EPT[March GSL] Code A Ro32 Day 4 - Page 68
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
This thread is for discussing the games, not crying about balance. Thanks. | ||
|
Annq
Germany104 Posts
| ||
|
ccHaZaRd
Canada1024 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:09 spidii wrote: In the battle yes, completely mishandled, very bad control, terrible engagement, but he did out macro him, there's no doubt about that. you can macro all you want but when you dont set up any flanks and let the terran walk up and siege half your units and THEN attack him with mass ling muta while hes already stimmed in your choke, then yea your macro doesn't matter | ||
|
Namu
United States826 Posts
| ||
|
Essentia
1150 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:10 .Theory wrote: Well, Ret was outclassing him in macro. I think he had like 60 food on him or something ridiculous. I think that we can conclude that macro doesnt win you games in SC2. We need to get over it. | ||
|
flexy
United States182 Posts
| ||
|
Garnet
Vietnam9048 Posts
| ||
|
xmichaels
84 Posts
| ||
|
hiyo_bye
United States737 Posts
| ||
|
cerebralz
United States443 Posts
I feel terrible for ret, he's one of the best players we have. Hopefully the infestor change in the next patch will make this matchup a little easier for Z. Other than that, the multi marine drops are way to hard for the zerg to deal with even if you have a huge army and econ. | ||
|
BluePabs
United States317 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:10 Zerokaiser wrote: It's posts like this that stop others from taking our Zerg complaints seriously. Ret obviously didn't play flawlessly or he would have won. Were his flaws less obvious and more subtle than losing a hatchery or 30 mutas? Yes, but that doesn't mean they weren't there. Is Zerg playing uphill nowadays? Probably, but that doesn't mean that Zerg players like Ret can't win. Thank you, that was a great response. | ||
|
-Strider-
Mexico1605 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:06 KMARTRULES wrote: The most disappointing Foreigner in Code A is the only one left. awesome. kill this guy | ||
palookieblue
Australia326 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:07 TUski wrote: Here we go again. They both played pretty well that game with a few mistakes from both players.Story of all the zergs around the world.. Completely outclass your opponent, then lose to 1+a. Ret played FLAWLESSLY that game without even losing an expansion. His upgrades were 2-1 at the final push. Yet he loses. Objective analysis of that game much welcomed. To say that Ret played quote 'FLAWLESSLY' is pushing it. His macro was beastly but his unit control in the engagements left much to be desired. Mutas were lost engaging stimmed marines and for the second game in a row his broods were sniped due to poor placement. Banelings were wasted and the infestors died pretty quickly as well. Terran didn't play perfectly either imo. Thors would have been a nice addition in the main and if Ret stayed a little bit longer he could have taken out that chunk of supply depots. The drop play wasn't as awesome as game 1 but it made Ret split up his army. 1+a doesn't describe what Terran did in this game. You have to press a different button to siege, and another one to stim. Unless of course you think running banelings straight into an army is more difficult than kiting said banelings. I wish we could just watch the games. Also I'm pretty sure you've done this silly whining before and it's not really helpful in a LR thread. <3 | ||
|
Twitches
Canada365 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:10 GP wrote: Ret's play and unit control was pretty disappointing suiciding broods against marines, not building spine crawlers at his expansions bases, sitting on his hands with a max army. if Ret was more aggressive he would have won that game. Pretty much were my thoughts the whole game.. Obviously it's easy to see when you're the observer but I think Ret needs a little more experience. If a guy as talented as him practiced more he'd be scary as hell. | ||
|
StUfF
Australia1437 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:09 Bommes wrote: Oh come on, don't blame that loss on imbalance, Ret had every tool possible available to beat MMA in that game, he killed all the drops, he lost no drones, he had a maxed army, just DON'T FUCKING LET HIM SIEGE UP RIGHT IN YOUR FACE. Seriously, that map is so big, Ret was so far ahead, just spend all your time on delaying that push until the broodlords are out and you will crush him easily. I'm 100% sure Ret knows why he lost that. He spent heaps of time delaying the push... He lost his infestors delaying the push, he counterattacked delaying the push, he harasses with mutas delaying the push. Jjob pretty much siege pushed all the way, the distance between close positions isnt that large. | ||
|
zeru
8156 Posts
| ||
|
ZapRoffo
United States5544 Posts
| ||
|
Candide
456 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:10 terransarelame wrote: Surprise surprise, better zerg plays a lesser terran with decent skill and guess what? You need to be so much better than the terran in order to win. Sc2 is so awesome. Im diggin the "1 post" person here Idk if you noticed but if you understand the game this terran macroed pretty well, it wasn't anything "he lucked out" moment he stayed on par for a tvz macro. | ||
|
Kyhol
Canada2575 Posts
How about Ret losing the first game because he suicided like 15 baneings into the planetary fortress instead of chasing the marines. You guys piss me off. | ||
|
Grettin
42411 Posts
I'm gonna be sad if Ret lost.  | ||
|
Buff345
United States323 Posts
On February 28 2011 20:10 terransarelame wrote: Surprise surprise, better zerg plays a lesser terran with decent skill and guess what? You need to be so much better than the terran in order to win. Sc2 is so awesome. Did you even watch that game? How can you say the terran was just decent? Or even lesser!? His multi tasking was amazing. He literally made zero micro mistakes and his macro was superb as well. | ||
| ||
