|
Sweden33723 Posts
On January 15 2011 17:55 z00t wrote:
Man, I was watching with a friend so wasn't posting here, but I followed the whole thing and DAMN, am I proud of Jinro!
I feel that MC could have been a little better-mannered though - if it were Jinro in his position, he woulda given a handshake, I think. I know that it meant a lot to MC, but given how they had to teamkill last season, I would have thought that MC would be a little more happy for Jinro, even if he lost =/. I guess it's just that intense.
Idra vs Jinro....man, SO epic! The buildup to this rematch is just the greatest thing! :D
I wanna make it clear I didnt go there for a handshake or anything really. MC came up to me after the semis last time, and I felt I should too.
|
Dam I'm loving this gsl. Hopefully idra/jinro keep it up :D
|
On January 15 2011 18:37 Hoju wrote:I was going to write about how pathetic some of these posts were, and a bunch of serious crap, but this felt more appropriate: + Show Spoiler +
Pegg and Frost are the best. ^^
Oh, the pics are soooo true. So many trolls on the forum. So many senseless posts.
|
On January 15 2011 20:48 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2011 17:55 z00t wrote:
Man, I was watching with a friend so wasn't posting here, but I followed the whole thing and DAMN, am I proud of Jinro!
I feel that MC could have been a little better-mannered though - if it were Jinro in his position, he woulda given a handshake, I think. I know that it meant a lot to MC, but given how they had to teamkill last season, I would have thought that MC would be a little more happy for Jinro, even if he lost =/. I guess it's just that intense.
Idra vs Jinro....man, SO epic! The buildup to this rematch is just the greatest thing! :D
I wanna make it clear I didnt go there for a handshake or anything really. MC came up to me after the semis last time, and I felt I should too.
It looks like you went for a handshake, short convo w/ condolences, etc. from the spectators' POV. MC basically ignored your offer.
|
|
|
You did it Jinro, you beat your #1 nemesis!!! Now nothing can stop you, believe it!
|
Jinro, you better buy a crapload of pens and black markers to sign autographs.
|
On January 15 2011 20:48 Liquid`Jinro wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2011 17:55 z00t wrote:
Man, I was watching with a friend so wasn't posting here, but I followed the whole thing and DAMN, am I proud of Jinro!
I feel that MC could have been a little better-mannered though - if it were Jinro in his position, he woulda given a handshake, I think. I know that it meant a lot to MC, but given how they had to teamkill last season, I would have thought that MC would be a little more happy for Jinro, even if he lost =/. I guess it's just that intense.
Idra vs Jinro....man, SO epic! The buildup to this rematch is just the greatest thing! :D
I wanna make it clear I didnt go there for a handshake or anything really. MC came up to me after the semis last time, and I felt I should too.
Jinro, you are so goood.
|
On January 15 2011 20:48 Liquid`Jinro wrote:
I wanna make it clear I didnt go there for a handshake or anything really. MC came up to me after the semis last time, and I felt I should too.
You did nothing wrong. You are a friend of MC and it's between you and him. Ignore the trolls.
P.S: Happy Birthday. Amazing last game! Congratz!
|
On January 15 2011 20:25 raidmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2011 20:14 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 20:04 raidmaster wrote:On January 15 2011 20:01 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 19:55 raidmaster wrote:
I don't wanna argue here but for some people the picture above (crucifix etc.) may be an insult to religion and is far worse than those made-in-5-seconds troll images. And as far as I'm concerned such things are ban-worthy for the most of forums. I appreciate the work an author put to create it, but it isn't necessairly better from other images for everyone, just because it required more effort. I'm cool with it, but someone may not. Just sayin. Lol, we are clearly not visiting the same forums then if you think that is ban-worthy on most forums. In fact I have a hard time thinking of one that would outright ban someone for that. It is clearly stated in most of the forums that insult to religion is forbidden (in any form). You probably think what you think because you don't care. But some people do. And because of that forums have rules like that. Where did I write my opinion on the picture? I just said with quite certainty that most forums that I visit wouldn't have a problem with such a picture (pretty much every swedish forum I know of, and quite a few english speaking as well). Can you prove otherwise? I don't have to prove you anything. It is obvious that rules of that exist on "mature" forums just to respect people thoughts and opinions. Why is it so hard to understand? For somebody cursing is inappropriate, for someone else its insulting religion (especially if this person believes in such). This is why regulations exist and why moderatos exist. Can anyone link me a TL regulations?
Lol, you are a piece of work. "Mature" forums... Once again I can post the picture on forums that most would consider "mature", whatever that means (or would that be Christian forums?). You can basically offend anyone no matter what you post. Are you suggesting we banned someone just because a few gets offended? We wouldn't have any kind of discussion that way. Every forum sets a limit and naturally that is connected to what kind of people read and post on said forum. You might have no hesitation of posting a picture of a steak while an Indian might get highly offended by a picture of a holy cow served as food.
And you were the one claiming that "most" forums would have that picture as bannable while I disagree while offering to give you plenty of proof. But apparently you think you can just throw out a statement as fact and them justify it by saying you don't have to prove anything... If that is your stance please refer from making blatantly incorrect statements in the future and we won't have a problem.
Also far from every forum have rules that are directly connected to religion, but rather posting rude, offensive things which is in the eye of the beholder (admins and such). If you don't like that, you must have a terrible time surfing the internet.
|
Epic game Jinro, great stuff, good luck against Idra, i know u can beat him!!
|
ok i just wake up and cant believe what i am reading so i will get back later...
|
On January 15 2011 20:59 nihlon wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2011 20:25 raidmaster wrote:On January 15 2011 20:14 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 20:04 raidmaster wrote:On January 15 2011 20:01 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 19:55 raidmaster wrote:
I don't wanna argue here but for some people the picture above (crucifix etc.) may be an insult to religion and is far worse than those made-in-5-seconds troll images. And as far as I'm concerned such things are ban-worthy for the most of forums. I appreciate the work an author put to create it, but it isn't necessairly better from other images for everyone, just because it required more effort. I'm cool with it, but someone may not. Just sayin. Lol, we are clearly not visiting the same forums then if you think that is ban-worthy on most forums. In fact I have a hard time thinking of one that would outright ban someone for that. It is clearly stated in most of the forums that insult to religion is forbidden (in any form). You probably think what you think because you don't care. But some people do. And because of that forums have rules like that. Where did I write my opinion on the picture? I just said with quite certainty that most forums that I visit wouldn't have a problem with such a picture (pretty much every swedish forum I know of, and quite a few english speaking as well). Can you prove otherwise? I don't have to prove you anything. It is obvious that rules of that exist on "mature" forums just to respect people thoughts and opinions. Why is it so hard to understand? For somebody cursing is inappropriate, for someone else its insulting religion (especially if this person believes in such). This is why regulations exist and why moderatos exist. Can anyone link me a TL regulations? Lol, you are a piece of work. "Mature" forums... Once again I can post the picture on forums that most would consider "mature", whatever that means. You can basically offend anyone no matter what you post. Are you suggesting we banned someone just because a few gets offended? We wouldn't have any kind of discussion that way. Every forum sets a limit and naturally that is connected to what kind of people read and post on said forum. You might have no hesitation of posting a picture of a steak while an indian might get highly offended by a picture of a holy cow served as food. And you were the one claiming that "most" forums would have that picture as bannable while I disagree while offering to give you plenty of proof. But apparently you think you can just throw out a statement as fact and them justify it by saying you don't have to prove anything... If that is your stance please refer from making blatantly incorrect statements in the future. Also not every forum have rules that are directly connected to religion, but rather posting rude, offensive things which is in the eye of the beholder (admins and such). If you don't like that, you must have a terrible time surfing the internet.
Ok, so tell me why people got banned for posting those troll pictures few pages before. I'm sure that only "few got offended".
You've never provided any proofs either? It is just what you said against what I've said.
If you don't think that people deserve to have rights protecting their believes then my discussion with you is pointless. You just don't understand basic forms of human coexistence.
|
|
|
On January 15 2011 21:03 raidmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2011 20:59 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 20:25 raidmaster wrote:On January 15 2011 20:14 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 20:04 raidmaster wrote:On January 15 2011 20:01 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 19:55 raidmaster wrote:
I don't wanna argue here but for some people the picture above (crucifix etc.) may be an insult to religion and is far worse than those made-in-5-seconds troll images. And as far as I'm concerned such things are ban-worthy for the most of forums. I appreciate the work an author put to create it, but it isn't necessairly better from other images for everyone, just because it required more effort. I'm cool with it, but someone may not. Just sayin. Lol, we are clearly not visiting the same forums then if you think that is ban-worthy on most forums. In fact I have a hard time thinking of one that would outright ban someone for that. It is clearly stated in most of the forums that insult to religion is forbidden (in any form). You probably think what you think because you don't care. But some people do. And because of that forums have rules like that. Where did I write my opinion on the picture? I just said with quite certainty that most forums that I visit wouldn't have a problem with such a picture (pretty much every swedish forum I know of, and quite a few english speaking as well). Can you prove otherwise? I don't have to prove you anything. It is obvious that rules of that exist on "mature" forums just to respect people thoughts and opinions. Why is it so hard to understand? For somebody cursing is inappropriate, for someone else its insulting religion (especially if this person believes in such). This is why regulations exist and why moderatos exist. Can anyone link me a TL regulations? Lol, you are a piece of work. "Mature" forums... Once again I can post the picture on forums that most would consider "mature", whatever that means. You can basically offend anyone no matter what you post. Are you suggesting we banned someone just because a few gets offended? We wouldn't have any kind of discussion that way. Every forum sets a limit and naturally that is connected to what kind of people read and post on said forum. You might have no hesitation of posting a picture of a steak while an indian might get highly offended by a picture of a holy cow served as food. And you were the one claiming that "most" forums would have that picture as bannable while I disagree while offering to give you plenty of proof. But apparently you think you can just throw out a statement as fact and them justify it by saying you don't have to prove anything... If that is your stance please refer from making blatantly incorrect statements in the future. Also not every forum have rules that are directly connected to religion, but rather posting rude, offensive things which is in the eye of the beholder (admins and such). If you don't like that, you must have a terrible time surfing the internet. Ok, so tell me why people got banned for posting those troll pictures few pages before. I'm sure that only "few got offended". If you don't think that people deserve to have rights protecting their believes then my discussion with you is pointless. You just don't understand basic forms of human coexistence.
Lol, are you serious? This is a private forum, you have no rights other than what the site owners give you. And there were about of 2 people that raised objections to the religious picture while the rest gave 10+ pages of arguments. That might give you a clue why one was allowed and why one wasn't. If you can't understand that, then you don't get the internet. Once again, are you suggesting we ban everything that a few find offensive? Yes, with a few I mean a few. You can't please everyone.
And your last sentence is just laughable.... Really?
|
No news on the possible maps right? Can't wait to see what they are.. if it really is a best of 5 I hope they allow 2 vote downs like before.
|
sooo happy
now I think it has 3 possibilities
1) the IM guys wins
2) Jinro wins
3) foxer wins
still i think IM guys have more chance than jinro and jinro way more than foxed =DDDD
|
On January 15 2011 21:09 nihlon wrote:Show nested quote +On January 15 2011 21:03 raidmaster wrote:On January 15 2011 20:59 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 20:25 raidmaster wrote:On January 15 2011 20:14 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 20:04 raidmaster wrote:On January 15 2011 20:01 nihlon wrote:On January 15 2011 19:55 raidmaster wrote:
I don't wanna argue here but for some people the picture above (crucifix etc.) may be an insult to religion and is far worse than those made-in-5-seconds troll images. And as far as I'm concerned such things are ban-worthy for the most of forums. I appreciate the work an author put to create it, but it isn't necessairly better from other images for everyone, just because it required more effort. I'm cool with it, but someone may not. Just sayin. Lol, we are clearly not visiting the same forums then if you think that is ban-worthy on most forums. In fact I have a hard time thinking of one that would outright ban someone for that. It is clearly stated in most of the forums that insult to religion is forbidden (in any form). You probably think what you think because you don't care. But some people do. And because of that forums have rules like that. Where did I write my opinion on the picture? I just said with quite certainty that most forums that I visit wouldn't have a problem with such a picture (pretty much every swedish forum I know of, and quite a few english speaking as well). Can you prove otherwise? I don't have to prove you anything. It is obvious that rules of that exist on "mature" forums just to respect people thoughts and opinions. Why is it so hard to understand? For somebody cursing is inappropriate, for someone else its insulting religion (especially if this person believes in such). This is why regulations exist and why moderatos exist. Can anyone link me a TL regulations? Lol, you are a piece of work. "Mature" forums... Once again I can post the picture on forums that most would consider "mature", whatever that means. You can basically offend anyone no matter what you post. Are you suggesting we banned someone just because a few gets offended? We wouldn't have any kind of discussion that way. Every forum sets a limit and naturally that is connected to what kind of people read and post on said forum. You might have no hesitation of posting a picture of a steak while an indian might get highly offended by a picture of a holy cow served as food. And you were the one claiming that "most" forums would have that picture as bannable while I disagree while offering to give you plenty of proof. But apparently you think you can just throw out a statement as fact and them justify it by saying you don't have to prove anything... If that is your stance please refer from making blatantly incorrect statements in the future. Also not every forum have rules that are directly connected to religion, but rather posting rude, offensive things which is in the eye of the beholder (admins and such). If you don't like that, you must have a terrible time surfing the internet. Ok, so tell me why people got banned for posting those troll pictures few pages before. I'm sure that only "few got offended". If you don't think that people deserve to have rights protecting their believes then my discussion with you is pointless. You just don't understand basic forms of human coexistence. Lol, are you serious? This is a private forum, you have no rights other than what the site owners give you. And there were about of 2 people that raised objections to the religious picture while the rest gave 10+ pages of arguments. That might give you a clue why one was allowed and why one wasn't. If you can't understand that, then you don't get the internet. Once again, are you suggesting we ban everyone that a few find offensive. Yes, with a few I mean a few. And your last sentence is just laughable.... Really?
Wow, can you read all my post before posting? I've said at the beginning that I'm comparing that Jinro-Jesus picture and those troll pictures and I'm saying that they both may be insulting for some people. But both had 10+ pages of statements like "GOSU!" (arguments? lmao) and only troll pictures were banned. It's Internet, RIGHT?
|
Foxer Vs MVP GSL4 finals to determine best terran :D
|
i thought there is no game on saturday so i missed them 
what a surprise!! MC didnt advance!!! and how depressing when i see foxer advance again=_= but i am so glad jinro beat him :D cant wait for vods!
idra v jinro rematch will be epic XDDD
and foxer v nada!!! i wish i can see nada's total ownage:D
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/CuR0s.jpg)
