|
Live report thread equals no balance whining; Balance whining equals warnings and bans! |
United Kingdom38161 Posts
On July 20 2011 18:46 IgnE wrote: how was that an all-in? trickster had more probes than losira had drones and could have pulled back any time he wanted.
He went another 44 probe 6gate timing, this time with VR support.
He only had more workers because Losira was overly greedy and ended up having to pull a ton to defend lol.
|
don't think losira should have gone zerglings in that situation against that many zealots
definitely lost quite a bit for very little
|
On July 20 2011 18:46 Yuriegh wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2011 18:46 Seditary wrote:On July 20 2011 18:45 iMp.will. wrote: Where is the guy from yesterday with the match fixing? Losira gonna start with 2-0 over Trickster etc He's banned lol. Dude I was just thinking about him You mean Drazerk?
|
On July 20 2011 18:45 Gilead wrote: A little bit all inish, he doesn't even look happy after winning like that, no emotion
Why should he be happy? If he doesn't win the series it doesn't matter if it's 3-0 or 3-2.
|
T.T losira underreacted but he won't do that again. In a straight up macro game he has the advantage so i'm interested to see the rest of the matches.
|
I really, really hope Trickster doesn't win with this style. Protoss doing nothing but timing attacks is just horrible and disappointing. It doesn't develop the game and I thought we were past that. I mean, yeah, well done, good build order and decent execution, but c'mon. . .
Hopefully he has something else in his arsenal and won't continue to do them.
|
On July 20 2011 18:46 Tantaburs wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2011 18:44 doihy wrote: Can trickster try something else other then all ins?
he had more probes then losira had drones and more tech. How was that all in?
There is no such thing as allin for protossuss
|
After the first game when he went all in and didn't beat Losira, even when catching him off guard, Trickster realized the need to use tricks to beat zerg. This was a great one.
|
On July 20 2011 18:47 ChaLei wrote: That was cool actually, and it wasn't even an all in
He was also building probes at the end. Nothing was all in.
|
On July 20 2011 18:46 Tantaburs wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2011 18:44 doihy wrote: Can trickster try something else other then all ins?
he had more probes then losira had drones and more tech. How was that all in?
Really? That wasn't all-in? He only ended up with more probes because Losira pulled drones at his main to fight at one point.
Losira holds that attack and he wins the game...it was all-in.
|
i came here expecting to see zerg/losira fanboys crying about all-ins. i was pleasantly surprised.
|
On July 20 2011 18:46 IgnE wrote: how was that an all-in? trickster had more probes than losira had drones and could have pulled back any time he wanted. No, Losira definitely had more drones before Trickster's attack, the observer just happened to show the worker count AFTER Losira had to pull drones off the line to deal with the attack in the main.
|
I feel like Trickster just practiced a bunch of different allins and that's is entire plan for this series.
|
Trickster definitely has macro capababilities, I hope he switches up his strats in the next 3 games.
|
I'm definitely rewatching that game. It's very rare i consider doing that.
|
Shockingly good build by Trickster. He might be a decent player after all!
|
I really hate the use of the word "all-in". I mean, what is even the definition nowadays? I, myself don't have a clue.
|
This guy has such good and stealable builds.
Void Ray mothership is my current PvZ build and oh man is it sick.
|
On July 20 2011 18:48 Medrea wrote:Show nested quote +On July 20 2011 18:47 ChaLei wrote: That was cool actually, and it wasn't even an all in He was also building probes at the end. Nothing was all in.
Wasn't sarcasm, I said it was cool because it wasn't all in.
|
wow, i'm pleasantly surprised by the recommendation poll for second game. Had this happened two months ago, there would've been more "no" than "yes".
|
|
|
|