05:20 Vocal wrote: Inori 2-1 MC. Calling it now. well its pretty much 50/50 so even if you got it right ... you know what i'm saying? | ||
|
Joseph123
Bulgaria1144 Posts
| ||
|
conz
United Kingdom163 Posts
| ||
|
Linwelin
Ireland7554 Posts
On October 09 2011 05:22 Knightess wrote: lol a bit random but I just found this while searching on google+ Show Spoiler + Welcome to some hundred pages ago | ||
|
ceaRshaf
Romania4926 Posts
On October 09 2011 05:22 Knightess wrote: lol a bit random but I just found this while searching on google+ Show Spoiler + Excuse me one moment: HAHAHAHAAHHAAHAAHA | ||
|
FliedLice
Germany7494 Posts
well the first immortal would've died much earlier instead of surviving with 10hp for as long as he did :o | ||
|
noBode
Thailand439 Posts
On October 09 2011 05:20 Demonace34 wrote: Just wanted to make sure I actually did follow up with my results. All with a-moving both forces in a unit tester. Small scale battles 10 phoenix vs 15 mutalisk 6 phoenix left. 10 phoenix vs 20 mutalisk 11-12 mutalisk left. Average Scale Battles 20 phoenix vs 20 mutalisk 15-16 phoenix left. 20 phoenix vs 25 mutalisk 13 phoenix left. 20 phoenix vs 30 mutalisk 5 phoenix left. Large Scale Battles 50 phoenix vs 60 mutalisk 23 phoenix left. 50 phoenix vs 75 mutalisk 18 mutas left. 50 phoenix vs 70 mutalisk 9 out of 10 times phoenix win with 7-12 phoenix left. One time Mutalisk came out on top with 6 left. From what I've gathered from around 50 unit tests that if the gas used is equal the phoenix will always win. The closer that mutalisk get to the same mineral consumption the better chance they have to win engagements. With good to above average micro or a good spread of phoenix the more likely they will beat out bigger amounts of mutalisk. if your opponent mass muta and you mass phoenixes in response all the time, you'll die to zerglings and ground attacks because phoenixes can't attack ground while mutas can. | ||
| ||
