• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 16:36
CEST 22:36
KST 05:36
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202560RSL Season 1 - Final Week9[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams10Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings What tournaments are world championships? #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time The StarCraft 2 GOAT - An in-depth analysis Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation #239 Bad Weather Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava
Brood War
General
Ginuda's JaeDong Interview Series [Update] ShieldBattery: 2025 Redesign BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion Dewalt's Show Matches in China
Tourneys
[Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational [CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET
Strategy
Does 1 second matter in StarCraft? [G] Mineral Boosting Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Post Pic of your Favorite Food!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Eight Anniversary as a TL…
Mizenhauer
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 761 users

[D] TvP--why hellions are really really good against P - P…

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
August 27 2010 19:00 GMT
#81
Thanks Jay for the input. Again, I don't think ignitor is a cost-effective option against a 1-base Protoss. Terran should not research it until P expands. As for the later game, I guess I'd have to see a replay, but in my testing, well-controlled MMM+ignitor hellion beats any P composition that doesn't involve collosi which, in turn, are easily countered by vikings. It sounds like Terran was simply behind by the time that P was going zealot-HT. I find it hard to believe that T was worse off with MMM+single factory ignitor hellion against zealot-HT than he would have been with pure MMM. It may be that T was simply going to lose either way.
onionchowder
Profile Joined July 2009
United States137 Posts
August 27 2010 19:17 GMT
#82
I definitely agree with this - I've been experimenting with Marauder-Hellion in TvP. One thing you may also want to note is that Hellions are great for bringing down Immortals' shields as well, and shield-less immortals fall very quickly to marauders.
Eric Guan is a sexy beast
mahnini
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
United States6862 Posts
August 27 2010 19:35 GMT
#83
On August 27 2010 06:40 kcdc wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2010 04:43 Ezareth wrote:
One correction:

Maurauders take 17 shots to kill one Zealot.

10 * 5 shots against the 50 shields +
10- 1 * 12 shots against the 100 Health due to the 1 armor. The last shot is for 1 hitpoint.


Thanks. Corrected in OP.

Show nested quote +
On August 27 2010 04:51 Jayrod wrote:
I dont see why so many T's are opposed to trying them out or are stuck in this mindset that hellions are only a harassment tool (one of MANY). People point out stalkers, but honestly stalkers are barely viable in this matchup at all and would only be gotten for blink harass or in response to some type of air. This is because stalkers are pathetic against mass bio and almost every terran build has a little bio involved at a minimum.


Exactly. Stalkers get crushed by marauders and lose for cost to marines, even without combat shield. Throw in medivacs and stim the whole ball, and, well, getting a large number of stalkers aginst any amount of bio is a joke. Immortals are a similar story. They get crushed by marines and lose for cost to stimmed marauders. The only situation in which immortals are good against bio is if zealots are tanking the shots.

And you're also right that hellions become better and better as the game goes on. Protoss becomes more spread out defending multiple bases and has to rely increasingly on the efficiency of zealots to compete with MMM. In steps the hellion with pre-ignitor to screw over a mid-to-late game Protoss on both fronts. Honestly, I don't know what P's mid/late-game answer is to pre-ignitor hellions. Once you're on 3 bases, it's a nightmare to try to kill 4 hellions before they can get off a single shot on one of your mineral lines. Cannons simply don't kill them fast enough. And in the main army, if you add more stalkers and immortals, you just lose to the MMM. For now, my plan is to kill them before they remember that pre-ignitor hellions exist.

IMO, the Terran players who don't understand the threat of hellions just don't yet realize how critical zealots are against bio. Sure, hellions aren't good against any other Protoss unit, but if you can neutralize the zealot, you've effectively defeated the entire Protoss composition.

you may or may not believe it but people also used to think dragoons sucked in pvt and it's kind of true. cost for cost, they were worse than vultures and tanks but they were still the staple damage dealer in the protoss army. the same thing goes for stalkers. i don't see a problem mid-late game of walling your expos with pylons or just clogging up the area behind the min lines and simcity your expos more since you can warp units in anywhere anyway. if all else fails maybe you could just build an extra gateway or two to keep idle (most of the time) and deal with various harassment.

i don't know, i play bio a lot (that's all i know how to do) and i'm never really intimidated by any number of zealots, marauder/medivac in large numbers with slow just melt them and if i didn't feel like marauders were good enough i'd just mix in some marines. tvp i'm much more concerned with collossi / ht.
the world's a playground. you know that when you're a kid, but somewhere along the way everyone forgets it.
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-27 20:48:36
August 27 2010 20:00 GMT
#84
On August 28 2010 04:35 mahnini wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 27 2010 06:40 kcdc wrote:
On August 27 2010 04:43 Ezareth wrote:
One correction:

Maurauders take 17 shots to kill one Zealot.

10 * 5 shots against the 50 shields +
10- 1 * 12 shots against the 100 Health due to the 1 armor. The last shot is for 1 hitpoint.


Thanks. Corrected in OP.

On August 27 2010 04:51 Jayrod wrote:
I dont see why so many T's are opposed to trying them out or are stuck in this mindset that hellions are only a harassment tool (one of MANY). People point out stalkers, but honestly stalkers are barely viable in this matchup at all and would only be gotten for blink harass or in response to some type of air. This is because stalkers are pathetic against mass bio and almost every terran build has a little bio involved at a minimum.


Exactly. Stalkers get crushed by marauders and lose for cost to marines, even without combat shield. Throw in medivacs and stim the whole ball, and, well, getting a large number of stalkers aginst any amount of bio is a joke. Immortals are a similar story. They get crushed by marines and lose for cost to stimmed marauders. The only situation in which immortals are good against bio is if zealots are tanking the shots.

And you're also right that hellions become better and better as the game goes on. Protoss becomes more spread out defending multiple bases and has to rely increasingly on the efficiency of zealots to compete with MMM. In steps the hellion with pre-ignitor to screw over a mid-to-late game Protoss on both fronts. Honestly, I don't know what P's mid/late-game answer is to pre-ignitor hellions. Once you're on 3 bases, it's a nightmare to try to kill 4 hellions before they can get off a single shot on one of your mineral lines. Cannons simply don't kill them fast enough. And in the main army, if you add more stalkers and immortals, you just lose to the MMM. For now, my plan is to kill them before they remember that pre-ignitor hellions exist.

IMO, the Terran players who don't understand the threat of hellions just don't yet realize how critical zealots are against bio. Sure, hellions aren't good against any other Protoss unit, but if you can neutralize the zealot, you've effectively defeated the entire Protoss composition.

you may or may not believe it but people also used to think dragoons sucked in pvt and it's kind of true. cost for cost, they were worse than vultures and tanks but they were still the staple damage dealer in the protoss army. the same thing goes for stalkers. i don't see a problem mid-late game of walling your expos with pylons or just clogging up the area behind the min lines and simcity your expos more since you can warp units in anywhere anyway. if all else fails maybe you could just build an extra gateway or two to keep idle (most of the time) and deal with various harassment.

i don't know, i play bio a lot (that's all i know how to do) and i'm never really intimidated by any number of zealots, marauder/medivac in large numbers with slow just melt them and if i didn't feel like marauders were good enough i'd just mix in some marines. tvp i'm much more concerned with collossi / ht.


Good comparison re: stalker/dragoon vs T. Neither is 'efficient', but both are necessary in their respecitve games. The big difference between the respective roles of the dragoon and the stalker against Terran in SC:BW and SC2, however, is the presence of the marauder in SC2. In BW, the dragoon wasn't hard-countered by any Terran unit. Sieged tanks and mines would take goons down pretty quickly, but you could handle those issues with good control and catching the tanks on the move. In SC2, however, using stalkers as the core of your composition simply isn't an option because stimmed marauders crap all over them, especially when you start throwing in medivacs.

You're also right that large numbers of marauder/medivac beats large numbers of zealots. The ranged MMM ball scales much better than the Protoss gateway composition, so storms or collosi are necessary. That said, you still need large numbers of zealots to deal with bio because storms + stalkers still loses to well-controlled bio at even cost. I can't speak to stalker+collosi vs MMM+viking because I haven't tried it much, but it sounds bad for Protoss to me. I guess P could try something like 6 gateway, triple robo-immortal + storm as a late-game composition.

As for limiting the threat of hellions, I will definitely start making a concerted effort to sim-city my mineral lines with warpgates. They're really the perfect building to wall off your mineral lines with because you need so many of them and it doesn't matter where they're placed. It's something I've always done vs Z, and will start doing more against T.

With a good sim-city, a cannon on each mineral line, and good map coverage, I think a good P will be able to handle hellion harrass decently. Honestly, I'm not there yet, but I think it can be done.

The problem with the main army as I see it is (1) hellions are REALLY good against zealots, and (2) marauders are REALLY good against stalkers, leaving P without a good option with which to form the backbone of his composition against T. If you could make mardauders merely counter stalkers instead of COUNTERING stalkers, that would solve the problem. I'd make a ton of stalkers with a few zealots, and try to beat the marauders with economy, positioning, forcefield and storms. It wouldn't take a huge marauder-nerf or stalker-buff to make that work, but right now, the efficiency-gap is too big to beat marauders-based compositions with stalker-based compositions, even with superior play.

I'd prefer to see a small nerf to hellion damage vs zealots, however. Hellions are clearly designed to be harassment units, and building harassment units over muscle units should hurt the strength of your main army composition at least slightly. (Think muta-ling vs roach-hydra) In my experience, adding hellions improves the strength of your main army, which makes them a little too good. IMO, nerfing their damage to 21 (so they still 2-shot drones) instead of 24 against light would more clearly define their role as a harassment unit. I don't think Terran players would really mind this change, as the vast majority of them already see hellions as harassment-only units.
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-27 20:02:14
August 27 2010 20:01 GMT
#85
double-post. deleted.
Bungle
Profile Joined November 2002
Canada59 Posts
August 27 2010 20:53 GMT
#86
On August 28 2010 03:37 Jayrod wrote:
Hi, ~300 bronze league 3v3 here...

My friend sv1 and I have been posting on/following this thread. We tried this out, he is a T and I am a P. We came to the conclusion that the hellion timing push is not effective, at least at 50 food, and probably never because you need 3 upgrades and 300/300 to make it effective. The push was 4 hellion 4 marauder and like 6 marines or so (I think thats what I counted in the replay). Basically the time and resoures needed to conc shell the marauders is wasted if you are replacing four of them with 4 hellions. A more effective push is still with more marauders. You save resources from pre-ignition that can be better used elsewhere during early stages of the game. Your conc shell upgrade also applies to more units within that push. I was able to forcefield the ramp for one more wave of gateway units and a second immortal, then moved out and completely crushed his push (only lost 1 stalker and 1 zealot).

The game continued (to my surprise as I stopped building completely and went full retard thinking we were just testing). Late game he supplemented his army with the pre-ignition hellions as I was zealot/ht/immortal with a couple sentries. We discovered another problem here. Yes, the hellions were able to make quick work of the zealots, making the fights fairly close, though the zeals still did enough tanking to do their part overall. The problem for the terran is actually counterintuitive to the idea that protoss transitions so much slower than terran. When it comes to the warpgate and gateway-oriented armies. Terran are actually SLOWER to respond than the toss. Noticing his now hellion-scattered army, I warped in a higher ration of stalker with fewer zealots (you still need some) and it crushed his hellions. There's no possible way for a terran to adapt a ground army AFTER a fight has happened as quickly as toss for a followup push. When the game becomes a macro game, and the protoss has multiple bases and 10+ gateways, he can pick and choose a comp that will shit on an army with hellion-based mech.

I'm sure my ladder teammate can comment further, but a timing push with hellions is out of the question. I suggested to him a smaller bio timing push at the ramp while you hellion drop in the main, but this is a whole new build.


Sup, King Bungle here - 1v1 copper league 124 pts

If I recall correctly I was obs'ing the game between you and your 'friend' and would just like to add that the forcefield on the ramp was completely unnecessary, in fact you could have strolled down there and crushed his army with what you had when he showed up.

Or if you were feeling particularly clever (as I am known to after a half dozen beers) you could have FF'd behind his units while they were walking up the ramp eliminating their retreat path.

In short, I'd just like to say that the comp he pushed out with against your 2 gate robo wouldn't have lasted 4 seconds.

Adieu,

King Bungle
=]
Bommes
Profile Joined June 2010
Germany1226 Posts
August 29 2010 07:42 GMT
#87
I'm currently playing a build against protoss which opens with 1/1/1 reactor marine, tank, raven into expand (with a lot of bunkers, because 90% of eu-protoss 1-base) into 4-fax midgame push with tank hellion.
It deals really well with pretty much anything a protoss can throw at you. I only lose when I make mistakes myself.
And if the protoss is passive you have all the harass opportunities with hellion drop, raven autoturrets etc
BrTarolg
Profile Blog Joined June 2009
United Kingdom3574 Posts
August 29 2010 12:44 GMT
#88
A lot has been said already but i think ill make the key point clear

People that don't use hellions as the main part of the composition of their bio builds, don't understand just how important zealots are to the P army

Currently, the only viable composition for P is zealot templar (give or take archons and sentries)
Colossi are a BAD tech route, and stalkers SUCK. The amount of games i've seen people lose with a 50% bigger army because they had stalkers instead of zealot/temp is rediculous

This build is ofc, hard countered by precisely 5 hellions along wih the rest of your army.

People that think there are other viable compositions vs T bioballs except for the base zealot templar really need to play more PVT and understand how badly you are going to lose in terms of cost efficiency otherwise.
Yaotzin
Profile Joined August 2010
South Africa4280 Posts
August 29 2010 12:48 GMT
#89
Someone inform all the pros that make collossi that they're actually BAD, please.
Voyager I
Profile Joined July 2010
United States260 Posts
August 29 2010 13:00 GMT
#90
Maybe I'm late here, but I noticed that the unit compositions in your OP didn't include any Sentries. Guardian Shield makes a huge difference for Marines (it basically negates the damage bonus from Stim) and makes Zealots significantly harder for Marauders to kill, to say nothing of Forcefields. Do you think you could have gotten better results for the Protoss player by allocating some of the gas into Sentries? I know you're already pretty short on Stalkers and Immortals, but it seems like Sentries could make the already dangerous Zealots even more durable.


This would likely emphasize the importance of Hellions, since Blue Flames - 2 still comes out to a lot.
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
August 29 2010 13:00 GMT
#91
http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Plexa/sc2_reps/20100829_221802.sc2replay seems relevant to the discussion. Blue hellion harass is ridiculous... I think you need to fan probes out rather than maynard them away, going to have to practice that this week I think.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
ltortoise
Profile Joined August 2010
633 Posts
August 29 2010 13:45 GMT
#92
On August 29 2010 22:00 Plexa wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Plexa/sc2_reps/20100829_221802.sc2replay seems relevant to the discussion. Blue hellion harass is ridiculous... I think you need to fan probes out rather than maynard them away, going to have to practice that this week I think.


I think if you let the hellions get to your mineral line it's pretty much already too late. Stopping hellions has to be preventative. That being said, yeah. You're better off just letting your probes keep mining or splitting them in a million different directions like a maniac. Telling them all to move away in the same direction is pretty much the worst possible thing you could do.
simme123
Profile Blog Joined February 2010
Sweden810 Posts
August 29 2010 14:00 GMT
#93
Helions in TvP is sort of a waste imo to make it worth it u need to have a bunch and get the upgrade imo but the helions will be raped if he goes for a stalker heavy army or well anything else than sentries and zealots so I'd say that they aren't really worth it since I seldom go massive zealot armies vs T
PulseSUI
Profile Joined August 2010
Switzerland305 Posts
August 29 2010 14:07 GMT
#94
On August 29 2010 21:48 Yaotzin wrote:
Someone inform all the pros that make collossi that they're actually BAD, please.


most noticed it them self and shy away from early Colossus.
Colossus is good in late game, when you can afford to pump them out of 3 Robos, but 1 or 2 base Colossus will more often then not loose you the game against a Bioball.
CharlieMurphy
Profile Blog Joined March 2006
United States22895 Posts
August 29 2010 14:10 GMT
#95
I'm pretty sure one of three things needs to change to balance hellions:

1- Nerf their life/damage (Maybe the dual wide flame from campaign instead of more damage as ignitor upg)

2- Pylons, Bunkers, etc. certain structures need to wall medium and large units but not small units. So you can make walls like people did in bw to keep vults out.

3- The maps need to have expansions and naturals that are safer. Take XNC, Metalopolis, Desert Oasis for example. They are just wide open for harassment from like 280° or more.
..and then I would, ya know, check em'. (Aka SpoR)
Yaotzin
Profile Joined August 2010
South Africa4280 Posts
August 29 2010 14:26 GMT
#96
On August 29 2010 23:07 PulseSUI wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 29 2010 21:48 Yaotzin wrote:
Someone inform all the pros that make collossi that they're actually BAD, please.


most noticed it them self and shy away from early Colossus.
Colossus is good in late game, when you can afford to pump them out of 3 Robos, but 1 or 2 base Colossus will more often then not loose you the game against a Bioball.

Many do go early colossi, but anyway. The post I was responding to categorically said colossi and stalkers are BAD, which pros clearly disagree with!
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
August 29 2010 14:40 GMT
#97
On August 29 2010 22:45 ltortoise wrote:
Show nested quote +
On August 29 2010 22:00 Plexa wrote:
http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Plexa/sc2_reps/20100829_221802.sc2replay seems relevant to the discussion. Blue hellion harass is ridiculous... I think you need to fan probes out rather than maynard them away, going to have to practice that this week I think.


I think if you let the hellions get to your mineral line it's pretty much already too late. Stopping hellions has to be preventative. That being said, yeah. You're better off just letting your probes keep mining or splitting them in a million different directions like a maniac. Telling them all to move away in the same direction is pretty much the worst possible thing you could do.

Pretty hard to stop them getting there if they arrive via medivac
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Floophead_III
Profile Joined September 2009
United States1832 Posts
August 29 2010 14:47 GMT
#98
On August 29 2010 23:10 CharlieMurphy wrote:
I'm pretty sure one of three things needs to change to balance hellions:

1- Nerf their life/damage (Maybe the dual wide flame from campaign instead of more damage as ignitor upg)

2- Pylons, Bunkers, etc. certain structures need to wall medium and large units but not small units. So you can make walls like people did in bw to keep vults out.

3- The maps need to have expansions and naturals that are safer. Take XNC, Metalopolis, Desert Oasis for example. They are just wide open for harassment from like 280° or more.


Hellions are fine as is. I do agree the maps need to have safer naturals, but that's a discussion for other threads. It's pretty much established that blizz can't make maps.
Half man, half bear, half pig.
Sword_Acolyte
Profile Joined August 2010
United States25 Posts
August 29 2010 14:48 GMT
#99
One mistake I saw in the OT is that the first protoss army was 10,10,2, then you say you lowered the stalkers, but now the army is 16,10,2.

Anyway, one thing to consider is the insanely slow fire rate of hellions.
Voyager I
Profile Joined July 2010
United States260 Posts
August 30 2010 01:36 GMT
#100
On August 29 2010 23:10 CharlieMurphy wrote:
2- Pylons, Bunkers, etc. certain structures need to wall medium and large units but not small units. So you can make walls like people did in bw to keep vults out.


I believe buildings that touch diagonally will allow small units, but block anything larger. I'm not 100% on this though.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 13h 25m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
JuggernautJason155
Nathanias 146
BRAT_OK 59
StarCraft: Brood War
Larva 580
TY 162
Aegong 31
JulyZerg 7
Dota 2
capcasts246
League of Legends
Grubby3586
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K667
oskar191
flusha56
taco 49
Super Smash Bros
Chillindude1
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu633
Other Games
tarik_tv5326
FrodaN2729
summit1g2360
Hui .223
Trikslyr55
Sick49
PPMD39
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 22 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• StrangeGG 33
• Hupsaiya 26
• poizon28 23
• tFFMrPink 22
• LUISG 12
• Adnapsc2 8
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• sooper7s
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• HerbMon 18
• 80smullet 17
• FirePhoenix3
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• masondota22484
League of Legends
• Doublelift3790
Other Games
• imaqtpie1256
Upcoming Events
CranKy Ducklings
13h 25m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
17h 25m
CSO Cup
19h 25m
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
21h 25m
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
1d 12h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 17h
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
1d 21h
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Online Event
3 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
4 days
[ Show More ]
The PondCast
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #1
ASL Season 20: Qualifier #2
ASL Season 20
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.