• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EST 01:27
CET 07:27
KST 15:27
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview0RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview2TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners12Intel X Team Liquid Seoul event: Showmatches and Meet the Pros10[ASL20] Finals Preview: Arrival13
Community News
[TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation12Weekly Cups (Nov 3-9): Clem Conquers in Canada4SC: Evo Complete - Ranked Ladder OPEN ALPHA8StarCraft, SC2, HotS, WC3, Returning to Blizzcon!45$5,000+ WardiTV 2025 Championship7
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups C & D Preview [TLMC] Fall/Winter 2025 Ladder Map Rotation TL.net Map Contest #21: Winners RSL Season 3 - RO16 Groups A & B Preview Mech is the composition that needs teleportation t
Tourneys
RSL Revival: Season 3 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Constellation Cup - Main Event - Stellar Fest Tenacious Turtle Tussle Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2)
Strategy
Custom Maps
Map Editor closed ?
External Content
Mutation # 499 Chilling Adaptation Mutation # 498 Wheel of Misfortune|Cradle of Death Mutation # 497 Battle Haredened Mutation # 496 Endless Infection
Brood War
General
FlaSh on: Biggest Problem With SnOw's Playstyle BW General Discussion What happened to TvZ on Retro? Brood War web app to calculate unit interactions [ASL20] Ask the mapmakers — Drop your questions
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [BSL21] RO32 Group D - Sunday 21:00 CET [BSL21] RO32 Group C - Saturday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Current Meta Simple Questions, Simple Answers PvZ map balance How to stay on top of macro?
Other Games
General Games
Path of Exile Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Clair Obscur - Expedition 33 Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread SPIRED by.ASL Mafia {211640}
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
White-Ra Fan Club The herO Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion Series you have seen recently...
Sports
2024 - 2026 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
SC2 Client Relocalization [Change SC2 Language] Linksys AE2500 USB WIFI keeps disconnecting Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Dyadica Gospel – a Pulp No…
Hildegard
Coffee x Performance in Espo…
TrAiDoS
Saturation point
Uldridge
DnB/metal remix FFO Mick Go…
ImbaTosS
Reality "theory" prov…
perfectspheres
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 2127 users

[G] 2 Rax-Proof 1 Gate 2 gas Expand Build for PvT

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
1 2 3 Next All
oli470
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom22 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-28 20:27:13
February 28 2012 00:33 GMT
#1
This seems to be the build to do on maps with ramped naturals or naturals with tight chokes such as: Antiga, Shakuras, entombed valley and cloud kingdom, It is less safe on maps such as korhal compound, shattered temple and metalopolis, as there is a small window of weakness in which you need to be able to forcefield your opponent away. On these maps I would reccomend a 3 gate expand or if you think your micro is vastly superiour, MC's 1 gate expand, against a terran that takes gas.


The ladder seems to be full of 2 Rax in this matchup at this moment as terran seem eager to kill or cripple protoss before transition into the very powerful area damage techs. This is a very safe 1 gate expand that can easily shut down or crush aggressive builds such as 1 gate tech lab marauder rush, reactor-techlab 2 rax and 3 rax whilst maintaining the flexibility of getting up a robo in time for safety against banshee, 1-1-1, etc. and all whilst reaping the rewards of an early expand economy. I first saw huk using this several months ago, but there has been a resurgence recently in its use with the large amount of 2 raxes we are now seeing, for this reason I will largely focus this guide on the build’s ability to hold the 2 rax, despite its safety against all other terran openers too.

Note: it is only worth doing this build if you have either scouted a gas or have not been able to get a scout in his base due to a marine killing your probe before being able to poke up the ramp. If you spot a gasless opening, I advise a more economic 1 gate expand such as the huk 20 food expand or a 1 zealot, 1 stalker expand (which is nice for killing off a supply depot and or some marines if they don’t get a bunker up and safer against a 3 rax marine/bunker rush covering an expand).

The engagement (vs the 2 rax army)

A well executed 2 rax will hit the natural with either 1 marauder and 5 marines at 5:55-6:00 with another 2 marines follow by around 6:10 or 9 marines and 2 marauders at 6:30 – 6:45. The most popular safe build (and the next safest perhaps) used to safeguard against this at the moment is MC’s 1 gate expand (with just 1 gas), which when engaging this 2 rax force will typically consist of 1 zealot and 6 stalkers. With good micro, the protoss is usually able to survive this rush, however when a terran brings 2 scvs to build 2 bunkers next to the nexus at the same time, it can be a nightmare to win this fight without allowing the bunkers to complete.

In this safer 2 gas build, you will have forcefields to save you from the earlier option, and a superior composition to save you against the second option. This is a much stronger army vs the 2 rax composition than that of MC's 1 gas build (courtesy of the guardian shield and the ineffectiveness of the marauders vs zealots and sentries).

The weakest time in the build is if he waits to engage with 7 marines and a marauder at around this 6:10 point, you cannot engage that without pulling around 8 probes, however it is better to drop down 3 force fields to keep him away from your natural until you get your warp-ins. Its should be impossible to lose on a map with a ramped natural with this build.

The take home message is that with guardian shield, marauder resistant units, with the safety net of force fields, this build is a whole level safer than any other 1 gate expand.

Build Order
9 pylon (scout on 4 player map)
11 CB nexus
13 gateway (with probe rallied from nexus)--> (then scout on 2 player maps)
13 CB nexus
14 gas
15 CB Nexus
16 pylon
18 Cybernetics Core
(at this time run your probe from the terran base as a marine normally pops out at 3:08, if he is building a 16 depot whilst the marine is training, then he cannot efficiently 2 rax, its wise to start thinking of why else he may want that gas, but don't rule 2 rax out)
19 2nd gas --> saturated at 100% with 3 probes
20 Start WG tech with 1 CB
20 Stalker With 1 CB
22 pylon
24 sentry
After 26 probe, brief probe cut
27 expand and the send the probe to the xel'naga, you may want to check proxy 2nd rax positions with this probe first however, whilst sending the probe that is currently at the xel'naga towards the terran base for scouting
27 sentry
First marauder pops out in a 2 rax at 5 minutes so sacrifice your initial probe (whilst leaving the second scout probe at the xel'naga) to see if he is stupid enough to have rallied it to the front, you will more likely see 5 marines here with no bunker which also a possible indicator of a 2 rax.
29 gateway
29 gateway
Resume probes
30 sentry
32 pylon
34 Robo

Pylon finishes around 6 minute mark, you should be watching out for terran 2 rax army approaching the xel’naga tower that your xel'naga probe is at around this time. The 5 marine and 1 marauder version of t he 2 rax will hit at around 6:00-6:15 map dependant, however your 1 zealot (or stalker) and 3 sentries holds this easily. Terrans from my experience has stopped doing this, as MC's 1 gate expand was able to able to easily hold this, opting for the 2 marauder 9 marine version, which MC's 1 gate struggles to hold. If he has cut corners and done a really dirty and early attack, the nexus in this build finishes at 6:25, you will know by his composition if you will able able to hold this or not, but you can cancel the nexus and still not be behind because I explained, he would have had to really cut corners to do this.

Assuming you see pressure coming your way:-

6:05 forcefield him out/away 6:10 WG tech finishes, 6:20 gates are converted, by 6:25 you will have warped in 2 zealots and a sentry.

Attack! Your army can easily defeat the 2 marauders and 9 marines. You can also chrono all 3 gates and wait for 3 more units for a guaranteed crushing of his army if you dont have to break any building bunkers, but the chronos may be best saved for robo as you transition into the midgame if you are feeling comfortable. Don’t forget to forcefield and use guardian shield!

If you didn’t see pressure at approximately 6:00 then get that observer asap to scout usuals such as:
1-1-1
Cloaked banshee
4 rax stim timing
Fast starport
Ghost academy
Etc.....

and start warping in stalkers in case of fast drop play

I usually favour a fast robo bay for colossus against a terran gas build that didn’t apply early pressure, because you can almost guarantee you will see some pressure in the mid game, creatorprime’s midgame strategy is perhaps a bit too greedy against a terran that went for an early gas.

Additional Thoughts

• At the time the scouting scv leaves your base he will have seen your 2 gas, a chrono on WG and a chrono on the gateway, this may lead him to be scared to 1-1-1 you as this opening at this point looks like voidray cheese, which hard counters it, though he may second guess this as being too obvious.
• This build is slightly less mineral economic than MC’s 1 gate FE, which may mean your transition into midgame slightly slower than MC’s 1 gate FE.
• A gas heavy economy may encourage you to make too many sentries which can be punished by a fast ghost push, it may be worth taking 1 probe off of each gas after you have enough for the initial sentry defence.
• If you crush a 2 rax, it is very easy to add on 2-3 more gates for a 5-6 gate allin to hit their very late and likely poorly defended expansion.
.

Replays

Bling vs Polt on ESV Cloud Kingdom - Assembly Winter group H

+ Show Spoiler +
Bling Skips the robo, defends the 2 rax with ease and does a 5 gate all in.


Bling vs Polt on Antiga Shipyard - Assembly Winter group H

+ Show Spoiler +
Bling forcefields the 2 rax army out till immortal support arrives, drives polt back home and puts on pressure himself, polt holds and a macro game develops.
CrazyF1r3f0x
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
United States2120 Posts
February 28 2012 01:01 GMT
#2
Are there any drawbacks as far as you can tell?
"Actual happiness always looks pretty squalid in comparison with the overcompensations for misery."
yoona2012
Profile Joined February 2012
Denmark196 Posts
February 28 2012 01:19 GMT
#3
In TvP 2 rax is an outdated opener and only good if you catch the protoss being extremely greedy and not chronoing from his first gate. I believe the only reason Polt did it twice, was because he believed that bling wouldnt expect him to do it (twice). Both games it put Polt far behind and had difficulty dealing with the counter preassure.
2 rax is mainly succesful on small maps with close ramp to ramp distance (which means non of the current ladder maps) or if proxied - assuming the protoss plays the FE safe.

@CrazyF1r3f0x
I´d say that the nexus first or 1 gate expand is complete safe without drawbacks vs Terran on current ladder maps assuming you scout well, poke with the first stalker and have mapcontrol till medivacs+stim is done.
Forbidden17
Profile Joined December 2011
666 Posts
February 28 2012 01:26 GMT
#4
this is no big deal or anything but:
1. you're missing your 2nd pylon in your build order :p
2. first marines completes closer to 3:08 ^^
3. reactor-techlab can hit closer to 6mins on, say, close air metalopolis. noteworthy imo because you'll be forced to react immediately should he throw down bunkers, but warpgate doesn't complete until 6:10 and in theory your first warp-in completes @6:20 but in practice it will be later.
oli470
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom22 Posts
February 28 2012 01:40 GMT
#5
On February 28 2012 10:26 Forbidden17 wrote:
this is no big deal or anything but:
1. you're missing your 2nd pylon in your build order :p
2. first marines completes closer to 3:08 ^^
3. reactor-techlab can hit closer to 6mins on, say, close air metalopolis. noteworthy imo because you'll be forced to react immediately should he throw down bunkers, but warpgate doesn't complete until 6:10 and in theory your first warp-in completes @6:20 but in practice it will be later.


thanks, I will update
oli470
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom22 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-28 01:48:40
February 28 2012 01:43 GMT
#6
On February 28 2012 10:19 yoona2012 wrote:
In TvP 2 rax is an outdated opener and only good if you catch the protoss being extremely greedy and not chronoing from his first gate. I believe the only reason Polt did it twice, was because he believed that bling wouldnt expect him to do it (twice). Both games it put Polt far behind and had difficulty dealing with the counter preassure.
2 rax is mainly succesful on small maps with close ramp to ramp distance (which means non of the current ladder maps) or if proxied - assuming the protoss plays the FE safe.

@CrazyF1r3f0x
I´d say that the nexus first or 1 gate expand is complete safe without drawbacks vs Terran on current ladder maps assuming you scout well, poke with the first stalker and have mapcontrol till medivacs+stim is done.


it's certainly not outdated on ladder, perhaps you were referring to pro level, then I could maybe understand what you are saying.

and more importantly, i state that i only recommend this if you scout gas, there are much greedier builds to play against a gasless expand, the other standard terran opener.
yoona2012
Profile Joined February 2012
Denmark196 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-28 01:55:44
February 28 2012 01:54 GMT
#7
On February 28 2012 10:43 oli470 wrote:
it's certainly not outdated on ladder, perhaps you were referring to pro level, then I could maybe understand what you are saying.


You can copy and execute the 1 gate or nexus first opening as progamer protoss does it without being pro level yourself (at least the first crucial 6 minutes flawlessly). The current ladder maps have far enough distance from ramp to ramp to make 1 gate or nexus first safe openings. The micro required to place down forcefields to hold it and chrono out from your gate(s) and robo isn´t excactly required to be GM level. In the very worst case, you may have to pull a few probes and accept a couple of probe losses, but you´ll still be ahead vs a 2 rax opening.

The most common TvP openings on ladder are 1 rax expand (into a bunch of different followups) or 1/1/1. 2 rax is outdated and easily scouted unless the 2nd rax is proxied, since the 2nd rax will be put down before the 1st marine pops. You can´t even wall off with 2nd depot to deny scouting when going 2 rax preassure expand, because the 2nd depot timing will delay your 2nd rax too much.
drybones
Profile Joined August 2011
United States69 Posts
February 28 2012 02:04 GMT
#8
i still think stopping production after zealot stalker (at 24/26 food) getting the nexus then adding 2 gates, the 3rd pylon, and finally the 2nd gas and 1st sentry is the best way to 1gate fe vs a 2 rax. What ends up happening is WG finishes at 6:10 not 6:20 and the nexus finishes at the same time as well so you can use 6-8 probes while transferring to fight with you.

Also timing works such that you have 1 zeal 1 stalker 2 sentry then the exact amount of money for 3 more stalkers + a few probes by 6:10. I practiced it a bunch of times and it seems by far the best vs a 2 rax but falls behind vs a gasless. Benefit is though you can choose to not warp in the 3 stalkers if there is no pressure and you can abandon ship if you SEE a CC. just seeing gasless isnt enough imo since terran can easy just throw 3 more rax and hit around same time as 2rax.

there is a 12/14 rax one tech lab timing that this either of these builds cannot hold.

i just dont see how 1 zeal 4 sentries and 1 stalker is better than 1 zeal 2 sentries and 4 stalkers. with good micro the terran can destroy you but with more stalkers the micro is far more forgiving
if ur not improving ur falling behind
oli470
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom22 Posts
February 28 2012 02:13 GMT
#9
On February 28 2012 10:54 yoona2012 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 28 2012 10:43 oli470 wrote:
it's certainly not outdated on ladder, perhaps you were referring to pro level, then I could maybe understand what you are saying.


You can copy and execute the 1 gate or nexus first opening as progamer protoss does it without being pro level yourself (at least the first crucial 6 minutes flawlessly). The current ladder maps have far enough distance from ramp to ramp to make 1 gate or nexus first safe openings. The micro required to place down forcefields to hold it and chrono out from your gate(s) and robo isn´t excactly required to be GM level. In the very worst case, you may have to pull a few probes and accept a couple of probe losses, but you´ll still be ahead vs a 2 rax opening.

The most common TvP openings on ladder are 1 rax expand (into a bunch of different followups) or 1/1/1. 2 rax is outdated and easily scouted unless the 2nd rax is proxied, since the 2nd rax will be put down before the 1st marine pops. You can´t even wall off with 2nd depot to deny scouting when going 2 rax preassure expand, because the 2nd depot timing will delay your 2nd rax too much.


ill say it again, dont do this build vs a gasless terran 1 rax expand, do something greedier of course. If you scout gas, its probably gonna be 1-1-1 or 2 rax (and from my experience and other protoss' experiences that i've talked to recently, 2 rax is far more common than 1-1-1 on ladder right now). This build holds both 1-1-1 and 2rax, just holds one of them better than any other FE build does, so i don't see your problem.

and besides that, you've said twice now that the protoss should do a 1 gate expand as standard, did you even read anything I wrote? This IS a 1 gate expand, except with a 2nd gas, in fact because the sentries are cheaper in minerals than stalkers, you are able to expand at 27 supply, so this is even a reasonably economical 1 gate expand.
yoona2012
Profile Joined February 2012
Denmark196 Posts
February 28 2012 02:15 GMT
#10
On February 28 2012 11:04 drybones wrote:there is a 12/14 rax one tech lab timing that this either of these builds cannot hold.


Do you have a replay of that?
12 rax, 14 rax with tech lab means 13 gas. 12 rax, 13 gas, 14 rax means either cutting scvs or delaying your orbital upgrade for a 20 second faster marauder pop (vs the 12 rax, 13 gas, 15 orbital, 16 rax) while the marines still pop at standard timing. It doesn´t make sense to me, but I would be interested in seeing it in action.
Pure theorycrafting, I believe 1 gate expand should deal with this easily however, it´s fine to let your nexus take a few shots while wait for another round of chrono to get out - afterall losing shield means nothing as long as you dont take hull dmg. This may however be a different story if there´s scv pulls and bunkers combined with this.
Again, any replays would be great (preferably executed at master+ level)
azn_dude1
Profile Joined October 2010
162 Posts
February 28 2012 02:15 GMT
#11
On February 28 2012 10:19 yoona2012 wrote:
In TvP 2 rax is an outdated opener and only good if you catch the protoss being extremely greedy and not chronoing from his first gate. I believe the only reason Polt did it twice, was because he believed that bling wouldnt expect him to do it (twice). Both games it put Polt far behind and had difficulty dealing with the counter preassure.
2 rax is mainly succesful on small maps with close ramp to ramp distance (which means non of the current ladder maps) or if proxied - assuming the protoss plays the FE safe.

@CrazyF1r3f0x
I´d say that the nexus first or 1 gate expand is complete safe without drawbacks vs Terran on current ladder maps assuming you scout well, poke with the first stalker and have mapcontrol till medivacs+stim is done.


The outdated version is when Terrans would put on light pressure and expand quickly. In the current 2 rax, Terrans keep reinforcing and put down a CC when they can, tech to starport, and get a nice upgraded bio force before any big tech units are out. Watch day9's MarineKing v. Whitera episode to get what I'm talking about.
smaug81243
Profile Joined October 2011
94 Posts
February 28 2012 02:19 GMT
#12
On February 28 2012 10:19 yoona2012 wrote:
In TvP 2 rax is an outdated opener and only good if you catch the protoss being extremely greedy and not chronoing from his first gate. I believe the only reason Polt did it twice, was because he believed that bling wouldnt expect him to do it (twice). Both games it put Polt far behind and had difficulty dealing with the counter preassure.
2 rax is mainly succesful on small maps with close ramp to ramp distance (which means non of the current ladder maps) or if proxied - assuming the protoss plays the FE safe.

@CrazyF1r3f0x
I´d say that the nexus first or 1 gate expand is complete safe without drawbacks vs Terran on current ladder maps assuming you scout well, poke with the first stalker and have mapcontrol till medivacs+stim is done.


I don't agree with this statement at all. If you blindly push with 2-rax and do not adapt to what you see it will certainly put you behind but you can come out even or ahead with just about any protoss build. 2-rax is NOT designed to kill a protoss outright, it can, but it doesn't need to. The goal behind it is to consistently trade your units for his gas heavy units while you are getting your tech infrastructure up and running. Your right, it does not work nearly as well on very large maps like tal darim but enough of the maps are small enough (metalopolis close-air, cloud kingdom, shattered temple and korhal compound) for it to be an extremely viable build. Additionally, I don't know about nexus first being completely safe on maps like tal darim as good hellion control can often kill the majority of your mineral line.
yoona2012
Profile Joined February 2012
Denmark196 Posts
February 28 2012 02:28 GMT
#13
On February 28 2012 11:13 oli470 wrote:
ill say it again, dont do this build vs a gasless terran 1 rax expand, do something greedier of course. If you scout gas, its probably gonna be 1-1-1 or 2 rax (and from my experience and other protoss' experiences that i've talked to recently, 2 rax is far more common than 1-1-1 on ladder right now). This build holds both 1-1-1 and 2rax, just holds one of them better than any other FE build does, so i don't see your problem.

and besides that, you've said twice now that the protoss should do a 1 gate expand as standard, did you even read anything I wrote? This IS a 1 gate expand, except with a 2nd gas, in fact because the sentries are cheaper in minerals than stalkers, you are able to expand at 27 supply, so this is even a reasonably economical 1 gate expand.


I believe you misunderstood me.
Your whole guide revolves around the idea that 2 rax is common and viable TvP opening at the moment. I respectfully disagree (personally I don´t know any master+ ranked terrans who does 2 rax often and I haven´t seen it being used succesfully in gsl for months)

You also stated in your guide that "A well executed 2 rax will hit the natural with 9 marines and 2 marauders". When 2 rax was a popular TvP opening, it was 5 marines and 1 marauder, with concussive shells finishing just as you reach the protoss ramp. The main reason of 2 rax is to hit as early as possible and hoping there´s no sentries to forcefield or the least amounts of units out of the field. So, a well executed 2 rax will have 5 marines, 1 marauder and 1-2 scvs out around 5.30 and depending on map, it will reach protoss ramp around 6.10-6.20 (5.55 on xel naga but that´s not in ladder pool).

This is how bomber does it, I can upload replay if need to be - even tho that replay is from before rax building time was nerfed by 5 seconds, so you can add 5 to it today.
yoona2012
Profile Joined February 2012
Denmark196 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-28 02:42:25
February 28 2012 02:31 GMT
#14
On February 28 2012 11:19 smaug81243 wrote:
I don't agree with this statement at all. If you blindly push with 2-rax and do not adapt to what you see it will certainly put you behind but you can come out even or ahead with just about any protoss build. 2-rax is NOT designed to kill a protoss outright, it can, but it doesn't need to. The goal behind it is to consistently trade your units for his gas heavy units while you are getting your tech infrastructure up and running. Your right, it does not work nearly as well on very large maps like tal darim but enough of the maps are small enough (metalopolis close-air, cloud kingdom, shattered temple and korhal compound) for it to be an extremely viable build. Additionally, I don't know about nexus first being completely safe on maps like tal darim as good hellion control can often kill the majority of your mineral line.


Watch Polt vs bling in the links provided above.
Both games he went 2 rax with constant reinforcement and it put him behind severely and he had difficulty dealing with counter preassure to the point where he wasnt able to claim his natural when he wanted to and lost stuff here and there.

PS.
Cloud Kingdom : main to natural distance is 47 seconds - fairly long.
Metalopolis close air : you need to walk around the high ground ramp area in a concave like fashion to avoid getting free stalker/sentry shots.
Shattered Temple close air: Same deal as metalopolis
Korhal Compound : 40 second main to natural distance.
KoveN-
Profile Joined October 2004
Australia503 Posts
February 28 2012 02:56 GMT
#15
On February 28 2012 11:15 yoona2012 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 28 2012 11:04 drybones wrote:there is a 12/14 rax one tech lab timing that this either of these builds cannot hold.


Do you have a replay of that?
12 rax, 14 rax with tech lab means 13 gas. 12 rax, 13 gas, 14 rax means either cutting scvs or delaying your orbital upgrade for a 20 second faster marauder pop (vs the 12 rax, 13 gas, 15 orbital, 16 rax) while the marines still pop at standard timing. It doesn´t make sense to me, but I would be interested in seeing it in action.
Pure theorycrafting, I believe 1 gate expand should deal with this easily however, it´s fine to let your nexus take a few shots while wait for another round of chrono to get out - afterall losing shield means nothing as long as you dont take hull dmg. This may however be a different story if there´s scv pulls and bunkers combined with this.
Again, any replays would be great (preferably executed at master+ level)


I believe he's talking about

12 rax, 14 gas, 14 rax.

Of course it's even stronger if you hide the 2nd rax.

Here's a replay:

http://sc2rep.com/replays/()lOvShinyStar_vs_()ReXWon/18110

If this is actually the build he's talking about.
oli470
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom22 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-02-28 14:37:07
February 28 2012 03:04 GMT
#16
On February 28 2012 11:04 drybones wrote:
i still think stopping production after zealot stalker (at 24/26 food) getting the nexus then adding 2 gates, the 3rd pylon, and finally the 2nd gas and 1st sentry is the best way to 1gate fe vs a 2 rax. What ends up happening is WG finishes at 6:10 not 6:20 and the nexus finishes at the same time as well so you can use 6-8 probes while transferring to fight with you.

Also timing works such that you have 1 zeal 1 stalker 2 sentry then the exact amount of money for 3 more stalkers + a few probes by 6:10. I practiced it a bunch of times and it seems by far the best vs a 2 rax but falls behind vs a gasless. Benefit is though you can choose to not warp in the 3 stalkers if there is no pressure and you can abandon ship if you SEE a CC. just seeing gasless isnt enough imo since terran can easy just throw 3 more rax and hit around same time as 2rax.

there is a 12/14 rax one tech lab timing that this either of these builds cannot hold.

i just dont see how 1 zeal 4 sentries and 1 stalker is better than 1 zeal 2 sentries and 4 stalkers. with good micro the terran can destroy you but with more stalkers the micro is far more forgiving


firstly its 3 zealots, 4 sentries and in this build, there are also 3 chronoboosts saved for your gates in this build and i think you underestimate the power of the forcefields in this defence. not only that, but you need at least 5 stalkers to 2 shot the marauders down in a stalker heavy opening, otherwise marauders will really hurt your stalkers quickly. i used to do that build, but i now find this one so much safer.
quillian
Profile Joined April 2010
United States318 Posts
February 28 2012 03:13 GMT
#17
cool!

so this force wins WITHOUT forcefields or micro? That is badass... why exactly is it so much stronger? just guardian shield? Have you tested other unit compositions with just 2-3 sentries to see if guardian makes the difference there?

at the very least, this will make me get a sentry as my 3rd unit pvt. very cool.
yoona2012
Profile Joined February 2012
Denmark196 Posts
February 28 2012 03:27 GMT
#18
On February 28 2012 11:56 KoveN- wrote:
I believe he's talking about

12 rax, 14 gas, 14 rax.

Of course it's even stronger if you hide the 2nd rax.

Here's a replay:

http://sc2rep.com/replays/()lOvShinyStar_vs_()ReXWon/18110

If this is actually the build he's talking about.


Thanks for the replay, just watched it. It was a very strange match to be honest. It wasn´t a 12 rax, 14 rax btw, it was a 12 rax, 14 gas, 15 rax, delayed marine, delayed orbital. If you watch it carefully, you will see his barracks sits idle after completion and his CC doesnt make any scvs till he can afford orbital upgrade. He would have accomplished same timing with standard 2 rax opening with a slightly stronger economy, but I guess the maka raxed 2nd rax threw his timing off a bit.

Anyways watching from the protoss perspective - he played insanely greedily and a bit sloppy.
1) he skipped the first zealot and let his gateway sit idle till core finished where he produced a stalker which he never cronoboosted and lost it without dealing any dmg at all.
2) after the stalker scouted what only possibly could be a 2 rax, he still lets his gateway sit idle and throw down 2 more gateways that wont help him in time or can afford to build from yet.
3) he finally starts gateway production again but doesnt crono boost it even tho he has crono saved up - he does get an immortal however.

I felt if the protoss had played more safely and crono´d off 2 gateway+robo instead of making early 3rd gateway he would have been in much better shape. Also skipping the zealot is a bit risky on dual sight which has insanely short natural to natural distance (28 seconds).
oli470
Profile Joined September 2011
United Kingdom22 Posts
February 28 2012 04:06 GMT
#19
On February 28 2012 12:13 quillian wrote:
cool!

so this force wins WITHOUT forcefields or micro? That is badass... why exactly is it so much stronger? just guardian shield? Have you tested other unit compositions with just 2-3 sentries to see if guardian makes the difference there?

at the very least, this will make me get a sentry as my 3rd unit pvt. very cool.


in practice, the terran player will try to kite you, but you put 3 force forcefields behind him and he aint going anywhere.
paintfive
Profile Joined September 2011
785 Posts
February 28 2012 04:13 GMT
#20
just go zealot zealot(chrono) sentry sentry and whatever else you wish after
1 2 3 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 33m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 167
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 9297
actioN 1573
Shuttle 748
Larva 545
PianO 229
Bale 36
NotJumperer 7
Dota 2
monkeys_forever528
XaKoH 418
NeuroSwarm161
League of Legends
JimRising 594
Other Games
summit1g14587
C9.Mang0434
WinterStarcraft363
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick998
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 72
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Lourlo838
• Stunt437
• HappyZerGling117
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
3h 33m
RSL Revival
3h 33m
herO vs Gerald
ByuN vs SHIN
Kung Fu Cup
5h 33m
Cure vs Reynor
Classic vs herO
IPSL
10h 33m
ZZZero vs rasowy
Napoleon vs KameZerg
OSC
12h 33m
BSL 21
13h 33m
Tarson vs Julia
Doodle vs OldBoy
eOnzErG vs WolFix
StRyKeR vs Aeternum
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d 3h
RSL Revival
1d 3h
Reynor vs sOs
Maru vs Ryung
Kung Fu Cup
1d 5h
WardiTV Korean Royale
1d 5h
[ Show More ]
BSL 21
1d 13h
JDConan vs Semih
Dragon vs Dienmax
Tech vs NewOcean
TerrOr vs Artosis
IPSL
1d 13h
Dewalt vs WolFix
eOnzErG vs Bonyth
Replay Cast
1d 16h
Wardi Open
2 days
Monday Night Weeklies
2 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
3 days
BSL: GosuLeague
3 days
The PondCast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
BSL: GosuLeague
5 days
RSL Revival
6 days
WardiTV Korean Royale
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-11-07
Stellar Fest: Constellation Cup
Eternal Conflict S1

Ongoing

C-Race Season 1
IPSL Winter 2025-26
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 4
SOOP Univ League 2025
YSL S2
BSL Season 21
CSCL: Masked Kings S3
SLON Tour Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 3
META Madness #9
BLAST Rivals Fall 2025
IEM Chengdu 2025
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025

Upcoming

BSL 21 Non-Korean Championship
Acropolis #4
IPSL Spring 2026
HSC XXVIII
RSL Offline Finals
WardiTV 2025
IEM Kraków 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026
BLAST Bounty Winter 2026: Closed Qualifier
eXTREMESLAND 2025
ESL Impact League Season 8
SL Budapest Major 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.