EPT[GSL] S3 Ro64 Day 2 - Page 101
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Kavas
Australia3421 Posts
| ||
|
Highwinds
Canada954 Posts
| ||
|
Deleted User 3420
24492 Posts
On November 23 2010 15:59 jere wrote: Terran here all I see is cheese in the form of scv all in. that wasn't remotely allin it's just a terran weapon | ||
|
thopol
Japan4560 Posts
| ||
|
Alejandrisha
United States6565 Posts
| ||
|
NeoLearner
Belgium1847 Posts
On November 23 2010 15:58 Titan107 wrote: Ret is going to go far in this GSL. Way to put pressure on him  Ret, the great white foreign hope!I really hope he goes far in this GSL, love his playstyle. Too bad HayprO won't be there to train his slew of inevitable ZvZ's with. | ||
|
Xeteh
United States589 Posts
 Gg Haypro, you'll stomp them next time! | ||
|
Fighter
Korea (South)1531 Posts
best of luck next time HayPrO | ||
|
Lush
United States657 Posts
On November 23 2010 15:59 kojinshugi wrote: Nothing's stopping you from using probes to tank damage for people who are a-moving. Lack of economy/mules is. SCVs are sent to tank/repair. meanwhile they can mine with a few mules and send in a few more additional units. Probes/drones only attack and those races have no mules, so no more econ whatsoever. | ||
|
Everlong
Czech Republic1973 Posts
On November 23 2010 15:58 dtz wrote: stop calling scv pulls all in. everyone knows that is not true. and pulling scv is always smart for Terrans no matter what. as Day9 puts it. 60 scv + 1 mule against 60 probes/drones is 10 percent economic advantage. 6 scv + 1 mule against 6 probes/drones is 100 percent economic advantage. No reason whatsoever not to force the opponent to trade workers. Sorry, but since its obvious, that if Terran fails with this push with scvs, hes gonna gg right away.. So whats the definition for all-in? If theres no transition, its all-in.. What is the transition for this? Start from 0 Scv against 2 Zerg base? Please. | ||
|
oPPRoBe
United States199 Posts
Less 2 Rax vs Zerg please. I don't care if it's a strong build - it's damned boring to watch. | ||
|
Subversion
South Africa3627 Posts
I'm so disappointed. | ||
|
Madder
Australia427 Posts
On November 23 2010 15:58 Liveon wrote: How could someone like that qualify while InControl, HuK and Tester couldn't? So bad... ... | ||
|
KiNGxXx
7928 Posts
On November 23 2010 15:58 Subversion wrote: Well, I'd seen nothing of Haypro before this. I've still seen nothing of Haypro. Sad but true! | ||
|
-vVvTitan-
United States473 Posts
On November 23 2010 16:00 Alejandrisha wrote: oh wow artosis just answered my question haha Oh em Gee HI ALEJ | ||
|
FirstQT
United States115 Posts
| ||
|
sqrt
1210 Posts
Sad panda for Hypro, if I must say, Hypro looked like he hasn't adapted to the Korean leagues. Keep trying HyprO, Hypro hwaitiiing~! | ||
|
Accidentus
59 Posts
| ||
|
epik640x
United States1134 Posts
| ||
|
seph`
Austria329 Posts
| ||
| ||
