• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:12
CEST 16:12
KST 23:12
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall12HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed10Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll4Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Who will win EWC 2025? Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo) WardiTV Mondays Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Starcraft in widescreen A cwal.gg Extension - Easily keep track of anyone
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Cosmonarchy Pro Showmatches CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Future of Porn Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 621 users

[G] short guide on easy wins in PvZ - Page 15

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 21 Next All
RiSkysc2
Profile Joined September 2011
696 Posts
July 30 2012 20:02 GMT
#281
Doesn't this completely rely on getting a vortex?
Eifer
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States138 Posts
July 30 2012 20:31 GMT
#282
I watched Shinya do this in ESEA (The first game he linked), and I couldn't believe it worked. I feel like while it is proven to be effective, it is only gimmicky. The games I have seen this win in are generally due to surprise (lack of good scouting), the zerg player making poor decisions after receiving the correct scouting information, or positional failures for the zerg army. To me, this means that a competent, rational grandmaster zerg wouldn't have an issue beating it and thus I wouldn't use the build. It can still win. Anything with archons and a vortex has the possibility of winning in pvz, but I don't think that it will win very many games at the highest level for a sustained period of time if more people used it.
ineversmile
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States583 Posts
July 30 2012 21:12 GMT
#283
I think what's valuable from this thread is that the build proves zealots and archons can be good against zerg with the right positioning, and as time passes and we figure out ways to make that happen proactively and without mothership aid, we can use a different army composition. I think the fundamental issue with this particular build is that you're trying to do so many things at once--upgrades, teching charge and archons, getting mamaship, and taking a third. But if we instead go for a much smoother game flow, that takes the gimmick nature out of the equation.
Nostradamus.146@AM, Nostradamus.398@KR, Nostradamus.922@EU http://www.teamliquid.net/blog/ins
DeathToSquid
Profile Joined July 2012
United States20 Posts
July 30 2012 21:51 GMT
#284
What makes something a "gimmick"? To me it is a strategy that only works due to a surprise factor. OP states this is not the case; despite knowing what is coming it works.

For a long time, a FFE was considered a gimmick because people thought there was no way you could survive a range of openings with so few early units. Now it is the most popular opening in PvZ.

To prove this is build a gimmick, figure out how to reliably counter it in a game. If, however, it can reliably be pulled off and adapted to deal with anything the Zerg can throw at it, what makes it a gimmick? To me that just makes a solid, original build.
Cheney always seemed squiddy to me.
Primal666
Profile Joined November 2010
Slovenia418 Posts
July 30 2012 22:01 GMT
#285
to any one having truble, upgraded roach hydra are good against this, tried it twice on ladder, but i'm only diamond:S
Yokoblue
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada594 Posts
July 30 2012 22:09 GMT
#286
On July 31 2012 07:01 Primal666 wrote:
to any one having truble, upgraded roach hydra are good against this, tried it twice on ladder, but i'm only diamond:S


I really really dont think its good against that... mass roach lose to it and Hydras die to both Archons and Zealot charge... And no protoss is going to let your snipe the mothership with hydras...
Master League playing Protoss and Zerg
Tolazytobecreative
Profile Joined July 2012
Germany17 Posts
July 30 2012 22:12 GMT
#287
So to all the people who haven't tested it out and still wondering if they should because it seems so easy: don't.

this strat is utter bullshit and the only reason why it works is because zergs on OP's level dont know wtf they just scouted and will then be confused and just do random things wich will actually make them lose.

Why is it bullshit? because you could never hold your third with this. you could just drop some roaches in the main and while the army moves into the main you could simply snipe the ms with corrupters
you could also simply bust the third and dont stack all your units in a circle to for the toss to get a cortex that catches 20+ units.
You could also turtle up play macro game and yet aigan dont stack your units up (zerg from op's replay... putting all your bl's at one place and the infestor under them so you get everything vortexed like an idiot... what is this low master?
but the easiest way would be to simply deny/snipe third (wich you cant possibly hold with this if done correctly) or drop.

also you posted this before. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=271126
it's the exact same thing (but hey two threads get more attention right?)

your shittalking during games hasn't improved either

and yes i am fairly pissed since this thread is pure attention whoring(and maybe ment to piss people like me off?). the tactic is bad and solely relies on the zerg reacting wrong

also this is coming from top 100 eu gm. so dont tell me i dont know wtf im talking about. i know it.
DeathToSquid
Profile Joined July 2012
United States20 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-07-31 17:07:32
July 31 2012 14:09 GMT
#288
Dear Tolazytobecreative

I don't really care about the personal stuff, but thanks for your input on this build! That's what i'm interested in.

you could just drop some roaches in the main and while the army moves into the main you could simply snipe the ms with corrupters


That sounds like a great plan! I'll get my practice partner to try this. Do you know what the approximate timing is on getting 6 or so corrupters, pneumatic carapace, and ventral sacs as well as a roach army is on 3 bases? Knowing the timing would help me plan and I would appreciate it :D

Just based on the upgrades it would be a minimum of 3:10 mins after lair, but It seems like gas might be a problem given that you still have to crank out a ton of workers/roaches. Before moving out you would have to have gotten a spire, produced corrupters, and used them to kill the phoenix and deny scouting, cause the drop won't work if P still has map control. This would reveal your corrupter tech and make P careful with their momma. If you timed it right you might be able to have your roaches close by air to the main right as ventral sacs finishes. SC2 is updating right now so I can't look at the replays, but it sounds like this might hit around14-15 minutes, due to the gas cost, or else you would have a relatively small, un-upgraded roach army from going straight for a ton of gas early game.

One advantage of this push is that P might mis-read it as mutalisk play (given all the gas and spire), and get some useless pheonix. On the downside, if P thinks its mutalisk play they may already have cannons / stalkers in positions that are vulnerable to air, which would incidentally mitigate some of the drop threat.

If I am interpreting you right, the Z build / gas cost would be around:
Lair - 100
Spire - 200
Corruptor x 6 - 600 (Note: this is about the minimum it will take to finish off a momma. Keep in mind that the vortex will probably be used to remove 2/3 corrupters from the battle for a while, and motherships have 700 hp. With 3/4 corrupters doing 22 damage per hit (base 20 + 20% from corruption -2 from armor) every 1.9 seconds, it will take an absolute minimum of 21/15 seconds to kill the mothership. If it takes any longer than that there is no way you won't be able to get under some anti air, and even in that time i would expect 1-2 of the corrupters to fall just to the mothership and VR, even if the rest of the army is busy)
Glial Reconstitution - 100
Roach x 60/40/20 - 1,500 / 1000 /500
Pneumatic Carapace: - 100
Ventral sacs - 200
4 overseers - 200
Total: 3,000 / 2,500 / 2,000

The earliest timing I could possibly see this happening is 13 minutes, unless I am not getting something. If you could do this attack before 13 minutes, I think you would have P by the balls.

By 13 minutes, In my last game I had 4 archons (2 were still morphing, but close enough), a few zealots, charge, +1, a mothership with 101 energy, an established, mining third with 3 cannons, and 8 warp gates.
By 14 mins I had 6 archons, 12 warp gates and +2 13 secs from completion and a handful chargelots (this was after an attack, but I think I lost mostly chargelots, so without interruption this number would be higher).
By 15 mins I had 8 archons, about 20 chargelots, +3 attack on the way, and about 16 warp gates.

Please keep in mind that all of there timings are based on my level of play and that of opponents I see in game, if you are gosu you might be able to shave some off the timings for both Z and P.

The only problem with this attack is that it seems like if it doesn't work, Zerg is in big, big trouble as they just wasted so much gas and tech that their upgrades and army composition are going to suck late game.

All my opponents that have tried the other tactics you mentioned failed, probably because they aren't as experienced as you, so I'm not as worried about the other stuff you talked about.

Thanks in advance for more advice on how this would work (and a replay? :D)
Cheney always seemed squiddy to me.
Yokoblue
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada594 Posts
July 31 2012 20:54 GMT
#289
On July 31 2012 23:09 DeathToSquid wrote:
Dear Tolazytobecreative

I don't really care about the personal stuff, but thanks for your input on this build! That's what i'm interested in.

Show nested quote +
you could just drop some roaches in the main and while the army moves into the main you could simply snipe the ms with corrupters


That sounds like a great plan! I'll get my practice partner to try this. Do you know what the approximate timing is on getting 6 or so corrupters, pneumatic carapace, and ventral sacs as well as a roach army is on 3 bases? Knowing the timing would help me plan and I would appreciate it :D

Just based on the upgrades it would be a minimum of 3:10 mins after lair, but It seems like gas might be a problem given that you still have to crank out a ton of workers/roaches. Before moving out you would have to have gotten a spire, produced corrupters, and used them to kill the phoenix and deny scouting, cause the drop won't work if P still has map control. This would reveal your corrupter tech and make P careful with their momma. If you timed it right you might be able to have your roaches close by air to the main right as ventral sacs finishes. SC2 is updating right now so I can't look at the replays, but it sounds like this might hit around14-15 minutes, due to the gas cost, or else you would have a relatively small, un-upgraded roach army from going straight for a ton of gas early game.

One advantage of this push is that P might mis-read it as mutalisk play (given all the gas and spire), and get some useless pheonix. On the downside, if P thinks its mutalisk play they may already have cannons / stalkers in positions that are vulnerable to air, which would incidentally mitigate some of the drop threat.

If I am interpreting you right, the Z build / gas cost would be around:
Lair - 100
Spire - 200
Corruptor x 6 - 600 (Note: this is about the minimum it will take to finish off a momma. Keep in mind that the vortex will probably be used to remove 2/3 corrupters from the battle for a while, and motherships have 700 hp. With 3/4 corrupters doing 22 damage per hit (base 20 + 20% from corruption -2 from armor) every 1.9 seconds, it will take an absolute minimum of 21/15 seconds to kill the mothership. If it takes any longer than that there is no way you won't be able to get under some anti air, and even in that time i would expect 1-2 of the corrupters to fall just to the mothership and VR, even if the rest of the army is busy)
Glial Reconstitution - 100
Roach x 60/40/20 - 1,500 / 1000 /500
Pneumatic Carapace: - 100
Ventral sacs - 200
4 overseers - 200
Total: 3,000 / 2,500 / 2,000

The earliest timing I could possibly see this happening is 13 minutes, unless I am not getting something. If you could do this attack before 13 minutes, I think you would have P by the balls.

By 13 minutes, In my last game I had 4 archons (2 were still morphing, but close enough), a few zealots, charge, +1, a mothership with 101 energy, an established, mining third with 3 cannons, and 8 warp gates.
By 14 mins I had 6 archons, 12 warp gates and +2 13 secs from completion and a handful chargelots (this was after an attack, but I think I lost mostly chargelots, so without interruption this number would be higher).
By 15 mins I had 8 archons, about 20 chargelots, +3 attack on the way, and about 16 warp gates.

Please keep in mind that all of there timings are based on my level of play and that of opponents I see in game, if you are gosu you might be able to shave some off the timings for both Z and P.

The only problem with this attack is that it seems like if it doesn't work, Zerg is in big, big trouble as they just wasted so much gas and tech that their upgrades and army composition are going to suck late game.

All my opponents that have tried the other tactics you mentioned failed, probably because they aren't as experienced as you, so I'm not as worried about the other stuff you talked about.

Thanks in advance for more advice on how this would work (and a replay? :D)


I like your post... And its true that the build seems easy to counter... buts its not...
What I dont like though is if the zerg spot you doing that... and rush to broodlord... I mean almost pure brood or pure air... I would we be able to kill corruptor - brood with only archons...

I used the build and I always find that there is only a small follow up (Voidrays)

Any help on that matter ?
Master League playing Protoss and Zerg
AceLight
Profile Joined March 2012
New Zealand220 Posts
July 31 2012 21:15 GMT
#290
On August 01 2012 05:54 Yokoblue wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2012 23:09 DeathToSquid wrote:
Dear Tolazytobecreative

I don't really care about the personal stuff, but thanks for your input on this build! That's what i'm interested in.

you could just drop some roaches in the main and while the army moves into the main you could simply snipe the ms with corrupters


That sounds like a great plan! I'll get my practice partner to try this. Do you know what the approximate timing is on getting 6 or so corrupters, pneumatic carapace, and ventral sacs as well as a roach army is on 3 bases? Knowing the timing would help me plan and I would appreciate it :D

Just based on the upgrades it would be a minimum of 3:10 mins after lair, but It seems like gas might be a problem given that you still have to crank out a ton of workers/roaches. Before moving out you would have to have gotten a spire, produced corrupters, and used them to kill the phoenix and deny scouting, cause the drop won't work if P still has map control. This would reveal your corrupter tech and make P careful with their momma. If you timed it right you might be able to have your roaches close by air to the main right as ventral sacs finishes. SC2 is updating right now so I can't look at the replays, but it sounds like this might hit around14-15 minutes, due to the gas cost, or else you would have a relatively small, un-upgraded roach army from going straight for a ton of gas early game.

One advantage of this push is that P might mis-read it as mutalisk play (given all the gas and spire), and get some useless pheonix. On the downside, if P thinks its mutalisk play they may already have cannons / stalkers in positions that are vulnerable to air, which would incidentally mitigate some of the drop threat.

If I am interpreting you right, the Z build / gas cost would be around:
Lair - 100
Spire - 200
Corruptor x 6 - 600 (Note: this is about the minimum it will take to finish off a momma. Keep in mind that the vortex will probably be used to remove 2/3 corrupters from the battle for a while, and motherships have 700 hp. With 3/4 corrupters doing 22 damage per hit (base 20 + 20% from corruption -2 from armor) every 1.9 seconds, it will take an absolute minimum of 21/15 seconds to kill the mothership. If it takes any longer than that there is no way you won't be able to get under some anti air, and even in that time i would expect 1-2 of the corrupters to fall just to the mothership and VR, even if the rest of the army is busy)
Glial Reconstitution - 100
Roach x 60/40/20 - 1,500 / 1000 /500
Pneumatic Carapace: - 100
Ventral sacs - 200
4 overseers - 200
Total: 3,000 / 2,500 / 2,000

The earliest timing I could possibly see this happening is 13 minutes, unless I am not getting something. If you could do this attack before 13 minutes, I think you would have P by the balls.

By 13 minutes, In my last game I had 4 archons (2 were still morphing, but close enough), a few zealots, charge, +1, a mothership with 101 energy, an established, mining third with 3 cannons, and 8 warp gates.
By 14 mins I had 6 archons, 12 warp gates and +2 13 secs from completion and a handful chargelots (this was after an attack, but I think I lost mostly chargelots, so without interruption this number would be higher).
By 15 mins I had 8 archons, about 20 chargelots, +3 attack on the way, and about 16 warp gates.

Please keep in mind that all of there timings are based on my level of play and that of opponents I see in game, if you are gosu you might be able to shave some off the timings for both Z and P.

The only problem with this attack is that it seems like if it doesn't work, Zerg is in big, big trouble as they just wasted so much gas and tech that their upgrades and army composition are going to suck late game.

All my opponents that have tried the other tactics you mentioned failed, probably because they aren't as experienced as you, so I'm not as worried about the other stuff you talked about.

Thanks in advance for more advice on how this would work (and a replay? :D)


I like your post... And its true that the build seems easy to counter... buts its not...
What I dont like though is if the zerg spot you doing that... and rush to broodlord... I mean almost pure brood or pure air... I would we be able to kill corruptor - brood with only archons...

I used the build and I always find that there is only a small follow up (Voidrays)

Any help on that matter ?


Vortex pretty good.
Avicularia
Profile Joined February 2012
540 Posts
July 31 2012 23:00 GMT
#291
On July 31 2012 07:12 Tolazytobecreative wrote:
So to all the people who haven't tested it out and still wondering if they should because it seems so easy: don't.


People don't realize that most of us, read this forum and we're not top players and just want to have some fun with game. I used to play in gold/plat and this build is just great for me. Before I couldn't win PvZ unless zerg was really lame, and now I have much more fun about the game and also my winrate is higher.
There are many build on TL. For example planetary cheese as a terran. I wouldn't call it GM build, but I used it in silver, it worked and was really great.
So what's the point of all these posts? If you don't like it- don't use it.
Xequecal
Profile Joined October 2010
United States473 Posts
July 31 2012 23:11 GMT
#292
I'm pretty sure you beat this easily by just splitting your army in half and attacking both the third and the natural at the same time. The mothership can't be in both places at once and there's no way to defend that without sentries.
DeathToSquid
Profile Joined July 2012
United States20 Posts
August 01 2012 00:11 GMT
#293
What I dont like though is if the zerg spot you doing that... and rush to broodlord... I mean almost pure brood or pure air... I would we be able to kill corruptor - brood with only archons...


In my experience this absolutely destroys pure brood lord. You can stutter step the archons underneath, and broodlings die in one hit. Since most of the damage from broodlords is from the broodlings staying alive, this really cuts into their damage, and you kill brood lords really fast. Also, they arn't fast enough to run away. The only problem is if there are infestors in the mix and you don't have a vortex, then they can fungal your army and you take damage without being able to hit back.
Cheney always seemed squiddy to me.
DeathToSquid
Profile Joined July 2012
United States20 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-01 00:31:36
August 01 2012 00:28 GMT
#294
'm pretty sure you beat this easily by just splitting your army in half and attacking both the third and the natural at the same time. The mothership can't be in both places at once and there's no way to defend that without sentries.


This is somewhat true, 2 pronged attacks are annoying and can do some damage, dependent on the map. On a map like cloud kingdom, you basically have to rely on a wall off and 1 sentry to hold of 1 prong while you deal with the other prong. You do take damage, but doing this basically gauruntees you will kill his entire force. I suck so I usually get lings in my probe line when they do this. As long as you can stay on 3 bases, though, things work out just fine.

This isn't a problem on maps like Ohana and condemned ridge, where you can position your army to cover both with ease, these are probably the best maps for this build.

The worst thing about this build for me is that it is messing with my ranking and making me play Terrans and Toss that are way better than me. I haven't lost a game to zerg since I became somewhat practiced with this build.
Cheney always seemed squiddy to me.
TankseL
Profile Joined June 2012
United States4 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-08-10 06:02:57
August 10 2012 06:00 GMT
#295
Wouldn't it be better to use Dark Templar instead of High Templar for the Archons? DT's are 25 gas cheaper so for each archon you save 50 gas. They are more expensive with minerals but gas is what limits this build for me most of the time. Also you could harass with the DT's if you wanted.

6 gas gives you about 775 gas a minute so 300 gas for an HT archon you could get about 5 Archons in 2 minutes. With DT Archons you could get around 6 in 2 minutes. This means less zealots/cannons if you spend all the minerals but i would rather have more archons.

Edit: made it easier to read.
| Battle.net ID: Quaternion |
Belial88
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States5217 Posts
August 10 2012 06:06 GMT
#296
You know I was frustrated with vortex for a really, really long time, but I was inspired recently by a game between CreatorPrime and some zerg on WCS, I think it was, on daybreak (could be some other toss, it was wcs korea on daybreak though and it got to the vortex endgame).

He had 5 corruptors, and they shot down the mothership super fast after they corrupted it. Then, they simple moved back the broodlords when the mothership tried to get close, and they threw down just a moderate amount of infested terrans, and FG, to keep the mothership at bay. 5 corruptors actually takes down a mothership so damn fast, and since it's AA only (corruptors), none of the units in the Toss army will bother to attack those 5 corruptors, since all the broodlings and infested terrans will be target fired first.

Go up to like, 6-8 corruptors, and omg, vortex is so easily dealt with, and worst case scenario you lose 8 corruptors.
How to build a $500 i7-3770K Ultimate Computer:http://www.teamliquid.net/blogs/viewblog.php?topic_id=392709 ******** 100% Safe Razorless Delid Method! http://www.overclock.net/t/1376206/how-to-delid-your-ivy-bridge-cpu-with-out-a-razor-blade/0_100
Oboeman
Profile Joined January 2011
Canada3980 Posts
August 10 2012 08:23 GMT
#297
On August 10 2012 15:06 Belial88 wrote:
You know I was frustrated with vortex for a really, really long time, but I was inspired recently by a game between CreatorPrime and some zerg on WCS, I think it was, on daybreak (could be some other toss, it was wcs korea on daybreak though and it got to the vortex endgame).

He had 5 corruptors, and they shot down the mothership super fast after they corrupted it. Then, they simple moved back the broodlords when the mothership tried to get close, and they threw down just a moderate amount of infested terrans, and FG, to keep the mothership at bay. 5 corruptors actually takes down a mothership so damn fast, and since it's AA only (corruptors), none of the units in the Toss army will bother to attack those 5 corruptors, since all the broodlings and infested terrans will be target fired first.

Go up to like, 6-8 corruptors, and omg, vortex is so easily dealt with, and worst case scenario you lose 8 corruptors.


This is basically how I deal with vortex in almost all of my games with a very high success rate. Lay down a million infested terrans in front of me so that he has to fly over them to vortex me. Spread out corruptors and target the mothership, and it just takes damage very quickly, and he has to rush his vortex out before the mothership dies, and it's usually not a very good one.

Then again, on ladder, players are consistently willing to fly their mothership above infested terrans and let it die instead of pushing slowly with colossus/storm. Granted, a slow push lets my broodlords and spines do their work. Usually they fly over the infested terrans and die or they back away and are forced to vortex corruptors before losing the mothership, because they don't focus fire the corruptors with their stalkers.

However I never face a mothership max +3 push as fast as the one described in this thread. I don't know if I'd have enough energy banked, as well as enough support units or spines (or enough broodlords). Seems like it'd be pretty painful.
Talvish
Profile Joined February 2012
United States1 Post
August 10 2012 08:30 GMT
#298
On July 14 2012 02:03 9-BiT wrote:
Interesting....... I guess? The build looks fun, and yes, it will probably get a lot of cheap wins, but I don't think this is a legitimate build....


A build is never cheap or not legitimate.
EGHuK ♥ EGiNcontroL ♥ ROOTMinigun
kaokentake
Profile Joined July 2012
383 Posts
August 10 2012 09:05 GMT
#299
On July 31 2012 06:51 DeathToSquid wrote:
What makes something a "gimmick"? To me it is a strategy that only works due to a surprise factor. OP states this is not the case; despite knowing what is coming it works.

For a long time, a FFE was considered a gimmick because people thought there was no way you could survive a range of openings with so few early units. Now it is the most popular opening in PvZ.

To prove this is build a gimmick, figure out how to reliably counter it in a game. If, however, it can reliably be pulled off and adapted to deal with anything the Zerg can throw at it, what makes it a gimmick? To me that just makes a solid, original build.


ffe was never really a gimmick

people were doing ffe on steppes of war, while complaining that ffe was impossible on metal and XNC

otherwise agree with you. just ffe was bad example
skyyan
Profile Joined April 2012
United States74 Posts
August 10 2012 10:08 GMT
#300
On August 10 2012 18:05 kaokentake wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 31 2012 06:51 DeathToSquid wrote:
What makes something a "gimmick"? To me it is a strategy that only works due to a surprise factor. OP states this is not the case; despite knowing what is coming it works.

For a long time, a FFE was considered a gimmick because people thought there was no way you could survive a range of openings with so few early units. Now it is the most popular opening in PvZ.

To prove this is build a gimmick, figure out how to reliably counter it in a game. If, however, it can reliably be pulled off and adapted to deal with anything the Zerg can throw at it, what makes it a gimmick? To me that just makes a solid, original build.


ffe was never really a gimmick

people were doing ffe on steppes of war, while complaining that ffe was impossible on metal and XNC

otherwise agree with you. just ffe was bad example


I'm going to go out on a limb and assume that he meant that FFE was considered a gimmick in BW when it was first being popularized as a legitimate strategy by Bisu (also famous for his "gimmick" turned full strategy the dt-corsair). All in all, still good points from both of you.
http://us.battle.net/sc2/en/profile/457733/1/skyyan/
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 21 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 48m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Vindicta 207
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 45856
Rain 5957
EffOrt 1544
BeSt 1238
Larva 645
firebathero 441
Stork 378
Mini 336
Rush 230
Light 196
[ Show more ]
PianO 172
Mind 129
Pusan 70
Aegong 58
sSak 57
GoRush 56
JulyZerg 53
sas.Sziky 41
Shinee 39
Movie 37
Noble 25
yabsab 21
scan(afreeca) 16
SilentControl 10
Shine 8
ivOry 5
Bale 4
Terrorterran 1
Dota 2
qojqva4461
Fuzer 214
canceldota125
League of Legends
Dendi1696
Counter-Strike
sgares657
byalli376
Super Smash Bros
amsayoshi41
Other Games
B2W.Neo2587
singsing2055
DeMusliM423
crisheroes415
Lowko400
ArmadaUGS92
Mew2King91
QueenE63
Pyrionflax56
markeloff53
ToD35
Trikslyr28
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick4021
StarCraft: Brood War
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 4
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1354
League of Legends
• Nemesis2751
• Jankos1276
Upcoming Events
WardiTV European League
1h 48m
ShoWTimE vs sebesdes
Percival vs NightPhoenix
Shameless vs Nicoract
Krystianer vs Scarlett
ByuN vs uThermal
Harstem vs HeRoMaRinE
PiGosaur Monday
9h 48m
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 1h
Replay Cast
1d 9h
The PondCast
1d 19h
WardiTV European League
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
Epic.LAN
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
Epic.LAN
3 days
[ Show More ]
CSO Contender
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
Online Event
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Esports World Cup
6 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Championship of Russia 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters

Upcoming

CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
K-Championship
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.