
[Q] Why haven't you edited Liquipedia recently? - Page 3
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
Medrea
10003 Posts
![]() | ||
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
| ||
MonsieurGrimm
Canada2441 Posts
On August 09 2011 13:05 Probe1 wrote: Because I'm LAZY. I have no excuse. I'll start contributing more to Liquipedia. If I don't have a little bronze coin thingy by the end of August I will ask for a temp ban. I'm holding you to this for sure, even though I can't enforce it ![]() | ||
JeanBob
Canada295 Posts
| ||
WarSame
Canada1950 Posts
| ||
![]()
Noam
Israel2209 Posts
On August 09 2011 14:09 JeanBob wrote: How do I translate a page? I'd like to contribute, but I'm a bad player and I don,t think I can add anything to strategy, so if I could translate a few pages I would feel more accomplished. We've compiled a list of instructions and guidelines: http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Liquipedia:Translations | ||
firehand101
Australia3152 Posts
| ||
![]()
salle
Sweden5554 Posts
On August 09 2011 09:46 Kalingingsong wrote: The main strategy pages seem kinda disorganized (with builds that overlaps and certain reactions named as "builds"), is there anything we can do to just help sort out the general organization rather than dealing with something extremely specific? Part of this would be helped by normal users going 'round and putting up ![]() Another thing would be to rework the way that the race strategy portal pages displays the different strategy pages. Pholon is working on something for them currently and can use help and feedback, ![]() For the reactions named as builds you can go into the discussion page and request that they should be moved to a name that much more fits the article. Also helping out with reviewing pages and writing which pages you think should be removed from the race strategy portal page on it's discussion page. Ask for new templates or changes to current one to increase the general organization. There's a lot of things you can do to help out with the general organization, but these were the only ones I could think of right now. | ||
prrr
Chile4 Posts
As a community we wanna make SC2 dinamics explainable and clear just like it was in BW (LP1), but actually SC2 have a lot of things that do not work like BW. So if we insist about trying to explain SC2 like you used to explain BW i think we might be getting a problem. It has the : "what's my opponent's gonna get" thing and the psicological factor so much highlighted that im starting to think that there are no "recipebook" builds like they where in BW. Please correct me if im wrong but i think the reason of the lack of Strat Posting in LP its due to game dynamics change and the way wer trying to post these "builds". We still dont get the full story, even developers are 100% aware of them. | ||
![]()
tofucake
Hyrule19026 Posts
On August 09 2011 07:05 barrykp wrote: I would contribute, but the attitude here is generally that only contributions (to debate for example) from people with high ratings are valued. TL is an elitist place, and I guess I've bought into that - I wouldn't be confident in something I might add to a wiki, even though I've watched enough pro games and analysis to be able to pass that on, even if I don't necessarily live up to it myself ingame. /shrug Eh? Look at salle. Something like 350 of his posts are in the LP staff board. TL is elitist in some regards, but nobody has ever turned away help or contributions because of a low post count. | ||
![]()
tofucake
Hyrule19026 Posts
Ways to contribute and be superawesomesexy: 1. Fix typos, grammar, layout, design, etc 2. Design new layouts and pages (the ![]() ![]() 3. Create and/or update pages for fanclubs, shows, tournaments, players, maps and other things. We really appreciate it. 4. Add/edit strategies 5. Create/edit templates 6. Translate the crap out of ![]() And there's more that can be done too. Don't be fooled. Adding strategies is only one way to contribute. | ||
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
edit - Buffing Blue Flame Hellion Drop Timing first since I have played the hell out of this build recently. | ||
![]()
zatic
Zurich15325 Posts
There are so many guides in the forum that really should be on Liquipedia. You really can just straightforward copy them into a new Liquipedia article. Similarly, watch existing guides on LP and update them should there be changed in the corresponding guide thread in the forums. Just do a Strat forum search for "[G]" and take it from there. Not everything needs to be in LP, but I am sure you will find plenty that should be there! | ||
Probe1
United States17920 Posts
On August 09 2011 13:52 MonsieurGrimm wrote: I'm holding you to this for sure, even though I can't enforce it ![]() Don't worry it was reposted and there's no fuck way I can get out of it. I'm already scrambling to learn how to contribute and I have a whole month to work. | ||
tehemperorer
United States2183 Posts
On August 09 2011 21:59 EtherealDeath wrote: Ok I will start buffing the hell out of the Terran section. Too depressed to do Aiur though, may my protoss past rest in peace (until a buff ^^). edit - Buffing Blue Flame Hellion Drop Timing first since I have played the hell out of this build recently. Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo | ||
EtherealDeath
United States8366 Posts
On August 09 2011 23:16 tehemperorer wrote: Whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Wut? Already did initial buffing, now to buff the mid game standard followups. | ||
Termit
Sweden3466 Posts
| ||
WarSame
Canada1950 Posts
EDIT: And yes, this is selfish. I do need someone to help me with the build quite a bit. | ||
iamcaustic
Canada1509 Posts
On August 09 2011 06:12 tofucake wrote: gogogogogo edit harder TY to all contributors. The rest of you need to stop slacking off. TT;;; I tend to steal strategies from Liquipedia, so I never have anything to contribute that isn't already in there. Sorry! I'll add something cool if I ever get the chance to actually come up with something good on my own. | ||
Yoshi Kirishima
United States10321 Posts
that way players would know whether a strategy is up to date or if it might be outdated and useless edit: Wait so I can write a strategy, and then it is a draft. Then it must be reviewed by people (who?) and if there's enough positiveness then it will show up as a strategy? or a stub strategy? I looked at the +1 Mech vs Protoss page and saw that it was not in the list of terran strategies. So how would you get to these draft strategies? just asking cus i think i will write a guide for air terran vs P soon xD | ||
| ||