|
On June 18 2011 17:11 DminusTerran wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2011 17:09 red4ce wrote:On June 18 2011 17:06 iLLusive wrote:
Forgive me for asking and not knowing of my own accord but is there some Korean history as to why they always make out er I mean kiss the trophy for photos? Do you watch sports at all? People from all over the world do that. Yeah and in team sports you can end up getting like 30 sets of man lips on those trophies, lol -_-.
At that point they have already kissed each other regardless at least ten times anyway haha. When men win something important we can become extremely emotional.
|
On June 18 2011 17:12 Zdrastochye wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2011 17:11 ThaSlayer wrote:On June 18 2011 17:07 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:05 youngminii wrote:On June 18 2011 17:05 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:02 karpo wrote:On June 18 2011 17:00 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 16:59 youngminii wrote:On June 18 2011 16:58 Zlasher wrote:
I think what amazes me most is the fact that DRG made like...literally almost 0 mistakes in all 5 games. Top 3 zerg in the world in my opinion. definitely DEFINITELY top 3 man it feels like only yesterday when drg was this little noob underdog No really, go back to explaining how that 2 base push wasn't all-in. I'm interested. After the first push it still wasn't a all in. People call everything all ins. Please rewatch it when you get the chance. He cut SCV production and didn't expand. He wasn't fully saturated and he didn't see a deathpush coming from DRG that would require a massive army to deal with before it rolled him over. He didn't even expand as he moved out. THAT'S NOT THE DEFINITION OF AN ALL IN god you people breed like flies Holy crap, if you gg after an attack it's an all-in. If your attack fails and you do the exact same thing with the exact same units after remaking them without expanding or making a single worker that's an all-in. Really? Its called a timing attack. You could easily expo behind it. So much zerg tears Timing attack huh? Don't you expand behind those? Or make SCVs? Or when they fail do you just gg. It was an all-in, and when it failed, he lost. It's textbook.
So wat u want zerg to drone comfortably till late game? 200 vs 200 food? And Zerg remaxes? Jesus
|
On June 18 2011 17:12 ooni wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2011 17:12 Ruscour wrote:On June 18 2011 17:08 Latto wrote:
Starcraft Pokemon style:
What?
BitbyBit is Evolving!
Congratulations!
Your BitbyBit evolved into sCfOu! Unless BitbyBit's special ability required him to pull workers before he could do any other action, then this is completely wrong. Or BitbyBit is a magikarp.
Or eevee.
|
On June 18 2011 17:10 ChickenLips wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2011 17:10 GwSC wrote:
Does anyone know where DRG sits on KR ladder? Not that it really matters, just curious #1 zerg
#38 Korea, #428 World according to sc2ranks.
|
On June 18 2011 17:07 Zdrastochye wrote:
Holy crap, if you gg after an attack it's an all-in. If your attack fails and you do the exact same thing with the exact same units after remaking them without expanding or making a single worker that's an all-in.
It's not an allin. He simply lost the battle to one-sidedly, and had no army left to 20+ mutalisks which is not possible to recover from. There was nothing more he could do, thus the GG.
Had he killed off the mutas he'd continue fighting.
|
Jesus christ that Nestea game was siiiiick
|
What is the song playing on Nestea vs Top highlight? Please give me a link or song name =D
|
On June 18 2011 17:11 Mioraka wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2011 17:08 karpo wrote:On June 18 2011 17:06 Mioraka wrote:On June 18 2011 17:02 Hierarch wrote:On June 18 2011 16:58 meep wrote:On June 18 2011 16:57 LoLAdriankat wrote:On June 18 2011 16:56 ShootingStars wrote:
DONGRAEGU :DDDDD woot i knew sc was a fluke It was 3-2. SC had DRG by the balls on the final match. He's not a fluke. -_- Not a fluke, but not as good as he's hyped up to be, IMO sC is hyped? The only Terrans I ever hear being hyped are MVP/MMA/Bomber sC is quite good, I don't understand why people dislike him so much, maybe they are mistaking him for TheBest? Maybe because he looks like TheBest(who is the new bitbybit, only more ugly)......and he 2rax a lot. Fucking terrans with their fucking bunkers and their fucking 2rax..... The only difference between him and TheBest is that he's actually really good with solid macro IMO. Oh wow, look! It's another zerg crying over early game harassment. All terrans do it. And some do it more than others. Some do it every game. Sc leans towards the every game side.
Two rax pressure into 4 rax pressure or expand, is just rock solid and is often a build order win vs 15 hatch depending on position. I don't hate on him for using it, but it definitely lacks creativity =/.
|
On June 18 2011 17:14 ThaSlayer wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2011 17:12 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:11 ThaSlayer wrote:On June 18 2011 17:07 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:05 youngminii wrote:On June 18 2011 17:05 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:02 karpo wrote:On June 18 2011 17:00 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 16:59 youngminii wrote:On June 18 2011 16:58 Zlasher wrote:
I think what amazes me most is the fact that DRG made like...literally almost 0 mistakes in all 5 games. Top 3 zerg in the world in my opinion. definitely DEFINITELY top 3 man it feels like only yesterday when drg was this little noob underdog No really, go back to explaining how that 2 base push wasn't all-in. I'm interested. After the first push it still wasn't a all in. People call everything all ins. Please rewatch it when you get the chance. He cut SCV production and didn't expand. He wasn't fully saturated and he didn't see a deathpush coming from DRG that would require a massive army to deal with before it rolled him over. He didn't even expand as he moved out. THAT'S NOT THE DEFINITION OF AN ALL IN god you people breed like flies Holy crap, if you gg after an attack it's an all-in. If your attack fails and you do the exact same thing with the exact same units after remaking them without expanding or making a single worker that's an all-in. Really? Its called a timing attack. You could easily expo behind it. So much zerg tears Timing attack huh? Don't you expand behind those? Or make SCVs? Or when they fail do you just gg. It was an all-in, and when it failed, he lost. It's textbook. So wat u want zerg to drone comfortably till late game? 200 vs 200 food? And Zerg remaxes? Jesus
So what do u say about the fact that sc stopped scv production?
|
Highlight packages are 100x more awesome with Korean commentary imo.
|
lmao hearing these Korean cast all these epic moments makes me feel like Tastosis aren't that good.
|
4-0 final incoming. Gom better run all their commercials now. I seriously don't think that MMA vs Polt can top what DRG vs SC brought to us.
|
United States23455 Posts
Alright, time for the finals.
|
Top vs Nestea highlights holy crap that was an awesome game.
|
|
|
|
|
On June 18 2011 17:15 Goibon wrote:
Highlight packages are 100x more awesome with Korean commentary imo.
yeah korean commentary is so good
|
United Kingdom31255 Posts
|
On June 18 2011 17:14 ThaSlayer wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2011 17:12 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:11 ThaSlayer wrote:On June 18 2011 17:07 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:05 youngminii wrote:On June 18 2011 17:05 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:02 karpo wrote:On June 18 2011 17:00 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 16:59 youngminii wrote:On June 18 2011 16:58 Zlasher wrote:
I think what amazes me most is the fact that DRG made like...literally almost 0 mistakes in all 5 games. Top 3 zerg in the world in my opinion. definitely DEFINITELY top 3 man it feels like only yesterday when drg was this little noob underdog No really, go back to explaining how that 2 base push wasn't all-in. I'm interested. After the first push it still wasn't a all in. People call everything all ins. Please rewatch it when you get the chance. He cut SCV production and didn't expand. He wasn't fully saturated and he didn't see a deathpush coming from DRG that would require a massive army to deal with before it rolled him over. He didn't even expand as he moved out. THAT'S NOT THE DEFINITION OF AN ALL IN god you people breed like flies Holy crap, if you gg after an attack it's an all-in. If your attack fails and you do the exact same thing with the exact same units after remaking them without expanding or making a single worker that's an all-in. Really? Its called a timing attack. You could easily expo behind it. So much zerg tears Timing attack huh? Don't you expand behind those? Or make SCVs? Or when they fail do you just gg. It was an all-in, and when it failed, he lost. It's textbook. So wat u want zerg to drone comfortably till late game? 200 vs 200 food? And Zerg remaxes? Jesus
I'm clearly talking about the game 5, the one we just watched, I have no idea why you're expanding this to no game in particular.
sC all-ined, it got crushed, he gged. First was a timing attack, second one wasn't.
|
On June 18 2011 17:12 Zdrastochye wrote:Show nested quote +On June 18 2011 17:11 ThaSlayer wrote:On June 18 2011 17:07 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:05 youngminii wrote:On June 18 2011 17:05 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 17:02 karpo wrote:On June 18 2011 17:00 Zdrastochye wrote:On June 18 2011 16:59 youngminii wrote:On June 18 2011 16:58 Zlasher wrote:
I think what amazes me most is the fact that DRG made like...literally almost 0 mistakes in all 5 games. Top 3 zerg in the world in my opinion. definitely DEFINITELY top 3 man it feels like only yesterday when drg was this little noob underdog No really, go back to explaining how that 2 base push wasn't all-in. I'm interested. After the first push it still wasn't a all in. People call everything all ins. Please rewatch it when you get the chance. He cut SCV production and didn't expand. He wasn't fully saturated and he didn't see a deathpush coming from DRG that would require a massive army to deal with before it rolled him over. He didn't even expand as he moved out. THAT'S NOT THE DEFINITION OF AN ALL IN god you people breed like flies Holy crap, if you gg after an attack it's an all-in. If your attack fails and you do the exact same thing with the exact same units after remaking them without expanding or making a single worker that's an all-in. Really? Its called a timing attack. You could easily expo behind it. So much zerg tears Timing attack huh? Don't you expand behind those? Or make SCVs? Or when they fail do you just gg. It was an all-in, and when it failed, he lost. It's textbook.
Only the last game of his was an all in. Everything else was just standard aggressive pushes into expands. sC isn't just a one-dimensional all-inner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3052
1208
234
EPT
