EPTSo yea, i think the mappool is really good.
edit: by players i meant people who actually have a decent chance at qualifying for this, not everyone who plays sc2.
IGN Pro League Season Two - Page 12
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
DarKFoRcE
Germany1215 Posts
So yea, i think the mappool is really good. edit: by players i meant people who actually have a decent chance at qualifying for this, not everyone who plays sc2. | ||
|
koprulureport
Austria43 Posts
awesome awesome awesome! | ||
|
deth
Australia1757 Posts
On May 04 2011 16:40 Alex.IGN wrote: Correct. As far as SEA goes everyone, we thought long and hard about what regions to include for IPL 2. I wish we could include everyone but that isn't our reality right now. There are a number of challenges for including SEA which include ease of communication, scheduling, latency affecting the quality of games, checking the legality of prize money and competition for the different areas of SEA and so forth. For IPL 2 we are sticking with our original plan of just the NA/EU/LA regions. We will be considering our options to include SEA for IPL 3 as this is something that we definitely eventually want to do, if it's the right move to make for us to make. This is not us hating on the SEA and SEA players, this is just the best move for us to make as an organization at this time. All of your "reasons" for not including SEA are just inconveniences for the player, NOT anything to do with the quality of your tournament. Look at your reasons critically. The only one that could possibly be a problem for your company is the legality of prize money, which can be solved very easily by a quick consultation with blizzard. Ease of communication? Please. Scheduling? If a SEA player is dedicated enough to organise their day around attending your event, then thats fine. Else, nothing lost as far as your concerned. The Latency issue has already been debunked. Its just a fact of life for some SEA players. Many SEA players, depending on ISP, will have better lat to NA than some EU players. Competition for the different areas of SEA? You're really scratching some weird excuses up there. | ||
|
Gigaudas
Sweden1213 Posts
| ||
|
nicrone
Australia9 Posts
| ||
|
red4ce
United States7313 Posts
| ||
|
Hypemeup
Sweden2783 Posts
| ||
|
viii
United States266 Posts
| ||
|
Elwar
953 Posts
Edit: Somehow I skipped over the 'LIVE' in the OP :/ completely nonsensical since EU > NA has similar lag to SEA > NA. | ||
|
Ragoo
Germany2773 Posts
On May 04 2011 17:12 DarKFoRcE wrote: I like that they dont use the iCCup maps. Very few players actually like Testbug (to me its ok, because its quite good for zerg compared to most other maps, but even i dislike it somewhat). And Neo Enigma is a fucking trainwreck of a map, its always the first map i veto in ESL cups. So yea, i think the mappool is really good. edit: by players i meant people who actually have a decent chance at qualifying for this, not everyone who plays sc2. Does anyone think Crossfire is a good map and fair for Zerg tho? | ||
|
Jayjay54
Germany2296 Posts
| ||
|
Vansetsu
United States1454 Posts
On May 04 2011 17:28 deth wrote: All of your "reasons" for not including SEA are just inconveniences for the player, NOT anything to do with the quality of your tournament. Look at your reasons critically. The only one that could possibly be a problem for your company is the legality of prize money, which can be solved very easily by a quick consultation with blizzard. Ease of communication? Please. Scheduling? If a SEA player is dedicated enough to organise their day around attending your event, then thats fine. Else, nothing lost as far as your concerned. The Latency issue has already been debunked. Its just a fact of life for some SEA players. Many SEA players, depending on ISP, will have better lat to NA than some EU players. Competition for the different areas of SEA? You're really scratching some weird excuses up there. I usually don't jump on people in threads, but seriously, let it be. IPL is doing EVERYTHING right, they are sticking to their promises, and they are producing quality stuff so far in everything they've done. I am sure they are taking the SEA possibility seriously, but at the moment aren't complicating themselves with liabilities and instead focusing on what their current plans are. Also keep in mind this is not some small organization we're talking about here. It is a very large company that is investing into this organization, and that's possibly a lot of red tape to cut through when making changes to anything that involves any type of finalized legality. I would just relax, and have faith in an organization that has been completely professional and competent since day 1. | ||
|
Mr Showtime
United States1353 Posts
| ||
|
CursedRich
United Kingdom737 Posts
| ||
|
Chainfire99
Canada474 Posts
| ||
|
Heathen
Philippines351 Posts
| ||
|
Grettin
42381 Posts
First season was fun to watch. | ||
|
zonkee
Germany46 Posts
 enjoyed the first one very much and due to the fact that it's only on weekends i can watch it from EU too! | ||
BLinD-RawR
ALLEYCAT BLUES50584 Posts
On May 04 2011 17:12 DarKFoRcE wrote: I like that they dont use the iCCup maps. Very few players actually like Testbug (to me its ok, because its quite good for zerg compared to most other maps, but even i dislike it somewhat). And Neo Enigma is a fucking trainwreck of a map, its always the first map i veto in ESL cups. So yea, i think the mappool is really good. edit: by players i meant people who actually have a decent chance at qualifying for this, not everyone who plays sc2. I didn't know enigma was bad and people didn't like testbug,but I heard that for MLG testbug has some major changes. | ||
|
gulden
Germany205 Posts
| ||
| ||
