EPT[GSL] S3 Ro64 Day 2 - Page 102
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Darhaja
United States108 Posts
| ||
|
Samp
Canada783 Posts
| ||
|
Zingerac
United States138 Posts
On November 23 2010 15:59 Doko wrote: I don't get why so many zergs get their baneling nest so ridiculously late. the 1 or 2 drones are not freaking worth it when your opponent has clearly 0 intention of taking an expo. The earlier we get the baneling nest the later we get lair. | ||
|
Rayeth
United States883 Posts
| ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6566 Posts
| ||
|
Xxavi
United States1248 Posts
| ||
|
Skullflower
United States3779 Posts
When does Ret play? | ||
|
Highwinds
Canada955 Posts
(That 4 banshees viking 1 from yesterday for example) | ||
|
Pyrrhuloxia
United States6700 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:00 travis wrote: that wasn't remotely allin it's just a terran weapon Bringing SCVs in a push is only an all in if scans are used or offensive mules are called down far from a CC. | ||
|
Slardar
Canada7596 Posts
Saved the day! Sucks for Haypro, Blistering of all maps is risky to 14 cause of the backdoor, spines can only do so much. | ||
|
Jaeger
United States1150 Posts
On November 23 2010 15:59 Xxavi wrote: I am sad Haypro lost, but some people on here need to get a grip when they see a bad play and say "oh Huk or Kiwikaki lost his place to such player, they would have done better". I won't be surprised if I see ret and Jinro go out like this. Hope that won't happen, but this is not training. Haypro needs to improve considerably. The scouting first. He was just droning and droning, no defense at all. And this is without scouting. What? Haypro was actively scouting with lings overlords and overseers. | ||
|
Hypatio
549 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:00 Kavas wrote: Bad position to engage for Haypro. Was interesting build from BitByBit. I still don't understand the Raven though. probably just to clean up tumors. | ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:00 Everlong wrote: Sorry, but since its obvious, that if Terran fails with this push with scvs, hes gonna gg right away.. So whats the definition for all-in? If theres no transition, its all-in.. What is the transition for this? Start from 0 Scv against 2 Zerg base? Please. no he isn't gonna gg right away... he only pulled like what.. 10 scvs? so he has like another 15 scvs at home and with mules he can match a fully saturated 1base easily the entire point is that the likelihood that he will at least hurt zerg economy is veeery high, which is why he does it | ||
|
SCC-Faust
United States3736 Posts
I just hope he uses this for motivation for his next tournament he attends and doesn't let it get him down. | ||
|
Shinta)
United States1716 Posts
Unless the terran has like 1 barracks xD | ||
|
zemiron
United States481 Posts
| ||
|
JoeSchmoe
Canada2058 Posts
| ||
|
Sfydjklm
United States9218 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:00 travis wrote: that wasn't remotely allin it's just a terran weapon to be honest nothing terrans do is all in unless they do like 0 damage. Mule's have huge fallback potential. | ||
|
Silidons
United States2813 Posts
| ||
|
Gooey
United States944 Posts
Guess I just have to hope for some good PvZ and PvT. | ||
| ||
