• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 20:44
CEST 02:44
KST 09:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202552RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams7Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing RSL Season 1 - Final Week
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams BW General Discussion [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food! Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 660 users

[Spoiler] Ret's quote - Page 4

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 Next All
Leviwtf
Profile Joined October 2010
174 Posts
December 07 2010 14:32 GMT
#61
inbase hatchery only means you get contained, Terran builds 2 bunkers at the bottom of the rank, tech up, expand can do whatever without fear. They have so many options including, 4 rax, expand, banshee, and the zerg has no way to scout unless they managed to get an OL down the map. You can't prepare to counter a 4rax AND a banshee rush at the same time as they require totally different responses.

Remember what I always hear, "Zerg always wants to be 1 base ahead", well at the start of the game both are on 1 base, so of course the zerg wants to expand to be 1 base ahead.

I think the SCV+marine all in is definitely defendable, so many people are forgetting the BitbyBitPrime vs Fruitdealer games.
Jermstuddog
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2231 Posts
December 07 2010 14:54 GMT
#62
On December 07 2010 23:32 Leviwtf wrote:
I think the SCV+marine all in is definitely defendable, so many people are forgetting the BitbyBitPrime vs Fruitdealer games.


BitbyBit botched every single rush in one way or another.
As it turns out, marines don't actually cost any money -Jinro
Thrombozyt
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Germany1269 Posts
December 07 2010 15:54 GMT
#63
Give drones the ability to morph into a creep tumor off creep (without the ability to spawn extra tumors). Suddenly you can place spines earlier in useful positions and deny ramp blocking bunkers. Problem solved.

At the same time increase hatch cost/time and decrease pool cost. 14 hatch shouldn't be the safest and economically most focused build at the same time.
Markwerf
Profile Joined March 2010
Netherlands3728 Posts
December 07 2010 16:03 GMT
#64
On December 08 2010 00:54 Thrombozyt wrote:
Give drones the ability to morph into a creep tumor off creep (without the ability to spawn extra tumors). Suddenly you can place spines earlier in useful positions and deny ramp blocking bunkers. Problem solved.

At the same time increase hatch cost/time and decrease pool cost. 14 hatch shouldn't be the safest and economically most focused build at the same time.



always nice to have people give completely retarded suggestions...
drone being able to morph into a creep tumor off creep??
Z would be able to block command center / nexus all the time then and it would take detection for P/T to deal with it.
Also massive spine defense into using spines offensively would be WAY too easy then...
If you post a suggestion by completely changing the game at least think it through a bit..

Phrencys
Profile Joined August 2010
Canada270 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 16:22:33
December 07 2010 16:21 GMT
#65
On December 08 2010 01:03 Markwerf wrote:
always nice to have people give completely retarded suggestions...

Here's mine:

Remove the Spawning Pool restriction to build Queen, allowing some openings such as Queen>Pool or Queen>Hatch.

The fact that ZvT games are decided in 4minutes show that the early game options are broken, not the metagame. They need to help zerg's early game, and early game only. This change is exactly that: it won't change mid-late game in any way while giving Zerg a chance to actually get there.

It's not like people are going to Queen cheese, and the early larvas are a requirement not a bonus.

Zerg is pigeon-holed in "FE or die". Allowing faster queens wouldn't change much to this, but it would make it go more smoothly.

Alternatively, they could give the queen's ground attack a longer range and bonus dmg vs light. But that would be a lazy band-aid change IMO.
onmach
Profile Blog Joined March 2009
United States1241 Posts
December 07 2010 16:41 GMT
#66
I don't think this is a zerg problem, I think it is a terran problem. None of this happens against protoss. They can apply pressure and their units are good, but it doesn't cause the problem we see here. Anything you do to shore up early game zerg is going to throw them out of whack in the late game.

Mules are most powerful right after the OC is built, that is when the mule powers the greatest percentage of their economy, and it allows them to use workers in combat with the least detriment of all the races. This stuff starts happening is right at the beginning of the game right when the orbital is strongest.

What is the fix for this? I don't know but I wish mule would just be gone or something because it is screwing up the delicate economy balance in this game. Maybe mule could have a different building requirement or a longer build time so that terrans would have a tougher decision on whether or not to get it immediately or wait for some time.
KiaL.Kiwi
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany210 Posts
December 07 2010 18:04 GMT
#67
Any good Z I talked to agrees with 14 Hatch being by the best opening atm against 2 Rax Marines. I myself (2,9k Diamond) have been preaching it for days on different forums, but there are still plenty of terrans with their "lol its risky it should die! play pool first DERP DERP" shenanigans confusing and derailing any debate about the build because they don't know what they're talking about.

Speedling first may be the traditional "safe" build, but it suffers from a severe lack of larva against the gods of war that are marines early on. The beauty of 2 Rax Marine ist the uncertainty about what and when the followup attack will come since it can basically be anytime the T feels confident. There's no dedicated timing that you could react to - and producing drones/lings at the same time (the thing you'd need to do) just throws you farther behind.

I'm not even sure if I'd agree on the notion that the first wave is harder to hold with a 14 Hatch (beside plain silly maps like SoW or DQ close spawns), but I'm absolutly confident that it's extremly much harder to fight of the following waves using only one base.
ltortoise
Profile Joined August 2010
633 Posts
December 07 2010 18:19 GMT
#68
This thread confuses me.

I thought we already have a thread detailing that 11 pool, 18 hatch has superior larvae production to 15 hatch, 14 pool? Or is that thread a lie?
lkjewq
Profile Joined November 2010
United States132 Posts
December 07 2010 18:36 GMT
#69
11 overpool is the better imo. ive been playing with it basically every game and i find that it is way safer and almost just as economical... 14 hatch bypasses it past the 4 minute mark but for the safety it provides, thats nothing.
MorsCerta
Profile Joined October 2010
United States234 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-07 18:38:46
December 07 2010 18:37 GMT
#70
On December 07 2010 18:03 aebriol wrote:
I just don't believe this to be true.

Another post has shown that 11 overpool is better for economy than any other build. It would also get you spinecrawler earlier - which can be moved afterwards.


Personally I think that 14 gas, 14 pool, speedling into baneling (bust if bustable - and that hits right before hellions can be out with 2 rax opening, and beats marines off 2 rax) is the correct counter to this non-stimmed, non-upgraded, marinepush with SCV's.

One thing is if you don't know it's coming (the push) - then it's almost an all-in gamble (even though you can recover, well, you can't really unless you do serious damage with it), but in the final match, everyone knew it was coming, including, I am sure, the players.

Bolded is false. It's not even the most economic pool first build. Simply the earliest pool you can get that wont absolutely destroy your economy.

Gas first vs terran?

On December 07 2010 18:26 Azzur wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 07 2010 18:16 teamsolid wrote:
On December 07 2010 18:07 Samhax wrote:
Ret and Idra are really biased, it's not even funny. We played months (I'm a zerg, in case) without hatch first, now they are saying without hatch first you can't play zerg? Sorry but i don't buy it.

Hatch first give you a strong lead in the mid-game if you are untouched, that's why terran hard pressure early and force a ton of zergling and maybe a spine, but when you don't go hatch first they can deal with it in the mid game just with pure macro and expand normally.

What they're saying is that hatch first is superior to pool first vs 2-rax builds not that without it the game is literally impossible if you go pool first. Pool/gas first used to be mandatory simply because of the possibility of 10 rax/reaper + bunker rush which = dead 14 hatch, so there was no alternative.

Ok, this post gives a lot of clarity to Ret's quote. So, if people say "go pool first to counter 2-rax all-in", then they are completely wrong? Ret is not saying that pool first is not viable; rather, if your intention is to counter the 2-rax, then it is better to hatch first. In JulyZerg's case, if Ret and Idra's experiment is correct, his pool first opening is inferior to hatch first against a 2-rax opening. However, JulyZerg's probably uses his opening because it suits his style better.

I thus want to focus on the 2nd part of Ret's statement:
Show nested quote +
not to mention you have to blindly make ~20 lings in that case so if terran just stops after 5 mariens and puts down a CC you are economically fucked

I feel the next phase of the TvZ matchup map explore this. Is it viable for the zerg to play safe blindly (e.g. pop down spines, make lings)? Would this set them back too much? Or would this result in an equal footing in the mid and lategame?

Do it in a game. Zerg would fall very far behind in worker count with no expo and the next pressure wave will be able to destroy you.

Because terran and protoss can produce both workers AND an army at the same time in rounds, they have an advantage early game where zerg really has to just drone hard to keep up in worker count until a certain point where zerg leap frogs them. So the earlier you put pressure on a zerg, as long as you keep making workers you will get a commanding economic lead over them. Then the zerg holds off your attack and you are ahead 24 to 14 workers, the zerg still can not drone up because your standing army will still be much larger than his unless he continues to use his larvae on an army, and if he uses his larvae on an army, then he loses because your economy is so much better than his.

This is why the basic principle of zerg is do not make an army until you have to.

On December 07 2010 20:19 Dente wrote:
I want to hear a sollution from idra and ret. Marine nerf? Spinecrawler buff? I really don't know what blizzard can do about this. Make queen avaible without pool (= extra larvae early)?

Spine crawler build time would be the only thing that wouldn't entirely change the race. And the build time makes no sense to me anyway. Spine crawlers take 50 seconds to complete, photon cannons take 40 and they shoot up and down, bunkers take 35, spore crawlers 30, missile turrets 25. I think the build time on spine crawlers should get 5 or 10 seconds shaved off. They take way to fucking long to build.

And the root time is an hour.

On December 08 2010 03:19 ltortoise wrote:
This thread confuses me.

I thought we already have a thread detailing that 11 pool, 18 hatch has superior larvae production to 15 hatch, 14 pool? Or is that thread a lie?

11pool/18hatch is becoming the new 7 roach rush. Everyone is spreading it everywhere claiming it is this amazing new build when in reality it is quite behind compared to 14hatch. You have larvae down time with 11pool, no creep at your natural, less drones and minerals, and you make it very easy for terran to stop your expansion. You do not get more larvae production.

11overpool is fine versus protoss and zerg but it doesnt have a place versus terrans (at least good ones.)

And if you are referring to the graph proving 11pool/18hatch has superior production, he is comparing it to 13 pool/15 hatch.
If I was you then I would prolly hate on me too. http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/MorsCerta
1Eris1
Profile Joined September 2010
United States5797 Posts
December 07 2010 18:42 GMT
#71
actually this is pretty interesting. i always though pool first was better, but i see what he's saying.
Known Aliases: Tyragon, Valeric ~MSL Forever, SKT is truly the Superior KT!
PhiliBiRD
Profile Joined November 2009
United States2643 Posts
December 07 2010 18:46 GMT
#72
u ppl act like idra/artosis saying so means anything? come on they lose to anything and call imba terran or imba map.

its definitely not unstoppable, but i think the issu comes where u dont know if hes committing or expanding and then u have no idea on how to defend. so thre is an issue.
Jermstuddog
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States2231 Posts
December 07 2010 18:47 GMT
#73
On December 08 2010 03:37 MorsCerta wrote:
Spine crawler build time would be the only thing that wouldn't entirely change the race. And the build time makes no sense to me anyway. Spine crawlers take 50 seconds to complete, photon cannons take 40 and they shoot up and down, bunkers take 35, spore crawlers 30, missile turrets 25. I think the build time on spine crawlers should get 5 or 10 seconds shaved off. They take way to fucking long to build.

And the root time is an hour.


Spine Crawlers also have short range and low DPS when used to defend against marines.

1 spine crawler does roughly 18 dps, or the equivalent of 1 1/2 marines. For 3x the cost, that's a poor deal.

You also have 2 major vulnerabilities in Marine rushes. There's the hatch itself and your ramp toward your main. That means you have to spend 300 minerals in spine crawlers and you'll only ever have 1 of them attacking at any given time, sad to say, but I think buffing spine crawlers would do very little.
As it turns out, marines don't actually cost any money -Jinro
ltortoise
Profile Joined August 2010
633 Posts
December 07 2010 18:48 GMT
#74
On December 08 2010 03:37 MorsCerta wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 08 2010 03:19 ltortoise wrote:
This thread confuses me.

I thought we already have a thread detailing that 11 pool, 18 hatch has superior larvae production to 15 hatch, 14 pool? Or is that thread a lie?

11pool/18hatch is becoming the new 7 roach rush. Everyone is spreading it everywhere claiming it is this amazing new build when in reality it is quite behind compared to 14hatch. You have larvae down time with 11pool, no creep at your natural, less drones and minerals, and you make it very easy for terran to stop your expansion. You do not get more larvae production.

11overpool is fine versus protoss and zerg but it doesnt have a place versus terrans (at least good ones.)

And if you are referring to the graph proving 11pool/18hatch has superior production, he is comparing it to 13 pool/15 hatch.


See now I'm even more confused. Maybe you can set me straight.

You say you don't get more larvae production... Correct me if I'm wrong but with the 11 pool, 18 hatch build you get a much faster first queen, and therefore a much faster first inject. This implies to me that during a large window of time (from start to before the 15 hatch finishes), the 11 pool should be ahead on larvae due to having the queen out before hand.

Again correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems pretty straightforward to me.
TLOBrian
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States453 Posts
December 07 2010 18:48 GMT
#75
Hatch first SHOULD die to early attacks. IMO, in the state that the Zerg is being played with the early pool openings into heavy eco, Hatch first (in my eyes) is nothing more than economic cheese that isn't very effective.

Early pool (10-12) with an expo (16-18) is ALWAYS going to be more flexible AND economic than a hatch first build because of the early queen, production capacity, ability to rush, eco, or tech at a moments notice. You're not locked into "Shit I made a hatch first build, I have to lay down 4 spine crawlers as soon as its done to survive."

What happens if they delay your hatch anyways?

Hasn't it been a more recent practice to build an engineering bay ASAP on the zerg expansion to block it? What then? You delay your hatch and pool. It then becomes a like 15-16 pool first build, which is drastically inferior to 11-12 pool builds.

You decide. Are the pros always right in everything?

I seriously doubt they've tried 11 pool 18 hatching AT ALL.
Steven Bonnell II is the friggin man.
Enervate
Profile Joined August 2010
United States1769 Posts
December 07 2010 18:58 GMT
#76
On December 08 2010 03:48 TLOBrian wrote:
Hatch first SHOULD die to early attacks. IMO, in the state that the Zerg is being played with the early pool openings into heavy eco, Hatch first (in my eyes) is nothing more than economic cheese that isn't very effective.

Early pool (10-12) with an expo (16-18) is ALWAYS going to be more flexible AND economic than a hatch first build because of the early queen, production capacity, ability to rush, eco, or tech at a moments notice. You're not locked into "Shit I made a hatch first build, I have to lay down 4 spine crawlers as soon as its done to survive."

What happens if they delay your hatch anyways?

Hasn't it been a more recent practice to build an engineering bay ASAP on the zerg expansion to block it? What then? You delay your hatch and pool. It then becomes a like 15-16 pool first build, which is drastically inferior to 11-12 pool builds.

You decide. Are the pros always right in everything?

I seriously doubt they've tried 11 pool 18 hatching AT ALL.

First of all, I am sure the pros have tried it. Second of all, early pool is NOT more flexible AND economic. It is EITHER flexible OR economic. Really the only way it can be economic is if your opponent applies no pressure and you make nothing but drones and then a hatch.
fleeze
Profile Joined March 2010
Germany895 Posts
December 07 2010 19:05 GMT
#77
this thread is full of wrong assumptions like the 11pool 18 hatch thread.
the 11 pool/18 hatch is bullshit against any early aggression. PERIOD.
- you are BEHIND until your first spawn larvae comes
- you are even more BEHIND if you don't spend those larvae on drones
- you probably won't hold the 18 hatch!
- you have no creep at the ramp
- you have fewer larvae at key timings
stop spreading this false rumor that the build is any good against early pushes.

You decide. Are the pros always right in everything?

I seriously doubt they've tried 11 pool 18 hatching AT ALL.

i strongly believe that the pros have figured out any possible opening and that nestea as an example has practiced against the 2 rax push very often. yet he came to the conclussion 14 hatch is superior. don't you think these players actually KNOW what they are talking about AND can back it up with their intense training of the matchup? you on the other hand.... relying on a dumb thread full of false informations with questionable measurements for rating builds...
Jacobs Ladder
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1705 Posts
December 07 2010 19:19 GMT
#78
I'm not a Z player, so I'm probably completely off base, but what about an in base hatch before pool? You don't need your second hatch to be at you expansion until you're saturated. It gives you more larva to defend. I also understand that you usually need a macro hatch if you plan on going Muta Ling because lings are so larva intensive.
Communism
Profile Joined November 2010
United States176 Posts
December 07 2010 19:20 GMT
#79
On December 08 2010 04:05 fleeze wrote:
this thread is full of wrong assumptions like the 11pool 18 hatch thread.
the 11 pool/18 hatch is bullshit against any early aggression. PERIOD.
- you are BEHIND until your first spawn larvae comes
- you are even more BEHIND if you don't spend those larvae on drones
- you probably won't hold the 18 hatch!
- you have no creep at the ramp
- you have fewer larvae at key timings
stop spreading this false rumor that the build is any good against early pushes.

Show nested quote +
You decide. Are the pros always right in everything?

I seriously doubt they've tried 11 pool 18 hatching AT ALL.

i strongly believe that the pros have figured out any possible opening and that nestea as an example has practiced against the 2 rax push very often. yet he came to the conclussion 14 hatch is superior. don't you think these players actually KNOW what they are talking about AND can back it up with their intense training of the matchup? you on the other hand.... relying on a dumb thread full of false informations with questionable measurements for rating builds...


Go read (note actually process the text and dont just spew more garbage from your mouth) Jdismoreglass' threads that do EXTENSIVE research on the 11 overpool build at many different key timings, and show that if it is behind a build in larvae count, minerals mined or drone count its only by a marginal amount. All of your points on the overpool build are unsupported and false. If you actually get down to it the timing on a properly executed 11 overpool the expo comes less than a minute later than on a 14 hatch. How can you say that you wont be able to defend the expo, when you can have a spine crawler already built, so that as soon as your expo pops you can go plop it down and you already have your second queen before the expo pops, so you actually have MORE larvae if you execute this propoerly. If you actually read the research of people who have spent countless hours testing this... (or go test it yourself) you will see this.

I agree with the fact that I seriously doubt they have tried this build, because up until a few weeks ago basically all builds with a pool before 13 were discarded as all in plays. Im almost certain that when Idra and Ret did their testing, they didnt even test any builds with a pool earlier than 13/14, because of preconceived notions (read. stubborness) that arise from their extensive understanding and mastery of the metagame.
SlipperySnake
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
248 Posts
December 07 2010 19:27 GMT
#80
So many cries of builds being overpowered. Idra is already complaining about how the new Protoss air build is OP. This is starting to get ridiculous just seems like zerg players constantly whining. Either that or they just whine the loudest.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 10h 16m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 224
StarCraft: Brood War
sSak 59
Sexy 54
NaDa 45
ivOry 16
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1318
League of Legends
Dendi933
JimRising 332
syndereN168
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe300
Other Games
summit1g15053
tarik_tv7388
Day[9].tv769
shahzam664
ViBE259
C9.Mang0175
ToD155
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 14 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Hupsaiya 115
• davetesta51
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 29
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Day9tv769
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
10h 16m
Serral vs Cure
Solar vs Classic
OSC
13h 16m
CranKy Ducklings
1d 9h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 13h
CSO Cup
1d 15h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 17h
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
[ Show More ]
Online Event
4 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
5 days
The PondCast
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.