| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Live report thread equals no balance whining; Balance whining equals warnings and bans! | ||
|
XiGua
Sweden3085 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:50 cassurai wrote: I think 5 years later people will still be debating about whether something is all-in "He pulled 14 scvs! That's not 68% of the income and therefore not an all-in since his marines was made to specifically kill off 1 queen and 3 drones atleast!" Lol, what if something like that happened ._. | ||
|
dc302
Australia576 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:48 Noktix wrote: Really? That wasn't all-in? He only ended up with more probes because Losira pulled drones at his main to fight at one point. Losira holds that attack and he wins the game...it was all-in. I disagree. Losira had something around 50 drones, much less than in game 1. If he had held, he would still need to drone up and get lair etc, just as Tester would need to get robo/twilight whatever he desired. | ||
|
Noktix
United States492 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:49 XiGua wrote: I really hate the use of the word "all-in". I mean, what is even the definition nowadays? I, myself don't have a clue. All-in : an attack that if fails to kill or do big economic damage loses you the game. At least that's my definition, fits most peoples use of the word. | ||
|
TheKefka
Croatia11752 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:50 Medrea wrote: Attack before 200 food is an all in. Also Cheese. And anything less than 4 bases is a rush. lol thats really funny and sad at the same time. | ||
|
Bleak
Turkey3059 Posts
| ||
|
SxYSpAz
United States1451 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:46 Sc2Null wrote: It irks me everytime a zerg loses, people say they are greedy...wtf? well maybe there's a problem with you being "irked" everytime a zerg loses. they can't always win... and in that situation, it wasn't so much greed, it was just being caught off by a new build. if this was a known build and popular, then it would be greedy to lose to it, but sometimes it's near impossible to react to a new build. you should probably just be happy to see some innovation. Multi-pronged toss attack. who knew? | ||
|
frogurt
Australia907 Posts
GSL > nuggets | ||
|
doihy
668 Posts
| ||
|
jmbthirteen
United States10734 Posts
| ||
|
frogurt
Australia907 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:51 Bleak wrote: Anyone else's stream having problems? I have stuttering every second. Try a lower quality :D I'm on hq and its smooth so I dunno. | ||
|
Seditary
Australia7033 Posts
| ||
|
HaXXspetten
Sweden15718 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:50 ondik wrote: wow, i'm pleasantly surprised by the recommendation poll for second game. Had this happened two months ago, there would've been more "no" than "yes". Was thinking the same, was hoping I wouldn't be the only one who was honestly impressed by that game, thought all the zergs here would whine beyond belief, but TL smiles upon us all today it seems  | ||
|
MooMooMugi
United States10531 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:51 Skyze wrote: If you dont pressure zerg early, their macro gets WAY too massive to deal with. Then it becomes a insane game of "Praying the zerg makes a mistake" ala MC vs Sen style. If you let a zerg sit there for 20 minutes and dont do any attacking at all, you already lost. So, "timing attacks" are REQUIRED to beat a zerg. I wouldn't say timing attacks are REQUIRED but definitely pressure to make them stop producing drones and instead, units. | ||
|
brachester
Australia1786 Posts
This comment wins | ||
|
Medrea
10003 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:52 doihy wrote: im pretty sure warping in units in your opponents base continuously is an all in. Nope. This is Starcraft 2 Not Base Builder 2: The Legend of Base Builder Continues... | ||
|
Amui
Canada10567 Posts
| ||
|
Sc2Null
United States3754 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:51 SxYSpAz wrote: well maybe there's a problem with you being "irked" everytime a zerg loses. they can't always win... and in that situation, it wasn't so much greed, it was just being caught off by a new build. if this was a known build and popular, then it would be greedy to lose to it, but sometimes it's near impossible to react to a new build. you should probably just be happy to see some innovation. Multi-pronged toss attack. who knew? I probably phrased that wrong, "it irks me everytime that when a zerg loses, people say they were greedy". | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50601 Posts
| ||
|
Tachion
Canada8573 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:51 Skyze wrote: If you dont pressure zerg early, their macro gets WAY too massive to deal with. Then it becomes a insane game of "Praying the zerg makes a mistake" ala MC vs Sen style. If you let a zerg sit there for 20 minutes and dont do any attacking at all, you already lost. So, "timing attacks" are REQUIRED to beat a zerg. Funny you mention that because Zerg's are increasingly more aggressive against Protoss now because THEY'RE the one who don't want to let the Protoss sit and macro. | ||
|
Nastiness
Sweden275 Posts
| ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
Korean StarCraft League
OSC
IPSL
Dewalt vs Bonyth
OSC
OSC
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Patches Events
|
|
|
EPT
