• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 10:23
CEST 16:23
KST 23:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China7Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL64Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
What are the most important principles of web? SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 787 users

"Carrier Has Arrived" Refreshing New PvZ Strategy - Page 15

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next All
CrAzEdMiKe
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada151 Posts
March 25 2011 21:13 GMT
#281
I wrote a really long detailed post and then my computer decided to eat it, so I'm going to quickly point out a few things that I feel are the REAL strengths of the build.

A) It's super safe early to mid game. Since you have a really fast and mobile harass force, you can leave the bulk of your army at home which keeps you very safe. You also get a very good scout off of what your opponent is doing as well as being virtually invincible from Mutalisk harass.

B) The Zerg is only capable of going for a few routes of dealing with this type of strategy. The Protoss player finds out pretty quickly what route the Zerg chooses to go and adapts his build accordingly (If he sees a lot of Corrupters, he makes lots of Voids, Infestors, HT etc). This all sounds super simple and everyone should do it, but it's not often you are able to really really scout what kind of unit composition the opponent is going. This is why Mutalisk harass is often so effective when the Zerg employs it, not only does it harass the opponent but the Zerg knows what kind of units the opponent will have to make in order to deal with the Mutas, and then techs in advance.

C) Straight to Mothership access. I made a huge deal about this in previous posts, and I made a super long detailed one before I lost it here... But if you don't believe that Mothership is awesome in PvZ, then you clearly haven't tried it.

I honestly don't believe that the build is designed to be played like "You make X of this unit, Y of this unit and Z of this unit and the Zerg cannot stop you!" The build is meant to provoke a certain type of reaction and if you execute right, you are already getting a step ahead of your opponent by preparing whatever it is that you need to fight that unit he's planning on untilizing.

Again, I wanted this to be way more detailed... But meh. You get the picture.
Hierarch
Profile Joined February 2011
United States2197 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-25 21:33:15
March 25 2011 21:19 GMT
#282
On March 26 2011 03:52 sylverfyre wrote:
As a zerg, I find that I have a friggin MISERABLE TIME trying to beat protoss if my third base gets slowed down - something that a gateway push doesn't really accomplish (ling/roach/bane/whatever can hold it) and a colossus push is too slow for (third is up and running before colossus push is ready). A void ray lasering my third hatch while I have to build shit to deal with phoenix harass would make me shit bricks - sure, I'll have anti air to deal with phoenix harass... but IN MY BASE, and not AT MY THIRD unless it's like tal'darim altar and my third is close enough to my base that I dont have to move that far off creep to get hydras/queens there.

I honestly feel like that's one of the major strengths - the ability to slow 3rd+ bases of the zerg. Less sure about the DT transition, but it would probably work OK since overseers have to fear for their lives and the zerg might not be able to handle taking a 4th/5th base against Air+DT.

upgraded Chargelots actually do pretty decently against hydras, too, without a roach front for them, and this play is going to make the zerg want to skew more heavily towards super-squishy hydras. Maybe adding storm at some point just to murder hydras even MORE, though storm is less helpful against corruptors (though corruptors won't save the zerg from the zealot heavy ground comp)

In terms of remaxing, if the zerg can only kill interceptors and not the carriers themselves, those "remax" basically instantly. (well, in time for the next fight for sure) Food for thought.

Show nested quote +
On March 26 2011 01:22 P0ckets wrote:
This is a very gas heavy build especially when you want to throw in the colossi, which I believe means you need either 2 base + extended period of time with no loses or 3+ bases with full gas saturation. I mean all toss air units are 100+ gas, collois are 200 each, each gate is 150, a robo is 100, and beacon/bay both are 200, so even if this does manage to come out their will be very little upgrades since most gas would go to production.

A) Colossi are nowhere in the game plan. Literally nowhere. Reread the game plan.
A.5) It's actually cheaper (in all 3: gas/mins/time) to go Stargate opening -> tech to carriers with catapult upgrade than it is to go Stargate -> Tech to colossi with range upgrade.
B) The build is designed for 3 bases with full gas saturation, and has a well-thought-out plan to get there on even terms.


Show nested quote +
On March 26 2011 02:18 kickinhead wrote:
I see a few problems with this build that will IMHO make it completely unplayable:

1) 3-gate into Expand and then into Air-Units is very susceptible to 2+ Base Speedling-Baneling attacks (No all-in, just Sauron-Zerg the hell out of the Toss...). If I'm able to execute this strat without having to adapt too much to maybe 4-warpgates into expansion etc. the only thing that really works against mass-base Speedling/Baneling+later on drops etc. is mass-gateway-play (Blinkstalkers+Archons+HT's).
2) Hydras alone will totally pwn anything from the Toss if he does not have any AoE whatsoever. I can maybe see that heavy Armor-Upgraded Zealots with Legs could could tank the Hydras and hold them on distance to the Carriers/VR's, but you'd have to extensively playtest that.
3) You wouldn't have to make Corruptors, cuz the Hydras are incredibly good against Air and Gateway-Units from the Toss, so theres no risk of over- or underproducing Corruptors.
4) If you don't have to make Roaches, cuz Hydras get pwned so hard by Collossi, the Zerg will actually have a strong maxed-out Army and could win in a straight-up fight, just cuz Hydras are so effective against anything but Toss-AoE.

So if the Zerg scouts well and reacts by just massing Hydras, Speedlings and maybe some Infestors, I don't see a chance for this build to be effective.



1) What? Sentries have the ability to shut down speedling/baneling attacks like, entirely. This build has A) the ability to adapt to such aggression and B) Cannons/At least 1 void ray to assist in this defense.

The weakest point in a 3gate expand, IMO, is when the protoss pressures the zerg with their sentry-zealot mix. The goal of such pressure is to force the zerg to quit droning without cares, but toss runs a risk of losing that push in the middle of the map. This build doesn't need to pressure as hard with this because it has void ray and phoenix en route which can pressure with pretty much zero risk of the retreat being cut off.

2) Carriers vs Hydras is skewed towards carriers. No really. Especially off-creep. Worst thing that happens is you lose some interceptors but kill some hydras and back off (hydras can't chase effectively) and interceptors are way cheaper than hydras.

which brings us to 3:
You do have to build corruptors, hydras can't handle carriers with no air support, as mentioned in 2.

4) Chargelots (the assigned mineral dump) will murder hydras cost for cost if you don't make any roaches.

Your theorycrafting has holes everywhere. I wants me some other people trying this out. I'm a mid diamond zerg looking to practice against this!


@OP - stick with the +1 attack for ground, IMO. It brings Zealot vs Hydralisk (a matchup you are expecting) from 6 hits (81 HP effectively.. 1 hp regens immediately) to 5 hits. From there, shields might be nice if the zerg doesn't get carapace.


Couldn't have said it better myself :D

I've also been going with a lot more voidray/gateway pushes, with like 6-8 voidrays. Another thing that can be done vs baneling busts is to hallucinate archons to soak damage.

On March 26 2011 06:13 CrAzEdMiKe wrote:
I wrote a really long detailed post and then my computer decided to eat it, so I'm going to quickly point out a few things that I feel are the REAL strengths of the build.

A) It's super safe early to mid game. Since you have a really fast and mobile harass force, you can leave the bulk of your army at home which keeps you very safe. You also get a very good scout off of what your opponent is doing as well as being virtually invincible from Mutalisk harass.

B) The Zerg is only capable of going for a few routes of dealing with this type of strategy. The Protoss player finds out pretty quickly what route the Zerg chooses to go and adapts his build accordingly (If he sees a lot of Corrupters, he makes lots of Voids, Infestors, HT etc). This all sounds super simple and everyone should do it, but it's not often you are able to really really scout what kind of unit composition the opponent is going. This is why Mutalisk harass is often so effective when the Zerg employs it, not only does it harass the opponent but the Zerg knows what kind of units the opponent will have to make in order to deal with the Mutas, and then techs in advance.

C) Straight to Mothership access. I made a huge deal about this in previous posts, and I made a super long detailed one before I lost it here... But if you don't believe that Mothership is awesome in PvZ, then you clearly haven't tried it.

I honestly don't believe that the build is designed to be played like "You make X of this unit, Y of this unit and Z of this unit and the Zerg cannot stop you!" The build is meant to provoke a certain type of reaction and if you execute right, you are already getting a step ahead of your opponent by preparing whatever it is that you need to fight that unit he's planning on untilizing.

Again, I wanted this to be way more detailed... But meh. You get the picture.


Well said
MC|NonY|HerO|NaDa|MVP|DRG|Ret|Sen|Dimaga|Leenock
Hierarch
Profile Joined February 2011
United States2197 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-25 21:26:47
March 25 2011 21:23 GMT
#283
On March 26 2011 04:17 DuneBug wrote:
Mass void ray would probably be more effective against virtually all zerg unit compositions except infestor/hydra play.

Corruptor is the best counter in the game to the carrier because of its +massive damage and because of its base 2 armor. At even upgrades interceptors do 6 damage per volley to a corruptor.
Yes you can mix in void rays, but even if zerg loses battle one he'll outproduce you on the 2nd round.

Carriers are viable in virtually every MU until the opponent overproduces the counter unit to kill them.

What really should be mentioned is archons. Archons guarding the carriers will do tremendous damage to clumped corruptors, and magic boxing corruptors is not what zerg wants to do going into a carrier fight. It doesn't even require that many archons. Psi storm works in theory but in practice zerg can move his corruptors on top of your army to prevent you from storming.


I do use a lot of archons in my late game play with this strategy and I replace my army with voidrays instead of carriers just to get my supply up faster, Once I hit like 170+ supply I start remaking carriers from my 4 stargates.

On March 26 2011 05:12 Bellygareth wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 26 2011 03:02 Hierarch wrote:
On March 26 2011 02:18 kickinhead wrote:
I see a few problems with this build that will IMHO make it completely unplayable:

1) 3-gate into Expand and then into Air-Units is very susceptible to 2+ Base Speedling-Baneling attacks (No all-in, just Sauron-Zerg the hell out of the Toss...). If I'm able to execute this strat without having to adapt too much to maybe 4-warpgates into expansion etc. the only thing that really works against mass-base Speedling/Baneling+later on drops etc. is mass-gateway-play (Blinkstalkers+Archons+HT's).
2) Hydras alone will totally pwn anything from the Toss if he does not have any AoE whatsoever. I can maybe see that heavy Armor-Upgraded Zealots with Legs could could tank the Hydras and hold them on distance to the Carriers/VR's, but you'd have to extensively playtest that.
3) You wouldn't have to make Corruptors, cuz the Hydras are incredibly good against Air and Gateway-Units from the Toss, so theres no risk of over- or underproducing Corruptors.
4) If you don't have to make Roaches, cuz Hydras get pwned so hard by Collossi, the Zerg will actually have a strong maxed-out Army and could win in a straight-up fight, just cuz Hydras are so effective against anything but Toss-AoE.

So if the Zerg scouts well and reacts by just massing Hydras, Speedlings and maybe some Infestors, I don't see a chance for this build to be effective.


I'll answer point by point:

1) I have started getting hallucination now to get a much earlier scout in, and when I see high eco ling/bling I actually don't do this strategy, I go into standard colossus play and canon up. I had a game on xel naga where this happened to me, and I agree that 2 stargate play doesn't work against it effectively. But that's the beauty of using this standard opener, you can transition into basically anything you want.

2) I have extensively tested against hydras and unless on creep they don't stand a chance, they die too quickly to zealots with legs, archons, and carriers. They also are outranged by carriers and archons and zealots provide great buffers, also zealots cost no gas which makes them awesome.

3) I've had people try just 100% pure hydra and it works to defend, but it doesn't provide a very mobile offensive, and once you attack with hydras off creep you are committed to that attack.

4) Maxed hydras are actually not that good since they are so slow they have a hard time forming a concave in battles and ff's exacerbate that problem even more. Also if I see 100% pure hydra I will get storm instead of DT's.

This last line could be said of any race against any strategy, if you scout well and build counters it will have a good chance to beat the opposing strategy, it doesn't make the enemies strategy invalid or unviable.

You're not considering an hydra "allin" kicking before you can get archons and maybe even speed for your zealots. On the smallest maps (2v2 maps), I see your strat fail to that hydra attack, which can be allin but it doesn't matter because it'll work and kill you right there.

I have no experience against it on the largest maps, but then again on largest maps zerg probably have other options and can try to harrass with lings against your slow carriers for ex. < I have yet to see how it plays out.


Hydras off creep coming across the map to my base with canons, lets me ff and split them in half and use voidrays to kill the front half, then the second wave comes and i warp in more units and use my phoenix to help lift the hydras.
MC|NonY|HerO|NaDa|MVP|DRG|Ret|Sen|Dimaga|Leenock
Uhh Negative
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1090 Posts
March 25 2011 21:54 GMT
#284
On March 18 2011 13:58 Hierarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2011 13:50 Audi309 wrote:
would loooove to see some top level players extensively try to refine this strategy. the question is can you effectively deal harass so zerg can't get those hoards of units they're known for. since you wont have those aoe dealing units, this could get very tricky. will be interesting to see what comes of this.


Carriers DPS is actually insane when they get +2 or +3 air attack, and to replace the aoe for late game the intercepters help by messing up targeting AI, the 1st replay I posted demonstrates this quite well.

Ehh not really. Only true if the zerg gets no armor upgrades. Yes, it adds +2 damage to each interceptor but each interceptor only goes out every 3 seconds and if the zerg has +1 armor it acts as essentially +2 armor against carriers. I've played toss doing 2 base carrier type play and it just dies so easily to mass hydra.
Hierarch
Profile Joined February 2011
United States2197 Posts
March 25 2011 22:38 GMT
#285
On March 26 2011 06:54 Uhh Negative wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 18 2011 13:58 Hierarch wrote:
On March 18 2011 13:50 Audi309 wrote:
would loooove to see some top level players extensively try to refine this strategy. the question is can you effectively deal harass so zerg can't get those hoards of units they're known for. since you wont have those aoe dealing units, this could get very tricky. will be interesting to see what comes of this.


Carriers DPS is actually insane when they get +2 or +3 air attack, and to replace the aoe for late game the intercepters help by messing up targeting AI, the 1st replay I posted demonstrates this quite well.

Ehh not really. Only true if the zerg gets no armor upgrades. Yes, it adds +2 damage to each interceptor but each interceptor only goes out every 3 seconds and if the zerg has +1 armor it acts as essentially +2 armor against carriers. I've played toss doing 2 base carrier type play and it just dies so easily to mass hydra.


Well good thing this isn't a 2 base carrier strategy then...
MC|NonY|HerO|NaDa|MVP|DRG|Ret|Sen|Dimaga|Leenock
atribone
Profile Joined March 2011
6 Posts
March 26 2011 06:50 GMT
#286
On March 26 2011 07:38 Hierarch wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 26 2011 06:54 Uhh Negative wrote:
On March 18 2011 13:58 Hierarch wrote:
On March 18 2011 13:50 Audi309 wrote:
would loooove to see some top level players extensively try to refine this strategy. the question is can you effectively deal harass so zerg can't get those hoards of units they're known for. since you wont have those aoe dealing units, this could get very tricky. will be interesting to see what comes of this.


Carriers DPS is actually insane when they get +2 or +3 air attack, and to replace the aoe for late game the intercepters help by messing up targeting AI, the 1st replay I posted demonstrates this quite well.

Ehh not really. Only true if the zerg gets no armor upgrades. Yes, it adds +2 damage to each interceptor but each interceptor only goes out every 3 seconds and if the zerg has +1 armor it acts as essentially +2 armor against carriers. I've played toss doing 2 base carrier type play and it just dies so easily to mass hydra.


Well good thing this isn't a 2 base carrier strategy then...


This is true. I metagame the shit out of him and I immediately get +1 armor for corruptor against this build. Still get raped.
SoulWager
Profile Joined August 2010
United States464 Posts
March 26 2011 08:43 GMT
#287
I've tried to find some stargate transitions in all matchups, and i've been leaning toward +armor charge lots(plus GS) and +attack carriers for the endgame, I find the sentry and zealots doubly necessary against hydra and rine heavy compositions, to keep interceptors from just evaporating.
Ownos
Profile Joined July 2010
United States2147 Posts
March 27 2011 02:31 GMT
#288
So I watched your replays. I think it's too much to go more than 4 phoenixes. Past experience dictates if you dink around too much with phoenixes they can just waltz in with an all-in-ish hydra timing attack. I suppose since it's easier to transition to carriers than it is to colossus you could afford maybe 6 or even 8. Honestly, I was playing today and going more than 4 makes me very uncomfortable. From what I saw you get a LOT of phoenixes.

And I don't really like transitioning to void rays (and a lot of them in fact). Chances are the zerg is spamming hydras in response to your phoenixes and the void rays don't do that well vs the hydras and if they hit you with a hydra push it could be gameover. If I were a zerg, once I have enough spore crawlers up I should be able to attack and win or at leasts slow you down.

Personally, I have always liked to get carriers after the phoenixes. That way if the hydra push does come you can micro the carriers + zealots around to edge out a win. Only when the carriers are revealed, then I transition to void rays to anticipate the inevitable "holy crap my hydras just died to carriers time for operation 16+ corruptors". This happened so many times today. And with +2 weapons the corruptors are no match. They will almost always be behind in upgrades.

And I don't get my third until at least 2 carriers (1 cycle) or if the map is large I can get it during the phoenix attacks (slightly earlier).

So I flipped around the carriers/void ray transitions and I find that works much better.




...deeper and deeper into the bowels of El Diablo
Hierarch
Profile Joined February 2011
United States2197 Posts
March 27 2011 03:40 GMT
#289
On March 27 2011 11:31 Ownos wrote:
So I watched your replays. I think it's too much to go more than 4 phoenixes. Past experience dictates if you dink around too much with phoenixes they can just waltz in with an all-in-ish hydra timing attack. I suppose since it's easier to transition to carriers than it is to colossus you could afford maybe 6 or even 8. Honestly, I was playing today and going more than 4 makes me very uncomfortable. From what I saw you get a LOT of phoenixes.

And I don't really like transitioning to void rays (and a lot of them in fact). Chances are the zerg is spamming hydras in response to your phoenixes and the void rays don't do that well vs the hydras and if they hit you with a hydra push it could be gameover. If I were a zerg, once I have enough spore crawlers up I should be able to attack and win or at leasts slow you down.

Personally, I have always liked to get carriers after the phoenixes. That way if the hydra push does come you can micro the carriers + zealots around to edge out a win. Only when the carriers are revealed, then I transition to void rays to anticipate the inevitable "holy crap my hydras just died to carriers time for operation 16+ corruptors". This happened so many times today. And with +2 weapons the corruptors are no match. They will almost always be behind in upgrades.

And I don't get my third until at least 2 carriers (1 cycle) or if the map is large I can get it during the phoenix attacks (slightly earlier).

So I flipped around the carriers/void ray transitions and I find that works much better.


That's not a bad idea, I'll try that, at most I get 10 phoenix if they just don't have enough to stop me from abusing them with my phoenix, but most of the time I stop around 5-7, I've stopped numerous hydra timings with well placed ff's,guardian shield and zealot/stalker/sentry/3 or so voidrays. Hydras are really good, when they can move at less than a snails pace. Thanks for the insight on the 2 carriers for defense, I didn't even think about that and taking your 3rd with a couple carriers for defense will make me feel super comfortable :D
MC|NonY|HerO|NaDa|MVP|DRG|Ret|Sen|Dimaga|Leenock
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
March 27 2011 04:58 GMT
#290
i like what gemini did in his replay, and nice to see my man bitters watching in!

unless youre playing on something as awful as slag pits, its easier to get and defend a third as protoss vs zerg now, which is great for us toss because that imo is the biggest timing window zerg has to crush us, in between start of third nexus and getting decent saturation on it. after that we have the economy to make big splashy units like colossus or carrier.

geminis third was so delayed that it definitely obscured how strong what he was doing would have been if hed had his third fully producing 3-4 minutes earlier than it was, he never got more than 2 carriers on the field at a time i believe. not making VRs and colossus and going phoenix/stalker/sentry/carrier/zealot off a better-timed 3rd i think would have been incredibly powerful with carriers providing the major dps, phoenix raising, zealot/ff tanking and stalkers hitting corrupters or raised units.

3 is the magic number of bases to have the money to start experimenting with new unit compositions and styles of play, and im glad to see it. zerg and terran are adapting to deathball, protoss isnt allowed to try to adapt to their adaptations?

yes you might roll me over with a baneling sling bust or bling hydras or roach all-in, but just as likely im not an idiot and position my cannons and gateways and ffs so u either pull back or lose all ur units and dont kill my natural either way. blizzard wants macro games otherwise the naturals and thirds wouldnt be so easy to get to and defend except again on awful maps like slag pits.

there are a lot of things you can try to do with this build and i am going to check them out; one thing i would change is the dts. you might as well get warp prisms or try to hide pylons and warp-in/drop zealots on expansions; more economical and just as if not more effective than dark templar.

if there is one deciding factor to me for PvZ, it is how well i use my force fields. sure you can talk about rolling a protoss over, but with the standard 3-gate expand, good cannon placement and un-noob forcefield use, you just arent going to be rolling over a protoss nat. which is why going muta harass or getting a quick 4th is as far as i know the standard zerg response to toss 3g sentry expand.

this build to me attempts to find another way to get protoss safely through that sometimes sticky transition from t1 to 2.5 that they need to go kill some bugs effectively and with a unit for your major dps that isnt colossus yay!
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
CrAzEdMiKe
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada151 Posts
March 27 2011 05:19 GMT
#291
On March 27 2011 13:58 DeepElemBlues wrote:
if there is one deciding factor to me for PvZ, it is how well i use my force fields. sure you can talk about rolling a protoss over, but with the standard 3-gate expand, good cannon placement and un-noob forcefield use, you just arent going to be rolling over a protoss nat. which is why going muta harass or getting a quick 4th is as far as i know the standard zerg response to toss 3g sentry expand.


This is something that I really like about this build actually. I had that happen to me today where I opened up with the Sentry expand and my opponent opted to go for Muta harass. By the time Mutas ended up in my base, I had plenty of Phoenix to take care of them.

I personally like having about 8 Phoenix as they are in a large enough number that they can do some serious harassment. With four it's kind of like sending in one Hellion to harass vs sending in 4. Yes you can harass with one Hellion, but you can do a LOT of damage with 4. Same principle... And I find that Phoenix don't ever really become "useless" as they do a ton of scouting, keep the opponent on his toes and also when that engagement occurs, lifting up a bunch of the DPS is soooo good (namely Hydras).

When I wrecked a huge chunk of his economy with my Phoenix (I had over 10 since he went heavy Muta) he basically had to all in me and tried a baneling bust... Even though my Forcefields were absolutely atrocious, it still wasn't even close. Granted, we're both terrible players so our micro/macro was by no means superb... But I do feel that the strategy is sound as I feel very secure when I'm utilizing it.
Hierarch
Profile Joined February 2011
United States2197 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-27 05:24:02
March 27 2011 05:21 GMT
#292
On March 27 2011 13:58 DeepElemBlues wrote:
i like what gemini did in his replay, and nice to see my man bitters watching in!

unless youre playing on something as awful as slag pits, its easier to get and defend a third as protoss vs zerg now, which is great for us toss because that imo is the biggest timing window zerg has to crush us, in between start of third nexus and getting decent saturation on it. after that we have the economy to make big splashy units like colossus or carrier.

geminis third was so delayed that it definitely obscured how strong what he was doing would have been if hed had his third fully producing 3-4 minutes earlier than it was, he never got more than 2 carriers on the field at a time i believe. not making VRs and colossus and going phoenix/stalker/sentry/carrier/zealot off a better-timed 3rd i think would have been incredibly powerful with carriers providing the major dps, phoenix raising, zealot/ff tanking and stalkers hitting corrupters or raised units.

3 is the magic number of bases to have the money to start experimenting with new unit compositions and styles of play, and im glad to see it. zerg and terran are adapting to deathball, protoss isnt allowed to try to adapt to their adaptations?

yes you might roll me over with a baneling sling bust or bling hydras or roach all-in, but just as likely im not an idiot and position my cannons and gateways and ffs so u either pull back or lose all ur units and dont kill my natural either way. blizzard wants macro games otherwise the naturals and thirds wouldnt be so easy to get to and defend except again on awful maps like slag pits.

there are a lot of things you can try to do with this build and i am going to check them out; one thing i would change is the dts. you might as well get warp prisms or try to hide pylons and warp-in/drop zealots on expansions; more economical and just as if not more effective than dark templar.

if there is one deciding factor to me for PvZ, it is how well i use my force fields. sure you can talk about rolling a protoss over, but with the standard 3-gate expand, good cannon placement and un-noob forcefield use, you just arent going to be rolling over a protoss nat. which is why going muta harass or getting a quick 4th is as far as i know the standard zerg response to toss 3g sentry expand.

this build to me attempts to find another way to get protoss safely through that sometimes sticky transition from t1 to 2.5 that they need to go kill some bugs effectively and with a unit for your major dps that isnt colossus yay!


Thanks :D

I try to hide pylons around the map, the reason DT's work so well is that my phoenix "harass" stops once i go down to 1-2 phoenix and then i just use the as really good scouts, so because of this zerg is not as likely to have pre-built spores at their 4th and 5th expansions which makes it easy pickings for DT's. Also DT's are amazing combat units for this build, overseers are so easy to kill with air units, and DT's do amazing damage in battle, and the last reason for getting a dark shrine is for archons which absolutely demolish a zerg corrupter force and alot of other zerg units.

On March 27 2011 14:19 CrAzEdMiKe wrote:
Show nested quote +
On March 27 2011 13:58 DeepElemBlues wrote:
if there is one deciding factor to me for PvZ, it is how well i use my force fields. sure you can talk about rolling a protoss over, but with the standard 3-gate expand, good cannon placement and un-noob forcefield use, you just arent going to be rolling over a protoss nat. which is why going muta harass or getting a quick 4th is as far as i know the standard zerg response to toss 3g sentry expand.


This is something that I really like about this build actually. I had that happen to me today where I opened up with the Sentry expand and my opponent opted to go for Muta harass. By the time Mutas ended up in my base, I had plenty of Phoenix to take care of them.

I personally like having about 8 Phoenix as they are in a large enough number that they can do some serious harassment. With four it's kind of like sending in one Hellion to harass vs sending in 4. Yes you can harass with one Hellion, but you can do a LOT of damage with 4. Same principle... And I find that Phoenix don't ever really become "useless" as they do a ton of scouting, keep the opponent on his toes and also when that engagement occurs, lifting up a bunch of the DPS is soooo good (namely Hydras).

When I wrecked a huge chunk of his economy with my Phoenix (I had over 10 since he went heavy Muta) he basically had to all in me and tried a baneling bust... Even though my Forcefields were absolutely atrocious, it still wasn't even close. Granted, we're both terrible players so our micro/macro was by no means superb... But I do feel that the strategy is sound as I feel very secure when I'm utilizing it.


Glad to hear you're enjoying the build, I tried to make it as safe as possible and I feel it is quite safe from most opposing strategies. The best part of phoenixes vs mutas is that if the mutas attempt to retreat the phoenixes act like air marauders, you can't run from them, so you end up just killing everything. I personally go for anywhere from 5-9 phoenix depending on their defense.
MC|NonY|HerO|NaDa|MVP|DRG|Ret|Sen|Dimaga|Leenock
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-27 05:37:51
March 27 2011 05:32 GMT
#293
Thanks :D

I try to hide pylons around the map, the reason DT's work so well is that my phoenix "harass" stops once i go down to 1-2 phoenix and then i just use the as really good scouts, so because of this zerg is not as likely to have pre-built spores at their 4th and 5th expansions which makes it easy pickings for DT's. Also DT's are amazing combat units for this build, overseers are so easy to kill with air units, and DT's do amazing damage in battle, and the last reason for getting a dark shrine is for archons which absolutely demolish a zerg corrupter force and alot of other zerg units.


You have a point there, I wasn't really being as clear as I wanted. I think getting DTs is still good for archons, mixed into general army, and good for preventing expos by patrolling and killing drones, but I think substituting Zealot drops/warp-ins to harass the already existing naturals would be more economical. Hey maybe go with a mix, with a little micro those DTs will do massive damage while Zealots do what they're good for ZvP, eat roach acid and zergling claws and die haha.

My only real suggestion for improvement was the Zealots on the expansion harass I guess is what I'm saying =D

This is something that I really like about this build actually. I had that happen to me today where I opened up with the Sentry expand and my opponent opted to go for Muta harass. By the time Mutas ended up in my base, I had plenty of Phoenix to take care of them.


personally i just put a cannon and 1-2 stalkers at min line and if zerg tries to muta harass, pylon coverage and phoenix = mutas better run like right NAOW lol.

personally i think a smart zerg should opt for pylon / tech sniping over more likely than not blindly a-moving into the mineral line after most likely going all the way around map to get in from behind, or if its the natural from above or below (whichever side the main isnt on), leaving more time to be scouted and defended

blizzard may have taken away our beloved dragoons, but they gave us them in spirit with the vastly improved photon cannons =)

as for the amount of phoenixs, i'd say 12-15 is what you need for your late-game army; with forcefield, thats enough to significantly lower the amount of roaches or hydras and allow your stalkers to pound on corrupters.

if you get off good forcefields and hydras are far back enough taht theyre having trouble hitting stalkers id raise roaches to keep more stalkers alive, and if not, raise the hydras and kill them for the same reason.

zerg has to win the numbers-firepower trade, phoenix and forcefield properly used have very powerful synergy. hell you could even get a mothership and if u got lucky maybe vortex top half his army, raise the ground part of lower half, kill everything, then do it again when vortex wears off. thatd be pretty sweet to see, and zerg would have a very limited time to react if you pulled it off right.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
CrAzEdMiKe
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada151 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-27 05:39:42
March 27 2011 05:35 GMT
#294
It is very safe... And what I've personally found is I actually try and gun for Overlords bigtime. If you can supply block the Zerg player, not only does it delay his ability to produce counters, but it's a huge mineral investment to get those Overlords back. With a flock of Phoenix it is quite easy to kill off at least 6 Overlords while you're running around in his base. Not only is that 48 supply he won't have access to, but thats 600 Minerals he has to reinvest in order to start building again. Sometimes you delay the third or fourth expo simply by them being stretched out by having to remake all those balloons.

EDIT:
One of the things is that I'm a huge upgrade freak as well. I often will sacrifice a lot of early units to buff up my stuff as quickly as possible. I've personally opted to go for a fast Fleet Beacon in order to keep upgrading and not even make Carriers... Just because it helps make your Phoenix (and of course the impending Carriers) much much stronger. If you manage to get +3 Armor on your Carriers, Hydras can become a liability if the Zerg hasn't upgraded their range attack. I do get the Twilight Council for Zealot Charge, but I haven't really gone for the Dark Templar tech simply because the faster upgrades usually end up being much more potent (And Phoenix with +2 attack can actually start to engage Corrupters).
DeepElemBlues
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United States5079 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-27 05:42:13
March 27 2011 05:40 GMT
#295
all races are highly dependent on not having to replace supply buildings. it totally destroys the balance of spending on army, workers, and tech, since 2 of the 3 also use the supply "resource." zerg are just way more vulnerable to losing them because they arent buildings =)

One of the things is that I'm a huge upgrade freak as well. I often will sacrifice a lot of early units to buff up my stuff as quickly as possible.


i am too, protoss gets a bigger boost going from lvl 0 to lvl 1 and then again from lvl 1 to lvl 2 than terran and zerg i think. but we get a smaller boost hitting lvl 3 than they do and it evens out.
no place i'd rather be than the satellite of love
Hierarch
Profile Joined February 2011
United States2197 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-27 05:51:17
March 27 2011 05:49 GMT
#296
On March 27 2011 14:32 DeepElemBlues wrote:
Show nested quote +
Thanks :D

I try to hide pylons around the map, the reason DT's work so well is that my phoenix "harass" stops once i go down to 1-2 phoenix and then i just use the as really good scouts, so because of this zerg is not as likely to have pre-built spores at their 4th and 5th expansions which makes it easy pickings for DT's. Also DT's are amazing combat units for this build, overseers are so easy to kill with air units, and DT's do amazing damage in battle, and the last reason for getting a dark shrine is for archons which absolutely demolish a zerg corrupter force and alot of other zerg units.


You have a point there, I wasn't really being as clear as I wanted. I think getting DTs is still good for archons, mixed into general army, and good for preventing expos by patrolling and killing drones, but I think substituting Zealot drops/warp-ins to harass the already existing naturals would be more economical. Hey maybe go with a mix, with a little micro those DTs will do massive damage while Zealots do what they're good for ZvP, eat roach acid and zergling claws and die haha.

My only real suggestion for improvement was the Zealots on the expansion harass I guess is what I'm saying =D


The way I look at is 1 DT is 125/125 and it can kill infinite drones until detection arrives, zealots can kill quite a few drones, but zerg can respond and save those drones a lot faster since no detection is required. However mixing it up by sending a DT in 1st and doing a lot of damage, and then sending in hit squads of like 5 zealots could have awesome results :D

On March 27 2011 14:40 DeepElemBlues wrote:
all races are highly dependent on not having to replace supply buildings. it totally destroys the balance of spending on army, workers, and tech, since 2 of the 3 also use the supply "resource." zerg are just way more vulnerable to losing them because they arent buildings =)

Show nested quote +
One of the things is that I'm a huge upgrade freak as well. I often will sacrifice a lot of early units to buff up my stuff as quickly as possible.


i am too, protoss gets a bigger boost going from lvl 0 to lvl 1 and then again from lvl 1 to lvl 2 than terran and zerg i think. but we get a smaller boost hitting lvl 3 than they do and it evens out.


My forge and cyber core are always upgrading and being chronoboosted throughout the game, I almost always end up with 3/1/1 on air and ground when I win or even higher.
MC|NonY|HerO|NaDa|MVP|DRG|Ret|Sen|Dimaga|Leenock
CrAzEdMiKe
Profile Joined March 2011
Canada151 Posts
March 27 2011 06:52 GMT
#297
I wasn't implying that you weren't upgrading lol, but I feel that you get a much stronger head start on those upgrades by going for a faster Fleet Beacon... Then again, I'm not too afraid to start up a Mothership on two bases (though I do agree, Carriers do require the three bases to actually begin real production).
johanngrunt
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Hong Kong1555 Posts
March 27 2011 15:44 GMT
#298
How does the build deal with infestors?

Is the constant harassment enough to keep the zerg off infestors?

I think that hydra infestor would be pretty good against this.
TheWahbinator
Profile Joined September 2010
United States131 Posts
March 27 2011 16:03 GMT
#299
I think the route to go when being protective against hydras is to get just a few stalkers/phoenix, lift the hydras and shoot it with both. But it is a big mineral sink to get stalkers with this build.
Hierarch
Profile Joined February 2011
United States2197 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-27 16:55:41
March 27 2011 16:54 GMT
#300
On March 28 2011 00:44 johanngrunt wrote:
How does the build deal with infestors?

Is the constant harassment enough to keep the zerg off infestors?

I think that hydra infestor would be pretty good against this.


Infesters do good damage, but if you're going infester hydra you won't have the gas to make corrupters, and carriers own hydras.

On March 28 2011 01:03 TheWahbinator wrote:
I think the route to go when being protective against hydras is to get just a few stalkers/phoenix, lift the hydras and shoot it with both. But it is a big mineral sink to get stalkers with this build.


This build always has extra minerals, however gas is the resource that's sparse
MC|NonY|HerO|NaDa|MVP|DRG|Ret|Sen|Dimaga|Leenock
Prev 1 13 14 15 16 17 18 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Wardi Open
11:00
#43
WardiTV1378
OGKoka 562
Harstem460
IndyStarCraft 205
Rex163
CranKy Ducklings127
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 562
Harstem 460
mouzHeroMarine 221
Hui .211
IndyStarCraft 205
Rex 163
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3645
Jaedong 2269
Flash 2114
Hyuk 858
EffOrt 737
Soulkey 533
actioN 467
Larva 459
Stork 413
Snow 372
[ Show more ]
ZerO 372
firebathero 326
Soma 310
GuemChi 233
sSak 140
Light 123
Mind 102
Pusan 89
hero 83
JulyZerg 80
Sharp 80
TY 80
PianO 64
Barracks 54
Yoon 50
Aegong 35
JYJ35
sorry 29
Terrorterran 24
HiyA 21
GoRush 21
soO 21
Free 18
yabsab 13
IntoTheRainbow 12
zelot 11
Shine 7
Rock 5
ivOry 4
Dota 2
Gorgc4786
qojqva3017
syndereN381
XcaliburYe258
League of Legends
singsing2471
Dendi903
Counter-Strike
byalli314
markeloff128
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King203
Other Games
hiko1353
B2W.Neo966
Beastyqt565
crisheroes373
Lowko319
ArmadaUGS126
Liquid`VortiX112
ZerO(Twitch)17
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick38777
StarCraft: Brood War
UltimateBattle 1022
StarCraft 2
IntoTheiNu 10
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 3406
• WagamamaTV394
League of Legends
• Nemesis7290
Upcoming Events
RotterdaM Event
1h 38m
Replay Cast
9h 38m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
19h 38m
WardiTV European League
1d 1h
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 9h
The PondCast
1d 19h
WardiTV European League
1d 21h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.