• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 12:54
CET 17:54
KST 01:54
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Finals Preview: Sweet Victory!9[ASL22] Ro4 Preview: Mirror Mirror6[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: Within Reach5[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy11[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5
Community News
Evil Geniuses - shutting down14ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier5Weekly Cups (October 12-18): 5.0.17 era begins1[$1250] International ShieldBattery League65Weekly Cups (October 5-11): Farewell to 5.0.167
StarCraft 2
General
No more SC2 streamers on team liquid? REPORT: StarCraft 2: Remastered In Development Evil Geniuses - shutting down How do you feel about the mass reverts in the 5.0.17 PTR? Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
ScienceCraft (October 24-25) - Live Event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 ISSL (IntoTheTV x SOOP SC2 League): Premier WORTEX Challenger Series — Open SC2 LAN in Budapes
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
[G] How to playtest arcade maps [A] Nemrods 1/4 players [M] (2) Sweltering Sands
External Content
Mutation # 548 Shining Bright The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 547 Temple Of Terror Mutation # 546 Catch the Train
Brood War
General
Do we even care about balance? [Recap] 0-6 Defeat for Mong's Team BW General Discussion Rollback Netcode in Brood War Bot on ladder
Tourneys
[$1250] International ShieldBattery League [BSL23] RO24 Group C Small VOD Thread 2.0 2v2v2v2 Tournament
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) 50,000-Word Terran Builds Memo 2026-10-22 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? General RTS Discussion Thread Dawn of War IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25!
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Canadian Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread
Fan Clubs
Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Innovate or Game Over?
TrAiDoS
ShieldBattery on Mac
Kraekkling
[ASL22] Ro4 Day1 Ticket Giv…
bITt.mAN
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 10733 users

[G] Storkmans 3cc Fast tank TvZ - Page 2

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Capulet
Profile Blog Joined October 2004
Canada686 Posts
June 12 2012 23:28 GMT
#21
On June 13 2012 07:04 storkman wrote:
Show nested quote +
I dont get it, why everybody tries to name a build after themselves. I am also quite sure i saw bomber do such a build on antiga. His siege mode finished when the zerg units knocked on the door, really nice timing. (cant remember when, gsl or gstl i think)


Why I named this build after myself is:
A) I created this post
B) I made my own build i didn't study one of his replays
C) I stated above that i'm sure that many people already do a version of this build so i just created my own version and posted it for you local team liquideans.

Show nested quote +
A very similar build was covered in one of Day[9]'s dailies a while ago; it was a build that Bomber used in the past.

If I recall, the idea was to hold off all aggression with tanks and go for a 2-2 doom push.

Personally, I stopped using this build after playing it for a month. The way I see it, this build is just a safe transition into the late game while hitting a timing attack. I think letting a zerg power drones and creep without being threatened will leave a terran in a tough situation despite being armed with a strong 2-2 timing (this is just a stylistic thing, I don't like butting heads with a zerg that has a powered economy). However, if zerg goes for some kind of bane/roach bust, you'll be in a commanding lead afterwards and should win the game rather easily.


I remember this bomber build but I really have no clue what was built and what was done

With the new queen buff i find it rather impossible to stop the creep spread. There really is no opening in the early-mid game in which you can do damage to justify the cost. I've played zergs who will get 6-12 queens(fitzyhere) and if you go for any hellion build you are completely behind. So if you can't deny creep with hellions what do you make? There really is no unit i can see being able to gain enough map control other than banshees to successfully deny creep. Big mid-game/late-game pushes are the only way i can see playing this match up due to the great power of the queens and their 20 range.

And yes if he does try to bust me i win 99% of the time.


Following the standard CC hellion opening, you can get cloak banshee which is not usually a bad investment. You can deny creep, threaten drone line, and gain tower control. While making the banshee you can put down the 3rd CC which won't be all that much slower than siege mode + 3rd CC. Granted, you have to be more vigilant of the roach/bane bust. Against mass queens, you can also threaten a marine hellion timing off 2 base and depending on how much you commit you can outright win the game (worked against Fitzy, although, he has refined his build since then and delays his 3rd base, which probably works in your favour).

I guess my point is that siege mode + 3 CC build really forces you down one path and that's the 2-2 timing attack. You don't have the flexibility of the standard 2 CC hellion build, where you can be creative and have multiple angles to make threats (marine-hellion pressure, hellion-banshee pressure, marauder-hellion all-in, etc.). Sure, it leaves you more susceptible to an early game bust, but you have options and you can keep your opponent guessing.

I'm not at all discrediting this build. Like I said, I used it for a month with moderate success, but to each their own. Stylistically, I'm much more comfortable having some sort of map presence and keeping my opponent in doubt.

"I'm just killing the spiders to save the butterflies... Wanting to save both is a contradiction. What would you rather do? Keep deliberating? The butterfly will be eaten in the meantime."
storkman
Profile Joined June 2011
United States157 Posts
June 13 2012 02:35 GMT
#22
Following the standard CC hellion opening, you can get cloak banshee which is not usually a bad investment. You can deny creep, threaten drone line, and gain tower control. While making the banshee you can put down the 3rd CC which won't be all that much slower than siege mode + 3rd CC. Granted, you have to be more vigilant of the roach/bane bust. Against mass queens, you can also threaten a marine hellion timing off 2 base and depending on how much you commit you can outright win the game (worked against Fitzy, although, he has refined his build since then and delays his 3rd base, which probably works in your favour).

I guess my point is that siege mode + 3 CC build really forces you down one path and that's the 2-2 timing attack. You don't have the flexibility of the standard 2 CC hellion build, where you can be creative and have multiple angles to make threats (marine-hellion pressure, hellion-banshee pressure, marauder-hellion all-in, etc.). Sure, it leaves you more susceptible to an early game bust, but you have options and you can keep your opponent guessing.

I'm not at all discrediting this build. Like I said, I used it for a month with moderate success, but to each their own. Stylistically, I'm much more comfortable having some sort of map presence and keeping my opponent in doubt.


Whenever i do the standard cc hellion opening i end up getting busted and die 90 percent of the time. They hit me once i have 4 hellions and one banshee. Every game this happens ill auto lose because 1 scv pretty much worth 3 drones because it takes so long to actually get any rolling.

And how the 3 cc isn't flexible ill leave it to the guys like you who do marine-hellion, hellion-banshee, rauder-hellion to keep the zerg on their toes.

And tvz i don't mind letting z's get what comp they want i'm pretty comfortable mid-late game so doing a fast 3 cc build should pretty much tell you my style of play.
OH YEAH
Jesushooves
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada553 Posts
June 13 2012 03:08 GMT
#23
I really don't like that you called this your build, whether you made it up on your own or not, bomber, mvp, and plenty of other Korean (and Foreign) terrans have been doing this build with minor variations for months now.
Lose its good, after will be win.
oOOoOphidian
Profile Joined January 2011
United States1402 Posts
June 13 2012 03:27 GMT
#24
What is the plan against a traditional ling/bane bust? No hellions after a double gas makes this way too risky. Same goes for ~6-7 minute roach/ling all-ins like the one Stephano used against Polt at MLG recently.
Creator of sc2unmasked.com
Salivanth
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
Australia1071 Posts
June 13 2012 03:45 GMT
#25
Maybe I'm just an idiot, but I looked over the marine-tank build a couple of times, and I don't see where you're supposed to take a third.
<@Wikt> so you are one of those nega-fans <@Wikt> that hates the company that makes a game and everything they stand for <@Wikt> but still plays the game <@Wikt> (like roughly 30% of blizzard's player base, maybe much more...)
storkman
Profile Joined June 2011
United States157 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-13 04:21:59
June 13 2012 04:02 GMT
#26
I really don't like that you called this your build, whether you made it up on your own or not, bomber, mvp, and plenty of other Korean (and Foreign) terrans have been doing this build with minor variations for months now.


I created my own B.O from my own replays so this would be my build other plays have their versions where I actually got the idea but what do you want me to call this? Bomber,mvp,korean and foreign terran fast 3 cc seige tank?

What is the plan against a traditional ling/bane bust? No hellions after a double gas makes this way too risky. Same goes for ~6-7 minute roach/ling all-ins like the one Stephano used against Polt at MLG recently.


With good bunker placement you should be able to hold ling/bane busts but a 6-7 min mark rush is pretty hard to hold no matter what build you do but all i can tell you is if you go for a double gas after cc into reactor hellions you will auto die to these builds.

Maybe I'm just an idiot, but I looked over the marine-tank build a couple of times, and I don't see where you're supposed to take a third.


I actually didn't have that in there but i normally take my third once i get my first two medivacs so around the 10-11 min mark
OH YEAH
Vanchen
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
55 Posts
June 13 2012 18:15 GMT
#27
http://drop.sc/196956 Here's my attempt at the mech transition of your build. I think if I pushed fast, I could've done a lot more damage but I wasn't sure his roach count so I didn't want to unsiege.
ST_Bomber|SKLGIM_MC|
storkman
Profile Joined June 2011
United States157 Posts
June 13 2012 18:39 GMT
#28
The bl transition is what killed you ;( just stay aware of when he takes hive so you can get an extra 2-3 starports to get those vikings going. Also when you saw he had neural parasite i think its more beneficial to get 4-5 tanks to snipe those infestors then rest thors. Last thing! When you go for the heavy thor build you have to have 2 reactor factories making hellions because you really need a buffer unit between your thors and his roach
OH YEAH
Spiner
Profile Joined February 2011
United States360 Posts
June 13 2012 19:28 GMT
#29
You guys get mass vikings against broods when going mech? Seems like they would just get fungaled/be useless against the ultra tech switch. I prefer going more thor heavy with only 4-6 tanks, 16+ hellions, a raven and a few banshees.

I usually do the 1 rax FE double gas into hellion banshee, but it is prone to losing to the roach bling bust. This is a nice substitute for when scouting early aggression
storkman
Profile Joined June 2011
United States157 Posts
June 13 2012 19:31 GMT
#30
I actually if i scout broods get like 10 thor and about 10 vikings with 10 or so hellions and whatever tank i ahve left, it really matters on their comp if they still have lots of roach ill get raven and vikings with more tanks but against pure air thor viking is king
OH YEAH
Spiner
Profile Joined February 2011
United States360 Posts
June 13 2012 20:41 GMT
#31
Just tested this build and it loses to the ling bling all in
storkman
Profile Joined June 2011
United States157 Posts
June 13 2012 21:08 GMT
#32
Just tested this build and it loses to the ling bling all in


Just added replay of a 22 drone bust so if you can't hold it work on your micro :D
<3
OH YEAH
Jesushooves
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada553 Posts
June 13 2012 21:14 GMT
#33
On June 13 2012 13:02 storkman wrote:
Show nested quote +
I really don't like that you called this your build, whether you made it up on your own or not, bomber, mvp, and plenty of other Korean (and Foreign) terrans have been doing this build with minor variations for months now.


I created my own B.O from my own replays so this would be my build other plays have their versions where I actually got the idea but what do you want me to call this? Bomber,mvp,korean and foreign terran fast 3 cc seige tank?


Why not call it 3 cc fast tank, just because you made up your own build doesn't make it yours if someone did it before you, in this case a long time before you.
Lose its good, after will be win.
CelestialX
Profile Joined February 2011
Canada32 Posts
June 13 2012 21:17 GMT
#34
I've been doing this a lot because of how good queens are at denying hellions. Hellions against a good zerg are completely worthless for map control, for example, DRG had his creep spread across all the way through ESV cloud kingdom to the point it was at the 4th base of the Terran in 12 minutes despite MKP going hellions.
imMUTAble787
Profile Joined November 2011
United States680 Posts
June 13 2012 21:20 GMT
#35
On June 14 2012 06:14 Jesushooves wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 13 2012 13:02 storkman wrote:
I really don't like that you called this your build, whether you made it up on your own or not, bomber, mvp, and plenty of other Korean (and Foreign) terrans have been doing this build with minor variations for months now.


I created my own B.O from my own replays so this would be my build other plays have their versions where I actually got the idea but what do you want me to call this? Bomber,mvp,korean and foreign terran fast 3 cc seige tank?


Why not call it 3 cc fast tank, just because you made up your own build doesn't make it yours if someone did it before you, in this case a long time before you.


Way to clutter a good post with retarded arguements.

I've used this build and had a few zergs just outright leave after failed roach busts etc ^^
*eternalenvy fanboy*
kranten
Profile Joined January 2012
Netherlands236 Posts
June 13 2012 21:27 GMT
#36
Love how half the thread is whining about the name.

About the BO, I think it misses when you put the TL on the factory. (or I'm blind)
Jesushooves
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada553 Posts
June 13 2012 21:46 GMT
#37
On June 14 2012 06:20 imMUTAble787 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2012 06:14 Jesushooves wrote:
On June 13 2012 13:02 storkman wrote:
I really don't like that you called this your build, whether you made it up on your own or not, bomber, mvp, and plenty of other Korean (and Foreign) terrans have been doing this build with minor variations for months now.


I created my own B.O from my own replays so this would be my build other plays have their versions where I actually got the idea but what do you want me to call this? Bomber,mvp,korean and foreign terran fast 3 cc seige tank?


Why not call it 3 cc fast tank, just because you made up your own build doesn't make it yours if someone did it before you, in this case a long time before you.


Way to clutter a good post with retarded arguements.

I've used this build and had a few zergs just outright leave after failed roach busts etc ^^

It isn't retarded to make a valid point, there are way too many threads where people are naming builds after themselves when they didn't make anything new.
Lose its good, after will be win.
kranten
Profile Joined January 2012
Netherlands236 Posts
June 13 2012 21:49 GMT
#38
On June 14 2012 06:46 Jesushooves wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 14 2012 06:20 imMUTAble787 wrote:
On June 14 2012 06:14 Jesushooves wrote:
On June 13 2012 13:02 storkman wrote:
I really don't like that you called this your build, whether you made it up on your own or not, bomber, mvp, and plenty of other Korean (and Foreign) terrans have been doing this build with minor variations for months now.


I created my own B.O from my own replays so this would be my build other plays have their versions where I actually got the idea but what do you want me to call this? Bomber,mvp,korean and foreign terran fast 3 cc seige tank?


Why not call it 3 cc fast tank, just because you made up your own build doesn't make it yours if someone did it before you, in this case a long time before you.


Way to clutter a good post with retarded arguements.

I've used this build and had a few zergs just outright leave after failed roach busts etc ^^

It isn't retarded to make a valid point, there are way too many threads where people are naming builds after themselves when they didn't make anything new.


Why does it matter?
storkman
Profile Joined June 2011
United States157 Posts
June 13 2012 22:07 GMT
#39
I've been doing this a lot because of how good queens are at denying hellions. Hellions against a good zerg are completely worthless for map control, for example, DRG had his creep spread across all the way through ESV cloud kingdom to the point it was at the 4th base of the Terran in 12 minutes despite MKP going hellions
.

This is exactly why i started doing this faster third build because as more zergs start to learn that creep and queens are good there is no way to deny it. Most zergs go to atleast 4 queens and the ones who are smart are getting around 10 because if zergs weren't aware queen,ultra,infestor,ling is pretty much impossible to kill if they can actually transfuse.

Way to clutter a good post with retarded arguements.

I've used this build and had a few zergs just outright leave after failed roach busts etc ^^


Grats on using it correctly :D have fun beating up zergs!

It isn't retarded to make a valid point, there are way too many threads where people are naming builds after themselves when they didn't make anything new.


So if a build makes marines do you want me to name it after the first person to ever make a marine? Really arguing over a name when i make my own build and have my own transitions is silly. If all my reps were of mkp doing it and i name it after myself then you could complain but since they are all my replays and all my builds i think i can take credit for this thread and build.
OH YEAH
storkman
Profile Joined June 2011
United States157 Posts
June 13 2012 23:18 GMT
#40
About the BO, I think it misses when you put the TL on the factory. (or I'm blind)


I said resume tank production so i added a make techlab ending to that sorry for not saying that
OH YEAH
Prev 1 2 3 4 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
FEL
19:00
ScienceCraft - Day 2
RotterdaM657
IndyStarCraft 509
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Serral 1663
RotterdaM 657
IndyStarCraft 509
Hui .207
BRAT_OK 78
Classic 43
MindelVK 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 19731
Calm 2700
Horang2 407
firebathero 154
ProTech152
Mind 103
Dewaltoss 89
Last 67
Sexy 42
Creator 38
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 28
Hm[arnc] 25
Aegong 17
JYJ 14
yabsab 12
Sacsri 11
Dota 2
Gorgc14028
qojqva2272
Cr1tdota1307
Counter-Strike
fl0m4039
Other Games
singsing1913
Liquid`RaSZi1714
B2W.Neo1450
FrodaN1390
Beastyqt808
Mlord661
olofmeister266
KnowMe179
syndereN162
XaKoH 112
Organizations
Counter-Strike
PGL25911
StarCraft 2
angryscii 0
[ Show 18 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Adnapsc2 11
• Reevou 6
• OhrlRock 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• Airneanach31
• Azhi_Dahaki18
• ChaeLyn 9
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 2965
League of Legends
• Nemesis2375
• Jankos2299
Other Games
• Shiphtur555
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
6h 6m
WardiTV Weekly
19h 6m
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 18h
ByuN vs Lambo
MaxPax vs Bunny
PiGosaur Cup
2 days
The PondCast
2 days
Kung Fu Cup
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
3 days
SHIN vs GuMiho
Clem vs Classic
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
GSL
4 days
Epic.LAN
4 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
Epic.LAN
5 days
Yamato Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Acropolis #5 - GSC
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HCC Season 3

Ongoing

Acropolis #5
KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 4
BSL Season 23
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026

Upcoming

IPSL Winter 2026-27
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
eXTREMESLAND 2026
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.