EPT[GSL] Super Tourney Finals - Page 101
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
MrCon
France29748 Posts
On June 18 2011 16:43 ChickenLips wrote: I love it when people, instead of using their brains, use stats. Shows such a clear lack of ability to individual thought Well, crossfire is at least balanced TvZ, and I'd say slightly Z favored. Yes, lots of chokes, but lots of quick ways to surround and flank too. Lots of paths for sneaky lings attacks. Not to hard 3rd for zerg but very hard 3 bases for terran. | ||
Szubie
United Kingdom294 Posts
On June 18 2011 16:46 L3g3nd_ wrote: its basically impossible for Z to get a 4th on that map. If the T plays a bit more turtly, gets about 8 tanks per push, Z cant do shit. also just dropping while pushing, and its too much for Z to handle When talking about this, it's all theory craft, but you can also say that mutalisks are very strong on this map, basically denying terran a safe 3rd at all. Bomber vs Nestea showed a good example of this. The thing is that the stats also seem to support the difficulty that terran has on this map. (Not to mention baneling landmines, costs scans etc.) At the very least, zerg qq-ing about map being imba against them is very questionable when the stats point to the exact opposite. If the results were 50/50 the zerg claim of imba would still haave trouble. Anyway, back to this game on Terminus! | ||
|
DrivE
United States2554 Posts
| ||
|
GwSC
United States1997 Posts
On June 18 2011 16:47 travis wrote: i drunk a beer ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/TrALr.jpg) OMG I was waiting for someone to do this! XD | ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
| ||
|
Sc2Null
United States3754 Posts
| ||
Fionn
United States23455 Posts
| ||
|
meep
United States1699 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + /sarcasm | ||
|
cordlc
United States360 Posts
On June 18 2011 16:46 Shardz wrote: People keep criticizing sC for pushing zerg and constantly losing his army. But what Tasteless keeps saying is a big loss actually hurt the zerg economy a lot. DRG's weakness imo is the fact that he does not know the exact timings of when to drone and overproduces units without having enough to end the game. If you produce units to kill an attack, the best way to end the attack is with barely any units left for zerg. If you overproduce, than you just wasted larva on what could have been economy. sC's pushes exploits DRG's weakness as he is not as good a droner as Nestea is. Even though the pushes appear to be failing, they were actually more successful than people think. The pushes prevented droning, wasted larva and prevented zerg over expansion. In reality this is how sC really gets ahead. These repetitive pushes that seem to fail are not as stupid as they seem to be. This isn't necessarily true - with a larger army, you'll be able to crush the Terran attacks more decisively, losing less units. I don't think DRG's drone timings are his weakness, there isn't a zerg out there who has an easy time dealing with sC's bullshit pressure. He's just making too many blunders (not quantity I guess, but the size of them). Also needs to stop going for Infestors, they're worthless against the sC style | ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
|
I)etox
1240 Posts
| ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
| ||
|
bbQ4Aiur
Hong Kong2752 Posts
| ||
|
youngminii
Australia7514 Posts
On June 18 2011 16:49 L3g3nd_ wrote: that was so poorly done by DRG, the banes didnt connect cos they were blocked by lings .................. | ||
|
andaylin
United States10830 Posts
| ||
|
Domination
United States1177 Posts
| ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38257 Posts
| ||
|
Pangolin
United States1035 Posts
| ||
|
meep
United States1699 Posts
On June 18 2011 16:49 L3g3nd_ wrote: that was so poorly done by DRG, the banes didnt connect cos they were blocked by lings lol | ||
| ||
