On August 04 2010 03:12 Backpack wrote: So they're playing SC at a WC event? I'm confused.
wtf are you talking about "Warcraft event"? It's the Blizzard's Regional Finals, which as of now only include WC3 and WoW. It's a Blizzard event, not a "Warcraft event". If SC2 had been released earlier, it would've been included as well.
On August 04 2010 03:18 Jameser wrote: I didn't even know madfrog was playing starcraft... what's his alias, I wanna find some replays of him
UnknownArt was his beta nick. I don't know whats his nick right now
Its Madfrog right now (with random capital letters). He plays Zerg. He's pretty good, I've seen a lot of his replays. I think he could beat TLO, but I still think TLO wins 2-1.
On August 04 2010 03:12 Backpack wrote: So they're playing SC at a WC event? I'm confused.
wtf are you talking about "Warcraft event"? It's the Blizzard's Regional Finals, which as of now only include WC3 and WoW. It's a Blizzard event, not a "Warcraft event". If SC2 had been released earlier, it would've been included as well.
Well i just figured since it was called "2010 European Warcraft Invitational" it was a warcraft event. I must be pretty stupid to make that assumption.
I also just saw this on blizzard's facebook.
(EU) For the viewing pleasure of StarCraft II: Wings of Liberty fans everywhere we’ve arranged a StarCraft II show match between two of the world’s best players at the 2010 European Warcraft Invitational in Cologne, Germany.
I'm glad to see that they are already starting to spark the e-sports scene.
On August 04 2010 03:12 Backpack wrote: So they're playing SC at a WC event? I'm confused.
wtf are you talking about "Warcraft event"? It's the Blizzard's Regional Finals, which as of now only include WC3 and WoW. It's a Blizzard event, not a "Warcraft event". If SC2 had been released earlier, it would've been included as well.
Dude, the event is called "2010 European Warcraft Invitational".
Very excited for this! I don't know much about Madfrog (I never followed any esport outside of SC really) but I'm always looking forward to seeing TLO in another match.
On August 04 2010 04:33 infuzer wrote: SC is like 99% macro. WC3 is like 99% micro. I think SC2 depends more on micro than macro for winning.
SC2 is 99% timings, build orders, and decision making. Micro and macro are the easiest aspects by far.
Moreover, while macro was nonexistent in WC3, micro wasn't nonexistent in SC. It was very much there and much, much harder to pull off than in WC3, although admittably the game wasn't as much about micro as WC3. Anyway, this is why Bisu is the person whose micro has been by far the most impressive I've ever seen from any game. I don't get it why they think SC had no micro.
On August 04 2010 04:33 infuzer wrote: SC is like 99% macro. WC3 is like 99% micro. I think SC2 depends more on micro than macro for winning.
SC2 is 99% timings, build orders, and decision making. Micro and macro are the easiest aspects by far.
Moreover, while macro was nonexistent in WC3, micro wasn't nonexistent in SC. It was very much there and much, much harder to pull off than in WC3, although admittably the game wasn't as much about micro as WC3. Anyway, this is why Bisu is the person whose micro has been by far the most impressive I've ever seen from any game. I don't get it why they think SC had no micro.
I don't see how micro in BW is harder to pull off than in WC3. WC3 has tons of spells and fewer units which makes it even more important to keep your units alive.
I'm going to be rooting for MadFrog, that guy was godlike in WC3.
On August 04 2010 06:45 AJMcSpiffy wrote: Very excited for this! I don't know much about Madfrog (I never followed any esport outside of SC really) but I'm always looking forward to seeing TLO in another match.
He came third in the SCBW WCG 2001 ;P
Might have been before your time, but he used to be quite the BW player.
On August 04 2010 04:33 infuzer wrote: SC is like 99% macro. WC3 is like 99% micro. I think SC2 depends more on micro than macro for winning.
SC2 is 99% timings, build orders, and decision making. Micro and macro are the easiest aspects by far.
Moreover, while macro was nonexistent in WC3, micro wasn't nonexistent in SC. It was very much there and much, much harder to pull off than in WC3, although admittably the game wasn't as much about micro as WC3. Anyway, this is why Bisu is the person whose micro has been by far the most impressive I've ever seen from any game. I don't get it why they think SC had no micro.
I don't see how micro in BW is harder to pull off than in WC3. WC3 has tons of spells and fewer units which makes it even more important to keep your units alive.
I'm going to be rooting for MadFrog, that guy was godlike in WC3.
The APM of starcraft and war3 didn't even compare in the pro world, this has been discussed and proven a billion times. war3 max apm 80+, starcraft 400+.
War3 had no macro and had to micro 4-10 units. Starcraft had tons of macro and had to micro 4-10 units and 10-20 units and 20-30 units etc etc.
Starcraft encompassed far more than War3 ever could.
On August 04 2010 04:33 infuzer wrote: SC is like 99% macro. WC3 is like 99% micro. I think SC2 depends more on micro than macro for winning.
SC2 is 99% timings, build orders, and decision making. Micro and macro are the easiest aspects by far.
Moreover, while macro was nonexistent in WC3, micro wasn't nonexistent in SC. It was very much there and much, much harder to pull off than in WC3, although admittably the game wasn't as much about micro as WC3. Anyway, this is why Bisu is the person whose micro has been by far the most impressive I've ever seen from any game. I don't get it why they think SC had no micro.
I don't see how micro in BW is harder to pull off than in WC3. WC3 has tons of spells and fewer units which makes it even more important to keep your units alive.
I'm going to be rooting for MadFrog, that guy was godlike in WC3.
The APM of starcraft and war3 didn't even compare in the pro world, this has been discussed and proven a billion times. war3 max apm 80+, starcraft 400+.
War3 had no macro and had to micro 4-10 units. Starcraft had tons of macro and had to micro 4-10 units and 10-20 units and 20-30 units etc etc.
Starcraft encompassed far more than War3 ever could.
MadFrog averaged over 200 apm, and in one game he had 379 apm in a 30 minute game against Grubby:
On August 04 2010 04:33 infuzer wrote: SC is like 99% macro. WC3 is like 99% micro. I think SC2 depends more on micro than macro for winning.
SC2 is 99% timings, build orders, and decision making. Micro and macro are the easiest aspects by far.
Moreover, while macro was nonexistent in WC3, micro wasn't nonexistent in SC. It was very much there and much, much harder to pull off than in WC3, although admittably the game wasn't as much about micro as WC3. Anyway, this is why Bisu is the person whose micro has been by far the most impressive I've ever seen from any game. I don't get it why they think SC had no micro.
I don't see how micro in BW is harder to pull off than in WC3. WC3 has tons of spells and fewer units which makes it even more important to keep your units alive.
I'm going to be rooting for MadFrog, that guy was godlike in WC3.
The APM of starcraft and war3 didn't even compare in the pro world, this has been discussed and proven a billion times. war3 max apm 80+, starcraft 400+.
War3 had no macro and had to micro 4-10 units. Starcraft had tons of macro and had to micro 4-10 units and 10-20 units and 20-30 units etc etc.
Starcraft encompassed far more than War3 ever could.
Thread after thread the shitstorm stirs. SC players just can't admit that WC3 is a skillful game that is vastly different compared to SC. Most if not all WC3 pros APM averages are above 200. Why cant we both coexist and just stop bashing eachother over and over?
On August 04 2010 10:35 reza wrote: who the f is madfrog lol
Someone who would walk all over you at BW, SC2, or WC3 take your pick.
Really, going through your posts log I didn't see one thing that wasn't some negative bnet forum trash. You can't just post wishing TLO and FroG good luck? Then don't post.
The very highest level of BW is above that of WC3, simply due to the advanced pro culture in Korea, but other than that WC3 is no less competitive and requires no less skill to succeed in than SC1.
A guy like Moon has earned hundreds of thousands of dollars in his career and rose to the very top of an ultra-competitive, international RTS scene. Maybe the likes of Flash and Jaedong can look down on him, somewhat, but it's funny to see D level BW players turning their nose up at a guy who is 1000x the RTS player they could ever hope to be.
On August 04 2010 10:35 reza wrote: who the f is madfrog lol
Someone who would walk all over you at BW, SC2, or WC3 take your pick.
Really, going through your posts log I didn't see one thing that wasn't some negative bnet forum trash. You can't just post wishing TLO and FroG good luck? Then don't post.
hey nerd its a fucking question relax buddy and i certainly don't give a fuck about shitty war3 he can walk all over me all he wants hahaha..regarding BW unless he's reached B high on iccup I highly doubt it..and I don't even have SC2 right now due to school work/exams.. so stfu
On August 04 2010 10:47 cuppatea wrote: The very highest level of BW is above that of WC3, simply due to the advanced pro culture in Korea, but other than that WC3 is no less competitive and requires no less skill to succeed in than SC1.
A guy like Moon has earned hundreds of thousands of dollars in his career and rose to the very top of an ultra-competitive, international RTS scene. Maybe the likes of Flash and Jaedong can look down on him, somewhat, but it's funny to see D level BW players turning their nose up at a guy who is 1000x the RTS player they could ever hope to be.
Haters find it very easy to hate through the internet. And yes, it's funny and pathetic.
On August 04 2010 10:44 holy_war wrote: Thread after thread the shitstorm stirs. SC players just can't admit that WC3 is a skillful game that is vastly different compared to SC. Most if not all WC3 pros APM averages are above 200. Why cant we both coexist and just stop bashing eachother over and over?
they cant accept anything else. iam sure they think they are better FPS player then anyone else and stuff.
but yeah 80apm for wc3 :D average pro has 250+ and the real top has 300 400 so stfu with ur stupid bashing u never see a wc3 player bashing SC? u might think SC community is a bit older but it seems like there are just some stupid kids running around bashing on everything.
If you didn't know this is a starcraft community site and its been that way for the last 10 or so years..if I don't know who the fuck madfrog is i don't see what gives you the right to respond to me like that..if you don't like me asking that question then gtfo
On August 04 2010 10:35 reza wrote: who the f is madfrog lol
Someone who would walk all over you at BW, SC2, or WC3 take your pick.
Really, going through your posts log I didn't see one thing that wasn't some negative bnet forum trash. You can't just post wishing TLO and FroG good luck? Then don't post.
hey nerd its a fucking question relax buddy and i certainly don't give a fuck about shitty war3 he can walk all over me all he wants hahaha..regarding BW unless he's reached B high on iccup I highly doubt it..and I don't even have SC2 right now due to school work/exams.. so stfu
Thank you for giving me another example of the bnet forum trash posting I referred to.
On August 04 2010 10:35 reza wrote: who the f is madfrog lol
Someone who would walk all over you at BW, SC2, or WC3 take your pick.
Really, going through your posts log I didn't see one thing that wasn't some negative bnet forum trash. You can't just post wishing TLO and FroG good luck? Then don't post.
hey nerd its a fucking question relax buddy and i certainly don't give a fuck about shitty war3 he can walk all over me all he wants hahaha..regarding BW unless he's reached B high on iccup I highly doubt it..and I don't even have SC2 right now due to school work/exams.. so stfu
On August 04 2010 10:35 reza wrote: who the f is madfrog lol
Someone who would walk all over you at BW, SC2, or WC3 take your pick.
Really, going through your posts log I didn't see one thing that wasn't some negative bnet forum trash. You can't just post wishing TLO and FroG good luck? Then don't post.
hey nerd its a fucking question relax buddy and i certainly don't give a fuck about shitty war3 he can walk all over me all he wants hahaha..regarding BW unless he's reached B high on iccup I highly doubt it..and I don't even have SC2 right now due to school work/exams.. so stfu
Thank you for giving me another example of the bnet forum trash posting I referred to.
On August 04 2010 10:51 reza wrote: If you didn't know this is a starcraft community site and its been that way for the last 10 or so years..if I don't know who the fuck madfrog is i don't see what gives you the right to respond to me like that..if you don't like me asking that question then gtfo
We know it's a community site. You asked a question and people answered who MaDFroG is and you get mad. It appears that you just love to rip on people in a majority of your previous posts, so I'll just try to ignore your posts. Also, you joined in January 2010...
On August 04 2010 10:51 reza wrote: If you didn't know this is a starcraft community site and its been that way for the last 10 or so years..if I don't know who the fuck madfrog is i don't see what gives you the right to respond to me like that..if you don't like me asking that question then gtfo
We know it's a community site. You asked a question and people answered who MaDFroG is and you get mad. It appears that you just love to rip on people in a majority of your previous posts, so I'll just try to ignore your posts. Also, you joined in January 2010...
are you dumb? go back and read his response to the question i asked.
Why are you guys hating on Madfrog lol. He used to be one of the top European SC players back in the day and eventually moved on to WC. I think at one point people regarded him to be the best WC3 player for a short while (don't quote me on this). Anyway, obviously Madfrog is a talented RTS player and will do good in SC2 as well. It's great to see these old school names back in SC2.
ps. You might wanna work on the attitude a little, reza.
Stop being so bad mannered and calm the fuck down dude. He was ex-SC1 that switched over to WC3. Oh can we go back to the original topic that was TLO vs MaDFroG showmatch?
I don't know why you guys are telling me to chill..all I asked was a simple question, and then dude replied in a BM way."oh he'll walk all over u in bw, sc2, war3.." like what the fuck?
On August 04 2010 10:50 Belegorm wrote: lol we bash WC3 because it's not BW (and we're SC fans) and it's such an incredibly different RTS game (though it's kind of a pseudo RTS IMHO).
Though I don't really bash WC3 myself (if I did my friends would not play BW or SC2 with me), but I just really don't like WC3.
I do like seeing WC3 progamers playing SC2.
no one say su have 2 like it but this bashing is just retarded stupid. no matter where. but yeah the talk about the high mannered stuff right? bash it for no reason thats the high manner right there.
On August 04 2010 11:01 Smorrie wrote: Why are you guys hating on Madfrog lol. He used to be one of the top European SC players back in the day and eventually moved on to WC. I think at one point people regarded him to be the best WC3 player for a short while (don't quote me on this). Anyway, obviously Madfrog is a talented RTS player and will do good in SC2 as well. It's great to see these old school names back in SC2.
ps. You might wanna work on the attitude a little, reza.
2004-2005 was often regarded as MaDFroG's golden years
Multiple tournament finishes and widely considered the best NonKorean player (only MooN really opposed him tbh)
On August 04 2010 11:01 Smorrie wrote: Why are you guys hating on Madfrog lol. He used to be one of the top European SC players back in the day and eventually moved on to WC. I think at one point people regarded him to be the best WC3 player for a short while (don't quote me on this). Anyway, obviously Madfrog is a talented RTS player and will do good in SC2 as well. It's great to see these old school names back in SC2.
ps. You might wanna work on the attitude a little, reza.
2004-2005 was often regarded as MaDFroG's golden years
Multiple tournament finishes and widely considered the best NonKorean player (only MooN really opposed him tbh)
Best nonkorean? :S.... What about sky, grubby, tod, infi...... I wouldn't say he was the best nonkorean player.... But he was a very good UD for sure.
On August 04 2010 11:01 Smorrie wrote: Why are you guys hating on Madfrog lol. He used to be one of the top European SC players back in the day and eventually moved on to WC. I think at one point people regarded him to be the best WC3 player for a short while (don't quote me on this). Anyway, obviously Madfrog is a talented RTS player and will do good in SC2 as well. It's great to see these old school names back in SC2.
ps. You might wanna work on the attitude a little, reza.
2004-2005 was often regarded as MaDFroG's golden years
Multiple tournament finishes and widely considered the best NonKorean player (only MooN really opposed him tbh)
Best nonkorean? :S.... What about sky, grubby, tod, infi...... I wouldn't say he was the best nonkorean player.... But he was a very good UD for sure.
In 2004-2005? There was nobody that could really touch him
On August 04 2010 10:44 holy_war wrote: Thread after thread the shitstorm stirs. SC players just can't admit that WC3 is a skillful game that is vastly different compared to SC. Most if not all WC3 pros APM averages are above 200. Why cant we both coexist and just stop bashing eachother over and over?
You know what was really funny? It was the chatroom going bonkers during the Day[9] SC 2 Countdown Party when all these Warcraft 3 players being interviewed and saying, "Starcraft 2 is nice, graphically, but the game is much simpler/easier than Warcraft 3." I never saw so many heads exploding in a chatroom before.
If War3 was such a cakewalk, why didn't only BW players dominate it? Probably because it wasn't a cakewalk.
Anyway, I remember downloading many MadFrog replays and watching them. The guy is a very skilled player. This should be a fun showmatch, either way.
This is awesome, had totally missed that mr Frog played SC2. Since I used to be a part of the swedish WC3-scene for a few years I've had a lot to do with him and he is a really nice guy and I wish him all the best if he "goes for it" in SC2.
On August 04 2010 10:35 reza wrote: who the f is madfrog lol
Someone who would walk all over you at BW, SC2, or WC3 take your pick.
Really, going through your posts log I didn't see one thing that wasn't some negative bnet forum trash. You can't just post wishing TLO and FroG good luck? Then don't post.
hey nerd its a fucking question relax buddy and i certainly don't give a fuck about shitty war3 he can walk all over me all he wants hahaha..regarding BW unless he's reached B high on iccup I highly doubt it..and I don't even have SC2 right now due to school work/exams.. so stfu
My money is on TLO taking the series without a loss, TvZ is just plain horrible at the moment and he seems to have gathered more experience in SC2 than MadFrog so far.
On August 04 2010 04:33 infuzer wrote: SC is like 99% macro. WC3 is like 99% micro. I think SC2 depends more on micro than macro for winning.
SC2 is 99% timings, build orders, and decision making. Micro and macro are the easiest aspects by far.
Moreover, while macro was nonexistent in WC3, micro wasn't nonexistent in SC. It was very much there and much, much harder to pull off than in WC3, although admittably the game wasn't as much about micro as WC3. Anyway, this is why Bisu is the person whose micro has been by far the most impressive I've ever seen from any game. I don't get it why they think SC had no micro.
I don't see how micro in BW is harder to pull off than in WC3. WC3 has tons of spells and fewer units which makes it even more important to keep your units alive.
But that has nothing to do with what I said. I said its true that the amount of micro percentage-wise in WC3 is larger than in SC. I'm just correcting the false claim that SC doesn't have much micro at all. And I'm also pointing out that the micro moves are much harder to pull off in SC. For example pulling a wounded unit back is much easier in War3 than in SC because of the game mechanics (engine). I've seen some War3 people claiming some of the "wow" moments in SC micro are not at all impressive in War3 standards. They don't really seem to have a clue. Then there is also the matter of the units being much smaller and weaker. Not to mention that some tiny micro moves are just a waste of time in SC. It is often better to just move the whole group of marines right away, instead of wasting time with a single marine. You still have to click like hell though. War3 people think that SC can have macro while they have micro. But that's just not how it is.
On August 04 2010 10:44 holy_war wrote: Thread after thread the shitstorm stirs. SC players just can't admit that WC3 is a skillful game that is vastly different compared to SC. Most if not all WC3 pros APM averages are above 200. Why cant we both coexist and just stop bashing eachother over and over?
You know what was really funny? It was the chatroom going bonkers during the Day[9] SC 2 Countdown Party when all these Warcraft 3 players being interviewed and saying, "Starcraft 2 is nice, graphically, but the game is much simpler/easier than Warcraft 3." I never saw so many heads exploding in a chatroom before.
If War3 was such a cakewalk, why didn't only BW players dominate it? Probably because it wasn't a cakewalk.
Anyway, I remember downloading many MadFrog replays and watching them. The guy is a very skilled player. This should be a fun showmatch, either way.
Why would only BW players dominate it even if it was a cakewalk? In early stages of War3, BW players did dominate more or less. Elky for example won some Korean league, and War3 wasn't even the only game he was playing at the time afaik. Many just moved back to BW pretty soon. A large number of War3 pros who stayed have a BW background too, so those who stuck with it, have performed quite well it seems. Anyway, you do have a point. We see mediocre BW players outplaying much better BW players. Clearly how and what skills transfer over is a complex matter.
With that being said, I don't understand why anyone would have a problem with Madfrog. Sure, this fanboyism is really annoying, but don't hate Madfrog for it.
This is indeed going to be awesome although if TLO has been practising I'm expecting him to win quite decisively.
YESSSSSSSS MADFROQ IS BACK! MY ALL TIME FAVORITE PRO GAMER!! He was the guy that got me into e-sport at all. Madfroq for teh win!! TLO is also totally awesome so TLO+Madfroq sounds like a blast
I like the mix, the ex-wc3 players are managing well in sc2 so far. should be a fun showmatch, would like to see madfrog win but i think TLO will win 2-1
in rts in general madfrog is one of the best players in the whole world, he's like boxer and nada, but he ended his career early, if he takes sc2 serious he can be the best. he's getting old though
TLO is good but its nothing to compared to madfrog, but TLO has been playing sc2 a lot more
On August 04 2010 11:38 MICHELLE wrote: Best nonkorean? :S.... What about sky, grubby, tod, infi...... I wouldn't say he was the best nonkorean player.... But he was a very good UD for sure.
Sky was just on the rise and came to the proscene in late 05, infi was a noname back then. ToD wasn't as good and Grubby might be the only contender for being as skilled as Frog in Europe.
But there was one specific player who was better than Frog or Moon-> FoV. Maybe Sweet aswell.
Madfrog was a god, noone comes close to him. In terms of skill maybe, but Frog was like Backstreet Boys for wc3-nerds in Europe. He was the rolemodel for players like Grubby. He was more than just some skilled player.
On August 05 2010 00:56 Jameser wrote: for the wc3 hatin BW players; I was a mediocre at best wc3 player, and am now I would say by comparison a much much better sc2 player
so if wc3 took no skills, I guess sc2 takes even less lol (clearly it doesn't)
Yeah, you're better because you've had prolonged exposure to the RTS genre, therefore, your skill has increased. It has nothing to do with one game being easier than the other.
On August 05 2010 01:09 Nereus wrote: SC2 is a very easy game compared to wc3 and bw, but thats mostly because wc3 and bw has been out for a long time
Why do people keep saying this bullshit? SC2 is just as easy for the opponent as it is for you, unless you are playing singleplayer.. Which makes it just as hard as any other game where both parts are playing at the same difficulty. If it is so easy, howcome I dont see you anywhere at the top?
If you are playing singleplayer I apologise, because then it would perhaps be correct to say its easy.
On August 05 2010 01:09 Nereus wrote: SC2 is a very easy game compared to wc3 and bw, but thats mostly because wc3 and bw has been out for a long time
Why do people keep saying this bullshit? SC2 is just as easy for the opponent as it is for you, unless you are playing singleplayer.. Which makes it just as hard as any other game where both parts are playing at the same difficulty. If it is so easy, howcome I dont see you anywhere at the top?
If you are playing singleplayer I apologise, because then it would perhaps be correct to say its easy.
He's right though, they're harder because they've been out for many years and player skill level has increased
In sc and war3 everybody on ladder has played every map a thousand times and has memorized every detail and every possible matchup, so it's a lot harder to get into
On August 05 2010 01:22 StormsInJuly wrote: He's right though, they're harder because they've been out for many years and player skill level has increased
In sc and war3 everybody on ladder has played every map a thousand times and has memorized every detail and every possible matchup, so it's a lot harder to get into
Ah you are right here. But the game itself is just as easy as it was when it was released .
On August 05 2010 00:05 Nereus wrote: in rts in general madfrog is one of the best players in the whole world, he's like boxer and nada, but he ended his career early, if he takes sc2 serious he can be the best. he's getting old though
TLO is good but its nothing to compared to madfrog, but TLO has been playing sc2 a lot more
Really looking forward to this. Obviously TLO will be slightly stronger at the moment but I wouldn't completely count out MadFrog. He's one hell of a competetor.
Anyone in here who actually followed Madfrog's prime 4-5 years ago? I can tell you I was watching every step he took and he was one of my greatest idols/inspiration back then when I was a really active wc3 player.
I can only say one thing GO Mad]Q[Frog!!!!!!!1 The undead GOD
After seeing the close call between White-Ra (DuckloadRa, makes me laugh every time) and MadFrog on scrap, I can't wait for this.
Seriously. Nerd chills, and uncontrollable ear-to-ear grinning. I think MadFrog is getting there, but to some extent he's in WC3 mode still, so I'd expect TLO to win. You never know though.
For the people who remember the OLD scbw time, madfrog were known to be a bitch with his zerglings staying alive forever with his micro driving you crazy. Maybe thats why he became one of the best wc3 players ever. Anyhow, let's enjoy this showmatch, I'm sure it will be some show for the viewers.
Yea and also in the light of previous comments, I don't think it matters if it was scbw or wc3 he played as a pro. If you have the skill and determination to go to korea and compete among the top players in a game like wc3. Then there is no doubt that he will be a top foreign player if he plays enough. If you got talent, determination, disciplin and experiance its only a question about adapting to a new game.
On August 07 2010 18:39 Tascher wrote: For those with problems seeing the stream, change your language in the top right from English US to English EU, it should show up then.
On August 07 2010 18:39 Tascher wrote: For those with problems seeing the stream, change your language in the top right from English US to English EU, it should show up then.
Yeah, this seems to work, thanks for the tip. I'm kinda irritated that I need to install some junk on my hard to watch this:|
On August 07 2010 18:39 Tascher wrote: For those with problems seeing the stream, change your language in the top right from English US to English EU, it should show up then.
Should be good. I haven't seen MadFrog play at all so I'm looking forward to that. Hopefully both players pull out the stops and try something special for the crowd.
On August 04 2010 10:38 FragKrag wrote: This SC player bias against WC3 players really hurts :/
Most of the competitive WC3 players had no trouble keeping 160-200ish APM.
When MadFroG was a wc3 player he was always thought of as a Starcraft player so I guess it's only fair that now when he plays Starcraft we think of him as a wc3 player.
it's not a bad deal, I mean, with all the breaks that there are for the finals, the games should all finish before the second match for KT SKT starts...
If you have already set your location to English (EU) - using the drop down link top of the screen that says English - then when you click the stream to start it, you will get a msg from Adobe asking you if you want to install it.
On August 07 2010 19:08 dabom88 wrote: What exactly is this octoshape people are referring to? I want to try and get this stream to work.
When you press play, it should come up with a pop up, asking you to install a Octo plug in or whatever. After doing that, I just refreshed and it started working.
I think if people just see Madfrog play once they can let go of all this silly WC3 resentment. I mean, TLO was a sup-com player and nobody cares about that, it's just that the WC3-SC:BW wars bleed through with this.
Just a suggestion: instead of using "n" different times, why not use UTC for everyone? Makes it much easier. One just needs to know his timezone, and all other UTC times can be converted easily.
Ex: For me to know what time 12am CEST is here i have to:
1) put it on UTC, in this case UTC+2, that is having to search what the mentioned time is, sometimes people just mention one time be it CEST, EST, PST, Hawaii time, or or wathever zone they happen to live in 2) compare to my time zone UTC+1 3) see the difference (1h).
Putting it in UTC makes it much more easier.
Tournament is
12 am UTC+2
Great i am UTC+1 so its 11 am here. Done. And it's the same for everyone, whether you live in America, EU, Asia, Australia, Africa or Antartica.
UTC is for all those times the same way metric system is for imperial system. Much easier and universal to use. So if someone reads this and cares, please at least add the UTC time when you're putting the time for an event.
On August 07 2010 19:11 Bash wrote: Blizzard with the massive dickmove to put this on during PL finals. Not that I would've watched this showmatch anyway, just shows how pathetic Blizzard has become.
On August 07 2010 19:21 Hikari wrote: commentators are boring..... back to SPL!
MadFroG hasn't had enough time to hit his prime yet. Which is sad, watching two of the most innovative players like TLO and MadFroG would be soooo epic if they were both in their top. I'll be looking forward to later tourneys including these two, but right now it's stupidly onesided.
On August 07 2010 19:27 iEchoic wrote: Why are the Thors so huge? Was this pre-recorded before that beta patch or something?
they play live and the thor is bigger cause TLO has the collectors edition with the special thor model. CE thors look like the Odin from the single player campain missions
On August 07 2010 19:27 iEchoic wrote: Why are the Thors so huge? Was this pre-recorded before that beta patch or something?
they play live and the thor is bigger cause TLO has the collectors edition with the special thor model. CE thors look like the Odin from the single player campain missions
Was wondering about that, but good lord are those Thors huge. I'm glad I didn't get the CE if they're that big.
On August 07 2010 19:27 iEchoic wrote: Why are the Thors so huge? Was this pre-recorded before that beta patch or something?
they play live and the thor is bigger cause TLO has the collectors edition with the special thor model. CE thors look like the Odin from the single player campain missions
Was wondering about that, but good lord are those Thors huge. I'm glad I didn't get the CE if they're that big.
i have the CE and the actual size of the thors are the same as the standard edition's.
On August 07 2010 19:46 iEchoic wrote: I don't understand why TLO seemingly never gets the infernal pre-igniter. The upgrade is absolutely huge for drone harass and killing lings.
He got a ton of hellions harassing so he kills drones really fast anyways and Madfrog is using roaches to deal with his hellions not lings so it's I guess he would rather get an armory upgrade or something instead.
I like that frog tries sneaky stuff and not playing by the book, in the end it will make him a succesful player. Right now he is still trying to back to his old level.
On August 07 2010 19:54 vyyye wrote: Why does he keep trying to sneak expansions?
When it works, it works big. Pretty cheesy, though, I agree.
Well, I can tell you why. You need an expansion to have a chance against terran. And on LT the natural is dead, and this map is almost impossible to defend against fast hellions if you expand to the natural.
On August 07 2010 19:54 vyyye wrote: Why does he keep trying to sneak expansions?
When it works, it works big. Pretty cheesy, though, I agree.
Well, I can tell you why. You need an expansion to have a chance against terran. And on LT the natural is dead, and this map is almost impossible to defend against fast hellions if you expand to the natural.
On LT it made a bit of sense, but second time and in that position. Eh, I'm no pro but I it looked like a lot of risk for not too much reward.
One of the things that seperates the pros from the others are the estimation of what the opponent should have at any time. If he sees that MadFroG has too few things he'll know that he has a sneaky expo or something else. Also, I can't believe he tried it again after failing hard the first time.
The second game was just great, if Madfrog works on his macro in lategame he's gonna be a beast. I don't quite understand his "hidden" expands though, did he honestly think he'll suprise TLO?
It feels like MadFroG was working with a serious deficit of experience with SC2 specifically. Trying to rely on hidden expos and mutas especially. Even in the game he won, I saw late/no drone transfers out of the over saturated main, weak nydus placement, a lot of mistakes that he clearly has the ability to correct in the near future. It could have been much worse for TLO in that game, especially if nydus had been used to speed roach reinforcements after TLO lost all those tanks to burrow move.
On August 07 2010 19:44 Yawne wrote: Wow learn to macro .... i´m really bad but 3k min for several minutes...
Yeah well, while you're busy cripping TLO enough to win the game, you might slack off a bit on the macro.
He had the game the moment he pushed out with his mass roaches.. after that it was just clean up.
If he would have skipped the tricky sneak play, at 100 food and just maxed his army with roaches he could have just rolled over him. You don´t need to cripple a wounded opponent. The only thing he did with this was give TLO the chance to maybe come back into the game.
One the other hand it was nice to watch.. and he won that game either way.
Im really impressed by Madfrog winning one game. I was stunned he could pull it out that well vs a player of that calibre. I just have to point out one that and that's what Madfrog said in the interview. He mentioned how SC2 has a lot of more dimensions than Wc3 and I really must disagree there. I wonder what he thought about stating that.
Otherwise, wonderful showmatches. Glad to see Froggy back in action!
EDIT: People judging Madfrog's lack of macro. Well dammit he's a former Wc3 player, where micro played a much bigger role than macro, what'd you expect really? As I said I just must say im impressed he managed to win one game.
On August 07 2010 19:27 iEchoic wrote: Why are the Thors so huge? Was this pre-recorded before that beta patch or something?
they play live and the thor is bigger cause TLO has the collectors edition with the special thor model. CE thors look like the Odin from the single player campain missions
Was wondering about that, but good lord are those Thors huge. I'm glad I didn't get the CE if they're that big.
Same size different skin.
Hoping for some higher quality VODs because Blizzards horrible planning put this on the same time as the fucking Grand Finals, seriously wtf.
at first I figured he threw down the expansion just to buy time for his muta tech and keeping all his drones alive in the base, if the expansion hadn't been there TLO would've tried to harrass his main and scout his lair and double gas, but I guess TLO was prepared for fast mutas anyway. I dunno if it would be a smart thing to throw away 300 minerals and a drone in order to try to get him off guard with fast mutas. I actually think it would be good against a worse player.
After hearing the interview it seems like that wasn't what he was doing though.
On August 07 2010 19:15 Mothxal wrote: I think if people just see Madfrog play once they can let go of all this silly WC3 resentment. I mean, TLO was a sup-com player and nobody cares about that, it's just that the WC3-SC:BW wars bleed through with this.
I think madfrog has the potential it takes to play in the higher levels of starcraft 2 pro gameing scene but i also think hes not at the same level as TLO yet. Besides they both agreeded that zergs playstyle still has flaws against terrans.
On August 07 2010 19:15 Mothxal wrote: I think if people just see Madfrog play once they can let go of all this silly WC3 resentment. I mean, TLO was a sup-com player and nobody cares about that, it's just that the WC3-SC:BW wars bleed through with this.
you guys, madfrog was a top zerg player in europe before he switched over to war3. he played in the same era as insomnia before he also moved to wc3 (mr.x anyone?)
and also he played the most beautiful wc3 style of any wc3 progamer. very focused on speed and harassing, with artful micro techniques.
if you dont know about the guy you really shouldnt bash him.
No it isn't. He however has a tendency to not hotkey/group his units enough (which he admits is weakness he has to work on) - he always groups all his buildings though.
On August 08 2010 00:10 setzer wrote: Not surprising. Unless you are moon, high level SC players will always > WC3 players.
He was a high level SC player when he switched to the newer game (WC3). And besides, DeMuslim and Lucifron have shown WC3 players can win big matches in SC2. So please stop with the nonsense.
On August 08 2010 00:16 setzer wrote: Which major international tournaments did demuslim win? And I'm not talking about those weekly zotac cups.
This quote doesn't align with your previous message. If you want to say they haven't won big international tournaments yet then please do so. You however said SC players will always > WC3 players and made it sound like your quote had some relevance to a showmatch.
I don't plan on arguing with you, but I will say the only WC3 players that have consistently impressed me are a few Korean's like Maka and Check. I always see SC players run deeper in tournaments than WC3 players.
Setzer, you're using a showmatch between an ex-Supreme Comamnder player, who has been amongst the top of the Euro SC2 scene since early in the beta and an ex-WC3 player, who has only just began to make a name for himself in SC2, as proof of BW players being better than those from WC3, even though the loser in this match had the more accomplished BW career of the 2?
No shit you don't want to argue with him because you haven't got a leg to stand on.
On August 08 2010 01:07 cuppatea wrote: Setzer, you're using a showmatch between an ex-Supreme Comamnder player, who has been amongst the top of the Euro SC2 scene since early in the beta and an ex-WC3 player, who has only just began to make a name for himself in SC2, as proof of BW players being better than those from WC3, even though the loser in this match had the more accomplished BW career of the 2?
No shit you don't want to argue with him because you haven't got a leg to stand on.
Heh, there's a blatant flaw in your reasoning. MadFroG might've been more accomplished, but in his prime in BW he wasn't even as good as an average D player on iCCup right now. People were really bad at StarCraft (comparatively) back in the days. On the other hand, TLO reached A-.
In terms of skills in BW, TLO was way better that MadFroG ever was, albeit less accomplished.
Anyone notice madfrogs style with the burrow roaches?? reminds me of WC3 So bad.... he needs to fix his style to more sc2 type because he stands no chance
On August 08 2010 01:33 backtoback wrote: Anyone notice madfrogs style with the burrow roaches?? reminds me of WC3 So bad.... he needs to fix his style to more sc2 type because he stands no chance
Are you saying sc2 player should not use roach burrow?
On August 08 2010 01:07 cuppatea wrote: Setzer, you're using a showmatch between an ex-Supreme Comamnder player, who has been amongst the top of the Euro SC2 scene since early in the beta and an ex-WC3 player, who has only just began to make a name for himself in SC2, as proof of BW players being better than those from WC3, even though the loser in this match had the more accomplished BW career of the 2?
No shit you don't want to argue with him because you haven't got a leg to stand on.
Heh, there's a blatant flaw in your reasoning. MadFroG might've been more accomplished, but in his prime in BW he wasn't even as good as an average D player on iCCup right now. People were really bad at StarCraft (comparatively) back in the days. On the other hand, TLO reached A-.
In terms of skills in BW, TLO was way better that MadFroG ever was, albeit less accomplished.
lol.... the average D player? i got to c in a month..
On August 08 2010 01:23 maybenexttime wrote: Heh, there's a blatant flaw in your reasoning. MadFroG might've been more accomplished, but in his prime in BW he wasn't even as good as an average D player on iCCup right now. People were really bad at StarCraft (comparatively) back in the days. On the other hand, TLO reached A-.
In terms of skills in BW, TLO was way better that MadFroG ever was, albeit less accomplished.
You too pleasse stop the nonsense. After not playing for 5 years I could still get to B in TSL without any practice. Madfrogs skills from 2001 in no way translate to todays D or anything close to it.
On August 08 2010 01:07 cuppatea wrote: Setzer, you're using a showmatch between an ex-Supreme Comamnder player, who has been amongst the top of the Euro SC2 scene since early in the beta and an ex-WC3 player, who has only just began to make a name for himself in SC2, as proof of BW players being better than those from WC3, even though the loser in this match had the more accomplished BW career of the 2?
No shit you don't want to argue with him because you haven't got a leg to stand on.
My conclusion was drawn from watching numerous WC3 players and tournaments. It is not a coincidence the top foreign players all have a history of BW. My thinking is not in the minority, pretty much every player who has a history in BW knows this to be true. And the results speak for itself.
edit: typed this before Nazgul's post. Will stop now.
On August 07 2010 20:13 LittleeD wrote: Im really impressed by Madfrog winning one game. I was stunned he could pull it out that well vs a player of that calibre. I just have to point out one that and that's what Madfrog said in the interview. He mentioned how SC2 has a lot of more dimensions than Wc3 and I really must disagree there. I wonder what he thought about stating that.
He said similar things about WC3 in comparasion to Brood War after he made that switch. It's probably a mental thing where it helps him stay motivated if he feels he is playing the best of games. In this case it might also serve to rationalize why he is not performing aswell as in the previous game.
Translated MadFroG interview Cool that you are doing so well! But why!? Why did you change so drastically to WC3 from Starcraft/Brood War? What tempted you to play War3?
Haha, I was probably the last team-q member to change. I wasn't even playing the War3 beta. But what was fun with BW was going to events and so on, and I knew that there wouldn't be much of that considering all the talk about WC3. In the start after changing, I liked BW much better, but now I have to say that I think WC3 is the better game.
How anyone can possibly say Frog isn't anywhere close to TLO in level of play at the moment is ridiculous after watching him take a game off him. Yeah he screwed up with the hidden expansion crap but you go play 40 games of ZvT on LT and tell me that thought doesn't start looking like a damn good idea after losing natural after natural to cliffs.
I don't believe Frog is better than TLO at this current stage, but don't act like he's just some kid who walked in off the street with a copy of SC2. He's a pro, he's proven it so many times in the past and he's only going to get better. Hell just being (re)picked up by SK already says a lot.
One difference choice in game 3 as to where to put his expo and it could easily have been 2-1 Frog.
I now watched the games and here are my thoughts: + Show Spoiler +
The hidden expos is what cost MadFrog the first and third game. The hidden expo in the third game was really bad because he put it so close to the terran, a better spot would have been one in the east side so that at least he'd have a chance to defend it. As soon as TLO spotted the expo that game was over and MadFrog knew it but he played on to try to give the crowd a show.
That second game was great and it showed MadFrog's legendary harassing skills.
For the second series tomorrow I think MadFrog should pick Kulas Ravine and Metalopolis. I believe he can win tomorrow's series 3-2 if he picks the right maps.
Kulas Ravine is a very bad pick as Zerg when you face a Terran who knows how to use Vikings. They don't pick maps by the way but veto until 3/5 maps are left.
1 question: Does anybody know where I can watch VODS?
And btw, Madfrog has been at top ladder player since phase 2, and played even matches against top players like Whitera. While TLO definately was the favourite before this one, one should def. still expect close matches.
On August 08 2010 06:02 Hider wrote: 1 question: Does anybody know where I can watch VODS?
And btw, Madfrog has been at top ladder player since phase 2, and played even matches against top players like Whitera. While TLO definately was the favourite before this one, one should def. still expect close matches.
Moon switching to SC2 would be really great for the game. He did more for Warcraft 3 than any other player, really opened up new ways to play Night Elf.
you know madfrog dominated wc3 during the earlier stages of wc3. just like starcraft, it became much more challenging over the years. back in his day ud always went lich ghoul in mirror while today dk fiend is much more popular (it's about as fundamental a change as bio vs. mech in TvZ) focus, one of the more recent pros, has average apms over 400 consistently.
On August 08 2010 06:02 Hider wrote: 1 question: Does anybody know where I can watch VODS?
And btw, Madfrog has been at top ladder player since phase 2, and played even matches against top players like Whitera. While TLO definately was the favourite before this one, one should def. still expect close matches.
On August 08 2010 06:02 Hider wrote: 1 question: Does anybody know where I can watch VODS?
And btw, Madfrog has been at top ladder player since phase 2, and played even matches against top players like Whitera. While TLO definately was the favourite before this one, one should def. still expect close matches.
On August 08 2010 06:02 Hider wrote: 1 question: Does anybody know where I can watch VODS?
And btw, Madfrog has been at top ladder player since phase 2, and played even matches against top players like Whitera. While TLO definately was the favourite before this one, one should def. still expect close matches.
On August 08 2010 06:02 Hider wrote: 1 question: Does anybody know where I can watch VODS?
And btw, Madfrog has been at top ladder player since phase 2, and played even matches against top players like Whitera. While TLO definately was the favourite before this one, one should def. still expect close matches.
I will be streaming the stream again for those who can't view the original website still. If you are able to view it go to their website, I'm not trying to leech viewers just help those who are having technical difficulties.
On August 08 2010 06:02 Hider wrote: 1 question: Does anybody know where I can watch VODS?
And btw, Madfrog has been at top ladder player since phase 2, and played even matches against top players like Whitera. While TLO definately was the favourite before this one, one should def. still expect close matches.
On August 08 2010 06:02 Hider wrote: 1 question: Does anybody know where I can watch VODS?
And btw, Madfrog has been at top ladder player since phase 2, and played even matches against top players like Whitera. While TLO definately was the favourite before this one, one should def. still expect close matches.
BO5? great Altho madfrog won't be able to win more than 1 game I think, his play didn't feel solid and his macro was seriously lacking, too bad- he was one of my favourite wc3 players... Not sure how he will do in the later stages of sc2, I bet hes gonna have a hard time. We'll see^^
On August 08 2010 19:00 Desutroyah wrote: definitely watch and support this! great to see players play on a live stage with audience outside of Korea! Awesome!
Go TLO!!!
Demuslim is 2 cocky for his own good!!!
I dont know who madfrog is!!!
madfrog is that handsome swede. legendary wc3-player!
On August 08 2010 19:07 kilolo wrote: This stream (http://www.wow-europe.com/rf10/) is extreamly laggy, unwatchable, is there any way to fix it?fix it?
it worked better using internet explorer instead of mozilla
its hilarious that so many people fail to realize very simple objective facts.
1)madfrog was a top level broodwar player, before switching to wc3
2)madfrog was literally #1 pointwise out of all players in phase 2 of the beta for a long period of time in the europe server under the name 'unknownart'
this means that he is worthy to play TLO, even if TLO is obviously better than him right now. He also has a lot of potential.
he also packs snus while playing, and shows signs of his trademark wc3 crazy as fuck harass style. how baller is that?
Lol who is the caster ? Sounds exactly like Kermit The Frog :D Also they shoudl ahve a 3rd guy moving the cam they have absolutely no overview on what is going on its sometimes a bit annoying :/
lol @ facebook chatting "David Yakinian: its not hard to go against the top europeans. they are about on the same level as silver league asians and gold americans." right.....
On August 08 2010 19:45 PredY wrote: madfrog has sickkk control but his macro isn't up there with others yet
I think his macro have been fine these first two games.
Well... he did manage to produce about 17 mutalisks and 40+ zlings at the same time because of pooled resources. It would not be surprising if he was maxed and just lost his army, but I don't think he was.
On August 08 2010 19:45 TheDna wrote: Lol who is the caster ? Sounds exactly like Kermit The Frog :D Also they shoudl ahve a 3rd guy moving the cam they have absolutely no overview on what is going on its sometimes a bit annoying :/
On August 08 2010 19:45 TheDna wrote: Lol who is the caster ? Sounds exactly like Kermit The Frog :D Also they shoudl ahve a 3rd guy moving the cam they have absolutely no overview on what is going on its sometimes a bit annoying :/
The "Kermit the frog" caster is actually a very knowledgeable top level Terran =P
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Mutas do not counter vikings if they are microed. they got +6 range on mutas, if there are too many they just shoot down 1 and go back, mutas arent fast enough to chase them down on KR
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Mutas do not counter vikings if they are microed. they got +6 range on mutas, if there are too many they just shoot down 1 and go back, mutas arent fast enough to chase them down on KR
#
Except muta move fast enough that you don't need to worry about that. Seen people like sen go mass muta to kill vikings.
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Mutas do not counter vikings if they are microed. they got +6 range on mutas, if there are too many they just shoot down 1 and go back, mutas arent fast enough to chase them down on KR
#
Except muta move fast enough that you don't need to worry about that. Seen people like sen go mass muta to kill vikings.
yes i saw Sen doing well on KR, every other Zerg i saw or know fails against Vikings on KR, including myself. They have a great distance advantage and the safety is not far away so their solwer movespeed is a lot harder to be abused. Plus you canot expect to pump mutas out of 2 gas, and the natural's gas can be denied easely for a very long time. Are we realyl argugin that KR T>Z ?
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Funny, saw you bashing frog yesterday as well. If he's so clueless, how come he's picking maps off TLO in what is arguably the most difficult matchup to play right now?
I just think it's all envy from you, seeing as frog is where you want to be.
dont think frog can lose after that, just psychologically speaking. metalopolis is good for z too. but yeah hopefully tlo doesnt feel too down about it and gives us a good game
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Mutas do not counter vikings if they are microed. they got +6 range on mutas, if there are too many they just shoot down 1 and go back, mutas arent fast enough to chase them down on KR
You can't micro against mutas because vikings stop when they shoot, hence what you say is wrong.
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Funny, saw you bashing frog yesterday as well. If he's so clueless, how come he's picking maps off TLO in what is arguably the most difficult matchup to play right now?
I just think it's all envy from you, seeing as frog is where you want to be.
Madfrog is not at TLO level by any mean, but he's still winning some games. What makes me laugh is the fact that people is still saying terran imba when there are players who can't lose at all against terran like Dimaga. They should have invited him instead of Madfrog, then everyone would have seen how strong zerg really is. Watching Madfrog losing 50 lings against 2 hellions, making corruptors against vikings and not mutas, stacking more than 3k minerals every single game, suiciding stuff into defense instead of sniping expansions just makes me think he's still clueless about SC2. The only game he played with the correct unit composition today was the one on Delta Quadrant, and he still managed to get over 6k minerals. It's not bashing, it's more like stating the facts.
On August 08 2010 19:45 PredY wrote: madfrog has sickkk control but his macro isn't up there with others yet
I think his macro have been fine these first two games.
having 1k+ minerals and 1k+ gass for more than 75% of the game isn't good macro
If you can prove that was the case in the first two games (which was what I was commentating) I'll agree with you. I do suspect though you just pulled those numbers out of your ass. And I said fine, not good. I can show you plenty of replays with high level players with similar macro skills so I don't see how he isn't "up there with others".
The ESL stream is 2 seconds ahead of the wow-europe one ...
Madfrog is playing Zerg in an interesting way we do not see from our usual "good Zerg players" and he is winning with these tactics. He is fun to watch compared with loads of other Zerg and somewhat creative as TLO himself is.
On August 08 2010 20:33 Day[9] wrote: those games were like rigged level good. fortunately, I know dario would never do that so, just fucking insane play by both players wowowowowow.
Only managed to catch the 2nd half on the 5th game, i was surprised to see 2v2. I think that we will see some pretty cool stuff from madfrog's Z in the future.
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Mutas do not counter vikings if they are microed. they got +6 range on mutas, if there are too many they just shoot down 1 and go back, mutas arent fast enough to chase them down on KR
You can't micro against mutas because vikings stop when they shoot, hence what you say is wrong.
i said shoot down one then pull back all the way home, IF he has more mutas. But given the fact you deny his natural's gas early on, there's not likely he'll outnumber your vikings anytime soon. Btw i thought you were a Protoss player Cloud.
On August 08 2010 20:33 Day[9] wrote: those games were like rigged level good. fortunately, I know dario would never do that so, just fucking insane play by both players wowowowowow.
The Thoughthammer has spoken.
At like 4am his time?? GJ Thoughthammer!! A True TLO fan!
Madfrog's improvement today over yesterday was like night and day. I figured he was going to get better but damn, that was quick. He still lost a quite a bit of minerals on that attempt to hide an expo on LT but he did manage to squeeze some gas out of it.
TLO's Fist pump at the end of game 5 was hilarious. Then he hid it and tried to semi hide it. Great series, very entertaining from these players but I do feel that the game where TLO opened CC was unplanned and quite random. Queen larvae vomit really is super powerful if left unchecked.
On August 08 2010 20:33 Day[9] wrote: those games were like rigged level good. fortunately, I know dario would never do that so, just fucking insane play by both players wowowowowow.
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Mutas do not counter vikings if they are microed. they got +6 range on mutas, if there are too many they just shoot down 1 and go back, mutas arent fast enough to chase them down on KR
You can't micro against mutas because vikings stop when they shoot, hence what you say is wrong.
i said shoot down one then pull back all the way home, IF he has more mutas. But given the fact you deny his natural's gas early on, there's not likely he'll outnumber your vikings anytime soon. Btw i thought you were a Protoss player Cloud.
It pretty much works like this on Kulas Ravine, you use queens to counter vikings in air and mutas won't allow them to land. Once you have mutas it's impossible to harass gas, and if the terran keeps making vikings it's just autoloss. TLO was lucky Madfrog didn't keep stacking mutas for some reason, otherwise the game wouldn't have been won by him.
Today's series was much better than yesterday's. Madfrog did really well and I think he had good chances to win it if he hadn't decided to base trade. Once Madfrog gets more experience with SC2 he'll be a beast. Congrats to TLO.
On August 08 2010 20:39 01d55 wrote: Madfrog's improvement today over yesterday was like night and day. I figured he was going to get better but damn, that was quick. He still lost a quite a bit of minerals on that attempt to hide an expo on LT but he did manage to squeeze some gas out of it.
He said something in the post interview about not being used to the equipment yesterday. Empty excuse or not, it might have played a factor.
Yeah guys MadFrog sucks at macro he got 2k unused minerals?
Have you ever watched a zerg game before? Maybe go watch some Idra games or any zerg for that matter because when you got 4+ bases minerals always stack up.
On August 08 2010 20:15 SimpleHarmonicMotion wrote:
On August 08 2010 19:59 iG.ClouD wrote:
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Funny, saw you bashing frog yesterday as well. If he's so clueless, how come he's picking maps off TLO in what is arguably the most difficult matchup to play right now?
I just think it's all envy from you, seeing as frog is where you want to be.
Madfrog is not at TLO level by any mean, but he's still winning some games. What makes me laugh is the fact that people is still saying terran imba when there are players who can't lose at all against terran like Dimaga. They should have invited him instead of Madfrog, then everyone would have seen how strong zerg really is. Watching Madfrog losing 50 lings against 2 hellions, making corruptors against vikings and not mutas, stacking more than 3k minerals every single game, suiciding stuff into defense instead of sniping expansions just makes me think he's still clueless about SC2. The only game he played with the correct unit composition today was the one on Delta Quadrant, and he still managed to get over 6k minerals. It's not bashing, it's more like stating the facts.
Dimaga can't lose against Terran?
0-2 vs IntoTheRainbow in KOTB 0-2 vs QXC in KOTB 1-3 vs Strelok in last week's Craftcup final
On August 08 2010 19:57 Dionyseus wrote: So what's the zerg counter to vikings?
Mutalisks counter Vikings. Madfrog just playing cluelessly the whole series.
Mutas do not counter vikings if they are microed. they got +6 range on mutas, if there are too many they just shoot down 1 and go back, mutas arent fast enough to chase them down on KR
You can't micro against mutas because vikings stop when they shoot, hence what you say is wrong.
i said shoot down one then pull back all the way home, IF he has more mutas. But given the fact you deny his natural's gas early on, there's not likely he'll outnumber your vikings anytime soon. Btw i thought you were a Protoss player Cloud.
It pretty much works like this on Kulas Ravine, you use queens to counter vikings in air and mutas won't allow them to land. Once you have mutas it's impossible to harass gas, and if the terran keeps making vikings it's just autoloss. TLO was lucky Madfrog didn't keep stacking mutas for some reason, otherwise the game wouldn't have been won by him.
not after that opening mutas do counter vikings but after the early game harass madfrog's only chance was the zergling counter and it didnt do nearly enough. if all those corruptors had been mutas instead tlo still wouldve won the air fight, and madfrog hadnt even started a third.
the problem is not that terran is particularly strong mid/late game, pure mech is but very few people use it for whatever reason, its the strength of all the possible openings. ya mutas are fine vs vikings, but not when you lose a queen, a bunch of overlords, drones, and mining time early. tlo was even letting him get away with hatch first expand, which should never happen.
As for the complaints regarding the maps: Both players voted the maps so MaDFroG actually had the chance to remove some of the maps that you believe didn't favour the matchup for him. But he decided to remove different maps...
The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
because it's a Warcraft tournament. this showmatch was all about showing SC2 to the WC3 players
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
Because it's a Blizzard showmatch, the purpose of which is to draw attention to the event and the game and Madfrog is one of the most well known and well liked players in Blizzard game history.
It's similar to when glhf.it arranged an invitational tournament and invited you on the basis of your nationality, when there were clearly other better, more deserving players around. Of course, you weren't complaining in that instance.
TLO meeting some Blizzard employee in a few minutes now, guess it was a sorta surprise thingie since I havn't seen anyone mention it earlier. Same stream, http://www.wow-europe.com/rf10/index.xml
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
If Im not wrong madfrog was top on EU ladder at end of beta. Defo a top Z player.
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
It's not all about having the most skilled player for a show match. It's about what the audience want to see. Madfrog has a huge fan base from warcraft 3 while when I and many others hear the name Dimaga its like: "oh, the guy who cheated".
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
Because it's a Blizzard showmatch, the purpose of which is to draw attention to the event and the game and Madfrog is one of the most well known and well liked players in Blizzard game history.
It's similar to when glhf.it arranged an invitational tournament and invited you on the basis of your nationality, when there were clearly other better, more deserving players around. Of course, you weren't complaining in that instance.
These were pretty damn good games, much better than yesterday where the hidden expo lost two games. But it looks like Madfrog still has a lot of room for improvement, always banking 2k+ minerals and such. On the LT game he took a big lead and at one point was sitting on 1800 minerals and 1800 gas.. and eventually lost the game.
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
Because it's a Blizzard showmatch, the purpose of which is to draw attention to the event and the game and Madfrog is one of the most well known and well liked players in Blizzard game history.
It's similar to when glhf.it arranged an invitational tournament and invited you on the basis of your nationality, when there were clearly other better, more deserving players around. Of course, you weren't complaining in that instance.
That gave me a good chuckle.
Agree. And I would add that you werent complaining, and nobody did. Cause it's good to see some diversity in tournaments. Its always interesting to see a legend on his way back tot the top fighting against one of the best. Its was a good SHOWMATCH considering that he hasnt been playing the game for too long.
TLO seemed way better player for Madfrog to handle especially in the last 2 games. His strategic choices are so good and smooth execution really pays it. I would choose Dimaga over Madfrog because he is definitely better player but of course Madfrog has some audience of his own.
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
It's not all about having the most skilled player for a show match. It's about what the audience want to see. Madfrog has a huge fan base from warcraft 3 while when I and many others hear the name Dimaga its like: "oh, the guy who cheated".
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
It's not all about having the most skilled player for a show match. It's about what the audience want to see. Madfrog has a huge fan base from warcraft 3 while when I and many others hear the name Dimaga its like: "oh, the guy who cheated".
cheat?
Getting free wins from his friends in TSL ladder stages. That's why he's banned from the official TL events (dunno when the ban expires).
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
It's not all about having the most skilled player for a show match. It's about what the audience want to see. Madfrog has a huge fan base from warcraft 3 while when I and many others hear the name Dimaga its like: "oh, the guy who cheated".
cheat?
Think he means the TSL, couple of the players including dimaga got banned from events for a while for doing something against the rules in TSL2. Can't remember what it was now though.
Madfrog just started playing beta at phase 2.. he hasnt been around since the very first patch like TLO or Dimaga.. yet he was still #1 on the Euro ladder at the end. Give him afew more weeks to catch up with experience like the rest of the players have, and he'll be dominating like he always does soon.
On August 09 2010 03:50 Skyze wrote: Madfrog just started playing beta at phase 2.. he hasnt been around since the very first patch like TLO or Dimaga.. yet he was still #1 on the Euro ladder at the end. Give him afew more weeks to catch up with experience like the rest of the players have, and he'll be dominating like he always does soon.
i think he will need more then some weeks but im sure that after some time of training he will be one of the better sc2 players. (considering his RTS experience from sc1 and wc3)
I was very impressed by MadFrog's play in both the BO3 and BO5. You couldn't help but feel TLO was trying to put on a show for the crowd so didn't play 100 percent serious in some of those losses, but MadFrog was there to take advantage and almost pulled it out. Overall excellent series way above my original expectations. Very happy TLO pulled it out though, he seemed pretty pumped as well at the end.
Lol demuslim is such a baller, saying stuff like "Battlecruisers absolutely RAPES hydras" in the event like this. I wish i could've seen other guys face when he said that :D
On August 08 2010 22:35 iG.ClouD wrote: The fact I believe Madfrog was the wrong choice for such an important showmatch doesn't mean I wasn't cheering for TLO by any means. Again, why picking Madfrog over Dimaga or any real top zerg player?
Because it's a Blizzard showmatch, the purpose of which is to draw attention to the event and the game and Madfrog is one of the most well known and well liked players in Blizzard game history.
It's similar to when glhf.it arranged an invitational tournament and invited you on the basis of your nationality, when there were clearly other better, more deserving players around. Of course, you weren't complaining in that instance.
probably gonna need some ice for that burn
but seriously it's a warcraft 3 tournament and what better way to celebrate the game then to pit the legend madfrog against TLO.
On August 09 2010 03:50 Skyze wrote: Madfrog just started playing beta at phase 2.. he hasnt been around since the very first patch like TLO or Dimaga.. yet he was still #1 on the Euro ladder at the end. Give him afew more weeks to catch up with experience like the rest of the players have, and he'll be dominating like he always does soon.
Madfrog said he started playign a few weeks after beta came out. He just felt like he was good enough to announce his presence in phase 2
Definitely became a huge MadFrog fan here. His game on Delta Quadrant was absolutely unreal. I coulda sworn you cant do what he did without dying immediately but he proved me wrong. Although I have an admittedly limited understanding of WC3 (aka I've played like 10 games), it doesn't seem to be very economy oriented. But Madfrog just takes like 6 bases like it was nothing which seems especially weird for a WC3 player.
After watching the bo5 series, I retract my previous statement about TLO being the better player at the moment. FroG is better, TLO won purely by his race choice and map imbalance.
FroG made some stupid choices in the first series but still managed to take a game off TLO purely by outplaying him. He outplays him in multiple games in the second series but still gets gibbed by how ridiculously unfair LT and Kulas are not to mention bad luck on starting positions.
How do you not give madfrog credits for his games ? He played extremely well. Also when madfrog was terran he used to be #1 pointswise in beta with the nick UnknownArt right ?
I think in a few patches madfrog will be near the very top in sc2. His game 4 in the 2nd showmatch was super awesome. Tlo had no chance in that game whatsoever. Wich is really rare in that matchup. Ok Tlo messed up a bit with his tricky expo but still awesome awesome game.
On August 09 2010 09:29 Azile wrote: After watching the bo5 series, I retract my previous statement about TLO being the better player at the moment. FroG is better, TLO won purely by his race choice and map imbalance.
FroG made some stupid choices in the first series but still managed to take a game off TLO purely by outplaying him. He outplays him in multiple games in the second series but still gets gibbed by how ridiculously unfair LT and Kulas are not to mention bad luck on starting positions.
Mech solves, spam thors and press E for victory.
Hold up let me get my zerg tear collection equipment out.
On August 09 2010 08:26 Bibbit wrote: Definitely became a huge MadFrog fan here. His game on Delta Quadrant was absolutely unreal. I coulda sworn you cant do what he did without dying immediately but he proved me wrong. Although I have an admittedly limited understanding of WC3 (aka I've played like 10 games), it doesn't seem to be very economy oriented. But Madfrog just takes like 6 bases like it was nothing which seems especially weird for a WC3 player.
- A confused Madfrog fan.
Before War3 MaDFroG was a very strong BW player as well. Also he introduced a very economy oriented style to the otherwise more aggressive or tech oriented play of the undead race. So he's not as far out of his depth as you might think.
TLO could have rolled over madfrog at anytime, but he was like: "hey, im TLO lets to some funny battlecruiser rush and piss away the game!" Next game Madfrog double fe'ed and TLO went: "Hm, this tiem imma not harrass because im so innovative and funny!"
now blizz thinks: "Eh, that Madfrog guy took 3 games from TLO? Maybe Terran is not OP after all..."
holy shit, that was one of the best bo5 i've seen in sc2(and there has been some epic ones in beta). TLO once again prove why he is a fan favorite, such a strong player
Madfrog also showed that you don't have to win to impress, one of the best Zerg play so far!!!, he will be a force to recon with in tourneys
might as well add that Demuslim did some nice commentary blizz guy was also hot, i mean cool...
On August 09 2010 21:00 AT_Tack wrote: TLO could have rolled over madfrog at anytime, but he was like: "hey, im TLO lets to some funny battlecruiser rush and piss away the game!" Next game Madfrog double fe'ed and TLO went: "Hm, this tiem imma not harrass because im so innovative and funny!"
now blizz thinks: "Eh, that Madfrog guy took 3 games from TLO? Maybe Terran is not OP after all..."
the best game was the second one where TLO won i think, TLO played pritty standard and madfrog still held off quite well. The game where he did a battlecruiser rush he would most likley lost anyway i think considering him having no expansion and madfrog ready to take his third... Well thats just me thinking that maybe.
And the last game was a reall close one, i think if madfrog did not decied to base trade he could have won that game and more importantly if he built his "sneaky expansion" somewhere else so TLO could not abuse the xel naga watch tower... The third game was an hard lose for Madfrog but he is far from the first zerg i see lose that hard on Kulvas Ravine versus terrans, it just favores terran alot...
i nthe fourth game TLO lost majorly thanks to him not expecting that many banelings... not the fast expo... even if that migth added on the loss.
anyway dont matter who wins or losses was awsome matches and was a nice watch.
Well the amount of viewers watching these VODS on their site will be rather low compared to the livestream, and a stable HQ livestream is way more costly than hosting some VODs.
But I guess Blizzard insisted on having the livestream for free and didn't care about what the ESL does with the VODs
the most important games are when madfrog plays PERFECTLY and tlo actually plays standard terran and its evident theres absolutely nothing madfrog could do to win
Have you guys also watched the BO3 from before the BO3 ? TLO did a brilliant opener there with a very fast expo and early upgrades. I am wondering why he upgraded Armor first consequently. His initial composition was Hellion, Thor - any ideas? Maybe because Weapon upgrade wouldnt have reduced the number of hits required to kill stuff? Anyway im really impressed by Madfrogs play, in my opinion he shows how Zerg should be played in general. Huge focus on expanding, countering / run by and abusing the opponents unit composition (tech switches). His biggest problems / loses came from map imbalances, where either the rush distances are very short or there is same way to abuse like a cliff over the natural (LT / Kulas).
Madfrog likes zergling play so an armor upgrade is pretty good there because of the ling's low damage. (as opposed to roaches for example who have high base dmg so it won't do much there)
And not everyone has the guts to admit he hacked and tried to frame other, innocent people while making official statements denying he ever hacked, it seems.
About the thor collectors model, can everyone see it or is this only some skin that CE guys can see? Cuz i have played so many games and never seen a collectors thor. Is it like a skin mod for your client only?
Sad that game2 in the Bo5 basically came down to that basetrade where MadFrog let the Vikings take out two Hatcheries. After absolutely PHENOMENAL play that entire game, beating the odds time and time again (even recovering from annoying Thordrop map abuse), he lost almost immediately because of one bad decision.
Overall impressed with MadFrog's play, but he did some really stupid things. I forget which game it was, but I am talking specifically about one of the longer, earlier games where he went speedling muta. TLO got tons of blue-flame hellions and Thors and MadFrog did not even attempt to alter his unit comp besides eventually throwing in some infestors. Granted, I'm surprised he was as competitive in that game as he was, given his strategy, but a quick 150min roach warren would have worked wonders for him in turning that game in his favor. = (
Krzysztof = hullah = 100% confirmed hacker, banned from all BW leagues/tournaments.
It's a shame Blizzard hired a hacker. It's definitely a hit to their credibility...
why is that a hit to their credibility?
Obviously that would hurt their credibility due to bad judgment hiring out for a guy to be involved in the "official" blizzard starcraft scene knowing that he was previously a hacker, it doesn't seem like it would really hurt them that much if thats what your emplying but it does show that they don't care as much about what active sc community members think towards their presenting us all with someone who did something of that nature. Personally it doesn't bother me because i mean comon blizz screws up a lot, mainly because we all have such high hopes for them (not to mention the game being a sport lol) that theres no way they could ever measure up but certainly this move could possibly come off as rude or insensitive towards players/community members who follow a moral code towards the game and its all those involved imo (think of it like if mcdonalds hired a cook who had previously purposefully given customers food poisoning, was caught, and fired from another mcdonalds, it just doesn't really seem like good business sense).
"2010 Warcraft EU Invitational - SC2 Showmatch: TLAF-Liquid`TLO vs SK.MaDFroG Set 1 (1/2)" This video contains content from Turtle Entertainment GmbH, who has blocked it on copyright grounds.
Krzysztof = hullah = 100% confirmed hacker, banned from all BW leagues/tournaments.
It's a shame Blizzard hired a hacker. It's definitely a hit to their credibility...
why is that a hit to their credibility?
Because that's hypocritical of them. On one hand, they ban hackers and are generally very negative towards them, on the other hand, they hire a blatant hacker from their very game...
It's ridiculous that someone who was deliberately RUINING StarCraft events is now going to be RUNNING them, on Blizzard behalf on top of that. Ironic. T____T
On August 11 2010 18:28 maybenexttime wrote: And not everyone has the guts to admit he hacked and tried to frame other, innocent people while making official statements denying he ever hacked, it seems.
On August 11 2010 18:28 maybenexttime wrote: And not everyone has the guts to admit he hacked and tried to frame other, innocent people while making official statements denying he ever hacked, it seems.
He got pretty low, won't you agree?
how do u frame someone for you hacking?:O
He tried to frame MistrZZZ while he himself hacked in the very game that was supposed to be the evidence of MistrZZZ hacking. Hullah also hacked in other games too.
Krzysztof = hullah = 100% confirmed hacker, banned from all BW leagues/tournaments.
It's a shame Blizzard hired a hacker. It's definitely a hit to their credibility...
why is that a hit to their credibility?
Obviously that would hurt their credibility due to bad judgment hiring out for a guy to be involved in the "official" blizzard starcraft scene knowing that he was previously a hacker, it doesn't seem like it would really hurt them that much if thats what your emplying but it does show that they don't care as much about what active sc community members think towards their presenting us all with someone who did something of that nature. Personally it doesn't bother me because i mean comon blizz screws up a lot, mainly because we all have such high hopes for them (not to mention the game being a sport lol) that theres no way they could ever measure up but certainly this move could possibly come off as rude or insensitive towards players/community members who follow a moral code towards the game and its all those involved imo (think of it like if mcdonalds hired a cook who had previously purposefully given customers food poisoning, was caught, and fired from another mcdonalds, it just doesn't really seem like good business sense).
your example isn't relevant at all. this is nothing at all like mcdonalds. hiring him would have nothing to do with what the community thinks about him, and furthermore if people are only thinking emotionally that's not really part of the business, do you think hiring him could possibly, at all, ever, have any effect on their sales? no. don't kid yourself, you're not going to not buy their game because someone who was a known cheater in a previous game of theirs is now working for them... although, i would agree that it's obvious at this point blizzard is all about their bottom line.
hiring someone who knows how programs work, and in this case probably knows how hacks work, is hiring someone who has better insight on exactly what you would want them to have insight on. if you hire someone who knows how to backwards engineer your previous anti-cheat system, or even iccup's, which was the communities anti-cheat system, you're hiring someone with experience and knowledge about how people will try to work around your new anti-cheat. this is a good example of exactly good business sense. why do you think there was so much competition over nazi scientists between the west and the soviets after wwii?