|
On September 06 2010 20:26 Vokasak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:23 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. So he did all the perfect responses and still got raped. I wonder why people complain, then. He got raped from the push, not from the harass. Did you miss the attack on Terran's natural? He was able to macro enough stuff. to do a scary attack forcing the pullback/delay of his second drop. He only "got raped" after the drops on the cliff stopped. Why do I bother, though? Zerg players can't see past their own overinflated sense of martyrdom.
He was able to macro enough to launch a failed attack on a Terran that had 2 Thors (a large proportion of his investment) out harassing.
He 'got raped after the drops stopped' because T hit him with everything in the front rather than defending while the hatch died, and the economic damage was already done.
|
On September 06 2010 20:26 Vokasak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:23 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. So he did all the perfect responses and still got raped. I wonder why people complain, then. He got raped from the push, not from the harass. Did you miss the attack on Terran's natural? He was able to macro enough stuff. to do a scary attack forcing the pullback/delay of his second drop. He only "got raped" after the drops on the cliff stopped. Why do I bother, though? Zerg players can't see past their own overinflated sense of martyrdom.
He lost 2 hatches, some spinecrawlers, and an extractor on top of most of his army when he attacked the terran natural. I hear losing 1000 minerals worth of stuff and mining time is conducive to losing.
|
Artosis is so scared he'd probably just leave(without gg)
|
So thats what Artosis' orgasm sounds like...
|
Wow, LastForever really has no micro, why would he start making such a micro-intensive unit?
|
rofl couldn't have said it better myself artosis.. "uahahhhquahhaha"
|
United Kingdom2950 Posts
On September 06 2010 20:25 Darksoldierr wrote:
Junwi < Xel'Naga Caverns > LegalMind played already or not yet?
No it got delayed.
DOUBLE QUEEN PLAY ALL THE WAY
|
On September 06 2010 20:27 TRAP[yoo] wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:26 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:23 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. So he did all the perfect responses and still got raped. I wonder why people complain, then. He got raped from the push, not from the harass. Did you miss the attack on Terran's natural? He was able to macro enough stuff. to do a scary attack forcing the pullback/delay of his second drop. He only "got raped" after the drops on the cliff stopped. Why do I bother, though? Zerg players can't see past their own overinflated sense of martyrdom. killing the hatch twice certainly helps terran. or am i wrong?
He gave up two thors, four marines, a siege tank, and three medivacs for those two hatcheries. If I was on 3 bases as a zerg vs 2 base terran, I'd take that trade any day.
|
Bong is actually his last name LOL
|
LiveForever is... well, he could learn a thing or two from Morrow's Reapers, this is almost painful. He should already have won if he just microed a little.
|
No creep tumors make me eat cry pie. 
|
On September 06 2010 20:29 I_Love_Bacon wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:26 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:23 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. So he did all the perfect responses and still got raped. I wonder why people complain, then. He got raped from the push, not from the harass. Did you miss the attack on Terran's natural? He was able to macro enough stuff. to do a scary attack forcing the pullback/delay of his second drop. He only "got raped" after the drops on the cliff stopped. Why do I bother, though? Zerg players can't see past their own overinflated sense of martyrdom. He lost 2 hatches, some spinecrawlers, and an extractor on top of most of his army when he attacked the terran natural. I hear losing 1000 minerals worth of stuff and mining time is conducive to losing.
At the cost of over 1000 minerals and quite a bit of gas worth of units. The second drop alone was over 1000 minerals.
|
Artosis: "Nice reaper play - I love it. By love it, I mean I hate it!"
|
51497 Posts
|
lol.. not broke like MC Hammer... hahaha
|
This play just seems a little subpar...but I understand not everyone plays their best at such a HUGE tourney
|
On September 06 2010 20:31 Vokasak wrote:Show nested quote +On September 06 2010 20:29 I_Love_Bacon wrote:On September 06 2010 20:26 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:23 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:22 Vokasak wrote:On September 06 2010 20:20 Shikyo wrote:On September 06 2010 20:18 Vokasak wrote:
And now he attacks to bring the thor drops back home. I hope Zerg forumgoers are taking notes. This is the way you handle agression on the highground above your natural, not by making "Serious Discussion" threads. If losing nat hatchery twice = handling the aggression on the highground, well okay It doesn't matter if he lost it twice. He took a lot of mech down with him, and he had the expansion to the North anyway. He did all the proper responses, as opposed to getting flustered and doing stoping stupid (Or outright ragequitting) the way most people on the ladder are doing. So he did all the perfect responses and still got raped. I wonder why people complain, then. He got raped from the push, not from the harass. Did you miss the attack on Terran's natural? He was able to macro enough stuff. to do a scary attack forcing the pullback/delay of his second drop. He only "got raped" after the drops on the cliff stopped. Why do I bother, though? Zerg players can't see past their own overinflated sense of martyrdom. He lost 2 hatches, some spinecrawlers, and an extractor on top of most of his army when he attacked the terran natural. I hear losing 1000 minerals worth of stuff and mining time is conducive to losing. At the cost of over 1000 minerals and quite a bit of gas worth of units. The second drop alone was over 1000 minerals.
But the zerg relies on the 2nd hatch for production, which he barely got to do, and the 3rd only got fully operational near the end.
|
On September 06 2010 20:30 Shikyo wrote:
LiveForever is... well, he could learn a thing or two from Morrow's Reapers, this is almost painful. He should already have won if he just microed a little.
Yeah... a little bit surprised, honestly. With all the hype about how far ahead of us the Koreans supposedly are, we see really poor reaper micro here and ZERO creep tumors despite having TWO queens. It doesn't even make sense.
|
God, ZergBong is so behind. Only a matter of time... T_T
|
well zergbong is terrible in SC2 as in BW if not worse
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
