EPTUser was warned for this post
[GSL] Ro8 Day 1 - Page 142
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Ancient.eu
Romania621 Posts
User was warned for this post | ||
|
Treadmill
Canada2833 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:16 Yaotzin wrote: Yawn always some excuse. Tournament results prove conclusively that Terran is very strong, despite them whining up a storm. Just like how FruitDealer's win proved conclusively that zerg didn't need a buff, or Terran a previous nerf? Not really. | ||
|
HollowLord
United States3862 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:17 Crissaegrim wrote: I dont understand why blizz wants to maintain a T>>P early game and P>T late game stance. Why dont they make it so that either race has a chance to take it early game or late game. Wouldnt that lead to more exciting games between back and forth advances, rather than terran racing to finish toss off as soon as possible? Still moaning the lack of protoss in the GSL. Actually if you watched the panel, they said that the Terran >> Protoss until the late game was a PROBLEM, and that they wanted to fix it. | ||
|
Ocedic
United States1808 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:17 Sanguinarius wrote: -100 sheild times 30 units? Yeah 1 ghost can do about 2.5-3k damage with the new clumping. Actually just like 1.5k - but thats still too much. Then learn how to spread out your units like Terran have to do against Banelings? | ||
|
AJ-
United States316 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:16 AmstAff wrote: I didnt saw 30 Ghosts... 1 EMP => -100 shields aoe spell man, come on | ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:18 Ocedic wrote: Then learn how to spread out your units like Terran have to do against Banelings? because EMPs travel the same speed as banelings? | ||
|
AmstAff
Germany949 Posts
So its the Terrans fault that the P has one clumped group? On the other site P users always give the hint to SPREAD YOUR UNITS and storms are shit. Sometimes I dont understand the world =/ | ||
|
Tx-MisfiT
United States283 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:14 Jehct wrote: Doing very well in two single elimination tournaments doesn't make you the 'best SC2 player'; perfect example is Select, won both TL Opens and got to the finals of MLG DC but Idra totally stomped him and undoubtedly showed he was the stronger player at the time. Don't think Hopetorture deserved his win here and can't understand people praising his play - he didn't make any gross mistakes but in situations where neither player does, he loses. His BW progaming experience is what helps gets him through IMO, as a player he hasn't done anything outstanding recently. I would say back to back Ro4 in the GSL is pretty impressive. There are the exceptions, but most players are given the "great" title after winning championships. He has to really win something before being considered the best. | ||
|
Crissaegrim
2947 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:18 HollowLord wrote: Actually if you watched the panel, they said that the Terran >> Protoss until the late game was a PROBLEM, and that they wanted to fix it. In that case, I hope they do it soon. | ||
|
zemiron
United States481 Posts
I think their match will be great, but only one of them can go on and I just prefer a greater racial mix no matter who the players are. | ||
|
Sanguinarius
United States3427 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:18 HollowLord wrote: Actually if you watched the panel, they said that the Terran >> Protoss until the late game was a PROBLEM, and that they wanted to fix it. They said exactly this. I just dont know how they are going to fix it. | ||
|
BurningSera
Ireland19621 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:17 Crissaegrim wrote: + Show Spoiler + On November 01 2010 22:12 Sanguinarius wrote: According to the blizzcon pannel, Terran >> Protoss until the late game. both game 2 and 3 were decided in the early game - when toss is at a disadvantage. Game 4 was mid-late game, but no HTs were out yet - another 2-3 mins would have been late game. Why dont they make it so that either race has a chance to take it early game or late game. Wouldnt that lead to more exciting games between back and forth advances, rather than terran racing to finish toss off as soon as possible? . they did say that  thats why they said they will still have more patches in future. each race should have a 50/50 winning rat regardless early/mid/late game. | ||
|
Kraznaya
United States3711 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:18 eggs wrote: am i the only one that isn't all that into DjWheat? He's definitely doesn't understand the game enough to cast GSL well, but neither does Tasteless Day9 is a self-absorbed commentator who operates better alone in his echo chamber with his fans IMO the best commentator team would be Artosis doing color and analysis paired with a very solid play by play guy, but unfortunately Jason Lee has a much better job at Arirang | ||
|
necmon
194 Posts
| ||
|
Yaotzin
South Africa4280 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:17 Crissaegrim wrote: I dont understand why blizz wants to maintain a T>>P early game and P>T late game stance. Why dont they make it so that either race has a chance to take it early game or late game. Wouldnt that lead to more exciting games between back and forth advances, rather than terran racing to finish toss off as soon as possible? Still moaning the lack of protoss in the GSL. No, they said that's how the view the MU at the moment. They specifically said they don't want it to be like that. On November 01 2010 22:17 Kraznaya wrote: Nice concession ty Not sure you know what that word means.. | ||
|
Zozo
Brazil2579 Posts
| ||
|
eggs
1011 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:19 AmstAff wrote: So its the Terrans fault that the P has one clumped group? On the other site P users always give the hint to SPREAD YOUR UNITS and storms are shit. Sometimes I dont understand the world =/ nobody says to spread for storm, they say to move out of storm | ||
|
PartyBiscuit
Canada4525 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:16 Yaotzin wrote: Yawn always some excuse. Tournament results prove conclusively that Terran is very strong, despite them whining up a storm. If most of the Zs weren't lined up in the same bracket, it'd be a much different distribution...also Kyrix/Foxer was extremely close. So it could've been easily 2 Zs and 2 Ts. (7 Zergs and 6Ts in Ro16), so stop reverse-QQing. | ||
|
SoL[9]
Portugal1370 Posts
Everyone have bad days. You can do a think right 106161 times but if you fail one than you are the worse. Fish memory... | ||
|
Doko
Argentina1737 Posts
On November 01 2010 22:17 Crissaegrim wrote: I dont understand why blizz wants to maintain a T>>P early game and P>T late game stance. Why dont they make it so that either race has a chance to take it early game or late game. Wouldnt that lead to more exciting games between back and forth advances, rather than terran racing to finish toss off as soon as possible? Still moaning the lack of protoss in the GSL. They don't want it to be that way. Dustin Browder specifically addressed that. If you buff gateway units 4 gate is now unstoppable, if you nerf terran... zerg rolls over them. Protoss is probably gonna be stuck with 2gate robo till HoTS. | ||
| ||
