• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 08:10
CEST 14:10
KST 21:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week2[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation14$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced6Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles6[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL67
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Season 1 - Final Week Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation TL Team Map Contest #4: Winners Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament $25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL [G] Progamer Settings ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Positive Thoughts on Setting Up a Dual-Caliber FX
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Men Take Risks, Women Win Ga…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 684 users

Pushing The Limits of Zerg Economy Builds - Page 8

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 21 Next All
IzieBoy
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
United States865 Posts
December 11 2010 04:14 GMT
#141
wow cool so 14 hatch 15 pool might be the winning ticket for 4v4s
Let's Do This! Leeeeeeeeeeeeeroy Jenkins!
jacobman
Profile Joined December 2010
217 Posts
December 11 2010 04:25 GMT
#142
On December 11 2010 13:06 Skrag wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2010 12:53 jacobman wrote:
I'm pretty sure that 24 drones can actually mine effectively on 8 patches. Each patch can support 3 drones as far as I know. The issue is that it takes them a really long time to reach equilibrium.

I never actually tested this though. It's possible some patches are close enough that they can't support 3 drones? It's also possible that the line doesn't reach equilibrium before it's mined out. I don't really know, but I've always thought that 24 drones can mine on a line.


I'm absolutely positive they can't, and did *extensive* testing during the beta on it.

Mineral patches that are "close" to the hatchery can only be mined by 2 workers at a time. Patches that are further away can be mined by 3. If you ever see any workers bouncing around from patch to patch, those workers are not contributing to your economy at all.

Xel'Naga has 4 close patches, where most maps only have 2, so the maximum number of workers in the mains is 20. (4 patches that can support 2 workers, 4 that can support 3)

In that base, 24 workers will mine at almost exactly the same rate as 20. I didn't test this on XelNaga specifically (because it didn't actually exist at the time), I tested on Lost Temple, which has two "close" patches in the main, and 30 workers mined at almost the exact same rate as 22. There is a *very* small improvement, because the timing on the close patches is not 100% perfect, and there's a very small gap that can be improved upon if there are enough extra workers bouncing around, but the benefit is really really really small, and definitely not worth the extra worker.

Also, even though the base *can* support 20 miners, the last worker or two that the patches can support will often take so long to settle in that they're not worth building unless you're intentionally oversaturating to expand, and even then, it's going to be better to have them distance mine at the expansion than to interfere with the routines at the main.

I haven't figured out which patches on the expansions are too close to support 3 workers, so I don't know what the max number of drones at the expansion is, but more than 20 at the main is definitely too many.


Interesting. I didn't know that. I'm not going to change it though. I want to keep the builds consistent.
jacobman
Profile Joined December 2010
217 Posts
December 11 2010 04:26 GMT
#143
On December 11 2010 13:14 IzieBoy wrote:
wow cool so 14 hatch 15 pool might be the winning ticket for 4v4s


It might be. Don't get too attached to one build yet. Check back in like a week and we'll likely have more builds for comparison. Right now the number of hatch first builds tested is kind of weak.
Drae
Profile Joined December 2010
70 Posts
December 11 2010 06:01 GMT
#144
Simple question.

Why is the seconds lost for transferring workers in the build order 19 seconds for 13p15h and 21 seconds for the other builds?
jacobman
Profile Joined December 2010
217 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-11 07:06:30
December 11 2010 06:14 GMT
#145
On December 11 2010 15:01 Drae wrote:
Simple question.

Why is the seconds lost for transferring workers in the build order 19 seconds for 13p15h and 21 seconds for the other builds?

First of all, just for clarification, that note is only meant for the BO tester that I listed. I'm currently only using that to help with overlord timings and finding new builds. That is not used in any way for the AI testing.

I included in this time the time lost when you brought the drone to make the hatchery. Since there was no easy way to input this in the BO tester that I knew of. I found it to take about 15 seconds to get to the expansion location. Minus the 3 seconds already included in the building delay brings it to 12. If you divide that between two transfered drones that is 6 extra per drone to make up for the drone that went to make the hatch. 15+6 = 21. With 3 drones transfered 12/3 = 4 and 15+4=19
Drae
Profile Joined December 2010
70 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-11 09:46:04
December 11 2010 09:43 GMT
#146
On December 11 2010 15:14 jacobman wrote:
First of all, just for clarification, that note is only meant for the BO tester that I listed. I'm currently only using that to help with overlord timings and finding new builds. That is not used in any way for the AI testing.

I included in this time the time lost when you brought the drone to make the hatchery. Since there was no easy way to input this in the BO tester that I knew of. I found it to take about 15 seconds to get to the expansion location. Minus the 3 seconds already included in the building delay brings it to 12. If you divide that between two transfered drones that is 6 extra per drone to make up for the drone that went to make the hatch. 15+6 = 21. With 3 drones transfered 12/3 = 4 and 15+4=19


The problem with this method is that you are accounting for lost income from the hatchery drones transfer time much later in the build order than actually would occur.

Based on the syntax info page for that BO tester, I think a better way to account for time lost for travel time for the expansion would be the scout then proxy command. Then just use the transfer command as normal.

BO tester script then looks like this;

# Startup Build Delay = 3 Seconds
10 Extractor trick
11 Overlord
11 Spawning Pool
16 Queen then constant Spawn Larvae
@150 minerals scout (15 seconds)
@300 minerals proxy Hatchery, then transfer 2 Drones (15 seconds)
17 Overlord
18 Overlord
21 Queen then constant spawn larvae
28 Overlord
36 Overlord

The same can be used for any of the builds you listed.
jacobman
Profile Joined December 2010
217 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-11 09:50:30
December 11 2010 09:48 GMT
#147
On December 11 2010 18:43 Drae wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 11 2010 15:14 jacobman wrote:
First of all, just for clarification, that note is only meant for the BO tester that I listed. I'm currently only using that to help with overlord timings and finding new builds. That is not used in any way for the AI testing.

I included in this time the time lost when you brought the drone to make the hatchery. Since there was no easy way to input this in the BO tester that I knew of. I found it to take about 15 seconds to get to the expansion location. Minus the 3 seconds already included in the building delay brings it to 12. If you divide that between two transfered drones that is 6 extra per drone to make up for the drone that went to make the hatch. 15+6 = 21. With 3 drones transfered 12/3 = 4 and 15+4=19


The problem with this method is that you are accounting for lost income from the hatchery drones transfer time much later in the build order than actually would occur.

Based on the syntax info page for that BO tester, I think a better way to account for time lost for travel time for the expansion would be the scout then proxy command. Then just use the transfer command as normal.

BO tester script then looks like this;

# Startup Build Delay = 3 Seconds
10 Extractor trick
11 Overlord
11 Spawning Pool
16 Queen then constant Spawn Larvae
@150 minerals scout (15 seconds)
@300 minerals proxy Hatchery, then transfer 2 Drones (15 seconds)
17 Overlord
18 Overlord
21 Queen then constant spawn larvae
28 Overlord
36 Overlord

The same can be used for any of the builds you listed.


That does sound like it would be better. Thanks for the idea. I'll use that from now on. I'll probably go back and change the old BO when I get the chance.

This doesn't change my final results at all, since those weren't reliant on the BO tester, but your idea will make me a little more confident that I've found a good build on the BO tester when I do.

Have any build orders that you think would stack up with the 14/14 or 14/15 builds? I'm really curious if those actually are the builds with the greatest economic potential.
Drae
Profile Joined December 2010
70 Posts
December 11 2010 09:56 GMT
#148
On December 11 2010 18:48 jacobman wrote:

That does sound like it would be better. Thanks for the idea. I'll use that from now on. I'll probably go back and change the old BO when I get the chance.

This doesn't change my final results at all, since those weren't reliant on the BO tester, but your idea will make me a little more confident that I've found a good build on the BO tester when I do.



This news probably wont make you more confident

I just reviewed the output from the script and its bugged for multiple queens;

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=159994&currentpage=12#225

Its probably not a great script to using to base your analysis on.

Is there a link to the AI that Skragg is using? I am sure its on one of the four or so threads, but I cant find it.

On December 11 2010 18:48 jacobman wrote:

Have any build orders that you think would stack up with the 14/14 or 14/15 builds? I'm really curious if those actually are the builds with the greatest economic potential.



First thing I am going to do is post an optimized version of the 11p18h build. The one that is being used is off by a fair bit. The 18OL should be a 20 OL. Ill post a proper build once I can get a replay of it in a ladder 1v1.

Ill look at the other builds if I can find the time.
Bobgrimly
Profile Joined July 2010
New Zealand250 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-11 10:02:50
December 11 2010 10:01 GMT
#149
not a great player but just looking at the graphs it would seem that the difference is up to 200 mins at the 6:20 mark. I know that can make a difference but with the flexibility of earlier pools it makes sense to go pool first especially with all the terrans rushing. And so although the arguements for and against might rage on what at least this information purely shows, is that no matter what bo you go you won't really suffer in the early game enough economically to justify saying hatch first is a must for eco games.

Unless I suck at reading graphs...

Not talking about the top pros... 200 mins will probably make a difference if they can defend the early hatch. But for the other 99% of us pool first won't really make a huge difference.
For the swarm
jacobman
Profile Joined December 2010
217 Posts
December 11 2010 10:06 GMT
#150
Haha, I'm using AI too Drae. I don't when the last time you checked this thread was, but we actually changed directions from a day or two ago. None of the analysis is based on the build order tester. That's only a tool to help perhaps steer us towards other builds to try.

AI testing was the best idea we could come up with for testing the builds, so each build has been run by AI in the REAL GAME. The results for that are the one's that are posted. Each build was run 5 times too to get an average which better represents the build.

If you have any improvements to the builds I already have listed or if you have a new build, I would love to hear them. If you give me a detailed build order I'll actually test it right away.

Also, there is no link to the AI that Skragg is using. However, I did post example replays of my AI running each build. If you watch those, it should download the map and you can see the script that I'm using there. I have to warn you though, my coding is really really really unorganized and inefficient. I was just trying to get the job done, and I did not worry about making the code pretty. Also, there are some artifacts in the code from things I tried that did not work, which do not affect the game-play.
Drae
Profile Joined December 2010
70 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-11 10:15:28
December 11 2010 10:14 GMT
#151
On December 11 2010 18:56 Drae wrote:

This news probably wont make you more confident

I just reviewed the output from the script and its bugged for multiple queens;

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=159994&currentpage=12#225



Ignore that, its actually a bug in the completion time for the second queen, not the first larvae spit from the second queen. The second queen is listed as having a 60second production time, when it should be 50. That means that the second queens first larvae spit is on time at 50 secs.

So the bug has no impact on the output.

On December 11 2010 19:06 jacobman wrote:
Haha, I'm using AI too Drae. I don't when the last time you checked this thread was, but we actually changed directions from a day or two ago. None of the analysis is based on the build order tester. That's only a tool to help perhaps steer us towards other builds to try.

AI testing was the best idea we could come up with for testing the builds, so each build has been run by AI in the REAL GAME. The results for that are the one's that are posted. Each build was run 5 times too to get an average which better represents the build.

If you have any improvements to the builds I already have listed or if you have a new build, I would love to hear them. If you give me a detailed build order I'll actually test it right away.

Also, there is no link to the AI that Skragg is using. However, I did post example replays of my AI running each build. If you watch those, it should download the map and you can see the script that I'm using there. I have to warn you though, my coding is really really really unorganized and inefficient. I was just trying to get the job done, and I did not worry about making the code pretty. Also, there are some artifacts in the code from things I tried that did not work, which do not affect the game-play.


Fair enough, I'll just post the build orders when I have one optimized and let you test it
jacobman
Profile Joined December 2010
217 Posts
December 11 2010 10:16 GMT
#152
On December 11 2010 19:01 Bobgrimly wrote:
not a great player but just looking at the graphs it would seem that the difference is up to 200 mins at the 6:20 mark. I know that can make a difference but with the flexibility of earlier pools it makes sense to go pool first especially with all the terrans rushing. And so although the arguements for and against might rage on what at least this information purely shows, is that no matter what bo you go you won't really suffer in the early game enough economically to justify saying hatch first is a must for eco games.

Unless I suck at reading graphs...

Not talking about the top pros... 200 mins will probably make a difference if they can defend the early hatch. But for the other 99% of us pool first won't really make a huge difference.


Haha, you don't suck at reading graphs. I understand where you're coming from. I'm trying not make up peoples mind on which build they want to use. That's why I break down the analysis into pool first and hatch first. Although the good players can defend hatch first on many maps, many other people just aren't skilled enough to do this and will have more fun with other builds, even if other builds will work better if played best.

For many people I just want this thread to be informative and perhaps help them decide which build works best for them. For the really good players it helps pinpoint the builds that will give them that essential tiny boost to their game if they figure out how to defend it.
AcOrP
Profile Joined November 2009
Bulgaria148 Posts
December 11 2010 10:46 GMT
#153
I don't think this is good way to develop solid build orders. Yes it is always good to know what advantages and disadvantages each build order give you. But for hatch 1st builds what happen when you hatch get denied by manner pylon or bunker ? That is more important to me than how much minerals and larva you have @ 6:20. Becouse pool 1st builds will always give you better results in such cases. So we need to find the Best economy build considering all the factors.
jacobman
Profile Joined December 2010
217 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-11 11:22:57
December 11 2010 11:20 GMT
#154
On December 11 2010 19:46 AcOrP wrote:
I don't think this is good way to develop solid build orders. Yes it is always good to know what advantages and disadvantages each build order give you. But for hatch 1st builds what happen when you hatch get denied by manner pylon or bunker ? That is more important to me than how much minerals and larva you have @ 6:20. Becouse pool 1st builds will always give you better results in such cases. So we need to find the Best economy build considering all the factors.



If you don't like hatch first builds, then don't use them. Currently I'm not saying much of anything about the competative dynamics of the builds. I haven't received a single replay on any of the builds, which is what I was going to base such analysis on.

If you are right about hatch first builds, then I have a multitude of pool first builds with different economic potentials for you to try.

Your criticism, while possible, isn't really constructive. You give no direction to head in. At least with the current testing there is some information being delivered.

In addition to this, when you find the top builds, without interference, you can then branch off into different scenarios to figure out what effect certain challenges have and how those might be tackled. The kind of information we're gathering right now gives you a good base to branch off from.

Really, when it comes down to it, the more information the better. People can make different assumptions based off of what I'm posting, but having this information is still better than not having it.
Skrag
Profile Joined May 2010
United States643 Posts
December 11 2010 20:32 GMT
#155
On December 11 2010 18:56 Drae wrote:
Is there a link to the AI that Skragg is using? I am sure its on one of the four or so threads, but I cant find it.


No. The AI is just a bunch of triggers added to the official Xel'Naga Caverns map. I could post the map somewhere, but I wanted to add a few more builds to it before doing so, and even then, unless you're comfortable using the map editor, you won't be able to switch between builds and run it, which required a trigger change. It's a very simple change, but it does require using the map editor.

I'm going to try to post a replay though, to see if other people can watch it without actually having the map, which seems to work for jacobman's version. Maybe enough data is stored in the replay that you don't actually have to have all the trigger logic and whatnot.
"Just go *@#$ing kill him!" -- Day[9] "Thanks for being a jackass though! Enjoy your time on the forums!" - Artosis
Skrag
Profile Joined May 2010
United States643 Posts
December 11 2010 22:18 GMT
#156
Ok, gamereplays.org won't even let me upload the replay, claiming it's corrupted, presumably because the way I've done things won't allow for viewing the replay without the map. I'm guessing it's because I actually made changes to the terrain layer, adding some locator points.
"Just go *@#$ing kill him!" -- Day[9] "Thanks for being a jackass though! Enjoy your time on the forums!" - Artosis
Schnullerbacke13
Profile Joined August 2010
Germany1199 Posts
December 12 2010 01:14 GMT
#157
Why is nobody trying earlier hatches ?

* Early hatch (=more larvae) makes up somewhat for the larvae loss while waiting at 11
* Scout block of hatch not that easy, because its very early
* Hatch finished round 3.20 => harder to bunker rush, because of creeps spread
* earlier pool, earlier queen => more larvae
* economically not that weak, feels like a true hatch first :-)

10 Extractor Trick into Drone
11 Overlord
11 Hatchery
13 Spawning Pool
16 Queen, then constant Spawn Larvae
18 Overlord
23 Overlord
24 Queen, then constant Spawn Larvae
26 Overlord
21 is half the truth
Skrag
Profile Joined May 2010
United States643 Posts
December 12 2010 01:36 GMT
#158
Because an early queen is better than an early hatch, and I guarantee that build is going to waste so much larvae while waiting for 300 that it will at least offset (and maybe worse) the extra larvae from the faster hatch. 11 overpool barely squeaks by wasting half a larva, and it doesn't have to wait for 300 mins.

Building your second queen at 24supply is going to put you even further behind just about everything else in larvae as well.

Unless you can produce a replay that can compete economically with any of the other builds tested, it doesn't even seem worth the time to add the AI for it.
"Just go *@#$ing kill him!" -- Day[9] "Thanks for being a jackass though! Enjoy your time on the forums!" - Artosis
Drae
Profile Joined December 2010
70 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-12 01:55:34
December 12 2010 01:53 GMT
#159
My optimized 11p18h build;

Build Order
+ Show Spoiler +
# Startup Build Delay = 3 Seconds
10 Extractor trick
11 Overlord
11 Spawning Pool
16 Queen then constant Spawn Larvae
@150 minerals scout (15 seconds)
@300 minerals proxy Hatchery, then transfer 8 Drones (15 seconds)
17 Overlord
20 Overlord
20 Queen then constant spawn larvae
28 Overlord
36 Overlord
52 Cancel Drone

BO Calc Output

Replay of build vs AI
There are two errors in the replay. I Maynard 7 drones instead of 8, and make a 35OL instead of 36.

The main differences between this build and the previous one;
1: 20 OL instead of 18 OL. 18OL was finishing well in advance of the Larvae pop from the Queens first Larvae Spit and was unnecessarily early and delaying 19 drone.
2: Maynarding 8 drones instead of 2. This is a significant difference between the 11p18h and the 14h15p builds. 11p18h has 24 drones when the hatchery finishes, compared to the 18 that 14h15p has. Maynarding for the 11p18h is therefore much more effective than it is for the 14h15p.

I'll look at the other builds you mentioned and post up any results if they look decent.
Cambam
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
United States360 Posts
December 12 2010 02:04 GMT
#160
SCBuildOrder says 12 pool 16 hatch is best. Sounds good if it's true, since the pool finishes around 2:40. Here's the BO:

+ Show Spoiler +
10 Extractor Trick
11 Overlord
12 Spawning Pool
14 Queen
16 Hatchery
16 Overlord
18 Queen
21 Overlord
29 Overlord
40 Overlord


Also, I'd like to see the results for 16 pool 15 hatch. Very economical, while being a little safer because pool finishes around 3:10. Though the hatch is susceptible to getting blocked . Don't really have a refined build for it.

Hmm...while trying to find a refined build for it, EvolutionChamber came up with this build:

+ Show Spoiler +
9 Overlord
16 SpawningPool
15 Hatchery
15 Overlord
15 Hatchery
15 Queen
22 Queen
26 Overlord
28 Overlord
38 Overlord


It'd be interesting to see how a 3 hatch build compares to all these 2 hatch builds. The extra larva would be nice if you're planning on making a lot of lings or roaches (larva intensive units) after you get your econ going.
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 10 21 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
RSL Revival
10:00
Season 1: Playoffs Day 5
Clem vs ReynorLIVE!
Crank 1373
Tasteless1078
ComeBackTV 933
IndyStarCraft 157
Rex135
3DClanTV 73
IntoTheiNu 49
LiquipediaDiscussion
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Crank 1373
Tasteless 1078
IndyStarCraft 157
Rex 135
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 28164
Sea 23293
Rain 3745
Bisu 3250
Jaedong 1285
Hyuk 806
Light 648
Pusan 634
Mini 502
firebathero 472
[ Show more ]
actioN 305
Zeus 290
Stork 284
EffOrt 224
Backho 166
Hyun 158
ToSsGirL 143
Soulkey 127
hero 76
Snow 75
Mind 67
JYJ38
sas.Sziky 34
sSak 34
Rush 33
Shinee 32
Aegong 29
Sea.KH 29
Sharp 23
Icarus 21
JulyZerg 21
Sacsri 17
Free 16
yabsab 14
Noble 13
Movie 10
ajuk12(nOOB) 10
Hm[arnc] 7
SilentControl 7
IntoTheRainbow 6
ivOry 5
sorry 3
Dota 2
Gorgc8290
XaKoH 454
XcaliburYe305
League of Legends
singsing1843
Counter-Strike
x6flipin518
flusha324
allub284
markeloff41
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor151
Other Games
tarik_tv24331
B2W.Neo984
shahzam649
DeMusliM484
crisheroes483
Fuzer 257
RotterdaM191
Liquid`RaSZi180
Pyrionflax139
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick28828
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 11
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Stunt474
Upcoming Events
OSC
50m
Replay Cast
11h 50m
RSL Revival
21h 50m
Classic vs Cure
FEL
1d 3h
OSC
1d 7h
RSL Revival
1d 21h
FEL
1d 23h
FEL
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
2 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
FEL
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
CSL Xiamen Invitational: ShowMatche
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.