Banelings hurt so much, it's not even like you can let your tanks and thors take them while grouped up because you're busy running your MM away and the mech units just get wiped. I'm going to be curious as to what counter terran is going to need to do when faced with mass banelings.

That early marine pressure that Fake_Boxer uses must be the answer to this sort of play.

pyro19

6575 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#746

His Macro is quite Impressive.
He always has Enough Economy to Keep Building Banelings after Banelings.

dartoo

India2889 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#747

fun games! Woot! But my liquibet... got destroyed by banelings

Altar

United States577 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#748

I'm never betting against zerg against terran ever again, I'm still in the thought the matchup is terran favored.

BeMannerDuPenner

Germany5638 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#749

On October 28 2010 20:02 me_viet wrote:

Show nested quote +

He did, he brought like 4-5. SCV"s couldn't repair due to drones blocking lol. epic drone micro.

more like fail scv micro. scvs should be next to the thor all the time and not suddenly rightlick them on the thor when its totally surrounded.

ShLiM

Bulgaria178 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#750

KYRIX FTW

Altern

United States1053 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#751

more freakin' upsets

imarriedacow

United States19 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#752

On October 28 2010 19:51 Tobberoth wrote:
Artosis has such a hardon for Kyrix now, I'm sure he wants to interview him badly.

And man, how did Tasteless become the first big foreign SC caster? He's not even close to good casters like Artosis, Day9, Husky etc.

You obviously weren't a SC1 player then. Tasteless was THE caster for SC1, meaning he was really the only big named caster. He was also an extremely high level progamer before that, which contributed to his wealth of knowledge in the game. It's pretty obvious that he hasn't put in the same amount of work into SC2.

keV.

United States3214 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#753

for kicks.

Caphe

Vietnam10817 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#754

On October 28 2010 20:00 nucleargnome wrote:
lol golden rule: never bet against zerg in liquibet

I learnt that 2 days ago :D

eNbee

Belgium487 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#755

On October 28 2010 19:59 iRRelevance wrote:
Is it just me or ensnare has bad macro ?

It's just you. You may have noticed the relentless pressure he was under, his standing army was never able to grow into anything scary, apart from the force he first pushed out with.

lorgoth

161 Posts

October 28 2010 11:03 GMT

#756

He outplayed ensnare so badly. I think it was not his day.

SKtheAnathema

United States885 Posts

October 28 2010 11:04 GMT

#757

i never understood why artosis kept calling him a bad all-in player. he's "upset" 3 players now. i don't think you can get lucky that many times without understanding what you're doing

Piski

Finland3461 Posts

October 28 2010 11:04 GMT

#758

On October 28 2010 20:02 FuryX wrote:
What's S Class?

Code S = High seed

For future GSL tournaments.

zzaaxxsscd

United States626 Posts

October 28 2010 11:04 GMT

#759

yeah that was totally entertaining
a little worried for Nada, because it looks like it will be really hard to play safe (macro) vs Zerg

teekesselchen

Germany886 Posts

October 28 2010 11:04 GMT

#760

What the hell are those guys talking about? I've been playing and losing to overly agressive super expanding Zergs since the end of beta phase one and always wondered "how the hell could they consider Terran overpowered?". And now a Zerg does exactly what I fear for ages and everyone's like "omg such a playstyle exists?"

I hope at least Boxer can keep up the Terran flag in GSL