[GSL] Ro32 Day 2 - Page 115
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
dukethegold
Canada5645 Posts
| ||
teacash
Canada494 Posts
On October 25 2010 23:39 Heimatloser wrote: Percentage of Korean Players that where eliminated in RO64: 31 of 62 = 50% Percentage of non-Korean Players eliminated in RO64: 1 of 2 = 50% to this point Korean and non Korean Players where of equal strength. Percentage of Korean Players that where eliminated in RO32: 16 of 31 = 52% Percentage of non-Korean Players eliminated in RO32: 0 of 1 = 0% obviously in the RO32 non-Koreans performed waaaaaaaaaay better! Loner isn't Korean. btw, you can't say shit with statistically insignificant sample numbers.. dono why you're even trying | ||
Chocobo
United States1108 Posts
On October 25 2010 21:50 raidmaster wrote: I partly agree with you but c'mon. Magix box is not a strategy nor anything that zerg discovered using the "drawing board". I would call it a bug. I think that with increased roach range magic box should be fixed. TvZ would be at least balanced somehow. How the heck is magic box a bug? That's like saying it's a bug to spread your workers out in different directions if a baneling gets in, because it's "supposed to" do splash damage to multiple units. | ||
sleepingdog
Austria6145 Posts
On October 25 2010 23:38 gozima wrote: IMO, the only obstacles he faces in his bracket are going to come from ![]() ![]() zenio will lose vs MVP I think and MC will have a hard time defeating maka....but inca vs MC would be really awsome, hoping for it | ||
shannn
Netherlands2891 Posts
On October 25 2010 23:44 teacash wrote: Loner isn't Korean. btw, you can't say shit with statistically insignificant sample numbers.. dono why you're even trying I think he was trying to be sarcastic. Atleast that's what my impression is after reading his post. | ||
teacash
Canada494 Posts
On October 25 2010 23:48 shannn wrote: I think he was trying to be sarcastic. Atleast that's what my impression is after reading his post. I considered that momentarily, but thought it was too dumb to even be sarcasm | ||
Heimatloser
Germany1494 Posts
On October 25 2010 23:44 teacash wrote: Loner isn't Korean. btw, you can't say shit with statistically insignificant sample numbers.. dono why you're even trying small sample size? what the hell? 64 for players in the round of 64 is the whole lot, its everything, all. theres no statistics about this, tis is only facts! dont you come with the bullshit before even thinking! insignificant numbers... you can only say that when i take maybe 10 players out of those 64 and go with my conclusion... or when i try to make conclusions on the whole scII community with this 64 samples. but in what i said i took EVERYTHING into account. learn your math... edit: i took EVERYTHING into account except that loner isnt korean.. ;-) | ||
Surrealz
United States449 Posts
| ||
Chocobo
United States1108 Posts
On October 25 2010 23:29 shell wrote: I think NaDa is allready one of the top terrans. He has amazing map control and his slow metodical style is very good against younger faster rush styles of the youngers terrans! that's why i also believe Boxer might have a good chance against SC2 T's and make if far! But from what i've seens boxer vs nada i would go with nada! Agreed... in fact I think Nada might be the #1 terran right now, and probably the biggest threat to the top zerg players. Terrrans have been trying cute tricks against zerg, or harrassing and just hoping to kill a lot of drones, and in the long run it hasn't been all the effective. I think the biggest threat to a zerg could be a terran who can keep up with them on macro. Nada's macro is so strong and I can't really understand it, it almost seems like his units must cost less than other terran players. If he can keep up with the zerg army size and get a critical mass of thors with some tanks, any zerg player would be in real trouble. I love Boxer but unfortunately he seems to be a step behind players like Nada and HopeTorture. | ||
omgbbq2
Canada169 Posts
| ||
InFiNitY[pG]
Germany3474 Posts
Idra vs MVP Nada vs Leenock Ensnare vs Kyrix Loner vs Boxer (maybe) Sangho vs Fruitdealer | ||
Devlin
Sweden91 Posts
On October 26 2010 00:03 InFiNitY[pG] wrote: good god top16 matches all look insanely good. Idra vs MVP Nada vs Leenock Ensnare vs Kyrix Loner vs Boxer (maybe) Sangho vs Fruitdealer Jumping quite far ahead of schedule... but yes, if those players make it through ro32 it will be really interesting in ro16! | ||
PuercoPop
Peru277 Posts
| ||
teacash
Canada494 Posts
On October 25 2010 23:51 Heimatloser wrote: small sample size? what the hell? 64 for players in the round of 64 is the whole lot, its everything, all. theres no statistics about this, tis is only facts! dont you come with the bullshit before even thinking! insignificant numbers... you can only say that when i take maybe 10 players out of those 64 and go with my conclusion... or when i try to make conclusions on the whole scII community with this 64 samples. but in what i said i took EVERYTHING into account. learn your math... edit: i took EVERYTHING into account except that loner isnt korean.. ;-) When you're comparing the % successes of two groups, you need significant sample sizes in EACH group.. not just a large total number.. there's 3 people in 1 group, and 61 in the other, therefore you can't make any legit comparisons.. learn your statistics | ||
Heimatloser
Germany1494 Posts
On October 26 2010 00:07 teacash wrote: When you're comparing the % successes of two groups, you need significant sample sizes in EACH group.. not just a large total number.. there's 3 people in 1 group, and 61 in the other, therefore you can't make any legit comparisons.. learn your statistics don't be mad. i was sarcastic in the first place;-) Also: Yes i can! | ||
eckm
United States72 Posts
*gets called on it* "I was being sarcastic!" | ||
netherDrake
Singapore1831 Posts
| ||
Arevall
Sweden1133 Posts
On October 25 2010 22:45 Telcontar wrote: When did this thread turn into Korean vs Non-koreans? Can't we just forget about nationalities and just enjoy the games? Lets look past race and just treat each player as individuals. I agree, although I think it's good if as many countries as possible can be represented at big tournaments. It's makes it much more interesting than if it would only be players from one place. | ||
Jakalo
Latvia2350 Posts
Going in noble footsteps of Guemchi - bonjwa graphs. ![]() | ||
The KY
United Kingdom6252 Posts
Is there a bracket anywhere? EDIT; After a mere 3 seconds research I found the schedule. | ||
| ||