Oh and also, gg hero DTs.
[NASL] Day 6-4 - Page 48
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Hoffburger
19 Posts
Oh and also, gg hero DTs. | ||
Moonwrath
United States9568 Posts
| ||
HolyArrow
United States7116 Posts
| ||
MrProb
Thailand794 Posts
MC had more Colossis MC had better unit compositions Hasu had better upgrades (2W 2A vs. 2W) MC was behind a bit in supply | ||
Mattchew
United States5684 Posts
btw lets go ret... he is the fucking man. I LOVE SC2 i edited to not look like a dick head TL is the NUMBER 1 SITE FOR ANYTHING SC2!!!!!!! | ||
Nevuk
United States16280 Posts
On May 22 2011 13:31 Mailing wrote: He had 30 more supply at one point and hasu had better ups. MC was behind. Colossus won, archons lost. Correct this to being behind by 16 supply, taking probes into account... at like 120 - 140 values. I really don't think Hasu was ever even slightly ahead. | ||
TheTenthDoc
United States9561 Posts
HasuObs didn't "need" to do anything except keep pumping colossus and attack once he reached 200 supply with a slightly better (thanks to armo) upgraded force. He would have slammed in ahead even after that base snipe. I have no idea why he didn't. | ||
Pajegetc
United States3158 Posts
On May 22 2011 13:32 Shellshock1122 wrote: What do you suggest? Switching to 0-0 air tech vs mass colossus and blink stalkers with +3 attack? The tech switch would have taken too long to get the right upgrades. Hasu should have had a second robo a long time ago and shouldn't have lost that nexus to 2 DTs. Last time I checked, Colossus don't attack air units...so upgrades are irrelevant and the stalkers melt to colossus/void ray. | ||
Clog
United States950 Posts
On May 22 2011 13:32 Shellshock1122 wrote: What do you suggest? Switching to 0-0 air tech vs mass colossus and blink stalkers with +3 attack? The tech switch would have taken too long to get the right upgrades. Hasu should have had a second robo a long time ago and shouldn't have lost that nexus to 2 DTs. MC didn't have that many blink stalkers... A stargate tech switch could have definitely worked well if performed correctly, although the behind-in-upgrades point is still valid. | ||
garlicface
Canada4196 Posts
| ||
pieman819
Australia457 Posts
| ||
mordk
Chile8385 Posts
On May 22 2011 13:33 Nevuk wrote: Correct this to being behind by 16 supply, taking probes into account... at like 120 - 140 values. I really don't think Hasu was ever even slightly ahead. Hasuobs was ahead, very much ahead right before those DTs... I swear those DTs were the best decision ever to grace a PvP | ||
SuperYo1000
United States880 Posts
| ||
Xxavi
United States1248 Posts
| ||
Xxavi
United States1248 Posts
| ||
Kazang
578 Posts
Why stargates are so rare in late game pvp is kind of confusing to me. Stalkers get fried so fast against that many colossus one would think having a least a few voidrays would make a huge difference. Will be interesting to see how it plays out long term if it will be viable or not. | ||
caster0123
324 Posts
| ||
s4life
Peru1519 Posts
On May 22 2011 13:32 Maskedsatyr wrote: Who won? This. fp has HasuObs winning but it doesn't seem to be that way judging from comments | ||
garlicface
Canada4196 Posts
On May 22 2011 13:36 s4life wrote: This. fp has HasuObs winning but it doesn't seem to be that way judging from comments Hasu g1 MC g2 MC g3 MC 2-1 Hasu | ||
instant
84 Posts
On May 22 2011 13:36 s4life wrote: This. fp has HasuObs winning but it doesn't seem to be that way judging from comments MC 2-1 | ||
| ||