|
On September 28 2010 19:22 ccexpert wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 19:21 Paz wrote: The interviewer is on fire today, really detailed explanations of the player response. Keep it up! He was in the thread yesterday and I think he is taking the advice to heart.
Ah I see, was he trying to shorten the answers previously? I much prefer this style - Far more informative and often hilarious haha.
|
Just hope for no cheese on this match.
|
On September 28 2010 19:21 deverlight wrote: That's interesting - Cool wasn't confident in taking Inca in a straight up game and decided to use some all-in ish builds against him.
How did Cool went for all in build g2, he went for standard 2 hatch opening, and when he saw inca going for zealot push, he countered it with banelings..
|
Go tester. he better get into the finals
|
okey, let's see the best games of GSL!
|
On September 28 2010 19:23 ZapRoffo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 19:22 Huko wrote:On September 28 2010 19:20 kickinhead wrote:On September 28 2010 19:17 leb wrote:On September 28 2010 19:13 jahre wrote: Think I'd be pissed too if I got 6pooled on a 4P map and then semi all-in'd the next game. how exactly is it a semi all-in when he had 2 bases vs 1? Banelings against P is almost always an all-in, cuz it's so easy to wall-off with buildings. have force-fields out etc. Dude, he fast expanded. It wasn't even close to an all-in. It was a way to end it quickly and not let protoss get back into it, and it worked perfect. If it was all-in, he would have won a lot quicker, he made just enough units to keep the protoss busy while he macro'd up. Naw man it was so all in, the 25 roaches that came to support was the follow-up all in. Yeah, and the third base was just to extend his all-in into the late game.
|
Agreed, the translator has been really good today. Detailed answers, good stuff, loving it.
|
Is someone restreaming this? I can't get on the stream anymore. T_T
|
The rules of the GSL actually say that if you type, you get disqualified. So GGing isn't required.
|
too bad we didn't see longer games, really don't understand why Inca went for 2 gates in his base, especially after the zealot nerf :/
|
On September 28 2010 19:21 CubEdIn wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 19:15 SkyZz wrote:On September 28 2010 19:14 CubEdIn wrote: You guys can blame cheese play all you want. This series was EPIC.
"Screw you PvZ", he seemed to say. Not blaming or anything but to call this series Epic ?... We all know both Cool and Inca can put up better performance then this =/ I disagree. I believe they put up a great performance, but Inca just got outplayed (in BOs, obviously). A faster gate in Game 1, not losing zeals in game 2 would have changed things dramatically. The thing is, these guys have played THOUSANDS of games, so you can't say "he didn't know what to do vs a 6pool" or vs banelings. It's not like that. Great players should be great at any stage of the game, ESPECIALLY the stage where you only have a handful of units to fight with. That's why short games are so intense. Think about it this way, if it were Tester instead of Inca, would he have done better? Judging by the games we saw, yes. Could have Tester won against this? Maybe. So it's not just the strategy, it's the art of defense, micro etc. I like macro games too, but every now and then I want to see things like this. It's what separates the good players from the great players (see SC, legends like boxer, nal_ra, etc. all known for being great at all stages, even cheeses).
+1
|
BTW I really love Artosis' commentary. Guy's so funny. Great job man!
|
On September 28 2010 19:23 ZapRoffo wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 19:22 Huko wrote:On September 28 2010 19:20 kickinhead wrote:On September 28 2010 19:17 leb wrote:On September 28 2010 19:13 jahre wrote: Think I'd be pissed too if I got 6pooled on a 4P map and then semi all-in'd the next game. how exactly is it a semi all-in when he had 2 bases vs 1? Banelings against P is almost always an all-in, cuz it's so easy to wall-off with buildings. have force-fields out etc. Dude, he fast expanded. It wasn't even close to an all-in. It was a way to end it quickly and not let protoss get back into it, and it worked perfect. If it was all-in, he would have won a lot quicker, he made just enough units to keep the protoss busy while he macro'd up. Naw man it was so all in, the 25 roaches that came to support was the follow-up all in.
Followup all in? He was getting his 3rd base up and he had 40+ drones. You're wrong. Unless you're trolling.
|
On September 28 2010 19:21 Zrah wrote:Show nested quote +On September 28 2010 19:17 Powster wrote: Whats wrong with 2 gating..? You want a protoss to go macro vs a zerg.. which is impossible. The only choice protoss has is to 4 gate every single game now.. True 4 gate destroy his expo expo yourself or Canon wall in that are only 2 things that can cripple zerg right now until he bashes you with his non stop production and complete army switches, he goes ling ultra you go zel immortal you beat that, he goes mass muta and it's a gg. Zerg has free win vs all races in late game since he can switch so fast and produce 120 food worth instantly from all saved larva. If you don't cripple zerg early game you will be fighting a downhill fight from there.
You couldnt be more wrong.
On anothe topic, im so fucking glad we get to see COOL vs another terran Hope to god we see Cool in the finals.
|
|
I don't get why people think this is such an extraordinary feat. ZvP is balanced. It's not the same as when a top zerg beat a top terran. IMO, Cool wasn't the underdog in this game.
|
Wasn't it against IntoTheRainbow July used the hatcherybug into regame into win? ^^
|
anyone know the song that they played during the intro of the players?
|
|
On September 28 2010 19:25 Spidinko wrote: BTW I really love Artosis' commentary. Guy's so funny. Great job man!
Totally agree, i'm a big fan of Tasteless but Artosis stole the show on this tournament.
|
|
|
|