EPTAnd as I already told him, Jinro's series against MC was so fucking awesome, that was so exciting it completely shut down my shitty mood of the day
Hope you win this whole shit now Jon, you deserve it
[GSL] Code A Ro16 Day 4 / Code S Ro16 Group D - Page 177
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
cArn-
Korea (South)824 Posts
And as I already told him, Jinro's series against MC was so fucking awesome, that was so exciting it completely shut down my shitty mood of the day Hope you win this whole shit now Jon, you deserve it | ||
|
McMonty
Canada379 Posts
On January 15 2011 18:29 GenT wrote: + Show Spoiler + On January 15 2011 18:27 bakla wrote: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/VxSUA.png) This deserves its own thread. OMG ROFLROFLROFLROLFORFL | ||
|
ZeNd0kUn
United States331 Posts
On January 15 2011 19:58 Highways wrote: Hope John or some other GOM member sees this and takes this into consideration for next season. Invading the GOM forums with this issue is another good alternative.Wow that is so stupid, whyare to two halves completely seperate?? Players playing each other again from the ro32 doesn't make sense. EPIC FAIL GOM | ||
|
raidmaster
474 Posts
On January 15 2011 20:01 nihlon wrote: Lol, we are clearly not visiting the same forums then if you think that is ban-worthy on most forums. In fact I have a hard time thinking of one that would outright ban someone for that. It is clearly stated in most of the forums that insult to religion is forbidden (in any form). You probably think what you think because you don't care. But some people do. And because of that forums have rules like that. | ||
|
Ansinjunger
United States2451 Posts
On January 15 2011 19:55 raidmaster wrote: I don't wanna argue here but for some people the picture above (crucifix etc.) may be an insult to religion and is far worse than those made-in-5-seconds troll images. And as far as I'm concerned such things are ban-worthy for the most of forums. I appreciate the work an author put to create it, but it isn't necessairly better from other images for everyone, just because it required more effort. I'm cool with it, but someone may not. Just sayin. I hope you're right, but religion bashing is very popular and in vogue among younger people, especially in online communities. Aside, why do people keep calling those 2 games a "series?" It's pretty sad the way things worked out that they had to play each other twice and MKP and MC never played and we also didn't get to see Jinro vs Rainbow. | ||
|
doffe
Sweden636 Posts
On January 15 2011 12:07 rawk wrote: thefuck? 3 Terrans in one group? I love how gom sets this shit up. MC's moving on for sure. I hope your trolling since there was 9 terrans in RO16 thus it was 100% chance of it being atleast 3 in one group. Furthermore the grouping was random so... | ||
|
Jacobs Ladder
United States1705 Posts
On January 15 2011 20:04 raidmaster wrote: It is clearly stated in most of the forums that insult to religion is forbidden (in any form). You probably think what you think because you don't care. But some people do. And because of that forums have rules like that. 1. This is an idiotic conversation for a LIVE REPORT THREAD. 2. This is not the case here so it doesn't matter in the SLIGHTEST what the rules are or are not elsewhere. 3. Congrats Jinro! 4. IMADRAGOON. | ||
|
raidmaster
474 Posts
On January 15 2011 20:06 Jacobs Ladder wrote: 1. This is an idiotic conversation for a LIVE REPORT THREAD. 2. This is not the case here so it doesn't matter in the SLIGHTEST what the rules are or are not elsewhere. 3. Congrats Jinro! 4. IMADRAGOON. Conversation about what is forbidden and what not started many pages before. I'm actually trying to find TL regulations to check just out of curiosity what is stated there. On a side note, Live reports contain loads of shit to be honest. I've seen many and all I can tell you is that 20% of any of them is not game related at all. | ||
|
Goibon
New Zealand8185 Posts
| ||
|
doffe
Sweden636 Posts
and btw, Jinro vs Idra in RO8!! I really hope jinro takes it but as a zerg im divided still :D My swedish side though conquers so I finish with a.... JINRO FIGHTING! | ||
|
nihlon
Sweden5581 Posts
On January 15 2011 20:04 raidmaster wrote: It is clearly stated in most of the forums that insult to religion is forbidden (in any form). You probably think what you think because you don't care. But some people do. And because of that forums have rules like that. Where did I write my opinion or what I think about the picture in that post? I just said with quite certainty that most forums that I visit wouldn't have a problem with such a picture (pretty much every Swedish forum I know of, and quite a few English speaking as well). Can you prove otherwise? In fact if you want I can post the picture and give you the links so you can sit and wait in vain for me to get banned. | ||
|
Zarahtra
Iceland4053 Posts
On January 15 2011 19:23 ZeNd0kUn wrote: + Show Spoiler + Q. ( Korean Interviewer ) Did you expect the carriers? A. ( Jinro ) I think the carrier itself is a decent unit. It's underrated by many people, but it's actually quite good against Terran mech. I agree ... If Jinro didn't scout the Fleet Beacon and made a ton of Vikings in time .. I doubt the Mech Push would have been as devastating as it was. I'm not saying MC would have won outright but in the game on Scrap Station ... the Carriers didn't even get a chance to fight. MC was in the Phase of building an army when Jinro pushed ( together with Vikings ) and this obviously won the game. And if it were any other Protoss I doubt they would have counter attacked and made a new base at the Gold. Just wanted to put this out their to the people making fun of MC going Carriers. They do well against Mech Terran without vikings and even when there are vikings but are low in number. mm, I actually think it was a decent response. If that banshee had been denied seeing the fleet beacon(and he hadn't scanned), I'm not sure if jinro would've actually taken that game, it'd have in the least been a lot closer. It really felt though like jinro just had a lot better macro, I mean he had so much stuff, like 15 or so vikings, 7+ tanks, 4+ thors mixed with rines and hellions. MC had 5 or so carriers, 5-7 phoenixes, like 2 immos, and couple of gateway units(this might not be exact, but felt like around those numbers when watching it). Add onto it that all the phoenixes died within the first 5 sec of the battle... Dunno wondering if he had some resources in the bank, since they were on similar worker count... | ||
|
Benjef
United Kingdom6921 Posts
| ||
|
bearhug
United States999 Posts
On January 15 2011 16:20 Asha` wrote: Wow, fucking sick drop decision from MarineKing to completely turn that game on its head. Jinro can take out MC twice, it's no problem =) The greatest prediction I have ever witnessed in sc2 history. | ||
|
bearhug
United States999 Posts
On January 15 2011 20:01 cArn- wrote: didn't know it but MKP is a pimp, there were some (hot) korean girls waiting to take pictures in his arms after the games haha And as I already told him, Jinro's series against MC was so fucking awesome, that was so exciting it completely shut down my shitty mood of the day Hope you win this whole shit now Jon, you deserve it the pimp part is epic  | ||
|
Pasky
United States29 Posts
On January 15 2011 19:05 HawaiianPig wrote: couldn't help myself I don't know why people think it was BM. It was most definitely an act of Good Manner. And lo did Jinro bring unto MC the Manner. And unto MC the Manner was good. ![[image loading]](http://hawaiianpig.pfordee.com/freepornxxx/lordjinro.jpg) Oh my god! that made me cry. So funny! | ||
|
Ayush_SCtoss
India3051 Posts
Gratz Jinro! | ||
|
doffe
Sweden636 Posts
On January 15 2011 20:16 Benjef wrote: Awesome win for Jinro. Dumb bracket system tho :S, they should now be playing people on the other side of the bracket now not people in their groups. I agree, and I also think the groupplay in RO16 should BO3s instead. The entire system is a bit of imo, just for a moment pretend they all where forced to face eachother instead of as it is now, then the result could have been very different. after 2 games each Marineking 2-0 Jinro 1-1 MC 1-1 Rainbow 0-2 then now the matchups would be Jinro vs Rainbow and MC vs Marineking. This could very well have had Jinro and MC as winners thus giving this table Marineking 2-1 Jinro 2-1 MC 2-1 Rainbow 0-3 with marineking jinro and MC all beating each other forcing another groupplay or something ot the sort. It just doesnt fit that you call it a "group" and then who you meet first can have such a huge play on the results. | ||
|
raidmaster
474 Posts
On January 15 2011 20:14 nihlon wrote: Where did I write my opinion on the picture? I just said with quite certainty that most forums that I visit wouldn't have a problem with such a picture (pretty much every swedish forum I know of, and quite a few english speaking as well). Can you prove otherwise? I don't have to prove you anything. It is obvious that rules of that exist on "mature" forums just to respect people thoughts and opinions. Why is it so hard to understand? For somebody cursing is inappropriate, for someone else its insulting religion (especially if this person believes in such). This is why regulations exist and why moderatos exist. Can anyone link me a TL regulations? | ||
|
Nemireck
Canada1875 Posts
On January 15 2011 20:25 raidmaster wrote: I don't have to prove you anything. It is obvious that rules of that exist on "mature" forums just to respect people thoughts and opinions. Why is it so hard to understand? For somebody cursing is inappropriate, for someone else its insulting religion (especially if this person believes in such). This is why regulations exist and why moderatos exist. Can anyone link me a TL regulations? I've never seen a forum that has banned people for such images. There's huge difference between something being listed in the rules, and the rules actually being enforced. So while you may be correct that there is often a rule handling such things, the actual enforcement of such rules is usually incredibly lax. | ||
| ||
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/eAFTZ.jpg)
