• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:25
CEST 16:25
KST 23:25
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed10Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll4Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Starcraft in widescreen A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Future of Porn Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 622 users

Math on Widow Mines -- How STLife Dodged the Shots - Page 11

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
Account252508
Profile Joined February 2012
3454 Posts
March 20 2013 19:27 GMT
#201
--- Nuked ---
WalkinDead
Profile Blog Joined February 2013
88 Posts
March 20 2013 20:54 GMT
#202
On March 19 2013 23:04 reikai wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
This explains a lot of the game on Daybreak, especially the battle in the the bottom middle base where Day[9] was even confused as to why Life's army took almost no damage.

Back to bio-tank? :[

bio tank is gonna get shreeddded by mutalisk ling/bane runbys
vNmMasterT
Profile Joined September 2012
68 Posts
March 20 2013 21:21 GMT
#203
Imo doing “micro trick” this is hardly worth the risk. Why risk having the mine triggered at clumped lings (which will happen if your timing following the runby ling is not exactly correct) when you can guarantee safe passage of the ling pack by just sacrificing 1 ling?
Zarahtra
Profile Joined May 2010
Iceland4053 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-20 21:31:56
March 20 2013 21:30 GMT
#204
On March 21 2013 03:31 Lone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2013 02:35 Zarahtra wrote:
I just dont understand why someone would bother going through so much math only to be proven "no the mines shot in middle of the pack and almost nothing died".

On the contrary, the math proves that it's possible to quite literally sneak entire masses of Zerglings over minefields by properly positioning a few "lead Zerglings" inbetween mines. It's a very complicated micro trick, but it could be important in the future.
I was also thinking about what would happen if players were to create a wedge formation with their Zerglings. As long as the point of the wedge cuts between mines, the entire mass could go straight through, as each Zergling in turn would hit the edge of the adjacent mine's radius before any Zerglings hit the middle of the radius.

Thanks to everyone for the support and comments! This went far further than I'd ever expected.

I will agree that there is potential in this, but you are acting like Life somehow knew about this or was actually doing something smart, when he wasn't(well there were probably shittons of things he was doing smart, but not anything close ot this). If this had any relevance on what he was doing, the mines would not be detonating, they however were. Furtheremore I'm hardly convinced that a zergling army needs to have some front zerglings when they can take the detonations in the face like Life did and come out with hardly any deaths, or better yet just send a few zerglings to bait all the mines.

So yeah, I think this thread is at best confusing and at worst based on incorrect statement to get more views.
Lone
Profile Joined August 2010
7 Posts
March 20 2013 21:53 GMT
#205
On March 21 2013 06:30 Zarahtra wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2013 03:31 Lone wrote:
On March 21 2013 02:35 Zarahtra wrote:
I just dont understand why someone would bother going through so much math only to be proven "no the mines shot in middle of the pack and almost nothing died".

On the contrary, the math proves that it's possible to quite literally sneak entire masses of Zerglings over minefields by properly positioning a few "lead Zerglings" inbetween mines. It's a very complicated micro trick, but it could be important in the future.
I was also thinking about what would happen if players were to create a wedge formation with their Zerglings. As long as the point of the wedge cuts between mines, the entire mass could go straight through, as each Zergling in turn would hit the edge of the adjacent mine's radius before any Zerglings hit the middle of the radius.

Thanks to everyone for the support and comments! This went far further than I'd ever expected.

I will agree that there is potential in this, but you are acting like Life somehow knew about this or was actually doing something smart, when he wasn't(well there were probably shittons of things he was doing smart, but not anything close ot this). If this had any relevance on what he was doing, the mines would not be detonating, they however were. Furtheremore I'm hardly convinced that a zergling army needs to have some front zerglings when they can take the detonations in the face like Life did and come out with hardly any deaths, or better yet just send a few zerglings to bait all the mines.

So yeah, I think this thread is at best confusing and at worst based on incorrect statement to get more views.


I used the title I did because that was how the idea came to my attention. Baiting or forcing detonations on 1 mine is not always possible, due to time constraints or the simple fact that an enemy army is sitting ontop of or near the mines. There are other possibilities, however, I'm just pointing out that with some good technique, a Zerg can run over the mines if he has no other options.

Whether or not Life knew about this, consciously or subconsciously, I wouldn't know. I think it's very likely that he realized on a conceptual level that he was able to do something like this, even if he didn't understand how or why.
I'm taking a situation I observed occurring and explaining it with math. At no point in the thread do I claim that Life did calculations in his head or that Life understood what was going on. I made a suggestion because I doubt that Life would intentionally run his Zerglings over known minefields if he thought that they would all score 35 kill shots.

And again, in the particular situation noted by several posters, it's true that all of the mines did detonate. In other situations during the 4 games, however, they didn't -- at least not when they should have. I can think of one distinct one (which I noted on page 10); perhaps two, where this was the case.
KillingVector
Profile Joined June 2012
United States96 Posts
March 20 2013 21:55 GMT
#206
On March 20 2013 17:29 MilesTeg wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2013 17:11 papaz wrote:
This is surely not working as intended.

This community might love things like this because it "raises skill level" but you don't design a game having it work like this.

Imagine a random player (which of course doesn't play the game to become pro but just for fun/relaxing) coming to bnet forums thinking he has found a bug saying "hey, I made these widow mines in this game but they didn't fire. Must be a bug".

And then a blue comes over with: "Well kid, thing is if you take this formula, consider these mechanics and then apply this to your situation it obvious that everything is just working as intended".

Sorry to burst everyones bubble, but this will be fixed just like mining tricks and all have been fixed.


?

This has nothing to do with the formula, OP was just just trying to calculate the effective range. There's nothing complicated about it, I don't think you understand.

And yes it's certainly working as intended.


This is interesting, but it doesn't really sound like it is working as intended. Blizzard will probably add some interval of time after the initial 1.5s delay, where the mine is "armed" and doesn't need to wait for another delay.
"In mathematics you don't understand things. You just get used to them." - John Von Neumann
PH
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
United States6173 Posts
March 20 2013 23:09 GMT
#207
On March 21 2013 06:21 vNmMasterT wrote:
Imo doing “micro trick” this is hardly worth the risk. Why risk having the mine triggered at clumped lings (which will happen if your timing following the runby ling is not exactly correct) when you can guarantee safe passage of the ling pack by just sacrificing 1 ling?

It worked for Life.
Hello
kevinmon
Profile Joined January 2011
United States540 Posts
March 21 2013 03:53 GMT
#208
This makes a lot of sense thank you for keeping it simple.
Kingsky
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Singapore298 Posts
March 21 2013 04:54 GMT
#209
On March 21 2013 04:27 monkybone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2013 03:37 UnholyRai wrote:
life is calculating this shit in real time during the games? What a genius prodigy


yep he's calculating sines and cosines like a calculator



i think he just figured it out in serenpidity when playing or watching replays

Of course i could be wrong and he actually used maths, if so, i would be very impressed
Why do people hate the Colossus? Because the Colossus is like banksters from Wall Street: “too big to fail”. - TheDwF
Rainling
Profile Joined June 2011
United States456 Posts
March 21 2013 06:17 GMT
#210
On March 20 2013 18:15 papaz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2013 17:47 Rainling wrote:
On March 20 2013 17:11 papaz wrote:
This is surely not working as intended.

This community might love things like this because it "raises skill level" but you don't design a game having it work like this.

Imagine a random player (which of course doesn't play the game to become pro but just for fun/relaxing) coming to bnet forums thinking he has found a bug saying "hey, I made these widow mines in this game but they didn't fire. Must be a bug".

And then a blue comes over with: "Well kid, thing is if you take this formula, consider these mechanics and then apply this to your situation it obvious that everything is just working as intended".

Sorry to burst everyones bubble, but this will be fixed just like mining tricks and all have been fixed.

You think widow mines taking 1.5 seconds after acquiring after a target to fire, and being visible while the target is acquired, is an error? I'm sure Blizzard knew what they were doing when they programmed this unit. The widow mine not firing if a unit is out of its attack range when it attacks? Also working as intended, I'm fairly certain. There isn't a unit in the game that can attack a unit outside of its attack range.

The only possible unintentional mechanic of the widow mine, imo, is being able to reacquire targets via right clicking.


If only I had a dollar everytime a developer "knows what they were doing and could anticipate how it would turn out" I would never have to work again.

Can we agree that this "mechanic" that you can actually run across widow mines without triggering them is kinda of a big thing in the game?

It's not just a "small" cute feature.

So you are designing a game. You are showing off your new units to the public. You demonstrate the unit for your audience "here is a mine, the purpose of this is some aoe effect, area control and look how it works in the battle".

Now if Blizzard anticipated that "hey, remember that even if this units is a mine there are cute things you can do so that it doesn't fire at all" you don't think this woud be mentioned AT ALL? They just go silently about a freaking unit that is supposed to blow up stuff can be DISREGARDED if you work out its "mechanics"?

It's just some "easter egg" that just got discovered by the community?

I know these subjects are sensitive here at TL because of the hardocre nature of many of the players/people here but here is the simplest way I can say this: This is a mine, the purpose of the mine is to blow up stuff. Blizzard adds different timers to it to balance out how it works. The timer could be there so that when you discover it you can run away, or you can have time to "gun it down" before it blows up.

It's certainly not there so that you can abuse the "lock on to target" and "relock on to target" indefinetely so that it NEVER EVER goes off if you are good enough.

If that was intended you bet Blizzard would have mentioned this when presenting this new unit. Like I said, this isn't just a tiny thing that got discovered. It's freaking HUGE.

A good example of Blizzard not mentioning something they intended to be in the game is the carrier micro change. Blizzard said they were thinking about changing how the carrier leash range worked, but they didn't disclose that they changed it in a patch of HotS and people had to discover it on their own.

I think you might be making too many assumptions. You can't abuse the mine so it never targets your lings, no matter what, you can abuse the mine so it never targets your lings unless the opponent takes the time to right click a ling right as it enters the mine attack radius.

This doesn't seem that unreasonable to me, considering it takes a fair amount of micro, as well as knowing fairly accurately the position of a widow mine, to avoid widow mine shots. Widow mines can be positioned in narrow chokes created by buildings where avoiding widow mine shots is no longer possible. Besides, the alternative is the widow mine killing or damaging one sacrificial unit- either way, it's not much of a loss for the opposing player.

I don't agree that, if Blizzard realized that avoiding widow mine shots entirely was possible under some circumstances, they would immediately conclude that this was a bug that must be fixed. You're entitled to your own opinion though, I don't know Blizzard's thought process.
Zaixer
Profile Joined June 2010
Sweden82 Posts
March 21 2013 07:02 GMT
#211
So basically you can run a 200 supply army straight over a mine without it firing as long as the leading unit happen to be slightly off center?

That cant be what Blizzard intended. It is something that will frustrate casual players and Blizzard will fix it.
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
March 21 2013 07:26 GMT
#212
I don't know why anyone would use mines offensively with Marine/Marauder to begin with. MMM was, besides a few games always not just inferior but completely dismanteled by muta/ling/bane. I remember MKP doing it on Metalopolis against Muta/Ling/Bane but that was only allowed by his godlike control AND constantly trading from the very beginning. If you allow a big enough muta/ling/bane force to gear up, marine & marauder will stand no chance, no matter the control.

Widowmines are a very good defensive thing, prevent runbys and can save bunkers/turrets but to actually be applied in battle you would have to be a genius with some luck. The problem in my opinion (offensively) is that they do trigger range. If the mine were to explode with a good amount of AoE when there's a unit running over it, it would be a far more efficient way of offence and would allow zoning. This way, most of the time the fast zerglings will be close to your units and you get the same AoE the zerg gets which spells disaster since Terrans biggest fear is actually AoE. No AoE means no victory over Terran, be it banelings, fungal or even the very own mines of Terran.

I am pretty sure had Flash played tanks and used mines defensively or offensively in the purpose of zoning only he would have won against Life's very aggressive muta/ling/bane style. Tanks have bigger range and a good amount of splash and can target effectively even before the battle begins. They can also force a situation and/or fight upon the zerg, while mines can pressure but not nesseccary force fights. The real problem for Terran were never the zergling numbers, as marines with good upgrades and medivacs behind eat zerglings alive, but the banelings. Now you can take out zerglings faster as they suffer from mines, but the likelyhood of you being hit by is is also there. The banelings will probably be close to you, if not in your force before the mines it and if they hit, banelings die and do damage regardless.

Kiting back over a mine field allows for more mines to trigger, but since zerglings are faster than bio and mutalisks are as well, this could be another potentially danger for Terran getting freehits in addition to the mines. Even if mines give the benefit of mobility , they cost you a lot of possible pressure and zoning you can do with tanks. They also don't buffer damage, as tanks would and they force you to play marine/marauder as units will get close and you cannot play marine medivac mine against muta/ling/bane as you will have banelings connect.

Mines are cheaper, but that cannot compensate the need of marauders for example. In my opinion marine/tank should and will become standard again and mines will be used to cut off reinforcement pathways and/or expansions OR zone out your push to prevent an engagement from the Zerg from multiple angles. Thats my take on it~
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
Addicted2Dreaming
Profile Joined February 2013
Canada116 Posts
March 21 2013 07:28 GMT
#213
On March 21 2013 16:02 Zaixer wrote:
So basically you can run a 200 supply army straight over a mine without it firing as long as the leading unit happen to be slightly off center?

That cant be what Blizzard intended. It is something that will frustrate casual players and Blizzard will fix it.


1 mine blowing up 50 lings or banelings is just as frustrating.
favs = leenock, gumiho, sC, life, sniper, jjakji, mvp, tear, innovation, polt, mc, dream
Shikyo
Profile Blog Joined June 2008
Finland33997 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-21 08:00:54
March 21 2013 07:50 GMT
#214
I doubt Life used any maths for this. You don't really even need maths. He probably just used some logic and observation "Oh, the mine doesn't detonate if I run the ling out of range in time. Oh I see, if I now make it switch targets after that it never has the time to go off". You really need no maths at all for this to get a good idea, you can just experiment for like 15 minutes.


v It was more in response to the people talking about Life calculating this ingame and such, I never criticized the OP.
League of Legends EU West, Platinum III | Yousei Teikoku is the best thing that has ever happened to music.
NarutO
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
Germany18839 Posts
March 21 2013 07:57 GMT
#215
On March 21 2013 16:50 Shikyo wrote:
I doubt Life used any maths for this. You don't really even need maths. He probably just used some logic and observation "Oh, the mine doesn't detonate if I run the ling out of range in time. Oh I see, if I now make it switch targets after that it never has the time to go off". You really need no maths at all for this to get a good idea, you can just experiment for like 15 minutes.


Some people are not satisfied with it working, they want to understand why it works like it does. Ofcourse you are right that Life probably didn't calculate and use math for it on the fly and figured out how a mine works, doesn't mean that the OP is not useful information.
CommentatorPolt | MMA | Jjakji | BoxeR | NaDa | MVP | MKP ... truly inspiring.
madnessman
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
United States1581 Posts
March 21 2013 08:10 GMT
#216
On March 21 2013 06:21 vNmMasterT wrote:
Imo doing “micro trick” this is hardly worth the risk. Why risk having the mine triggered at clumped lings (which will happen if your timing following the runby ling is not exactly correct) when you can guarantee safe passage of the ling pack by just sacrificing 1 ling?


It might be safer for most players to just sacrifice a ling but high level players could still benefit from this "micro trick".
figq
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
12519 Posts
March 21 2013 08:24 GMT
#217
I see, thanks, nice observations! I'm still leaning on the side that mines are too random (which is bad), but anything that makes them less a matter of luck and more a matter of skill, is a very good thing.
If you stand next to my head, you can hear the ocean. - Day[9]
MilesTeg
Profile Joined September 2010
France1271 Posts
March 21 2013 10:16 GMT
#218
On March 21 2013 06:55 KillingVector wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2013 17:29 MilesTeg wrote:
On March 20 2013 17:11 papaz wrote:
This is surely not working as intended.

This community might love things like this because it "raises skill level" but you don't design a game having it work like this.

Imagine a random player (which of course doesn't play the game to become pro but just for fun/relaxing) coming to bnet forums thinking he has found a bug saying "hey, I made these widow mines in this game but they didn't fire. Must be a bug".

And then a blue comes over with: "Well kid, thing is if you take this formula, consider these mechanics and then apply this to your situation it obvious that everything is just working as intended".

Sorry to burst everyones bubble, but this will be fixed just like mining tricks and all have been fixed.


?

This has nothing to do with the formula, OP was just just trying to calculate the effective range. There's nothing complicated about it, I don't think you understand.

And yes it's certainly working as intended.


This is interesting, but it doesn't really sound like it is working as intended. Blizzard will probably add some interval of time after the initial 1.5s delay, where the mine is "armed" and doesn't need to wait for another delay.


That would be pretty bad for the Terran IMO. Because in that case a smart Zerg will detonate the mines easily with a small pack of lings. And possibly do more damage to the marines than to the Zerg army.

No, I think that's really the smartest way for the mines to behave. And I think people are overreacting a bit, for 2 reasons:
- you'll have a bio army close to the mines, preventing the Zerg from doing this kind of stuff.

- the thing you really want to target is banelings, and the Zerg can't really micro them that way. Not just because they're slower, but because you want to move your banelings towards the bio army. You can't really pick your angle with banelings, you want to run them towards marines.



On March 21 2013 08:09 PH wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 21 2013 06:21 vNmMasterT wrote:
Imo doing “micro trick” this is hardly worth the risk. Why risk having the mine triggered at clumped lings (which will happen if your timing following the runby ling is not exactly correct) when you can guarantee safe passage of the ling pack by just sacrificing 1 ling?

It worked for Life.


Except he didn't actually do that.
MilesTeg
Profile Joined September 2010
France1271 Posts
March 21 2013 10:20 GMT
#219
On March 21 2013 03:31 Lone wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 20 2013 23:35 MilesTeg wrote:
On March 20 2013 22:58 monkybone wrote:
Let's wait and see if anyone else but life can pull it off so excellently. Really, all we have to do is to keep an eye on the resource lost tab for the coming months.


Life didn't pull it off (for the millionth time). I shall not quit this thread until everyone understands that, I don't care if I post half the messages in it :p

In the specific situation you referenced, it would appear that Life did not actually achieve the results noted in this thread. However, there were other situations throughout the series in which he was able to do so. There may have been other situations in the tournament as well.

For one, in the same game, I distinctly remember Life doing a runby into Flash's third. His lings went straight through the edge of the mine's radius, and the caster expressed his surprise that it didn't go off.

Whether Life knew of the trick or even where the mines were is irrelevant. In cases where the mines should have gone off based on Blizzard's description of the unit, they didn't. Whether this is intended or not is also unknown.

So yes, in the engagement where there were five mines on the southern ramp outside of Life's fourth, this does not apply, as so nicely diagrammed on page 6. You are correct in that particular circumstance, and I'll gladly add it to the OP if you'd really like people to understand.

I'm going to be going through the games today and noting specific circumstances.

Thanks for the input, MilesTeg and others who have made this apparent. However, the information in my article is still valid as far as I'm concerned.


Oh, didn't see that you answered. Fair enough. Didn't want to sound like a dick; I just think most people coming in this thread got confused, and got the wrong conclusion. When doing a run by, it can probably be useful, although I'd argue that it's better to just run a couple zerglings to detonate the mines and neutralize them for a few seconds.
Veriol
Profile Joined October 2010
Czech Republic502 Posts
Last Edited: 2013-03-21 10:55:32
March 21 2013 10:54 GMT
#220
All the stupid hate on OP "Life knew nothing about this" etc.. Wtf?! He probably went like "hmm if I run fast from mines they wont explode" and used it. Ofcourse he didnt use math - he doesnt care, if it works it works. The fact someone just explained us exactly how it works should be praised not damned.

And for the title of the thread .. quite simple if it wasnt for "how ST_life dodged the shots" most of you wouldnt even open the thread nor read it
"When you play, you have to start off with a mind to turn the game into a rape." -iloveoov
Prev 1 9 10 11 12 13 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 35m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Vindicta 185
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 46851
Rain 5998
EffOrt 1553
BeSt 1301
Larva 667
firebathero 404
Stork 384
Mini 317
Rush 233
Light 194
[ Show more ]
PianO 143
Mind 125
Pusan 71
GoRush 60
Aegong 58
sSak 52
JulyZerg 49
Movie 42
sas.Sziky 39
Shinee 36
Noble 24
yabsab 22
scan(afreeca) 14
SilentControl 9
Shine 9
Bale 6
Terrorterran 6
ivOry 5
Dota 2
qojqva3694
Fuzer 211
League of Legends
Dendi1888
Counter-Strike
sgares578
byalli342
Super Smash Bros
amsayoshi44
Other Games
B2W.Neo2589
singsing2070
Lowko419
DeMusliM415
crisheroes404
ArmadaUGS83
ToD82
Mew2King79
Pyrionflax76
QueenE63
markeloff61
Trikslyr34
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick3895
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 9
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1622
League of Legends
• Nemesis3310
• Jankos1584
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
1h 35m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
9h 35m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 1h
Replay Cast
1d 9h
The PondCast
1d 19h
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Contender
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
6 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.